Elsevier

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volume 325, 1 October 2017, Pages 289-299
Chemical Engineering Journal

Treatment of highly acidic wastewater containing high energetic compounds using dimensionally stable anode

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.061Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Electrochemical oxidative treatment of highly acidic wastewater by Ti/RuO2 electrode.

  • Characterization of wastewater.

  • Study of effect of parameters such as initial pH, current density, H2O2 dose and time.

  • Identification of intermediates and mineralization products by GC/MS and other techniques.

  • Degradation mechanism, kinetic modeling and cost analysis.

Abstract

Highly acidic (pH < 2) wastewaters have toxic and carcinogenic properties and can’t be treated by conventional biological treatment methods. In the work presented, investigation of the treatment of very low pH, actual wastewater containing highly energetic materials was carried out using electro-oxidation method using a dimensionally stable anode (DSA) namely ruthenium oxide coated titanium (Ti/RuO2). Chemical oxygen demand (COD), current efficiency (CE) and specific energy consumption (SEC) were measured under various process conditions of current density (J) and time (t). Maximum COD removal efficiency of 41.83% was observed at J = 750 A/m2, t = 150 min, and initial pH = 0.4 ± 0.1 with SEC = 1.23 kWh/kg COD. In the next phase, the addition of hydrogen peroxide (30% w/w) (H2O2) was done and COD degradation was evaluated by varying the dosage of H2O2. Maximum COD removal efficiencies of 48.83% was observed at J = 750 A/m2, t = 150 min, pHo = 0.3. This method produced very low or no amount of sludge and scum. The mechanistic study has been performed by carrying out scavenger study using terephthalic acid. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC/MS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and ion chromatography of the wastewater; and X-ray diffraction and Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE/SEM) of electrodes were carried out for understanding the treatment mechanism. Operating cost analysis has been done based on the studies performed in laboratory scale EC reactor, and compared with those reported for other pollutant degradation.

Introduction

A number of industries such as ammunition industries/labs, pharmaceutical industries, mining sites, steel industry, electroplating and phosphorous industries discharge highly acidic effluents. This highly acidic wastewater causes severe environmental problems as it is highly toxic and carcinogenic. The low pH effluent engenders several problems in the effluent treatment as well as in the water body in which it is discharged. The low pH causes the heavy metal and other contaminants to dissolve, which otherwise bond with negative hydroxide ion to form dense, insoluble, metal hydroxides which are removed easily by filtering or settling. Due to this, the treatment of effluent becomes more tedious. It also affects the aquatic life adversely as such low pH doesn’t allow aquatic life to sustain. Also, highly acidic medium breaks organic matter and kills any microbial growth which may help to treat the water naturally.

Many chemical industries, in particular, those manufacturing high energetic materials discharge wastewater with low pH due to the presence of high amount of nitric acid. The effluents generally have very low BOD to COD ratio which basically indicates their poor biodegradability. The wastewater can be of various varieties but some common constituents are nitro-aromatic compounds like hexamethylene, other nitrate and nitrites, waste acid like sulphuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric Acid, etc. Other constituents may include hardness, sulphates, ammonia, fluorides, phosphates, silica, metals (Al, Fe, Mn, etc.), etc.

Conventional treatment methodology involving physio-chemical and biological pathways are generally rendered ineffective for such kind of wastewaters. Treatment methodologies reported in the literature to treat the acidic wastewater include chemical addition, advanced oxidation processes (AOP) [1], catalytic peroxidation [2], Fenton method [3], electrochemical oxidation [4], [5], electro-Fenton method [6], sono-chemical [7] and photochemical processes [7]. The basic mechanism seen in these processes include degradation of pollutant by utilizing electrons as a vector. Electrochemical oxidation treatment methodology has direct or indirect treatment pathways. During direct type, the pollutant is degraded directly upon adsorption on the electrode surface, whereas, in indirect type, the oxidant (radical dotOH, radical dotOOH, radical dotOCl, etc.) is produced in the bulk of wastewater which further degrades pollutant in the wastewater [8], [9], [10]. Electrode characteristics like electrode morphology, dimensional stability, oxygen evolution, etc. impact majorly on the efficiency of the process.

Electrodes used in electrochemical wastewater treatment are classified majorly as: sacrificial electrodes and dimensionally stable anode (DSA) electrodes. Sacrificial electrodes like aluminium or stainless steel are cheap and easily available; however, these electrodes easily get consumed in the electrochemical cell, in turn, producing sludge which act as secondary pollutant and require further handling. On the other hand, DSA type electrodes are highly stable and resistant electrodes and don’t create any secondary pollutant, however, they are costlier. A number of DSA electrodes such as titanium and tantalum coated with RuO2 [11], [12], IrO2 [12], SnO2 [13], PbO2, boron-doped diamond (BDD) [14], Pt/Ti [15], Ti/Pt and Ti/Pt/Ir [16], TiO2-NTs/SnO2-Sb [17], TiO2-NTs/Sb–SnO2/PbO2 [18], RuO2/IrO2/TiO2 [19], etc. have been used by various researchers for the treatment of diverse wastewaters [20]. Ti/RuO2 is one of the highly stable electrodes which works efficiently under highly acidic conditions. It has high reusability and can be used for large number of experimental runs [21]. Being an active DSA, it provides its adsorption sites for radicals to get absorbed and degrade the pollutant over its surface area [22]. It also favours (Clradical dot) and oxychloro (Oradical dotCl) radicals generation which also facilitates in degradation of pollutant both at anode as well as bulk of system [5], [23], [24].

