Development of mesoporous structure and high adsorption capacity of biomass-based activated carbon by phosphoric acid and zinc chloride activation
Introduction
Activated carbon is an extremely versatile material with a high surface area. Due to its excellent adsorption capability, it is widely used in industrial wastewater and gas treatment [1], [2]. The pore structure of activated carbon in conventional applications is mainly microporous. Recently, the potential use of activated carbon with a high proportion of mesoporous structures has attracted increasing attention because it possesses a high pore volume and a wide range of pore size. The mesoporous carbon materials are very suitable for use in large molecule adsorption, including battery capacitors, catalyst supports, biomedical engineering and adsorbents for bulky pollutants [3], [4], [5]. In the future, gasoline and diesel fuel for vehicles will probably be replaced for economy advantages. An important application of activated carbon is related to the gas storage for natural gas vehicles [6]. Moreover, researchers have paid significant attention to the use of carbon materials in hydrogen storage. Large pores are necessary for the fast mass transfer of adsorbate to the bulk of the carbon material [7]. Hence, the high surface area of activated carbon and its well-balanced micro/mesoporosity can provide an appropriate medium for energy storage. In particular, the CO2 sorption of activated carbon plays an important role in reducing carbon emissions [8].
Sugar cane and sunflower are two of the most commonly cultivated plants in the world. Sugar cane bagasse is the waste material produced by sugar factories after sugar juice extraction. Sunflower seed hull is produced by oil extraction plants that manufacture bio-oil products. The production of sugar cane in Brazil, which is the largest global producer, totaled 425 million tons for the 2006/2007 season [9]. China and India are the two largest sugar cane producers in Asia. Together, these countries produced 437 million tons of sugar cane in 2008 [10]. On the other hand, global sunflower production reached 27 million tons in 2007 [11]. These two crops are abundantly available. Sugar cane and sunflower are also very good candidates for bio-ethanol and bio-diesel, which are used as alternative fuels [12], [13]. The production of sugar cane and sunflower can be anticipated to increase significantly in the future. The observations above show that sugar, oil, and ethanol manufacturing processes produce a large amount of sugar cane bagasse and sunflower seed hull wastes each year. These wastes are usually burnt in the open or left in the field, and only a small portion is used as paper pulp or fuel. This creates disposal and pollution problems. The activated carbon obtained from these two agricultural wastes can provide useful, value-added products in the sugar factories, oil refineries, and related industries. Activated carbon for commercial utilization can be obtained by thermal treatment of low-cost and low ash content materials. Sugar cane bagasse just conforms to the rule for it is a low ash content and availability. In contrast, sunflower seed hull contains a high proportion of ash content. This study compares the two carbon products obtained from these two biomass sources.
Mesoporous activated carbon can be synthesized by many methods. Traditional methods use carbon precursors such as lignocellulosic materials, coals, and phenolic resins in the presence of transition metals, followed by a combination of carbonization and physical activation with stream or carbon dioxide, to obtain mesoporous activated carbon powder [14], [15], [16]. Shen et al. [17] used commercially activated carbon produced by steam activation with cerium oxide as a catalyst to prepare mesoporous carbon, and found that the catalyst restricted the formation of mesoporous structures at temperatures of 800–870 °C. Besides, some recent studies have developed mesoporous carbon with pores that can be controlled using mesoporous ceramic templates, such as SBA or MCM series [18], [19]. Compared to the above methods, ZnCl2 and H3PO4 are considered more effective and less expensive activating agents for producing mesoporous carbon [20], [21]. Hu and Srinivasan [22] produced mesoporous activated carbon using coconut shells and palm seeds as starting materials, with simultaneous activation by ZnCl2 and CO2. They found that at a low ZnCl2 concentration, the main pore characteristic is microporous; whereas at a high ZnCl2 concentration, the main pore characteristic is mesoporous. Kennedy et al. [23] studied the H3PO4 activation of rice husk through precarbonization and chemical activation. They found that pores created at a higher activation temperature were enlarged or widened, leading to the formation of mesoporosity. Generally, activated carbon has a mesopore volume and a mesopore surface area in the range of 0.1–0.5 cm3/g and 100–200 m2/g, respectively [22]. However, for advanced applications, carbon materials should possess not only a high surface area, but also a high mesopore content. In particular, treating sugar cane bagasse and sunflower seed hull with an adequate base-leaching procedure enlarges or widens the micropore structure of the resulting carbon during the activation process. This, in turn, increases the mesopore surface area and mesopore volume. After activation, the carbon precursor must be washed with water to remove the chemical activating agent. However, traditional water-washing cannot effectively remove all chemical residues, and may result in the reduction of pore volume. In this case, acid-washing procedure is an adequate alternative [24].
