Elsevier

Catalysis Today

Volume 160, Issue 1, 2 February 2011, Pages 87-95
Catalysis Today

Heterostructured catalysts prepared by dispersing Au@Fe2O3 core–shell structures on supports and their performance in CO oxidation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.05.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Herein, we report novel gold catalysts made by dispersing Au@Fe2O3 core–shell structures on solid supports. In the synthesis of Au@Fe2O3 core–shell structures, dodecanethiol-capped gold nanoparticles were used as the seed and Fe(CO)5 was used as the precursor to Fe2O3 shell. The Au@Fe2O3 core–shell particles were deposited onto SiO2 support to obtain Au@Fe2O3/SiO2 catalysts that were highly active for low-temperature CO oxidation. The catalytic activity was even higher than that of Au/SiO2 or Au/Fe2O3 prepared by colloidal deposition with comparable gold loadings. The influences of thermal pretreatment, shell thickness, and different supports (e.g., SiO2, TiO2, C, Fe2O3) were investigated, and relevant characterization using TG/DTG, XRD, TEM, HAADF, and EDX was conducted.

Introduction

Gold nanoparticles dispersed on solid supports have many potential applications in environmental catalysis, chemical synthesis, and clean energy processing [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. These catalysts are usually prepared by deposition–precipitation and colloidal-deposition [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19] methods and the supports often used are TiO2, CeO2, Fe2O3, Al2O3, ZrO2, SiO2, and C. More complicated gold catalysts may be desirable for achieving better performance and stability in catalysis [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. Along this line, our group has previously explored the use of Au–Fe3O4 dumbbell heterostructures on SiO2, TiO2, and C supports to stabilize gold nanocatalysts and demonstrated the high activities and thermal stability of these catalysts in CO oxidation [31]. We have also dispersed colloidal NiAu particles onto SiO2 supports and demonstrated that upon oxidative pretreatment at elevated temperatures, NiAu nanoparticles could transform into Au nanoparticles whose surfaces were decorated by amorphous NiO [32], [33]. This Au–NiO/SiO2 catalyst was active for low-temperature CO oxidation. In the current contribution, we report the application of Au@Fe2O3 core–shell structures [34] as the precursor for the preparation of supported catalysts highly active for low-temperature CO oxidation (Scheme 1).

Great effort has been made toward the designing of metal@oxide core–shell structures [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]. However, only limited attention has been paid to the use of core–shell structures [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49] or their supported versions [49], [50], [51], [52] in making new catalysts [53], [54]. Notably, Tsang and co-workers prepared a CeO2-encapsulated-Pt catalyst (denoted as Pt@CeO2) via a microemulsion method [43], [44]. The catalyst showed activity in water–gas shift reaction comparable to Cu/ZnO and Pt/CeO2 catalysts, and there was no formation of undesirable methane. In another work, Tsang and co-workers prepared a Pt@SiO2/Al2O3 catalyst for the hydrogenation of toluene [52]. The resulting catalyst showed much higher thermal stability than Pt/SiO2–Al2O3. More recently, Somorjai and co-workers designed Pt@SiO2 core–shell structures for CO oxidation [47]. This catalyst had not only mesopores caused by the removal of residual organic species, but also good thermal stability due to the presence of SiO2 shell.

