Elsevier

Catalysis Today

Volume 216, 1 November 2013, Pages 76-81
Catalysis Today

Selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 over Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalyst at low temperatures

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.06.009Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Catalyst for the selective reduction of NOx with NH3 at low temperatures.

  • Mn-Ce mixed oxide prepared by the surfactant-template (ST) method is more active.

  • More reactive NH3 species formed on Mn-Ce catalyst prepared by the ST method.

  • NOx adsorption and activation was promoted on Mn-Ce catalyst prepared by the ST method.

Abstract

A series of Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalysts with different molar ratio of Mn/Ce were prepared by the surfactant-template (ST) method and conventional co-precipitation (CP) method for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia (NH3-SCR) at low temperatures. Catalyst preparation method exerts significant influence on the catalytic performance, and Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalyst prepared by ST method is more active than that prepared by CP method. The best Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalyst prepared by ST method yielded nearly 100% NOx conversion in the temperature range of 100–200 °C. Moreover, its resistance against H2O and SO2 is higher. The high surface area of Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalyst prepared by the ST method could contribute to the adsorption and activation of NH3 as well as NOx, thus promoting the NOx reduction to proceed.

Introduction

Nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2, and N2O), a major source for air pollution, can cause a variety of environmentally harmful effects such as photochemical smog, acid rain and ozone depletion [1], [2]. Selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 (NH3-SCR) has been widely used for the removal of NOx and the typical commercial catalyst for this process is V2O5-WO3(MoO3)/TiO2 [3], [4]. This type of catalysts are efficient at relatively high operating temperatures (300–400 °C), which makes it necessary to locate SCR unit upstream of the electrostatic precipitator. However, this renders these catalysts susceptible to deactivation from the high concentration of dust and SO2. Therefore, there is a great interest in developing a highly active catalyst for the low temperature SCR(<250 °C) that works downstream of the electrostatic precipitator and desulfurization, which could also lead to improved economics for the SCR process [5].

Great efforts have been made to develop the efficient low-temperature SCR catalyst and some transition metal-oxides and mixed-oxide catalysts are found to be active [6], [7], [8], [9]. Mn-containing catalysts, such as MnOx/TiO2 and MnOx, exhibited relatively high activity for the low temperature NH3-SCR [10], [11]. Cr-MnOx mixed-oxide catalyst is highly active in the range of 120–220 °C [8]. Fe0.5Mn0.5TiOx with the molar ratio of Fe/Mn = 1:1 also showed high activity, over which NOx was totally eliminated at 175 °C at GHSV = 50,000 h−1 [12]. Ce-based NH3-SCR catalyst has also attracted attention due to the high oxygen storage capacity and excellent redox property of CeO2. Shan et al. [13] reported that a novel Ce-W mixed oxide catalyst exhibited excellent NH3-SCR performance.

Recently, Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalyst has been studied and it appeared to be promising for the low temperature SCR process [14]. The catalyst previously reported was prepared by co-precipitation or citric acid method [14], [15]. It is well known that the catalytic performance of NH3-SCR catalyst depends strongly on the method of preparation [16], [17]. For example, a CeTiOx catalyst prepared by a homogenous precipitation method showed higher activity and a wider activity temperature window than CeO2/TiO2 prepared by a sol–gel method [18]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no investigation on the Mn-Ce mixed oxide prepared by the surfactant-template method is reported yet. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out the comparison of the activity and characterization of Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalyst prepared by the different methods. In the present study, we investigated the effect of preparation method on the catalytic performance of Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalyst in detail and found that the catalyst prepared by the surfactant-template method is more active. The effects of H2O and SO2 on the activity of Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalyst were also studied. On the basis of in situ DRIFTS experiments, the mechanistic cause of the higher performance of Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalyst was elucidated.

Section snippets

Surfactant-template method

A series of MnOx-CeO2 catalysts with different ratio of Mn/Ce were prepared by the surfactant-template method using hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide(CTAB) as the template. Appropriate amounts of 0.5 M cerium chloride, 0.5 M manganese chloride and CTAB (CTAB/(Mn + Ce) = 0.8) were mixed and stirred at room temperature for 15 min, then ammonia solution was added slowly to the above solution under vigorous stirring until pH is ca. 11. After stirring at room temperature for 2 h, the obtained suspension

Effect of preparation method

Fig. 1 showed the catalytic activities of MnCe catalysts prepared by the two different methods in the absence of H2O and SO2. It is evident that the catalyst preparation method exerts significant influence on the catalytic performance. For the MnCe(CP) catalyst, Mn1Ce9(CP) exhibited the lowest activity. Increasing the ratio of Mn/Ce results in the increase of the activity and the highest activity was obtained over Mn5Ce5(CP). In contrast, MnCe(ST) catalyst showed higher activity than MnCe (CP)

Conclusions

Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalysts prepared by the two different preparation methods have been evaluated for the reduction of NOx with NH3 at low temperatures. Nearly 100% de-NOx efficiency was obtained over the MnCe catalyst prepared by the surface template preparation method in the temperature range of 100–200 °C. Even in the co-presence of H2O and SO2, it still showed higher activity than that prepared by the co-precipitation method. The promoted activity of MnCe (ST) catalyst could be attributed to

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20907003, 21077009) and the National High-Tech Research and Development (863) Program of China (2010AA065003).

References (28)

  • Z. Liu et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2003)
  • G. Busca et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (1998)
  • B. Thirupathi et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2011)
  • X. Tang et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2010)
  • Z. Chen et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2010)
  • R. Jin et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2010)
  • M. Kang et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2007)
  • F. Liu et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2009)
  • G. Qi et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2004)
  • G. Qi et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2003)
  • W. Shan et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2012)
  • X. Gao et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2010)
  • Z. Liu et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2010)
  • H. Chen et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2001)
  • Cited by (268)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text