Encapsulation of aroma compounds in biopolymeric emulsion based edible films to control flavour release
Introduction
The loss of quality in food can be related to the transfer of small molecules: in particular, loss of aroma compounds causes a reduction of flavour intensity and change in the typical food flavour. Aroma compounds transfer in dense system, depends on both sorption and diffusion. The sorption mechanism consists of adsorption, absorption and/or desorption of penetrant molecules and depends on the polymer-volatile compound affinity, whereas diffusion is related to their mobility within the polymeric network of the matrix. Thus, the volatile compounds and matrix characteristics must be taken into account to explain the transfer process. In particular, physicochemical characteristics of volatile compounds influence their release: aroma compound shape and size affect its diffusivity, whereas solubility is influenced by the compound nature, polarity, and ability to condense (Reineccius, 2009). In order to decrease flavour changes during food conservation, different strategies could be used. The encapsulation of aroma compounds represents a method to increase the effectiveness of flavouring without adding high levels of aroma compounds. Encapsulation can be defined as a process where a continuous thin coating is formed around solid particles, liquid droplets, or gas cells that are fully contained within the capsule wall (King, 1995). Encapsulation with edible films allows control of flavour loss, which strongly affects food quality during the processing or storage of food (Miller and Krochta, 1997, Reineccius, 2009, Reineccius and Risch, 1988). This technique allows controlled release, defined as a strategy by which one or more active agents or ingredients are made available at a desired site and time at a specific rate (Pothakamury & Barbosa-Canovas, 1995). In this way, edible packaging does not represent only an inert barrier but it has an active role and interacts with the food or with the surrounding media. Edible films could be applied to food as active packaging, with the aim of gradually releasing aroma compounds with time and thus of maintaining the characteristic flavour of food product. Edible films or coatings have been defined as “a packaging, a film, a coating or a thin protective layer which is an integral part of the food and/or can be eaten with” (Guilbert, 1986). Two categories of ingredients have been used as film forming substances. Protein (wheat gluten, whey protein isolate, caseinate, soy protein) and polysaccharide (starch, carrageenan, alginate) are used for their mechanical, structural and oxygen barrier properties, hydrophobic substances (lipids, lacs, varnishes, resins, essential oils and emulsifiers) for their good moisture barrier properties (Kester & Fennema, 1986). Composite films make possible to combine the advantages connected to the different components. ι-Carrageenan, a water soluble polymer with a linear chain mainly composed of alternated (1,3)-d-galactose-4-sulfate and (1,4)-3,6-anhydro-d-galactose-2-sulfate units, is promising as a film-forming material. In aqueous solutions, ι-carrageenans produces thermo-reversible gels when cooling below the critical temperature. The conformation then changes from random coiled single chain to the formation of double-helices of carrageenan chain (Karbowiak et al., 2006a). This three dimensional network formed by the polysaccharide double-helices in a gel state is then dried to obtain a compact solid film. Lipids can be either dispersed in hydrocolloid aqueous solution and dried to obtain an emulsified film or cast as a layer on the hydrocolloid film used as a mechanical support, in order to obtain a bilayer film. The food industry has been focusing its research on emulsified films, which require only one step in manufacture, as opposed to the three steps required for bilayer films. With the addition of lipids to form emulsified films, they can also be used to encapsulate active molecules such as aroma compounds (Karbowiak, Debeaufort, Champion, & Voilley, 2006b).
The objective of this work was to encapsulate different aroma compounds in emulsified ι-carrageenans films. Release of ten aroma compounds from emulsified films was compared to that obtained from a lipid matrix. In the food industry, flavours are often added to lipids, because of their affinity to hydrophobic phases. Emulsified carrageenans films could represent a lipidic phase surrounded with a second layer consisted of hydrocolloids network, that is supposed to have good gases barrier properties. Headspace solid phase microextraction–gas chromatography (HS-SPME–GC) analyses were carried out. Compared to other extraction techniques, SPME technique is advantageous since it is economic, faster and concentrates the headspace, thus allowing the detection of compounds with low concentrations.
Section snippets
Materials
ι-Carrageenan was a gift from Degussa Texturant Systems (DTS, Baupte, France) and constituted the continuous matrix of the film. Anhydrous glycerol (98% purity, Fluka Chemical, Germany) was used as plasticizer in order to improve mechanical properties of carrageenan films. Fat used in this study, Grindsted Barrier System 2000 (GBS), supplied by Danisco (Bradbrand, Denmark), is an acetic acid ester of mono- and diglycerides made from edible, fully hydrogenated vegetable oil blended with beeswax,
Results and discussion
To investigate the possibility of using edible films as flavour carriers, different aroma compounds were added to carrageenans films. Flavour release from two matrices, one consisted of only Grindsted Barrier System 2000, GBS, and the other one consisted in emulsified film (cg wf), was followed by dosing aroma compound in the headspace. Different aroma compounds were chosen in order to consider the influence of flavour physico-chemical properties on release from solid media: ethyl acetate,
Conclusions
This work focused on the encapsulation of different aroma compounds with emulsion ι-carageenans based edible films. Release of methyl-ketones, ethyl-esters and alcohol from cg wf films was compared with that obtained from GBS sample. Release from the two matrixes resulted very different. We could hypothesize that in fat sample aroma compounds release is more affected by factors related to diffusivity, whereas in carrageenans emulsified films affinities between volatile compounds and polymer
References (19)
- et al.
Saturated vapour pressure of aroma compounds at various temperatures
Food Chemistry
(2004) - et al.
Wetting properties at the surface of iota-carrageenan based edible films
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
(2006) - et al.
Oxygen and aroma barrier properties of edible films: A review
Trends in Food Science & Technology
(1997) - et al.
Fundamental aspects of controlled release in foods
Trends in Food Science and Technology
(1995) - et al.
Sorption of flavor compounds by low-density polyethylene film
Journal of Food Science
(1991) - et al.
Concentration dependence of the order–disorder transition of carrageenans. Further confirmatory evidence for the double helix in solution
European Journal of Biochemistry
(1982) Handbook of flavor ingredients
(1975)Food packaging and preservation
(1986)- et al.
Sol–gel transition behavior of pure iotacarrageenan in both salt-free and added salt states
Biomacromolecules
(2001)
Cited by (55)
Testing tools and physical, chemical, and microbiological characterization of microencapsulated systems
2022, Microencapsulation in the Food Industry: A Practical Implementation GuideEdible films and coatings: An update on recent advances
2020, Biopolymer-Based Formulations: Biomedical and Food ApplicationsMutamba seed mucilage as a novel emulsifier: Stabilization mechanisms, kinetic stability and volatile compounds retention
2019, Food HydrocolloidsCitation Excerpt :Interestingly, the release behavior of linalool was different from limonene, myrcene, and α-pinene. This finding could be explained by the difference on chemical structure (e.g.: number of carbons, functional groups, etc.) and physicochemical properties (e.g.: volatility and polarity) of VOC, and how they interact with the surrounding components from disperse and continuous phase (Benjamin et al., 2012; Marcuzzo et al., 2010; Van Ruth et al., 2002). Unlike limonene, myrcene and α-pinene, linalool is substituted by a hydroxyl group at position 3 (3,7-Dimethyl-1,6-octadien-3-ol).
Sustainable Packaging
2018, Sustainable Food Systems from Agriculture to Industry: Improving Production and ProcessingCarrageenan for encapsulation and immobilization of flavor, fragrance, probiotics, and enzymes: A review
2017, Journal of Carbohydrate Chemistry