Preparation and properties of biodegradable starch–clay nanocomposites
Introduction
Most synthetic polymers are produced from petrochemicals and are harmful to nature. Their synthesis produces hazardous waste and these materials are not easily degradable, causing environmental problems. Plants are potential sources for a wide variety of polymers which are renewable and ecologically friendly. The agro-based biopolymers are edible, biocompatible and biodegradable, which make them superior to synthetic polymers and particularly useful in disposable plastics, food, and medicine applications. Starches, the dominant carbohydrate reserve materials of higher plants, are abundant and relatively inexpensive biopolymers. They contain stored energy from sun and can be produced steadily without fears of exhaustion. Furthermore, in the presence of plasticizers, starches can be processed using conventional thermoplastic techniques. However, the mechanical properties of starch-based materials are often sensitive and responsive to the changes in the environment such as humidity, temperature, and pH. This drawback has to be overcome to obtain high performance biomaterials.
Biopolymer–clay nanocomposites are a new class of materials with potentially improved mechanical properties. These composites are prepared by addition of low amounts of clay to the biopolymer matrix (Zhao, Torley, & Halley, 2008). The main challenge for preparing nanocomposites is the nanoscale dispersion of clay in the biopolymer matrix. Montmorillonite is the most commonly used natural clay and has been successfully applied in numerous nanocomposite systems (Giannelis, 1996, Paul and Robeson, 2008, Pavlidou and Papaspyrides, 2008, Raquez et al., 2008, Ray and Okamoto, 2003). However, most of the reported starch–clay nanocomposites suffer from poor dispersion, which is required for obtaining high performance materials (Bagdi et al., 2006, Chiou et al., 2006, Pandey and Singh, 2005, Park et al., 2003, Park et al., 2002, Wilhelm et al., 2003a, Wilhelm et al., 2003b). To improve the dispersion, organic cations such as stearyl dihydroxyethyl ammonium chloride (Bagdi et al., 2006), distearyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (Bagdi et al., 2006) and quaternary ammonium-modified starches (Chivrac et al., 2008) were used to exchange with the sodium ions residing in the interlayer of pristine montmorillonite. The more the modifier is compatible with starch, the more it facilitates clay dispersion (Chivrac et al., 2008). However, miscibility is still an issue and clay dispersion remains a challenge (Bagdi et al., 2006, Chiou et al., 2006, Park et al., 2002, Park et al., 2003).
Plasticizer is another important factor that influences the properties of starch–clay nanocomposites. The melting temperature of a starch granule is close to its degradation temperature. Hence, plasticizers are required to destroy the inter-molecular hydrogen bonding in the crystalline regions of starch granules and decrease the melting temperature during thermoplastic processing. Small molecules such as glycerol and water that can form hydrogen bonds with starch can serve as plasticizers in starch-based materials. A part of the plasticizers can potentially be absorbed on the clay surface, influencing the interfacial strength and stress transfer between the polymeric matrix and clay (Chivrac, Pollet, Schmutz, & Averous, 2008). Depending on the relative humidity, the moisture content (plasticizer concentration) of the starch–clay nanocomposites will change and consequently influence the Young’s modulus of the materials (Avella et al., 2005, Chivrac, Pollet et al., 2008, Huang et al., 2006, Ma et al., 2007, Perez et al., 2008).
In this study, we prepared well-dispersed starch–clay nanocomposites with three different kinds of clay: montmorillonite, chitosan-modified montmorillonite, and laponite. Chitosan-modified montmorillonite is of interest because chitosan is a natural polysaccharide that is compatible with the starch matrix as well as being ion-exchanged in the clay (Darder et al., 2003, Kampeerapappun et al., 2007). Laponite is a synthetic silicate clay with a smaller aspect ratio (20–30 nm in the planar dimension and ∼1 nm in the thickness) and purer than montmorillonite. Well-dispersed nanocomposites were produced, and the silicate dispersion from nanometer to micrometer scales was characterized using XRD, TEM, and SEM. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of starch–montmorillonite nanocomposites with various clay concentrations were investigated. In order to understand the interactions of starch matrix with plasticizers and clay, mechanical properties of the nanocomposites were evaluated with respect to relative humidity (0–75% RH) which also provides an insight to their mechanical response to the environmental changes.
