Elsevier

Catalysis Today

Volume 148, Issues 3–4, 30 November 2009, Pages 212-220
Catalysis Today

Short review
Surface science perspective of carbon dioxide chemistry—Adsorption kinetics and dynamics of CO2 on selected model surfaces

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2009.07.082Get rights and content

Abstract

The adsorption or formation of CO2 on surfaces is important in a variety of industrial and environmental applications such as methanol synthesis, exhaust cleaning, CO2 capturing/sequestering, fuel cell poisoning, fuel synthesis, etc. For most of these processes, a deeper understanding of the kinetics and dynamics of CO2 adsorption on surfaces could help to optimize the performance of catalysts. Historically, most surface science studies have focused on CO rather than CO2 as the probe molecule, i.e., fundamental knowledge about CO2 adsorption is still needed. This paper will focus on summarizing a few fundamental properties of CO2 adsorption on a number of selected model systems recently studied in our group. In particular, metals (Cu, Cr) and metal oxide (ZnO, TiO2, CaO) single crystals as well as so-called model catalysts (Cu-on-ZnO, Zn-on-Cu) and nanocatalysts will be considered. The similarities and differences between metals and metal oxides will be highlighted as well as the effect of surface defects. An attempt to tie the different systems together by proposing structure–activity relationships rules will be made. Kinetics experiments and molecular beam scattering data are summarized, some of which have been modeled by Monte Carlo simulations and density function theory.

Introduction

What motivates a physicist, trained in traditional experimental surface science, to study CO2 chemistry? Historically [1], surface science focused on metal single-crystal surfaces using CO as the probe molecule to gain a deeper understanding of the electronic, vibration, kinetic, and dynamic properties of surfaces. Well, CO2 may be the next more complicated probe molecule. In addition to this pragmatic view (gaining better knowhow through the collection of larger data sets), there are numerous important applications that could stem from a deeper mechanistic understanding of the interaction of CO2 with various surfaces. (1) Disregarding an initial controversy, the main source of carbon in the synthesis of methanol (MeOH) from syngas is CO2 [2], [3]. Thus, the adsorption of CO2 on the catalyst surface is the first elementary reaction step in the sequence of hydrogenation reactions that lead finally to the formation of MeOH (Fig. 1). MeOH, obtained by utilizing CO2, is an important feedstock in the chemical industry and can also be directly used as a fuel in direct liquid fuel cells. Recycling the greenhouse gas CO2 from the atmosphere to build an economy based on MeOH has been proposed [4]. As a realistic model system for MeOH synthesis, the adsorption of CO2 has been studied on clean ZnO single-crystal surfaces [5], [6] as well as on Cu nanoparticles deposited on ZnO (Cu-on-ZnO) [7], [8] by a variety of groups since industrially (among other systems) ternary ZnO-Al2O3-Cu powder catalysts are used. Our results (mostly kinetics and molecular beam scattering experiments) [5] are summarized in Section 4.2. Studying the effect of hydrogen and CO2 coadsorption is the next logical step [9], [10] (see Section 4.2.2). A related model system is bimetallic surfaces. Thus, Section 3 will discuss the work done on copper single crystals, and Section 5 considers ZnCu surface alloys using CO2 as the probe molecule [11], [12], [13]. Alloy sites have been considered as the active sites in the synthesis of methanol. (2) Closely related to the venue of this conference is the geological sequestration of CO2 as well as its capture in the exhaust gas of power plants (Fig. 2). Ca is used for the latter; and an interesting class of minerals, perhaps suitable for CO2 sequestration, consists of Ca compounds [14]. Section 4.3 will summarize our studies of CO2 adsorption on CaO(1 0 0) surfaces [15]. Regarding metal oxides, the effect of surface defects (oxygen vacancy sites) as well as the formation of surface carbonates are interesting mechanistic details. CaO is an excellent model system in this regard. A variety of further applications for CaO are known, including catalytic gasification of Ca-containing coal [16], [17], NO storage catalysts used for operating combustion engines at lean (oxygen-rich) conditions with alkaline-earth oxides as promising catalysts, the capture of SO2 by CaO [16], the dimerization of, for example, methane [18], the reduction of NO by CO [19], and the decomposition of chlorinated hydrocarbons [20]. For the decomposition of NO, CaO has been considered as a less expensive catalyst than systems based on noble metals [21]. Some work conducted on the prototype of a metal oxide, rutile TiO2(1 0 0), will be summarized for completeness in Section 4.1; this discussion focuses on CO2 adsorption [22], [23]. (3) CO2 is generated in the combustion of coal, which often includes inorganic impurities such as Ca and Fe (Fig. 3). Section 6.2 will discuss kinetics studies about CO2 adsorption on Fe-oxide nanoparticles supported on HOPG as a model system for particulate matter that is released in the plume of coal combustion plants [24], [25].

