A cellular automata approach to chemical reactions; 1 Reaction controlled systems
Introduction
Chemical reactions are studied since centuries. Reactions can be described based either on concentration or on particle geometry. Levenspiel [1], [2] and Szekely et al. [3], besides others, describe the progression of chemical reactions based on the particle geometry. From the described reactions, the chemical reaction controlled shrinking core model is the most simple reaction [2]. This reaction is relevant for particles and used for instance to describe the burning of carbon in air. The reaction kinetics are usually analyzed using numerical and analytical models. Besides these models also other methods have become available such as cellular automata (CA).
Cellular automata are already commonly used for the modeling of chemical systems [4], [5]. Cellular automata systems are among others applied for studying biology, cement reaction, population growth, computability theory, mathematics, physics, complexity science, theoretical biology and microstructure modeling. Kier et al. [6] uses cellular automata to describe the percolation within chemical systems. Furthermore Kier and co-authors described a broad range of chemical systems and processes in which the cellular automata approach can be applied, ranging from aqueous systems (water), dissociation of organic acid in solutions and bond interactions [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Berryman and Franceschetti [15] described the simulation of diffusion controlled reaction kinetics using cellular automata. Kier and Cheng [13] gave a cellular automata model for dissolution. Goetz and Seetharaman [16] used cellular automata to describe the static recrystallization kinetics with homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation. Liu et al. [17] and Raghavan and Sahay [18], [19] simulated grain growth using cellular automata. Dab et al. [20] used a cellular-automaton for reactive systems containing particles. Zahedi Sohi and Khoshandam [21] used 2D cellular automata to describe non-catalytic gas–solid reactions of pellets consisting out of agglomerated grains with diffusion through a porous product layer and reaction on the surface of grains. In their work the cells were the grains and the conversion per cell was considered. This paper considers spheres in 3D which consists of several cells, being either product, reactant or void. Kier and Seybold and their co-authors [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27] did research to the application of cellular automaton systems to describe chemical reactions. Their work describes first and second order reactions as well thermodynamically controlled reactions [26] and is closely related to our work. Their research on first and second order reactions is based on the concentration of the reactant, while in this research the shape is taking in account as well as the specific surface of the dissolving particle. Hence, this article considers the reaction as surface-based rather than volume-based.
A rigorous link between the (mathematical) chemical reaction models, like chemical reaction (shrinking core) model and the cellular automata approach to study the dissolution of particle has, to the authors’ knowledge, not been achieved yet.
Section snippets
Chemical reaction kinetics
Within the chemical reaction kinetics literature, two main reaction model families are distinguished the progressive-conversion model (PCM) and the shrinking unreacted core model (SCM). Within the progressive-conversion model (sometimes referred to as the zone reaction model [28]), the solid reactant is converted continuously and progressively throughout the particle, while within the shrinking core model, the reactions take place on the outer skin of the particle and the zone of reaction is
Cellular automata
Cellular automata (CA) were first proposed by Ulam [34], [35] and Von Neumann [36], based on ideas of Zuse [25]. The first full comprehensive description of cellular automata was made by Wolfram [37]. Cellular automata are ‘simple mathematical idealizations of natural systems. They consist of a lattice of discrete identical sites, each site taking on a finite set of integer values. The values of the sites evolve in discrete time steps according to deterministic rules that specify the value of
Simulation results
Using simulations, the cycle in a certain α is reached has been determined for a dissolution probability (P0) of 0.003–0.09 with steps of 0.003 and d = 7, 13, 21, 25 and 35. Analysis of the simulation data shows that the reaction rate depends on the available surface area of the reactant. Based on the description in the previous section, the chemical reaction controlled (CRC) model is most appropriate to describe a chemical system without precipitation of reaction products and the existence of a
Coupling cellular automata and reaction kinetics
Since the resemblance between the reaction curves obtained from the CEMHYD3D and the reaction controlled curves as, in this section a correlation between simulations and theoretical model is researched. Therefore a linear regression between cycle number (C-2) and (1 − (1 − α)1/3) is tested, since according to the chemical reaction controlled model a linear relation between time and (1 − (1 − α)1/3) exists and linear relation between cycle and time is assumed here. The relation with C-2 rather with C is
Conclusions
In this paper, the relation between the theoretical shrinking core reaction kinetic equations, as presented by Levenspiel [1], [2], Szekely et al. [3] and others, and a cellular automata reaction approach has been investigated. As cellular automata tool CEMHYD3D was employed. In order to derive this relation a major improvement/modification was introduced. This modification introduced the preference of the system to dissolve voxels on the outside of the particles rather than the middle of the
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to the European Commission (I-SSB Project, Proposal No. 026661-2) and the following sponsors of the research group: Bouwdienst Rijkswaterstaat, Graniet-Import Benelux, Kijlstra Betonmortel, Struyk Verwo, Attero, Enci, Provincie Overijssel, Rijkswaterstaat Directie Zeeland, A&G Maasvlakte, BTE, Alvon Bouwsystemen, V.d. Bosch Beton, Selor, Twee “R” Recyling, GMB, Schenk Concrete Consultancy, Geochem Research, Icopal, BN International, APP All
References (45)
- et al.
