Elsevier

Catalysis Communications

Volume 10, Issue 15, 15 September 2009, Pages 2051-2055
Catalysis Communications

A VOx/meso-TiO2 catalyst for methanol oxidation to dimethoxymethane

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2009.07.029Get rights and content

Abstract

Mesoporous TiO2 was prepared by simply controlling the hydrolysis of Ti(OBu)4 with the help of acetic acid. The mesoporous TiO2 had a well-crystallized anatase phase and a high surface area of 290 m2 g−1 with a pore size of about 4 nm. The anatase phase and the mesoporous structure were maintained in the VOx/TiO2 catalyst with a monolayer dispersion of V2O5, however, the surface area decreased to 126 m2 g−1. The catalyst was highly active and selective for methanol oxidation, giving about 55% conversion of methanol and 85% selectivity to dimethoxymethane at 423 K.

Introduction

TiO2 is one of the most important metal oxides in heterogeneous catalysis. In addition to be used as a typical photocatalyst, it is also an essential component in oxidation catalysts [1]. For example, the reaction rate of methanol oxidation over a VOx/TiO2 catalyst is at least one order of magnitude larger than those on VOx/SiO2 and VOx/Al2O3 catalysts at near monolayer coverage of V2O5 [2]. However, the surface area of the currently used TiO2 material is usually less than 100 m2 g−1, hindering the preferred monolayer dispersion of vanadia, particularly at higher loading (>10% V2O5). Mesoporous TiO2 materials synthesized using structure-directing agents have high surface area up to 1000 m2 g−1, but they are usually amorphous or semi-crystalline [3], [4], [5]. As a result, the mesoporous structure tends to collapse due to crystal growth upon thermal treatment at relatively higher temperatures (723–823 K) [4], [5]. Hydrolysis of titanium alkoxide in the presence of mineral acids (HNO3 or H3PO4) produced mesoporous TiO2 of anatase crystalline with a surface area of 106–294 m2 g−1 after calcination above 723 K [6], [7], but the mineral acids are difficult to be removed completely. Deshpande et al. [8] have recently reported that hydrolysis of Ti(OBu)4 in the presence of acetic acid produced anatase mesoporous TiO2 with a surface area of 125 m2 g−1 after calcination at 673 K. However, the process proceeded very slowly and the synthetic period was up to 120 days for obtaining the mesoporous structure. Therefore, a simple and effective method for preparing crystalline mesoporous TiO2 material with a high surface area is of high importance.

In this work, we synthesized mesoporous TiO2 with anatase crystalline by simply controlling the hydrolysis process of Ti(OBu)4. The TiO2 material was used to support VOx species as a catalyst for the selective oxidation of methanol to dimethoxymethane (DMM).

Section snippets

Materials preparation

The mesoporous TiO2 was prepared by hydrolysis of Ti(OBu)4. About 50 g Ti(OBu)4 and 10 ml acetic acid were dissolved into 200 ml ethanol at 273 K, and added to 700 ml ethanol aqueous solution (90%) at the same temperature under stirring. The mixture was kept at 298 K for 2 h and 323 K for 2 h, respectively. 45 ml deionized water was then added at 323 K and the mixture was kept at this temperature for 13 h. The precipitate was filtered, washed with deionized water and ethanol, and dried at 383 K for 12 h

Mesoporous TiO2

Fig. 1 shows the XRD pattern of the as-prepared TiO2 material. It exhibited typical diffraction peaks of crystalline anatase structure (JCPDS #86-1157). The crystalline size estimated from the (1 0 1) diffraction peak was about 7 nm. Fig. 2 shows the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and the pore size distribution (inset) of the as-prepared TiO2 material. It displayed type IV adsorption isotherm with H2 hysteresis loop, characteristics of mesoporous structure. This kind of pore structure may be a

Conclusions

Mesoporous anatase TiO2 was prepared by simply controlling the hydrolysis process of Ti(BuO)4 in the presence of acetic acid. The presence of acetic acid not only favored the formation of mesoporous structure but also accelerated the crystallization of TiO2. The resultant VOx/TiO2 catalyst had a monolayer dispersion of VOx even the loading was as high as 16% (in V2O5), and exhibited high activity and selectivity for methanol oxidation to DMM.

References (23)

  • U. Bentrup et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2006)
  • D.M. Antonelli

    Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.

    (1999)
  • D. Huang et al.

    Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.

    (2005)
  • S.B. Deshpande et al.

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2006)
  • G. Leofanti et al.

    Catal. Today

    (1998)
  • J.G. Yu et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2003)
  • D.A. Bulushev et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2002)
  • J. Choi et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2006)
  • M. Gasior et al.

    Appl. Catal.

    (1987)
  • A. Vejux et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (1978)
  • L.J. Burcham et al.

    Catal. Today

    (1999)
  • Cited by (29)

    • A review on direct synthesis of dimethoxymethane

      2022, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering
    • Reaction mechanisms and catalysis in the one-step synthesis of methylal via methanol oxidation

      2022, Journal of the Energy Institute
      Citation Excerpt :

      Industrially, DMM is produced by the catalytic polycondensation in the liquid phase through the reaction of methanol with FA produced by the oxidation of methanol [12]. However, this traditional method is complex and expensive due to the high reaction temperature of the acid catalyst and the resultant corrosion of the equipment [13]. Considering that the one-step selective oxidation of methanol to DMM is economical and environmentally friendly, this promising reaction warrants further study [14,15].

    • Walnut-like ZnO@Zn<inf>2</inf>TiO<inf>4</inf> multicore-shell submicron spheres with a thin carbon layer: Fine synthesis, facile structural control and solar light photocatalytic application

      2017, Acta Materialia
      Citation Excerpt :

      The nano-sized powders are also generally difficult to separate from the treated water following use, and this process may entail significant expense [12]. To address these concerns, many research groups have investigated visible-light photocatalysts and hierarchically-structured metal oxide micro- and nanostructures, and improvements in the ability of wide-band-gap semiconductors to utilize visible light through metal or non-metal doping techniques are well established [13–18]. According to these studies, metal and non-metal doped metal oxides have a narrow band gap in comparison with undoped wide-band-gap metal oxides.

    • Ruthenium trichloride as a new catalyst for selective production of dimethoxymethane from liquid methanol with molecular oxygen as sole oxidant

      2015, Catalysis Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      In consideration of the long technological processes which caused the inevitably high cost, a lot of effort have been made and most focused on one-step selective oxidation of gaseous methanol to DMM. And lots of selective oxidation catalysts have been reported such as crystalline SbRe2O6 [4–6], Re/γ–Fe2O3 [7], ReOx/TiO2 [8], RuOx/SiO2 [9], heteropolyacid [10,11], Cu–ZSM-5, Fe–Mo–O [12], V2O5/TiO2 [13–18] and so on. Among these catalysts mentioned above, ReOx/TiO2 [8], Fe–Mo–O [12] and V2O5/TiO2 [13–18] show better catalytic performance for the selective oxidation of methanol to DMM.

    • Promotional effects of Sm<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> on Mn-H<inf>4</inf>SiW<inf>12</inf>O<inf>40</inf>/SiO<inf>2</inf> catalyst for dimethyl ether direct-oxidation to dimethoxymethane

      2014, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Currently, DMM is mainly produced industrially via the acetalization of methanol with formaldehyde over acid catalysts. At present, many researchers have carried out the work of methanol oxidation to DMM [1–8]. Besides, there also exist other synthesis routes, such as the direct synthesis from synthesis gas via CO hydrogenation [9] and the direct oxidation of dimethyl ether (DME) [10,11].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text