Section snippets
Materials
Native normal corn starch (NCS, Cargill GelTM03420) was kindly provided by Cargill Co. (USA). Sodium montmorillonite (Na+MMT) and laponite RD were kindly supplied by Southern Clay Products, Inc. (USA). Pure glycerol (99.5%) and chitosan with molecular weight 5–190 kDa (Sigma–Aldrich, USA) were used as received.
Preparation of chitosan-modified montmorillonite
Chitosan solutions were prepared by adding 1 g of polysaccharide to 1% acetic acid (100 mL). The solutions were stirred at 60 °C for 1 h, followed by continuously stirring overnight at room
Synthesis of starch–clay nanocomposites
There are two basic structures reported for polymer–clay nanocomposites. In intercalated nanocomposites the polymer chains penetrate between the silicate layers keeping the clay stacks (tactoids) virtually unchanged except for an increase in the repeat distance (d-spacing). In exfoliated nanocomposites, the clay layers are delaminated and separated from one another by a distance greater than a few nanometers with no memory of the original clay tactoids. It is difficult to obtain either an
Conclusions
The main challenges for preparing high performance starch–clay nanocomposites include achieving a high level of clay dispersion in the polymeric matrix, finding suitable plasticizers, and controlling the interfacial strength between starch and clay. Well-dispersed starch–clay nanocomposites were prepared by adding a dilute clay dispersion to a solution of starch followed by coprecipitation in ethanol. In this approach, intercalation of the plasticizer (glycerol) in clay which is required for
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Grants NSC-96-2313-B-002-048-MY2 and NSC-96-2917-I-002-102 from the National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan. E.P. Giannelis acknowledges the support of Award No. KUS-C1-018-02, made by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). We also thank Chia-Chen (Jason) Fang for the SEM measurements and helpful discussions.
References (25)
- et al.
Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications
Food Chemistry
(2005) - et al.
Thermoplastic starch–clay nanocomposites and their characteristics
Carbohydrate Polymers
(2005) - et al.
Micromechanical modeling and characterization of the effective properties in starch-based nano-biocomposites
Acta Biomaterialia
(2008) - et al.
High mechanical performance MMT-urea and formamide-plasticized thermoplastic cornstarch biodegradable nanocomposites
Carbohydrate Polymers
(2006) - et al.
Preparation of cassava starch/montmorillonite composite film
Carbohydrate Polymers
(2007) - et al.
Morphological, thermal and mechanical properties of ramie crystallites-reinforced plasticized starch biocomposites
Carbohydrate Polymers
(2006) - et al.
Polymer nanotechnology: Nanocomposites
Polymer
(2008) - et al.
A review on polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites
Progress in Polymer Science
(2008) - et al.
Starch films reinforced with mineral clay
Carbohydrate Chemistry
(2003) - et al.
Thermoplastic starch/layered silicate composites: Structure, intercalation, properties
Composite Interfaces
(2006)
Effects of processing conditions on nanoclay dispersion in starch–clay nanocomposites
Cereal Chemistry
New approach to elaborate exfoliated starch-based nanobiocomposites
Biomacromolecules
Cited by (204)
Hydrolysis effects on the water uptake of starch-g-glycidyl methacrylate (<sup>GMA</sup>St)/dimethylacrylamide (DMAAm)-based hydrogels for potential agricultural purposes
2023, International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesInvestigating the effect of clay content and type on the mechanical performance of calcium alginate-based hybrid bio-capsules
2023, International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesA comparative study of starch-g-(glycidyl methacrylate)/synthetic polymer-based hydrogels
2023, Carbohydrate PolymersApplication of starch as an active ingredient for the fabrication of nanocomposite in food packaging
2023, Starch Based Nanomaterials for Food Packaging: Perspectives and Future ProspectusBio-nanocomposite films loaded with lemon leaf extract for bio packaging application
2022, Journal of King Saud University - Science