Elsevier

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volume 37, February 2012, Pages 132-141
Biomass and Bioenergy

Kinetics of methane fermentation yield in biogas reactors: Genetic variation and association with chemical composition in maize

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.12.020Get rights and content

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is the most competitive crop for methane production in Germany. Methane fermentation yield per unit of dry matter (MFY) is a determinant of methane yield, but little information is available on this trait. Our objectives were to investigate the kinetics of MFY during fermentation of maize, estimate quantitative-genetic parameters for different traits related to MFY and examine the relationship of MFY with chemical composition and silage quality. Whole-plant material of 16 inbreds and their 32 testcrosses was analyzed for MFY over 35 days of fermentation using a discontinuous laboratory assay. Data were also generated on chemical composition and in vitro digestible organic matter (IVDOM). Significant genotypic variances and high heritabilities were observed for MFY at early fermentation stages (up to 5 days) probably due to different concentrations of easily degradable chemical components. However, genotypic variances and heritability of MFY reduced as fermentation progressed, because of complete or partial degradation of all chemical components. Further, there were strong correlations of MFY with chemical components at early fermentation stages but not at later stages. Therefore, MFY at later stages, which is closer to potential MFY, does not seem to be amenable to selection. High heritability of IVDOM and its strong correlation with MFY in testcrosses indicated its possible use for preliminary or indirect selection. Keeping in view the magnitude of genetic variance that was low for MFY and high for dry matter yield (DMY), the other component of methane yield, more emphasis on breeding for DMY seems appropriate.

Highlights

► We investigated methane fermentation yield (MFY) of diverse germplasm of maize. ► The kinetics of MFY and its correlations with chemical composition were examined. ► Genetic variance and heritability for MFY decreased with fermentation time. ► Complete fermentation (35 d) reduced correlations of MFY with chemical composition. ► Silage quality parameters may be used as criteria for indirect selection of MFY.

Introduction

Biogas production from energy crops is gaining importance in many European countries. Under the agroclimatic conditions of Central Europe, maize (Zea mays L.) is currently the most competitive crop for biogas production due to its high yield of methane, easy integration into existing farming systems, and good suitability for storage of biomass [1]. Thus, maize is currently the most widely used crop for biogas production in Germany [2], with an area of more than 500,000 ha in 2010 [3]. To make cultivation of maize as an energy crop even more economical, it is important to breed cultivars with high yield of methane and rapid methane production during fermentation. In this context, the study of the temporal release of methane during fermentation, i.e., its kinetics, is essential.

The main aim in breeding maize as a biogas substrate is to develop cultivars with a high energy yield per unit of planted area, i.e., methane yield per unit area (MY). Besides dry matter yield per unit area (DMY), MY is determined by methane fermentation yield (MFY), which is the volume of methane produced per kg of dry matter. Thus, the breeder can focus on improving MFY and/or DMY. It is expected that DMY in maize can be increased by breeding from the present level of 15–18 t ha−1 to 30 t ha−1 [4]. This can be achieved through prolonging the vegetative growth period by using late maturing germplasm, combining late maturity with cold tolerance, introgressing short day genes from exotic populations and improving drought tolerance [4]. Since late maturing hybrids are expected not to attain complete ear fill [1], they may have a low MFY due to low concentrations of easily degradable components like starch, protein and fat that are mainly stored in the ear. However, only limited knowledge is available on MFY in maize.

By definition, MFY is the product of methane concentration in biogas (MC) and biogas fermentation yield (BFY), i.e., the volume of biogas produced per kg of dry matter. Based on stoichiometric equations, both BFY and MC are expected to vary among different chemical components [5], [6] and this will be reflected in MFY. In previous studies, the correlations between MFY and chemical composition in maize were inconsistent and ranged from strong [7] to very weak [1], [8]. Thus, further research is warranted to explore this association as it may also impact the kinetics of MFY and vice versa.

Quality traits like digestibility of organic dry matter and concentration of metabolizable energy (ME) of the feedstuffs have been recognized to be important in silage maize [9]. Therefore, selection is practiced to simultaneously improve DMY and quality using selection indices [10]. MFY can be seen as analog to the quality traits in silage maize. Thus, there is a need to examine if similar indices may be used in biogas maize breeding.

In animal nutrition, different in vitro assays have been developed to determine digestibility and ME of feedstuffs by measuring gas production from fermentation after incubation with rumen liquor [11], [12], [13], [14]. Cumulative gas production after 24 h in vitro has been found to be strongly correlated with in vivo digestibility and ME [11]. To assess the potential MFY in biogas reactors, different discontinuous laboratory assays based on the same principle as those for determination of digestibility and ME in vitro, have been developed. Some examples are the bioassay proposed by Owen et al. [15], the Hohenheim Biogas Yield Test [16] and the Weihenstephan Batch System [17]. These methods differ from the digestibility trials used in animal nutrition for the inoculum and incubation time. Thus, it would be of interest to examine the association of the kinetics of MFY with silage quality traits in breeding maize for MFY. However, to the best of our knowledge, no report is available in the literature on this topic.

In this study, we examined a set of 48 diverse maize genotypes, which is a larger set of genotypes than those used in previous studies [1], [7], [18]. Our objectives were to (1) investigate the kinetics of MFY during fermentation of dried whole-plant material by applying different mathematical models, (2) estimate quantitative-genetic parameters for various MFY-related traits relevant for maize breeding, and (3) examine the relationship of MFY with plant chemical composition and silage quality traits.