Previous studies have already reported the preparation of mesoporous activated carbon from lignocellulosic materials by physical or chemical activation. However, the mesopore surface area and mesopore volume of these materials are not high enough, and many of the proposed approaches are complicated or require expensive equipments. In addition, there is a lack of information in the literature about activated carbon prepared from sugar cane bagasse and sunflower seed hull using H3PO4 or ZnCl2 in a base-leaching or acid-washing process. This lack in existing literature is a motivation for the present study. The primary objective of this study is to compare activated carbon prepared from sugar cane bagasse and sunflower seed hull through chemical activation to produce a highly mesoporous activated carbon. The study investigates the effects of base-leaching, acid-washing, the impregnation ratio of activating agent, the kind of activating agent, and the carbonization temperature on the development of pore characteristics of activated carbon. Furthermore, the reactants and products are examined by several forms of analysis, including SEM, XRD, FTIR, ICP-MS, EA, TGA and a N2-adsorption analyzer. The method of activated carbon preparation proposed in this study is not complicated, and well suited to mass production. Simultaneously, it is an effective way to enhance the mesopore surface area and mesopore volume of activated carbon.
Section snippets
Materials
Sugar cane bagasse and sunflower seed hull were obtained from a sugar mill and a rural area, respectively. These two raw materials are respectively denoted as SCB and SSH hereafter. They were first washed thoroughly with distilled water to remove dust particles, and then dried at 100 °C, crushed, and sieved to obtain a uniform grain size approximately 10 mm long and 2 mm wide. ASTM standard test procedures were applied for ash content, volatile matter content and moisture content [25]. Fixed
Effect of base and acid treatment on activation
Table 2 shows the effects of thermal decomposition and acid-washing on the purity of samples. Beside P and Zn elements, the raw materials (S) for both SCB and SSH samples have the highest concentration of metallic ingredients, including Mg, Ca, Fe, Na, K, and Cu. The SSH sample has a higher impurities content than the SCB sample. These metal elements are clearly reduced when samples are activated (SBAW or SBAH). It may be possible that the metals are carried by the vaporization of organic
Conclusions
Using sugar cane bagasse and sunflower seed hull as raw materials, this study reports the preparation of activated carbon with a highly mesoporous surface area. Both H3PO4 and ZnCl2 serve as chemical activating agents. The starting raw materials, before and after treatment processes, and conditions employed for carbon synthesis, strongly affect the final pore structure and the adsorption behavior of the resulting carbon. The proposed base-leaching procedure can effectively enhance the surface
Acknowledgement
The author expresses thanks to the National Science Council of Taiwan for its financial support under Project No. NSC 94-2214 – E131 – 003.
References (55)
- et al.
Adsorption of polluting substances on activated carbons prepared from rice husk and sugarcane bagasse
Chem. Eng. J.
(2008) - et al.
Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production—a review
Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.
(2007) - et al.
Preparation and characterization of bamboo-based activated carbons as electrode materials for electric double layer capacitors
Carbon
(2006) - et al.
Preparation of Pd supported mesoporous activated carbons and their catalytic activity
Mater. Chem. Phys.
(2009) - et al.
Processing and characterization of activated carbon coated magnetic particles for biomedical applications
Mater. Sci. Eng. C: Bio. Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Preparation of granular activated carbons for adsorption of natural gas
Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.
(2008) - et al.
Electrochemical energy storage in ordered porous carbon materials
Carbon
(2005) - et al.
Adsorption of carbon dioxide on activated carbon
J. Nature Gas Chem.
(2006) - et al.
The future of sugar cane in China and India—supply constraints and expansion potential
Appl. Energy
(2009) - et al.
Optimisation of mild-acidic protein extraction from defatted sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) meal
Food Hydrocolloids
(2009)
Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel
Appl. Energy
Optimisation of biodiesel production by sunflower oil transesterification
Bioresour. Technol.
Mesoporous activated carbons from phenolic resins
Chem. Eng. Res. Des.
Adsorption characteristics of Congo red on coal-based mesoporous activated carbon
Dyes Pigment
Preparation of Pd supported mesoporous activated carbons and their catalytic activity
Mater. Chem. Phys.
Preparation of mesoporous carbon from commercial activated carbon with steam activation in the presence of cerium oxide
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
Functionalization of ordered mesoporous carbons synthesized with SBA-15 silica as template
Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.
Synthesis of mesoporous carbon supports via liquid impregnation of polystyrene onto a MCM-48 silica template
Carbon
Preparation and characterization of highly mesoporous spherical activated carbons from divinylbenzene-derived polymer by ZnCl2 activation
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
Adsorption of Zn(II) in aqueous solution by activated carbons prepared from evergreen oak (Quercus rotundifolia L.)
J. Hazard. Mater.
Mesoporous high-surface-area activated carbon
Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.
Adsorption of phenol from aqueous solutions using mesoporous carbon prepared by two-stage process
Chem. Eng. J.
Preparation of activated carbons from Spanish anthracite. I. Activation by KOH
Carbon
Preparation of high-surface area activated carbons from Paulownia wood by ZnCl2 activation
Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.
Fundamentals of the theory of adsorption in micropores of carbon adsorbents: characteristics of their adsorption properties and microporous structures
Carbon
Preparation and characteristics of rice-straw-based porous carbons with high adsorption capacity
Fuel
Kinetics study of thermal decomposition of electronic packaging material
Chem. Eng. J.
Cited by (446)
Pore-making strategy of bagasse-based heteroatom-doped porous carbon in chromium adsorbents
2024, Diamond and Related MaterialsRevolutionizing conventional adsorbents: Strengthening dimethyl phthalate adsorption through N/P co-doping macroscopic robust porous carbon
2024, Journal of Cleaner Production