In addition to applications, as one motivation, surface science research on CO2 aimed to address fundamental questions such as the following: (1) What are the fundamental differences in the catalysis of metal and metal oxide surfaces? How well can more complex surfaces be understood? (2) How do the adsorption kinetics and dynamics change when we go from a metal surface to a related metal oxide film [26]? (3) Is the adsorption kinetics correlated in a simple way to the adsorption dynamics (gas-surface energy transfer processes)? For example, CO2 binding energies on oxides are typically larger than for metal surfaces. What about adsorption probabilities governed by gas-surface energy transfer processes? (4) Oxide surfaces consist of very characteristic defects such as oxygen vacancy sites. How is the catalytic activity affected by these defects? Can we tune the reactivity of metal oxide surfaces by varying the defect density? Can these (model) defects serve to better understand powder catalysts or nanoparticles that have a large defect density? (5) How does the oxidation state of a system such as FeOx affect the kinetics/dynamics of surface reactions? (6) How does the size (and shape) of supported metal (metal oxide) clusters relate to chemical activity? Again, a deeper understanding of the mechanism would allow for catalyst tuning, etc.

This mini review will mainly summarize the work done in 2004–09 at NDSU on CO2 chemistry using molecular beam scattering and traditional kinetics techniques. Metal single crystals (Section 2), metal oxide films (Section 3) and single crystals (Section 4), bimetallic surfaces (Section 5), and nanostructured catalysts (Section 6) will be considered. The obtained results are discussed along with studies from other groups; however, due to strict text size limitations of the conference proceedings, for more complete surveys, see Refs. [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. Similarly, details about experimental and theoretical techniques are omitted [32], [33]. Very briefly, the first step in all surface reactions is the adsorption of at least one reactant on the catalyst. Molecular beam scattering allows understanding of the gas-surface energy transfer processes governing this adsorption process (referred to as adsorption dynamics). Thus, the potential energy surface can be mapped. Often complementary information is obtained by kinetics techniques such as TDS, a simple temperature ramping technique. Whereas TDS is a simple and readily available technique, molecular beam scattering systems are rather rare in the surface science community. This may be related to the fact that the equipment is not available commercially and that these multi-chamber UHV systems are somewhat more maintenance intensive.

Section snippets

Kinetics

CO2 adsorption kinetics has been studied thoroughly on Cu(1 1 0) [34], [35] and other metal surfaces (see e.g. Ref. [36]). Copper surfaces are prototypical due to the importance of Cu in the methanol synthesis which is one possibility to recycle CO2. According to prior work, CO2 desorbs at ∼90 K in the monolayer range (see Table 1), obeying 1st order kinetics. Strong CO2–CO2 lateral interactions have been identified from TDS peak shifts [34] that lead to a continuous transition from monolayer to

Metals vs. thin oxide films—the case of Cr(1 1 0) vs. Cr2O3(0 0 0 1)

In this project, we compared directly the chemical activity of a metal surface and its surface oxide toward CO2 adsorption [26]. The Cr(1 1 0) surface can simply be distinguished from the Cr2O3(0 0 0 1) surface oxide by the appearance of a square or hexagonal LEED pattern, respectively, as well as by TDS curves consisting of a single or double peak. The latter is consistent with an oxygen-terminated oxide surface [47]. At low temperatures, CO2 physisorbs on both surfaces. S0, is for both systems

Surface defects and kinetics

Rutile TiO2(1 1 0) is the prototype of a metal oxide model system [52]. In particular, surface defects on TiO2(1 1 0) have attracted the interest of many research groups [53], [54], [55] since defects are often the active sites in catalytic processes. However, creating defects in a well-controlled manner is challenging: sputtering [6], [56], [57], electron or UV exposure [58], reduction with hydrogen or CO [59], and annealing above 600 K have been used. It is believed that ion sputtering removes