Section snippets

Plant materials

The study is based on 48 maize genotypes selected for diverse maturity and biomass production. These comprised 16 dent inbred lines and their 32 testcross hybrids developed by crossing the lines with two flint single-cross testers (F052 × F047 and F084 × F055). The inbred lines were from breeding programs in Germany, France, Mexico (CIMMYT) and North America and were randomly drawn from a larger set of 285 inbred lines. The entire set of lines, described in detail by Grieder et al. [19], was

Non-linear regression

The Modified Gompertz and Michaelis Menten models gave a better fit for the biogas and methane production data as indicated by the lower AIC and higher R2 (Table 2). These two models fit sigmoidal shaped curves in which τ, the fractional rate of substrate degradation, first increased and then decreased with fermentation time. The Simple Mitscherlich model, which assumes constant τ, and the Gompertz model, which assumes exponentially increasing or decreasing τ, gave poorer results. Comparing the

Discussion

Currently, there is no consensus among breeders on whether separate breeding programs are required in maize for its use as biogas substrate (biogas maize) or silage for animal feed (forage maize). Further, no widely accepted laboratory assay to determine MFY in biogas maize is available. The laboratory assays developed for the evaluation of MFY [15], [16], [17] are based on the same principle as the in vitro gas production methods used for determination of silage maize quality traits [11], [12]

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. P. Tillman for providing the NIRS equations for prediction of silage quality traits, Prof. Dr. H.P. Piepho and Prof. Dr. H.F. Utz for suggestions on the statistical analysis and F. Mauch, J. Jesse, H. Poeschel, R. Lutz, T. Schmidt and R. Volkhausen for contribution to the conduct of the field experiments. This work was financed by the BMBF within the framework of the projects GABI-Energy (FK 0315045B) and Cornfed (FK 03115461A).

References (44)

  • BMELV [Internet]. Pressemitteilung Nr. 045 des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz...
  • W. Schmidt

    Hybridmaiszüchtung bei der KWS SAAT AG

  • U. Baserga

    Landwirtschaftliche Co-Vergärungs-Biogasanlagen

    (1998)
  • M. Lübken et al.

    Microbiological fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass: current state and prospects of mathematical modeling

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2010)
  • B. Eder et al.

    Welcher Maissortentyp zur Biogaserzeugung?

  • Y. Barrière et al.

    Past and prospects of forage maize breeding in Europe. I. The grass cell wall as a basis of genetic variation and future improvements in feeding value

    Maydica

    (2005)
  • H.F. Utz et al.

    Economic aspects of breeding for yield and quality traits in forage maize. 2. Derivation and evaluation of selection indices

    Plant Breed

    (1994)
  • K.H. Menke et al.

    The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro

    J Agric Sci

    (1979)
  • J.M. Tilley et al.

    A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops

    J Brit Grassland Soc

    (1963)
  • D. Helffrich et al.

    Hohenheimer Biogasertragstest – Vergleich verschiedener Laborverfahren zur Vergärung von Biomasse

    Landtechnik

    (2003)
  • F. Kaiser et al.

    Methanproduktivität nachwachsender Rohstoffe in Biogasanlagen

    (2007 July)
  • C. Grieder et al.

    Breeding maize for use as biogas substrate in Central Europe I: estimation of quantitative genetic parameters in testcrosses

    Theor Appl Genet

    (2011)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Downstream processing of biofuel

      2020, Genetic and Metabolic Engineering for Improved Biofuel Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass
    • Conversion of biomass into biofuel: A cutting-edge technology

      2020, Bioreactors: Sustainable Design and Industrial Applications in Mitigation of GHG Emissions
    • Towards high-biomass yielding bioenergy crop Silphium perfoliatum L.: phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of five cultivated populations

      2019, Biomass and Bioenergy
      Citation Excerpt :

      A reduced methane production is known to be associated with an increased lignin content of the biomass since lignin blocks access of the enzymes to cellulose [55,56]. Negative correlations between SMY, ADL and ADF have been previously reported [10,54,56] and could also be observed in our data (r = −0.32 and −0.6 for ADL and ADF, respectively). Interestingly, a recent study of Damm et al. [57] reports a similar lignin content for maize and Silphium but a different lignin composition.

    • The dynamics of an anaerobic digestion of crop substrates with an unfavourable carbon to nitrogen ratio

      2016, Bioresource Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Plant material that degrades rapidly might therefore be favourable, especially in reactors with high loading rates, as the majority of methane is produced within a short time. Thus, the kinetics of methane production has practical significance (Grieder et al., 2012). The processes of the right skewness were longer, especially for giant knotweed and giant miscanthus, for which digestion times were 55 days and 59 days, respectively.

    • Yield, fermentation kinetics and the role of quality properties of thatching reed (Phragmites australis) during discontinuous anaerobic fermentation

      2016, Industrial Crops and Products
      Citation Excerpt :

      During fermentation process, intensity of correlation of single chemical components and biogas production changed. Such changes were already shown by Grieder et al. (2012) for maize. In this study, mineral substances besides nitrogen were not observed to be important for all kinetic and yield parameters.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: JatroSelect GmbH, Wollgrasweg 49, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany

    View full text