Geopolymeric materials prepared using Class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing
Introduction
First scientific studies of geopolymeric materials indicated a certain potential for these materials to become cement for the future [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Davidovits [5], [6], [7] first used the term “geopolymers” in describing synthetic minerals similar to those that form in the Earth's crust. Geopolymers belong to the same silicoaluminates family as zeolites but have a significant difference from them: they are essentially amorphous polymers. Their properties are also different: they possess high strength, thermal stability, high surface smoothness and precision, and high surface hardness. [6], [7]. These mineral polymers with empirical formula: Mn[–(SiO2)z–AlO2]n·wH2O, where z is 1, 2 or 3; M is an alkali cation, such as potassium or sodium, and n is the degree of polymerisation, were called polysialates [5], [6], [7].
Geopolymer materials can be formed from silica–alumina oxides mixed with alkali hydroxides and alkali silicates. Davidovits [6], [7] used the silica–alumina oxide mixture, specially prepared highly reactive clay, for example, neokaolinite, parakaolinite, halloysite, milanite, and chamoisite, calcined and milled to increase its reactivity. The resulting silica–alumina oxide has the aluminium cation in fourfold coordination and in tetrahedral position. When this silica–alumina oxide is mixed with alkali silicates, reactions of dissolution and copolymerisation occur and polysialates, polysialate–siloxo and polysialate–disiloxo are formed [5]. Compared to the described patents, this paper presents an investigation of the properties of geopolymeric materials utilising Class F fly ash and the alkaline activators, such as sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide, and cured at elevated temperature.
Previous research reported that heat is an important factor for the activation of fly ash, because of the activation barrier, which has to be overcome for the reaction to take place [8]. It was reported that the activation energy is higher for fly ash than for slag, and thus heat treatment is more important for the activation of fly ash.
There were a number of researchers studying activation of fly ash by alkalies utilising elevated temperature curing [1], [2], [3]. The study by Swanepoel and Strydom [2] investigated utilisation of fly ash and kaolinite clay in a geopolymeric material cured at temperatures up to 70 °C. The compressive strength achieved after 28 days was 8 MPa. Palomo et al. [1] presented a study of alkali-activated fly ashes cured at 65 and 85 °C at two liquid/solid ratios: 0.25 and 0.3. The study indicated formation of an amorphous alkali aluminosilicate similar to that obtained in the alkali activation of metakaolin. The strength developed was in the range of 60 MPa. No crystalline zeolitic products were observed, but the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra indicated a possibility of their presence. The investigations showed the importance of elevated temperature curing particularly for samples exposed to 2 and 5 h curing, where a significant increase in strength was observed at 85 °C as compared to 65 °C. It was found that the rise of strength at 85 °C as compared to 65 °C was much smaller when curing time was 24 h. This study continues the investigation of the effect of different curing regimes and types of activator on the strength development and hydration products of Class F fly ash activated by sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide. It investigates the effect of precuring at room temperature before the application of heat on strength development and products of reaction and the effect of different heat treatment regimes and activators on long-term properties of geopolymer materials.
Section snippets
Materials
The chemical and mineral compositions of fly ash are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1, respectively. Fly ash used was sourced from Gladstone in Queensland, Australia. It is mainly glassy with some crystalline inclusions of mullite, hematite and quartz. Laboratory grade sodium silicate solution type D with Ms (ratio of silica oxide to sodium oxide) equal to 2.02, 14.7% Na2O, 29.4% SiO2 was supplied by PQ Australia, while 60 w/v% sodium hydroxide solution was supplied by Sigma. Sodium hydroxide and
Compressive strength
The studied pastes did not show hardening after 1 day of curing at room temperature; thus, three cases of heat curing described above were employed. Fig. 2, Fig. 3 show the results of the compressive strength measurements for materials prepared with sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide solutions and cured as described in Case I 75C. There was an increase in strength with increase in concentration from 2% to 8% Na in the mixtures prepared with the sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide solutions.
Strength development
The experiments showed that long precuring as room temperature was beneficial for strength development of all tested samples. In agreement with previous reports, the investigation showed that the first 6 h of heat curing induced significant changes in the geopolymeric materials. The reactions that occurred in the first 6 h of curing did not stop after heat exposure, but continued, and is evident from the further strength growth in samples cured as in Case III 75C and Case III 95C for sodium
Conclusions
Long precuring at room temperature is beneficial for strength development of geopolymeric materials utilising fly ash and cured at elevated temperature as it allows shortening the time of heat treatment for achievement of high strength. For materials utilising fly ash activated by sodium silicate, 6-h heat curing is more beneficial for the strength development than 24-h heat treatment. Fly ash samples formed with sodium hydroxide activator had more stable strength properties than fly ash
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to the Australian Research Council for financial support under Grant DP0209501 and to the Civil Engineering Department and School of Physics and Materials Engineering, Monash University for providing access to equipment used in this investigation.
References (11)
- et al.
Alkali-activated fly ashes, a cement for the future
Cem. Concr. Res.
(1999) - et al.
Utilisation of fly ash in a geopolymeric material
Appl. Geochem.
(2002) - et al.
The effect of metal contaminants on the formation and properties of waste-based geopolymers
Cem. Concr. Res.
(1999) - et al.
Alkali-activated fly ashes: Properties and characteristics
Proceedings of 11th ICCC
(2000) Properties of geopolymer cements
Cited by (783)
Feasibility study of engineered geopolymer composites based high-calcium fly ash and micromechanics analysis
2024, Case Studies in Construction MaterialsSynthesis, solubility and thermodynamic properties of N-A-S-H gels with various target Si/Al ratios
2024, Cement and Concrete ResearchEffect of an alkali activators on the compressive strength and reaction mechanism of coal gangue-slag-fly ash geopolymer grouting materials
2024, Construction and Building MaterialsApplication of cellulose nanocrystals in 3D printed alkali-activated cementitious composites
2024, Journal of Building EngineeringThe use of machine learning techniques to investigate the properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete
2024, Journal of Cleaner Production