Interaction of CO2 with bimetallic surfaces–the case of Zn-on-Cu(1 1 0)

The formation of a brass surface alloy has been observed in studies about the MeOH synthesis reaction [3], [92] on metal-oxide-based catalysts. Therefore, studying the effect of ZnCu surface alloys on adsorption processes more directly appears pertinent. In addition, the Zn-on-Cu system by itself can be regarded as a planar model catalyst since MeOH formation rates comparable with binary powder catalysts [92], [93], [94] have been determined. Interestingly, a maximum in the MeOH formation rate

Probing the Cu-on-ZnO model catalyst by means of CO2 adsorption

The growth morphology of Cu vapor deposited on ZnO(0 0 0 1) has literally been studied by all surface science techniques [97]. Agreement has been obtained [98], [99] about the growth mode at small and large Cu coverage, ΘCu. Accordingly, 3D Cu clusters dominate the growth at large ΘCu, whereas 2D islands form at very low ΘCu [100]. If gas-phase species adsorb on this so-called model catalyst, the following elementary adsorption pathways are possible (Fig. 9). (1) Diffusion of the adsorbate along

Summary and conclusions

Carbon dioxide adsorption on 10 different systems, ranging from metal single crystals and metal oxides to nanostructured catalysts (Table 1), recently studied at NDSU by molecular beam scattering and kinetics techniques, has been considered. Some trends seen in our projects are briefly outlined in the following.

Kinetic SAR. A correlation of adsorption kinetics to structural features of surfaces has frequently been seen. Regarding metal oxides, oxygen vacancy sites lead typically to larger

Acknowledgements

Most of the projects summarized here were part of the thesis work of S. Funk [115] and J. Goering [116] as well as the work of postdocs J. Wang and E. Kadossov at North Dakota State University. This short review also includes some work done with P. Schmuki's group at Erlangen-Nuerberg University on TiO2 nanotubes. Financial support from the Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy is acknowledged

References (119)

  • J.T. Yates

    Surf. Sci.

    (1994)
  • T.S. Askgaard et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1995)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2005)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2005)
  • S. Funk et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2006)
  • A. Snis et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1998)
  • S. Funk et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2006)
  • S. Funk et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2007)
  • F. Solymosi

    J. Mol. Catal.

    (1991)
  • H.J. Freund et al.

    Surf. Sci. Rep.

    (1996)
  • C. Song

    Catal. Today

    (2006)
  • J.W. Niemantsverdriet et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1988)
  • P.B. Rasmussen et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1992)
  • S.S. Fu et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1992)
  • G.C. Wang et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2004)
  • S. Kneitz et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1999)
  • S. Kneitz et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1999)
  • H.P. Steinrück et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1987)
  • M. Kunat et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2001)
  • U. Burghaus et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1995)
  • U. Burghaus et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1998)
  • C.L. Kao et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2002)
  • O. Seiferth et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1999)
  • C.L. Kao et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2004)
  • C. Kao et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2004)
  • M.A. Henderson

    Surf. Sci.

    (1998)
  • M.A. Henderson

    Surf. Sci.

    (1999)
  • Q. Zhong et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1992)
  • S. Wendt et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2005)
  • O. Dulub et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2002)
  • T. Becker et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2001)
  • P.J. Moller et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1995)
  • W. Hotan et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1979)
  • W.H. Cheng et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1982)
  • S.F. Jen et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1989)
  • P. Esser et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1980)
  • J. Stephan et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2002)
  • L. Vattuone et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1998)
  • M. Kunat et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2003)
  • D. Ochs et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1998)
  • F. Voigts et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2009)
  • J. Nakamura et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1996)
  • T. Fujitani et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1997)
  • M. Haruta

    Catal. Today

    (1997)
  • C.T. Campbell

    Surf. Sci. Rep.

    (1997)
  • J. Yoshihara et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1998)
  • J.B. Hansen
  • G.A. Olah et al.

    Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy

    (2003)
  • J. Wang et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (2005)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Catal. Lett.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text