Elsevier

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volume 256, 15 November 2014, Pages 324-334
Chemical Engineering Journal

Investigation of batch electrodialysis process for removal of lead ions from aqueous solutions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.094Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Separation of Pb(II) ions by batch electrodialysis.

  • Effect of operating parameters on Pb(II) separation by electrodialysis.

  • Very good separation and energy performances under optimal conditions selected.

  • Effective removal of lead ions and obtaining of non-toxic diluate.

  • High concentration of metal in concentrate suitable for further recovery.

Abstract

Lead is a highly polluting and toxic heavy metal, whose removal from wastewater is an important problem in specific industries. The present paper reports the feasibility of removal and concentration of Pb(II) ions from model aqueous solutions in a batch electrodialysis system, in order to comply with toxicity limit and with the regulations limit for discharging the wastewaters. For process optimization, the effects of applied potential, flow rate, temperature and initial metal concentration in feed on the separation performance, and also on the current efficiency (CE) and energy consumption (EC) were investigated. It was observed that the increasing of applied voltage, flow rate and process temperature decrease the duration of the ED process, but also decrease the cell performance in terms of CE and EC. Increasing feed concentration increases the CE to a maximum value for feed containing 500 mg Pb/L, and further decreases it. The optimum operating conditions selected are: applied potential of 10 V, flow rate and temperature of 70 L/h and 25 °C, respectively, and feed solutions containing 500–1000 mg Pb/L. Under these selected conditions very low final concentrations of diluate (1–2 mg Pb/L) are obtained, the metal is concentrated 5-fold in the concentrate compartment, and at the same time the CE is very high. The batch ED process investigated proved to be able to perform an effective removal of lead ions under advantageous energy-efficiency conditions, also leading to non-toxic wastewaters having metal concentrations very close to the limit suitable for discharges into the environment. The concentrate solution resulted after ED is adequate for further metal recovery.

Introduction

A wide range of wastewaters containing heavy metals is generated by various industrial activities which can cause critical environmental problems as heavy metals are extremely toxic, non-biodegradable and tend to accumulate in living organisms. Among them, lead is a highly toxic metal that can cause neurological disorders, elevated body blood pressure, anaemia and gastrointestinal diseases when present in the human body. Such effects were observed even at very small lead concentrations of only 0.01–5.0 mg/L [1]. Lead contamination originates from discharging of untreated wastewaters from electroplating, printing pigments, textile and fuel industry, mining, battery manufacturing, explosives manufacturing, automotive and building construction. The industrial wastewaters are generally acidic (pH = 1.5–6) and therefore contain soluble Pb2+ in a wide concentration range which has significant variations in types and also on specific sources [2]; thus, some examples of typical lead concentrations in polluted industrial waters are: metal finishing industry (0.02–42 mg Pb/L) [2], mining (15 mg Pb/L) [3], [5], landfill leachates (2–5 mg Pb/L) [4], plating industry (20–140 mg Pb/L) [5], various metal production by smelting and refining (0.02–53 mg Pb/L) and battery industry (7–2000 mg Pb/L) [2]. Therefore, the treatment of wastewaters for removal of heavy metals before discharging them is a problem of critical importance [1], [6]. According to the USEPA environmental regulations, the toxicity threshold level is 5.0 mg Pb/L in wastewaters [3], and the maximum acceptable concentration of lead for the discharging of wastewaters in the surface waters stipulated by the Czech regulations is 0.5 mg Pb/L [7].

The conventional methods developed for the removal of Pb(II) ions from wastewaters include solvent extraction [8], chemical precipitation [9], ion exchange [10] and adsorption on solid sorbents [11], [12], [13], [14]. Some limitations and disadvantages of those methods are the high capital and regeneration costs, long operation time and the fact that they can be considered as polluting methods themselves due to the use of chemical additives. Membrane-based processes are non-polluting separation techniques that compete with the above mentioned methods for the removal of heavy metals; liquid membranes [15], [16], [17], [18], pressure driven membrane processes like reverse osmosis (RO) [19] and nanofiltration (NF) [4], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24] proved that they can be used for obtaining highly purified effluents, being at the same time faster and cheaper than conventional separation techniques. However, in NF and RO the concentration polarization and the osmotic pressure make difficult the achievement of a high level of concentration of the metal in the retentate.