Little effort has been paid to the use of Au@oxide core–shell structures in catalysis. Others have prepared new catalysts featured by the strategic location of small gold nanoparticles in much bigger hollow ZrO2 or SiO2 shells [55], [56], [57], [58] or by the entrapment of a number of gold nanoparticles in amorphous SiO2 matrix [59]. These catalysts showed enhanced thermal stability due to the encapsulation of gold nanoparticles in inorganic matrixes. Recently, Xie and co-workers synthesized Au@SnO2 core–shell structures by an intermetallics-based dry-oxidation approach [60]. There were several steps in their approach: (1) Gold nanoparticles were prepared by reducing HAuCl4 by a sodium citrate solution; (2) AuSn nanoparticles were prepared by reducing SnCl2 by NaBH4 in the presence of the pre-synthesized gold nanoparticles; (3) The Au@SnO2 core–shell structure was formed via a three-step oxidation procedure. As a result, gold nanoparticles with a mean size of 15 nm were encapsulated by the SnO2 shell with a thickness of 6–7 nm. The core–shell structured catalyst still showed 50% CO conversion when the reaction temperature was 230 °C, even though the catalyst was pretreated at 850 °C prior to reaction testing. The authors proposed that the relatively high activity of Au@SnO2 was due to a synergetic confinement effect, the electron transfer from the oxide support to gold nanoparticles, and larger interaction areas [60]. Nevertheless, the size of gold nanoparticles was still too big for catalysis, and the preparation method was relatively complicated. In another work, Xu and co-workers synthesized bimetallic Au–Ni nanoparticles embedded in SiO2 spheres, and demonstrated that Au–Ni@SiO2 showed higher catalytic activity and better durability than monometallic Au@SiO2 and Ni@SiO2 in the hydrolysis of ammonia borane [48].

In this contribution, we designed supported Au@Fe2O3 catalysts and tested their activity in CO oxidation. We have chosen Fe2O3 as the shell based on below considerations. First, the synthesis of Au@Fe2O3 has been established in the materials community [34]. Second, Au/Fe2O3 with Au–Fe2O3 interface is known to be active in CO oxidation [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67]. Therefore, we expect that supported Au@Fe2O3 catalysts should also be active in CO oxidation. We are interested in investigating the following questions. First, is there any requirement for catalyst pretreatment in order to obtain high catalytic activity? Second, what is the effect of shell thickness on catalytic activity? Third, what effect can be induced if the underlying support is different? Finally, how do supported Au@Fe2O3 catalysts compare to Au/SiO2, Au/TiO2, Au/C, Au/Fe2O3, and Au@Fe2O3? The results from our work provide insights for the preparation and application of supported gold core-oxide shell catalysts.

Section snippets

Experimental

Gold nanoparticles were synthesized according to a classic method [68], [69], [70]. HAuCl4·3H2O (0.63 g) was added into 50 mL deionized water, and the aqueous solution was added, with vigorous stirring, into a solution containing 3.0 g tetraoctylammonium bromide and 160 mL toluene. The yellow HAuCl4 solution became clear quickly and the toluene phase became orange-brown as the gold precursor was transferred into it. The organic phase was isolated, 80 mg dodecanethiol was added, and the resulting

Case study of Au@Fe2O3/SiO2: effect of pretreatment temperature

Fig. 1 shows the light-off curves of Au@Fe2O3/SiO2 catalysts under different pretreatment conditions. The thickness of the Fe2O3 shell is estimated as 2 nm, as described in Supporting Information. The as-synthesized Au@Fe2O3/SiO2 catalyst is not active for CO oxidation when the reaction temperature is below 200 °C. The conversion increases sharply in between 230 and 250 °C, and the T50 (temperature required for 50% CO conversion) value is 238 °C. After the catalytic test was finished, we repeated

Conclusions

Au@Fe2O3 core–shell heterostructures were deposited on SiO2, TiO2, C, and Fe2O3 supports by colloidal deposition, and the performance in CO oxidation was studied. It is necessary to pretreat the catalysts at elevated temperatures such as 300 °C, in order to remove residual organic species. The burning of organic species could result in the creation of pores for the entrance of CO and O2 while allowing for the exit of CO2. However, the catalytic activity decreases further when the pretreatment

Acknowledgements

Research sponsored by the Division of Chemical Sciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed and operated by UT-Battelle, LLC. This research was also supported by the appointment for H.F. Yin to the ORNL Research Associates Program, administered by Oak Ridge Associated Universities.

References (93)

  • M. Haruta et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2001)
  • J.D. Grunwaldt et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1999)
  • F. Porta et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2000)
  • Y. Tai et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2010)
  • A. Quintanilla et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2010)
  • A.C. Gluhoi et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2005)
  • Z. Ma et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (2007)
  • K. Qian et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2007)
  • B.H. Wu et al.

