Novel method for screening microbes for application in microbial fuel cell
Introduction
Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a promising technology for the production of electricity from numerous raw materials such as natural organic matter, complex organic waste or renewable biomass, and can be advantageously combined with applications in wastewater treatment (Oliveira et al., 2013, Wen et al., 2010). Organic compounds commonly used as electron donors are easily biodegradable, including simple carbohydrates (e.g., glucose and saccharose), starch, low-molecular weight organic acids (acetate, oxalate, fumarate), xylose and amino acids (Hassan et al., 2012). The main advantage of this technology is the application of microorganism(s) as a catalyst to convert organic materials directly into electricity, thus it produces bioenergy even from wastes. It is well known that electron transport chains play an important role in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis where a series of compounds are involved transferring electrons from an electron donor to an electron acceptor via redox reactions. Organic matters generally act as electron donors, whereas many electron acceptor compounds (both organic and inorganic) are known. If oxygen is available (i.e., in aerobic respiration), it is used as the terminal electron acceptor, because oxygen provides the greatest Gibbs free energy difference. Moreover, it produces the highest level of energy and microbes usually maximize their energy gain by selecting electron acceptor with the highest potential (Rabaey et al., 2007). In anaerobic environments, different electron acceptors are used, including nitrate, nitrite, ferric iron, sulfate, carbon dioxide, and small organic molecules such as fumarate. Many microbes, for examples iron-reducing bacteria (Geobacter sulfurreducens, Geobacter metallireducens, Geobacter toluenoxydans (Caccavo et al., 1994), Rhodoferax ferrireducens (Chaudhuri and Lovley, 2003), Shewanella putrefaciens (Kim et al., 2002), Shewanella japonica, Shewanella algae (Ivanova et al., 2001), are reported to use soluble or insoluble metals or metal-oxides as the electron acceptor, and they are able to transfer electrons out of the cell membrane (Luu and Ramsay, 2003). Only those microorganisms can be potentially used in MFC that are able to transfer extracellular electrons to electrodes. Electron transfer can occur either through membrane-associated components (Logan and Regan, 2006, Aelterman et al., 2006), or soluble electron shuttles generated by specific bacteria (Logan and Regan, 2006, Bond and Lovley, 2003) or highly conductive nanowires (Reguera et al., 2005).
The electron transfer mechanism of the iron-reducing bacteria is represented mostly by Geobacteria spp. It is usually direct and independent from the type of electron acceptors (Fe(III)-oxide, Fe(III)-citrate, etc.) or different kinds of electrodes (Stams et al., 2006, Feng et al., 2013). For most microbes, the transfer of electrons to electrodes is inefficient because of electrically non-conductive cell walls and impedance by the peptide chain adjoining the active redox center of proteins (Kim et al., 2002). Some special bacterial strains can produce electron mediators and some of them are capable to transfer electrons directly (Chaudhuri and Lovley, 2003, Park and Zeikus, 2000, Pizzariello et al., 2002), therefore such inefficiency can be avoided. Also, another method may be the addition of artificial electron shuttle molecules (mediator). Yeasts generally need a mediator such as methylene blue, methyl orange, resazurin, etc., for electron transport (Watanabe et al., 2009, Rahimnejad et al., 2011); accordingly, the application of yeasts in MFC is still very limited.
The operation efficiency of the MFC can be influenced by numerous factors such as microorganisms, design of MFC, type of proton exchange membrane (PEM), type of electrodes, etc. (Feng et al., 2013). Among these, the microbial factor is crucial, so the screening of the potential species is essential. Several studies demonstrated different methods to screen the electrochemically active bacteria (e.g., U-tube MFCs (Yu et al., 2012), micro-fabricated MFC arrays (Hou et al., 2009) or Tungsten-oxide nanocluster probe (Yuan et al., 2013). However, these methods take relatively long time (5–6 days) to provide quantitative information about the extracellular-electron production of the microbes. Another limiting factor of these methods is the requirement of expensive equipment and materials; therefore there is an increasing demand for novel and rapid screening methods both in research and in development of MFCs. The main aim of this study was to develop a simple, affordable and high sample throughput method for the screening of microorganism strains for MFC application.
Section snippets
Microorganisms
G. sulfurreducens DSMZ 12127, G. toluenoxydans DSMZ 19350, Shewanella algae DSMZ 9167, Shewanella woodyi DSMZ 12036 and Shewanella xiamenensis DSMZ 22215 were purchased from Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganizmen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ), Braunschweig, Germany. Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 and Lactobacillus plantarum 2142 strains were obtained from University of Perugia, Italy. The yeast strain was Saccharomyces cerevisiae WS-120 (Hefebank Weihenstephan, TUM, Freising, Germany).
Inoculum preparation
Geobacter strains
Results and discussion
The iron(III)-reduction capability of different microorganisms were tested both in the presence and in the absence of methylene blue as the mediator. The results are shown in Table 1.
