Promotional effect of Sn addition to sulfated Pt/γ-Al2O3 catalysts on CH4 combustion. Effect of C3H8 addition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2005.12.019Get rights and content

Abstract

The effect of Sn addition to Pt/γ-Al2O3 and the effect of sulfating the bimetallic Pt–Sn/γ-Al2O3 catalysts are investigated for the combustion of methane in the presence and in the absence of C3H8. Sulfated Pt–Sn/γ-Al2O3 catalyst showed a higher thermal stability and higher activity on CH4–O2 reaction related to pre-sulfated 1%Pt/γ-Al2O3. C3H8 addition to the reaction feed resulted in a further strong promotional effect on methane oxidation over sulfated Pt–Sn/γ-Al2O3 catalysts. Reasons for these different effects are discussed. Results suggest that a sulfated Pt–Sn/γ-Al2O3 catalyst may eliminate methane emissions at low temperature without losing Pt active area, for these reactions and without being deactivated by sulfur.

Introduction

The activation of hydrocarbons is of interest because of the desire to functionalize inexpensive feedstocks and also because catalytic combustion offers a possible means to generate power without creating excessive amounts of nitrogen oxides. Natural gas provides an attractive source of energy for various purposes. For instance, it is used to fire gas turbine combustion chambers [1] and more recently has been reported as an alternative fuel for automotive applications [2]. The main advantages are lower levels of particulate matter and nitrogen oxides in lean burn combustion [3]. The high H/C ratio reduces the net carbon dioxide emissions when compared to other fossil fuels. Methane is the most difficult hydrocarbon to oxidize since it contains no C–C bond, but only C–H bonds, which are more difficult to break [4]. Although methane does not contribute to tropospheric ozone production, it is a potent greenhouse gas estimated to have a 20-year global warming potential 21 times that of carbon dioxide at equivalent emission rates [5]. The complete oxidation of methane can be performed over either noble metals or transition metal oxides [6], [7], [8], [9]. Few studies were made on platinum catalysts [10], [11], [12], [13] compared to palladium ones [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. Burch et al. observed T50 (temperature at 50% conversion) for Pt or Pd supported on high surface area γ-Al2O3 catalysts within 100 °C of each other, Pd having higher activity [13]. Natural gas vehicles exhaust contains sulfur derived from the gas and engine lubricating oil, although at ppm concentrations [19], and it is the sulfur in the exhaust that strongly deactivates Pd catalysts for methane oxidation. However, Pt based catalysts are not deactivated by sulfur in the exhaust for methane combustion. A mechanism for the oxidation of methane on Pt suggests that the metal would activate the almost non-polar C–H bonds of methane through a homolytic mechanism (dissociate adsorption of CH4 at free metal sites), oxygen species acting as an inhibitor for the reaction at full coverage [20].

In a recent paper [21], we showed that 2 wt% tin addition to a 1%Pt/γ-Al2O3 catalyst, prevents Pt particles from sintering during high temperature processes, thus, Pt surface remained unchanged for oxidation reactions. Now, D. Roth et al. [7] found that SnO2 strongly promoted the oxidation of methane over Pt catalysts. However, when Pt was supported on SnO2 grafted on Al2O3 (15 wt% Sn), the activity was found after ageing, lower than Pt/Al2O3. Thus, on basis of these results, we investigated in this work, the effect of lower amounts of tin addition (2 wt% Sn) on Pt/Al2O3 activity for CH4 oxidation.

On the other hand, in recent investigations [22], we found a strong promotional effect of the presence of 1000 ppmV C3H8 in the reaction feed on CH4–O2 reaction over pre-sulfated 1%Pt/γ-Al2O3. This promotion is explained in terms of the high propane combustion heat which is transferred, to activate the abstraction, of the first hydrogen of the adsorbed methane molecule. This abstraction is assumed to be the rate determining step, in the methane oxidation mechanism [20], [23]. Thus, in this work, we also investigated the effect of the presence of C3H8 in the reaction feed on CH4–O2 reaction over pre-sulfated 1%Pt/γ-Al2O3.

Section snippets

Experimental

The support used was γ-Al2O3 (Merck) with a grain size of 0.063–0.200 mm (70–230 mesh ASTM). Before use, the support was calcined for 6 h at 600 °C in air. Pt and Pt–Sn catalysts supported on alumina were prepared by impregnation using acidic aqueous solutions (0.1 M HCl) of SnCl4 · 5H2O (Alfa/Johnson Matthey) and H2PtCl6 · 6H2O (Merck, min. 98% purity). After impregnation, the catalysts were dried at 120 °C overnight, and then calcined in flowing air for 6 h at 500 °C. Finally, the catalysts were reduced

Catalysts characterization

The catalyst characterization data are summarized in Table 1. Comparable Pt dispersion values of 0.35, and 0.26 were obtained for the mono and the bimetallic catalysts, respectively.

Methane oxidation

In Fig. 1, and in Table 2, temperatures of 50% conversion (light-off temperatures) for methane on CH4–O2 reaction over unsulfated (a) and pre-sulfated (b) catalysts, in the presence and in the absence of C3H8 are indicated.

Discussion

Fig. 2 shows the effects of SO2 pre-treatment on the subsequent activities for the CH4 combustion reaction of 1%Pt/γ-Al2O3 and 1%Pt–2%Sn/γ-Al2O3. The temperature of 50% CH4 conversion is decreased over pre-sulfated catalysts, relative to unsulfated catalysts. From these observations, it would appear that the catalytic sites for CH4 activation are enhanced by the presence of the SO42- formed during sulfation process on both catalysts. However, pre-sulfating 1%Pt/γ-Al2O3, and 1%Pt–2%Sn/γ-Al2O3

Conclusions

Results obtained in this investigation revealed that sulfating a 1%Pt–2%Sn/γ-Al2O3 catalysts and the presence of 1000 ppmV of propane in the reaction feed resulted in a stronger promotion on methane combustion, related to pre-sulfated 1%Pt/γ-Al2O3. This activation and the fact that tin addition to a Pt/γ-Al2O3 catalyst, prevents Pt particles from sintering during high temperature sulfation process, suggest that a 1%Pt–2%Sn/γ-Al2O3 catalyst could resist high temperature reactions without losing

Acknowledgments

The authors are pleased to acknowledge valuable support for this research from CONACYT-SEMARNAT (project 2002-COL-0212), DEGUSSA CATALYST S.A. de C.V. and Vicerrectoria de Investigación y Estudios de Posgrado (BUAP).

References (29)

  • D. Ciuparu et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2001)
  • W.S. Epling et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1999)
  • C.F. Cullis et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1983)
  • S. Park et al.

    Catal. Lett.

    (2003)
  • J.L. Gland

    Surf. Sci.

    (1980)
  • R.F. Hicks et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1990)
  • R.W. McCabe et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1988)
  • R. Burch et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (1994)
  • P. Gelin et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2003)
  • M.A. Fraga et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2004)
  • S. Ordonez et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2004)
  • L.F. Cordoba et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2005)
  • N. Kraikul et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2005)
  • R. Burch et al.

    Catal. Today

    (1999)
  • Cited by (4)

    • Effects of additives Co, La, and Mn for Pt-based carbon oxidation catalysts

      2008, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
    • Catalytic combustion of methane

      2012, Catalysis for Alternative Energy Generation
    View full text