Simulation of normal grain growth by cellular automata
Scripta Mater.
(1996) - et al.
Modeling the topological features during grain growth by cellular automaton
Comput. Mater. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
Modeling the grain growth kinetics by cellular automaton
Mater. Sci. Eng.: A
(2007) - et al.
Cellular automata modeling of non-catalytic gas–solid reactions
Chem. Eng. J.
(2012) - et al.
Comparison of zone-reaction model and unreacted-core shrinking model in solid—gas reactions—I isothermal analysis
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1971) - et al.
A model for the film growth in samples with two moving reaction frontiers—an application and extension of the unreacted-core model
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(2000) - et al.
Comparison of zone-reaction model and unreacted-core shrinking model in solid—gas reactions—II non-isothermal analysis
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1971) - et al.
Fluidized-solids reactors with continuous solids feed—I: Residence time of particles in fluidized beds
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1961) - et al.
Fluidized-solids reactors with continuous solids feed—II: Conversion for overflow and carryover particles
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1961) - et al.
Fluidized-solids reactors with continuous solids feed—III: Conversion in experimental fluidized-solids reactors
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1961)
Preface
Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom.
Chemical Reaction Engineering
The Chemical Reactor Omnibook +
Gas-Solid Reactions
Cellular Automata Modeling of Physical Systems
Cellular Automata Modeling of Chemical Systems: A Textbook and Laboratory Manual
A cellular automata model of the percolation process
J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
A cellular automata model of bond interactions among molecules
J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
A cellular automata model of acid dissociation
J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
A cellular automata model of oil–water partitioning
J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
A cellular automata model of water structuring by a chiral solute
J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
A cellular automata model of water
J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
Cited by (14)
Development of a cellular mixing model for competitive-consecutive reactions
2023, Chemical Engineering ScienceA numerical investigation on the hydrogen reduction of wüstite using a 2D mesoscale method
2022, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyCitation Excerpt :Therefore, the computational efficiency and accuracy of the simulation of gas-solid heterogeneous reactions are not only related to the complexity of the problem under study, but also to the solving algorithms. Mesoscopic kinetic models, such as cellular automata (CA) [31,32], lattice gas cellular automata (LGCA) [33,34], and the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) [35,36] have also received attention for solving gas-solid heterogeneous reaction. Instead of establishing and solving strict theoretical equations, these mesoscale models simulate complex phenomena in macroscopic systems through evolutions according to a series of rules, which have the advantages of good numerical stability, easy handling of boundary conditions, and parallel operations.
Kinetics and associated microstructure for reactive phase formation
2022, Acta MaterialiaFuzzy reliability analysis using cellular automata for network systems
2016, Information SciencesCitation Excerpt :their works provided a formal framework for analyzing complex network. After that, CA was developed from perspective and used in different field such as chemical processing [14], pattern recognition [24], urban growth modeling [11], and computer network simulation [42]. Without exception, those proposed methods posses three key properties of CA in their operational process [21]:
Multi-cycle and multi-scale cellular automata for hydration simulation (of Portland-cement)
2016, Computational Materials ScienceCitation Excerpt :The extended cement hydration model (version B) including Eq. (13) is used in this section. The new (dissolution) routine, which was introduced in De Korte and Brouwers [25,32], has been incorporated in this (extended) version B of CEMHYD3D. The main difference between the original and the new (dissolution) routine is that the new routine tries to maintain the spherical shape of the particles and therefore its dissolution behaviour is closer to the shrinking core theory, since the creation of additional reactive surface, due to the discrete manner of cellular automata, is partially prohibited.
Interacting fronts in a prototypical, two-dimensional model of entropy-stabilized reactive phase formation
2023, Journal of Applied Physics