Electrodialysis (ED) is an electromembrane technique that has some important advantages like selective desalination, low use of other chemicals and high water recovery. ED is based on the transport of ions through ion-exchange membranes under the influence of an electrical potential difference as the driving force. The basic principles of ED are reviewed in the literature [25], [26]. The solution to be treated is circulated through an ED stack, which consists of a series of alternating parallel anion exchange membranes (AEM) and cation exchange membranes (CEM) which are fixed between two electrodes, the anode and the cathode. Under an electrical potential difference between the electrodes, the cations move towards the cathode and the anions migrate to the anode by permeating the oppositely charged membranes and being retained by the ion-exchange membranes with the same charge. In this way, the ions are depleted in one compartment (diluate compartment) and concentrated in the adjacent compartment (concentrate compartment). Thus, the feed stream entering the ED stack (wastewater to be treated) is separated into a concentrate stream (referred as concentrate) and a dilute stream (referred as diluate). An individual ED cell (a repeating unit from the ED stack) consists of an anion- and a cation exchange membrane, a diluate and a concentrate compartment. ED has proven high performance in a wide area of applications like sea/brackish/ground water and brine desalination [27], [28], [29], [30], energy generation [31], desalting of whey [32] and treatment of the pressure-driven membrane concentrates [33]. Furthermore, the suitability of ED for removal of various polluting heavy metals (copper, chromium, lead, zinc, nickel, silver) has been supported by a number of studies [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]. The ED processes can be operated in continuous mode (one pass flow), feed and bleed mode (partial recirculation) and in batch mode [25], [26], [43]. As in the continuous ED processes the wastewater is passing through the membrane stack/cell once, the metal removal and concentration, and also the current efficiency (CE) that can be achieved are not very high [25]. Therefore, continuous ED is used in large systems that contain several ED stacks in series, and thus separation is more efficient; at the same time, such big units have disadvantages like pressure loss in the stacks and high costs for pumping, maintenance and membranes [25], [43]. The batch ED is an alternative of the continuous process, and it is used in industry in order to achieve a high degree of desalination and concentration and thus to meet the required end product qualities [25]; also, batch ED is the usual operation mode of small and middle ED plants in the isolated area where the supply of water and electricity is difficult and costly [27]. Some of such applications of batch ED are: demineralization of whey [44], removal of nitrate [45], seawater desalination in an island [46] or in a tank [47], wastewater treatment [48], desalination of brackish groundwater [49]. Batch ED processes are attractive in such of applications due to the fact that the maintenance of the unit (membrane cleaning, replacing of severely fouled or damaged membranes and electrodes) can be realized between batch operations [50]. Besides the industrial applications, batch ED is a very useful tool for simulating the pilot and industrial scale operations and for fast optimization of their operating parameters [51], [52]. In this respect, investigations about batch ED processes performed in laboratory units like removal of heavy metals (chromium, silver) [34], [41], sea/brackish/ground water and brine desalination [27], [28], [29], [30], desalination of whey [32] or sodium sulfate removal [53], treatment of RO concentrates [51], [52] were also published in the literature. If these batch process investigations are carried out under operating conditions close to those in the real applications, i.e. laboratory units with ED stacks similar to those in the pilot/industrial units, the same membranes and thickness of the spacer like in the pilot/industrial units and similar flow rates, the results obtained can be used for upscaling the processes [51], [52].

To our knowledge, up to now the studies devoted to Pb(II) removal by ED have investigated the continuous ED processes in a single laboratory ED cell [35], [38], [39], [42] or using an ED unit containing 110 cells [36], [37]. These investigations were carried out in conditions which are not close to those in the real ED units, i.e. a unique small cell with thick compartments (3–4 mm), without spacers, and using very low flow rates of 0.07–1.2 mL/s [35], [38], [39], [42]; other investigations were performed in an ED unit equipped with 2 stacks of 55 cells each, but using very low flow rates in the range of 2–10 L/h [36], [37]. These studies were not achieving a very low concentration in diluate, reported low CE values [36], [38] or no information about this key parameter [35], [37], [42], and are also lacking in information about EC of the processes investigated [35], [37], [38], [39], [42].

Considering the highly toxic potential of Pb(II) [1], and also the interest in its recovery for further industrial reuse, studies involving lead separation in order to obtain non-toxic diluate and concentrate solution with high lead content, and being also performed under conditions approaching those used in the pilot/industrial units can be of interest.

In this work, the feasibility of a batch ED process using Ralex CM-PES and Ralex AM-PES heterogeneous ion exchange membranes for the removal and concentration of lead ions from model wastewaters is thoroughly investigated. The influence of various process conditions (applied voltage, flow rate of the diluate and concentrate solutions, temperature and initial metal concentration in the feed) is studied by using an ED unit designed for simulating the industrial conditions. Besides the higher separation performance that can be achieved by using batch ED, the efficiency and therefore the applicability of the ED processes are evaluated by calculating key parameters, such as CE and EC; these reflect both the separation performance and also the degree of current utilization for the ED separation, which finally determine the cost of the ED process. Thus, as the bulk of the operating costs in ED is related to the energy consumption during the ED desalination [50], the aim of the present work is to optimize the batch ED process investigated from the point of view of CE and EC, concomitantly with achieving a very high separation of Pb(II) ions leading to the generation of a non-toxic diluate and a highly concentrated solution in the concentrate compartment suitable for further recovery of the metal.