With the exception of L. plantarum all investigated microorganisms exhibited strong iron(III)-reducing capabilities in the absence of mediator compounds, which indicates the production and secretion of exo-electrons into the growth medium. Generally, Geobacter species and Shewanella species are iron-reducing
Conclusions
This study has made significant step toward screening microorganisms for application in MFC. The capability of production of exo-electrons and their transportation either to electron acceptors or to electrodes can be detected by a very simple and rapid photometric method. The current density produced by certain microorganism (if the initial cell count is higher than 106 CFU/mL) can be estimated by the model of current density = 46.77 ΔA/460 nm/ + 4.17. No doubt that this method is robust, takes a
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by National Development Agency (Project no. TÁMOP-4.2.1./B-09/1-KMR-2010-0005, TÁMOP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0023 and TECH_09-A3-2009-0194), as well as Bolyai Research Grant from Hungarian Academic of Sciences. Authors would like to thank Dr. Mihály Dernovics Associate Professor at Department of Applied Chemistry, Corvinus University of Budapest for reading manuscript.
References (31)
- et al.
Bio-current as an indicator for biogenic Fe(II) generation driven by dissimilatory iron reducing bacteria
Biosens. Bioelectron.
(2013) - et al.
Power generation from cellulose using mixed and pure cultures of cellulose-degrading bacteria in a microbial fuel cell
Enzyme Microb. Technol.
(2012) - et al.
Electricity generation from wastewaters with starch as carbon source using a mediatorless microbial fuel cell
Biosens. Bioelectron.
(2013) - et al.
A mediator-less microbial fuel cell using a metal reducing bacterium, Shewanella putrefaciens
Enzyme Microb. Technol.
(2002) - et al.
Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells
Trends Microbiol.
(2006) - et al.
Overview on the developments of microbial fuel cells
Biochem. Eng. J.
(2013) - et al.
Direct electron transfer with yeast cells and construction of a mediatorless microbial fuel cell
Biosens. Bioelectron.
(2007) - et al.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae as anodic biocatalyst for power generation in biofuel cell: influence of redox condition and substrate load
Bioresour. Technol.
(2011) - et al.
Methylene blue as electron promoters in microbial fuel cell
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
(2011) - et al.
A glucose/hydrogen peroxide biofuel cell that uses oxidase and peroxidase as catalysts by composite bulk-modified bioelectrodes based on a solid binding matrix
Bioelectrochemistry
(2002)
Impact and application of electron shuttles on the redox (bio)transformation of contaminants: a review
Biotechnol. Adv.
Electron shuttles in biotechnology
Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.
Effects of cathodic electron acceptors and potassium ferricyanide concentrations on the performance of microbial fuel cell
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
Production of electricity from the treatment of continuous brewery wastewater using a microbial fuel cell
Fuel
Continuous electricity generation at high voltages and currents using stacked microbial fuel cells
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Cited by (20)
Recent advancements in the development of Two-Dimensional nanostructured based anode materials for stable power density in microbial fuel cells
2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsAn electrochemical system for the rapid and accurate quantitation of microbial exoelectrogenic ability
2022, Biosensors and BioelectronicsCitation Excerpt :Microorganisms transfer electrons to colorimetric materials, of which the shift of redox states can trigger color change. The colorimetric materials used in visual-probe techniques include azo dyes (Xiao et al., 2017), WO3 (Yuan et al., 2014), and other metals (Szollosi et al., 2015). This technique can be used in the high-throughput screening of electroactive microorganisms due to its quick response (Yuan et al., 2014).
High throughput techniques for the rapid identification of electroactive microorganisms
2021, ChemosphereCitation Excerpt :The advantage of using dyes for testing the electroactivity of microbes possesses the advantage of being economically affordable, which is not the case for expensive crystalline substances like WO3 (Fig. 4). Furthermore, researchers have also employed other cost-effective metals, like iron, to detect the electroactivity in microbes (Szöllosi et al., 2015). Dye-based techniques have been vigorously employed for the identification of EAM.
Microbial electrochemical systems for sustainable biohydrogen production: Surveying the experiences from a start-up viewpoint
2017, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsCitation Excerpt :INOCULA containing anode-respiring bacteria can be delivered from various environments [25,26] and dozens of strains were found to have sufficient capability for powering BES via biocurrent generation by (i) exocellular electron transfer relying either on membrane cytochromes, (ii) artificial/self-secreted mediators or (iii) electro-conductive appendages [27–29]. To select the microbial species (with appropriate electrochemical activity) to be used in biological fuel cells, a fast screening method was lately reported by Szöllősi et al. [30]. BES can apply both pure- and mixed cultures for inoculation.
A high-throughput dye-reducing photometric assay for evaluating microbial exoelectrogenic ability
2017, Bioresource TechnologyPerformance improvement of microbial fuel cells for waste water treatment along with value addition: A review on past achievements and recent perspectives
2017, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Therefore there is an urgent need for developing a novel and rapid screening protocol to carry out the screening process. Recently, a novel and rapid protocol has been developed for screening of potential microbial community through the use of electron shuttle (mediator) [78]. To evaluate the microbial reduction of iron (III) efficiency, the different broths were supplemented with the oversaturated solution of Fe3+-as the electron acceptor material (5 g/L).