    Nano Res.

    (2009)
  • S. Albonetti et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2010)
  • C.L. Peza-Ledesma et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2010)
  • C.M.Y. Yeung et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (2010)
  • J. Lee et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2008)
  • M. Haruta et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1993)
  • A.P. Kozlova et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1998)
  • S.T. Daniells et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2005)
  • M. Khoudiakov et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2005)
  • G.J. Hutchings et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2006)
  • W.C. Li et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2006)
  • T.V. Choudhary et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2002)
  • S.-H. Wu et al.

    Catal. Lett.

    (2004)
  • L.D. Menard et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2006)
  • C.-W. Chiang et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2006)
  • H.G. Zhu et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2007)
  • G. Shirane et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. Solids

    (1959)
  • A. Knell et al.

    J. Catal

    (1992)
  • P. Konova et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (2004)
  • P. Konova et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2004)
  • Y. Hao et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2009)
  • E.D. Park et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1999)
  • N.A. Hodge et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2002)
  • S. Minicò et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2001)
  • V.R. Choudhary et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2008)
  • T.V. Choudhary et al.

    Top. Catal.

    (2002)
  • A.S.K. Hashmi et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2006)
  • G.C. Bond et al.

    Catalysis by Gold

    (2006)
  • M.C. Kung et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2007)
  • C. Della Pina et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2008)
  • A. Corma et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2008)
  • J.C. Fierro-Gonzalez et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2008)
  • S. Tsubota et al.

    Catal. Lett.

    (1998)
  • G. Martra et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2003)
  • J. Chou et al.

    Catal. Lett.

    (2004)
  • M. Comotti et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2006)
  • N.F. Zheng et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2006)
  • N. Hickey et al.

    Chem. Mater.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (63)

    • Exceptionally redox-active precursors in the synthesis of gold core-tin oxide shell nanostructures

      2021, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
    • Catalyst design using an inverse strategy: From mechanistic studies on inverted model catalysts to applications of oxide-coated metal nanoparticles

      2018, Surface Science Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      It was proposed that formation of dual catalytic sites of Au NPs and transition MO at the interface, facilitated by the core-shell configuration, leads to the higher CO oxidation activity [122,271–273]. Similar effects on CO oxidation was also observed for core-shell Au@Fe2O3 catalysts [127,274]. As with the core-shell catalysts, ALD has been used to modify Au NPs with reducible oxides for bifunctional catalysts.

    • Thin-felt microfibrous-structured Au-Α-Fe<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf>/ns-Γ-Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf>/Al-fiber catalyst for high-throughput CO oxidation

      2018, Applied Catalysis A: General
      Citation Excerpt :

      As to the effect of crystalline phase (α, γ-Fe2O3) on the catalyst performance, it has been reviewed that both phases supported Au NPs exhibit high activity for CO oxidation due to the strong Au-Fe2O3 interactions [30]. Additionally, novel architectures were designed to stabilize Au NPs and enhance CO oxidation activity, such as Au@Fe2O3 core-shell structure, over which high durability could be demonstrated by calcining at 700 °C and acceptable CO conversion was achievable at room temperature [31]. Moreover, Shodiya et al. explored the activity of Au/Fe2O3 under the real and harsh conditions (24 vol% CO2 and 10 vol% H2O), and the catalyst still performed well reaching 99.8% CO conversion at 80 °C [32].

    • Pretreatment impact on the morphology and the catalytic performance of hybrid heterodimers nanoparticles applied to CO oxidation

      2017, Catalysis Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      We believe that the new morphology, presenting an irregular/porous shell, may increase the interface and enhance the Au-FeOx interaction, explaining the improvement of the catalytic performance. In fact, Yin at al. [31] synthesized Au@Fe2O3 core-shell particles supported on SiO2 that were highly active for CO oxidation. The authors studied the effect of the thickness of the oxide shell on the catalytic performance and found that the thicker the oxide layer the lower the catalytic activity since a thick shell block access to the Au@Fe2O3 interface.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text