Section snippets

Chemicals, membranes and analysis methods

All chemicals used are of analytical reagent grade or the highest purity available, and were used as received. Pb(NO3)2, NaNO3 and HNO3 were supplied by Penta Co., Czech Republic. The aqueous solutions were prepared by dissolving the reagents in highly demineralised water (conductivity <1 μS/cm, pH 6.0 ± 0.1). The membranes used were Ralex CM-PES cation exchange membranes and Ralex AM-PES anion exchange membranes, all manufactured by Mega a.s. (Stráž pod Ralskem, Czech Republic). Ralex CM-PES and

Results and discussion

The performance of ion exchange membranes investigated under various process conditions is studied here with the aim to optimize the process by selecting the most convenient operating parameters. Under these optimal conditions, the desalinated model wastewater should be non-toxic or even suitable for discharging in the environment [3], [7], the desalination process being characterized also by high current efficiency (CE) and low energy consumption (EC). The objective parameters whose effects

Conclusions

In the present study, batch ED was studied for the removal of highly polluting and toxic Pb(II) ions from aqueous wastewaters using Ralex CM-PES and Ralex AM-PES heterogeneous ion exchange membranes. The effect of operating parameters on the performance of the ED process was investigated. The optimum operating conditions for the ED desalination were thus selected by considering the following criteria: (i) achievement of high removal of Pb(II) ions in order to obtain non-toxic wastewaters or

Acknowledgements

Cristina-Veronica Gherasim gratefully acknowledges the financial support for the research of the The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, Project CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0021 “Strengthening of Research and Development Teams at the University of Pardubice”. The work was also supported by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic within the framework of the project “Special membrane for the development and intensification of electromembrane technologies” program

References (56)

  • C.V. Gherasim et al.

    Influence of operating variables on the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by nanofiltration

    Desalination

    (2014)
  • S.M.C. Ritchie et al.

    Membrane based hybrid processes for high water recovery and selective inorganic pollutant separation

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2002)
  • J.M. Ortiz et al.

    Brackish water desalination by electrodialysis: batch recirculation operation modeling

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2005)
  • L.J. Banasiak et al.

    Desalination using electrodialysis as a function of voltage and salt concentration

    Desalination

    (2007)
  • M. Sadrzadeh et al.

    Treatment of seawater using electrodialysis: current efficiency evaluation

    Desalination

    (2009)
  • M. Turek et al.

    Renewable energy by reverse electrodialysis

    Desalination

    (2007)
  • M. Greiter et al.

    Desalination of whey by electrodialysis and ion exchange resins: analysis of both processes with regard to sustainability by calculating their cumulative energy demand

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2002)
  • I. Frenzel et al.

    Chromic aid recovery by electro-electrodialysis I. Evaluation of anion-exchange membrane

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2005)
  • M. Sadrzadeh et al.

    Separation of different ions from wastewater at various operating conditions using electrodialysis

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2007)
  • A. Abou-Shady et al.

    Effect of pH on separation of Pb(II) and NO3 from aqueous solutions using electrodialysis

    Desalination

    (2012)
  • A. Abou-Shady et al.

    Recovery of Pb(II) and removal of NO3 from aqueous solutions using integrated electrodialysis, electrolysis, and adsorption process

    Desalination

    (2012)
  • M. Sadrzadeh et al.

    Neural network modeling of Pb2+ removal from wastewater using electrodialysis

    Chem. Eng. Process.

    (2009)
  • M. Sadrzadeh et al.

    Separation of lead ions from wastewaters using electrodialysis: comparing mathematical and neural network modeling

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2008)
  • K. Dermentzis

    Removal of nickel from electroplating rinse waters using electrostatic shielding electrodialysis/electrodeionization

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2010)
  • A. Güvenç et al.

    Use of electrodialysis to remove silver ions from model solutions and wastewater

    Desalination

    (2005)
  • T. Mohammadi et al.

    Effect of operating parameters on Pb2+ separation from wastewater using electrodialysis

    Desalination

    (2004)
  • F. Hell et al.

    Experience with full-scale electrodialysis for nitrate and hardness removal

    Desalination

    (1998)
  • O. Kuroda et al.

    An electrodialysis sea water desalination system powered by photovoltaic cells

    Desalination

    (1987)
  • Cited by (145)

    • Tourmaline for heavy metals removal in wastewater treatment: A review

      2024, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text