Scavengers of HOradical dot, for example, Cl, Br, SO42−, carbonates, organic matter, etc. majorly affect the pollutant degradation efficiency of the overall process in more than one way [25], [26]. Chen et al. [17] studied the degradation of highly acidic explosive wastewater by applying electro-catalytic technique coupled with anoxic–oxic biodegradation using TiO2-NTs/SnO2-Sb. Degradation of water contaminated with RDX (hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine) and HMX (octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine) along with other nitrates using Fenton process was practiced by Tanvanit et al. [27] and Zoh and Stenstrom [28]. Rodgers and Bunce [29] also reviewed for variety of techniques been applied to degrade water contaminated with nitroaromatic explosives, for example, TNT (2,4,6-trinitrotoluene), DNB (dinitrobenzene), DNT (dinitrotoluene), TNB (1,3,5-trinitrobenzenene), picric acid (2,4,6-trinitrophenol) and tetryl (methyl-N,2,4,6-tetranitroaniline). These all works reported, prove that all these technologies are well able to reduce the strong acidic, carcinogenic and toxic behavior of such wastewaters. However, it may be noted that no studies have been reported on treatment of such high acidic and toxicity wastewater.

The present study is based on the electrochemical treatment of actual highly acidic wastewater from a nearby industry using an electro-oxidation method using a DSA electrode namely ruthenium oxide coated titanium (Ti/RuO2). The wastewater was highly acidic with extremely high COD. The overall process was optimized over various parameters like current density (A/m2), electrode gap and H2O2 dosage. Moreover, COD degradation, specific energy consumption, and operating cost were calculated for the overall treatment process. Also, the characterization of wastewater was done using various methods including gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS), ion chromatography (IC), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Also, the morphology of the electrode was studied using field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD).

Section snippets

Materials

All chemicals used for the experiment were of analytical grade. MilliQ water was used for preparing different solutions required for the study at room temperature. Ti/RuO2 electrodes used for electrochemical treatment were procured from Titanium Tantalum Products Limited, Gowriwakam, Chennai, India. Tributyl phosphate, used as an extractant for GC/MS study, was purchased from Hi-Media laboratories, limited. The physical and chemical characteristics of wastewater are presented in Table 1.

Experimental setup

Characterization of wastewater

In order to characterize the wastewater, various analysis like GC/MS, IC and FTIR was used. Fig. 2a shows the FTIR spectra of the wastewater obtained, which can provide some evidence of the functional groups present in the wastewater. The presence of stretch extending from 3750 to 2475 cm−1 is due to Osingle bondH group and vibrations due to intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonding. The stretch, indicating the presence of alcohols (free or H-bonded) and carboxylic acids, is due to free as well as

Conclusions

In the present study, electrochemical (EC) degradation of wastewater by titanium coated with ruthenium oxide (Ti/RuO2) was studied. On the basis of results and discussion presented, some major conclusions were drawn. The optimum condition for the EC treatment by Ti/RuO2 was found to be: current density  750 A/m2, treatment time  150 min, temperature = 50 °C and electrode gap  1 cm. At the optimum condition, COD removal efficiencies without and with the use of H2O2 (  323.43 mM) was found to be: ≈41.83%

References (44)

  • R. Yuan et al.

    Effects of chloride ion on degradation of Acid Orange 7 by sulfate radical-based advanced oxidation process: Implications for formation of chlorinated aromatic compounds

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2011)
  • K. Zoh et al.

    Fenton oxidation of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) and octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX)

    Water Res.

    (2002)
  • J.D. Rodgers et al.

    Treatment methods for the remediation of nitroaromatic explosives

    Water Res.

    (2001)
  • S. Sadaf et al.

    Batch and fixed bed column studies for the removal of indosol yellow BG dye by peanut husk

    J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.

    (2014)
  • V. Singh et al.

    Poly(methylmethacrylate) grafted chitosan: An efficient adsorbent for anionic azo dyes

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2009)
  • Y. Yuan et al.

    Combined Fe0/air and Fenton process for the treatment of dinitrodiazophenol (DDNP) industry wastewater

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    Treatment of high explosive production wastewater containing RDX by combined electrocatalytic reaction and anoxic-oxic biodegradation

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2011)
  • Y. Yang et al.

    Facile synthesis and photocatalytic properties of AgAgClTiO2/rectorite composite

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2012)
  • B. Yadav et al.

    Catalytic peroxidation of recalcitrant quinoline by ceria impregnated granular activated carbon

    Clean Technol. Environ. Policy.

    (2016)
  • E.V. dos Santos et al.

    Scale-up of electrochemical oxidation system for treatment of produced water generated by Brazilian petrochemical industry

    Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.

    (2014)
  • F. Xu, D. Bai, J. Mei, D. Wu, Z. Gao, K. Jiang, B. Liu, Enhanced photoelectrochemical performance with in-situ Au...
  • J.M. Poyatos et al.

    Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: state of the art

    Water. Air. Soil Pollut.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (64)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text