Effect of liquid jet diameter on performance of coaxial two-fluid airblast atomizers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2005.08.003Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of liquid jet diameter on performance of coaxial two-fluid airblast atomizer has been investigated with water–air system in a wide region of liquid/gas mass flux ratio (0.137 < m < 15.6). The Sauter mean diameters (SMD) were measured using Malvern Laser Particle Sizer. The experimental results showed that the liquid jet diameter has striking effect on SMD for large m, but has no effect for small m. For a fixed large m, a decrease of SMD with liquid jet diameter was observed first, followed by an increase. A similar non-monotonic trend was also observed between SMD and liquid jet velocity, We, Re, and M (gas/liquid momentum flux ratio) at the same m, respectively. The minimum SMD is obtained when the velocity of liquid jet flow is about 1.5–4.0 m/s. The following correlation for SMD is developed from the measured data:SMD=685.8(ug3.297ul)0.4813m0.3665+0.1824dlm.

Introduction

Atomization of liquids constitutes a technology presently used in almost all industrial operations. It covers a broad range of applications, such as evaporative cooling, combustion, gasification, fire suppression, agriculture, and spray drying [1], [2]. Numerous devices have been developed, and they are generally designated as atomizers or nozzles. Airblast atomizers are ideally suited for atomizing liquid fuels in continuous-flow combustion systems and entrained flow gasifiers. Droplet size in sprays is a crucial parameter of atomization process that is needed for the fundamental analysis of the transport of mass, momentum, and heat in engineering systems. Owing to the complicated and random nature of the atomization process, most practical atomizers do not produce sprays of uniform droplet size at any given operating conditions. Instead, the spray can be regarded as a spectrum of droplet sizes distributed about some defined mean droplet size. At present, the most widely used mean diameter may be the Sauter mean diameter (SMD=nidi3/nidi2, where ni is the number of droplets per unit volume in size class i and di is the droplet diameter) for airblast atomization process [1].

Coaxial two-fluid airblast atomizer is often used in liquid propellant rocket engines, gas turbines, and other industrial applications [1]. The first major work of coaxial atomization was an experimental study by Nukiyama and Tanasawa [3], who obtained an expression for the SMD as a function of the injection parameters. Since these early experiments, many other investigations [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] have been carried out. The results showed that the SMD of this type of atomizer depends on its geometry and size, the physical properties of the liquid and gaseous medium, gas velocity ug, and liquid/gas mass flux ratio m. Recently, Lasheras et al. [8] and Varga et al. [11] using high-speed digital video camera and phase-doppler particle analyzer, and Marmottant and Villermaux [14] and Villermaux et al. [15] using high-speed digital video camera, investigated the atomization mechanism (according to Kelvin–Helmholtz instability and Rayleigh–Taylor instability) of this type of atomizer, respectively. Now the influences of physical properties, gas velocity, and liquid/gas mass flux ratio are comparatively clear, which have been well reviewed by Lefebvre [1] and Lasheras and Hopfinger [9], respectively. Lasheras and Hopfinger [9] also proposed the breakup regime diagram of this type of atomizer.

However, owing to the complexity of the underlying physical processes involved in the breakup of a liquid jet by a high-speed turbulent gas jet, some influencing factors of this type of atomization, especially the effect of liquid jet diameter dl, are still poorly understood. Lefebvre [1] pointed out that there are appreciable differences in regard to the effect of liquid jet diameter on SMD. Lorenzetto and Lefebvre [4] observed, in agreement with Nukiyama and Tanasawa [3], that liquid jet diameter appears to have little influence on SMD for liquid of low viscosity. Rizk and Lefebvre [5] found that SMDdl0.6 for liquid of low viscosity. But Varga et al. [11] observed that SMD is larger for the case of the smaller liquid nozzle diameter that was reduced by a factor of approximately three, which is actually opposite to intuition. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the dependence of SMD on liquid jet diameter, which is one of the foundations to design atomizers with reliable atomization performance.

In the above studies, the liquid/gas mass flux ratio is usually less than 1.0 [1], [3], [4], [5], [11]. But in chemical industry, people often need to deal with much larger liquid/gas mass flux ratio because of the strict process requirements, such as the case in the entrained flow gasifiers of residual oil [16] or coal water slurry [17] based on the partial oxidation with pure oxygen. In the present work, the effect of liquid jet diameter on SMD was investigated experimentally using a Malvern Laser Particle Sizer with water–air systems in a very wide region of liquid/gas mass flux ratio.

Section snippets

Experimental set-up

The coaxial two-fluid airblast atomizer geometry is shown schematically in Fig. 1, consisting of the geometrically simple case of a round liquid jet surrounded by a co-flowing annular air stream. This fundamentally simple geometry provides the well-known nozzle exit conditions and avoids the complicated internal flows that are common to most practical atomizers. The atomization rig used in the current experiments was a modular design, consisting of an upper and lower block structure. The lower

Effect of liquid jet diameter

The experiment was carried out using atomizers 1–5 to investigate the influence of liquid jet diameter on SMD when the area of gas nozzle cross-section and air jet velocity were fixed. Fig. 3 shows the typical behaviour of SMD with liquid jet diameter when the air jet velocity is about 170 m/s. The liquid/gas mass flux ratios in the figure are from 0.137 to 5.48. A general non-monotonic trend observed is a decrease followed by an increase of SMD with liquid jet diameter at the same m, when m > 

Conclusions

The effect of liquid jet diameter on the SMD of coaxial two-fluid airblast atomizer has been investigated with water–air system in a wide range of liquid/gas mass flux ratio. The following conclusions are deduced here:

  • (1)

    The experimental results showed that the liquid jet diameter has obvious effect on the SMD for large m, but has little effect for small m.

  • (2)

    A general non-monotonic trend was observed, which showed a decrease first followed by an increase of the SMD with liquid jet diameter, liquid

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial supports for this project from the National High Technology Development Program of China (2003AA521021), the State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China (2004CB217703), and the Development Fund of Science and Technology of Shanghai (03QF14013). We would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments. We are also grateful to Dr. Huang Zhen-Yu of University of Tennessee, who read the manuscript and gave many very useful

References (18)

  • E.B. Babinsky et al.

    Modeling drop size distributions

    Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.

    (2002)
  • J. Keller

    Diversification of feedstocks and products. Recent trends in the development of solid fuel gasification using the Texaco and the HTW process

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (1990)
  • A.H. Lefebvre

    Atomization and Sprays

    (1989)
  • S. Nukiyama et al.

    Experiments on the atomization of liquids in an airstream

    Trans. Soc. Mech. Eng. Jpn.

    (1939)
  • G.E. Loranzetto et al.

    Measurements of drop size on a plain jet airblast atomizer

    AIAA J.

    (1977)
  • N.K. Rizk et al.

    Spray characteristics of plain-jet airblast atomizers

    Trans. ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power

    (1984)
  • C. Engelbert et al.

    Breakup phenomena in coaxial airblast atomizers

    Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A

    (1995)
  • X.G. Li et al.

    Absolute and convective instability of cylindrical liquid jets in co-flowing gas streams

    Atom Sprays

    (1998)
  • J.C. Lasheras et al.

    Break-up and atomization of a round water jet by a high-speed annular air jet

    J. Fluid Mech.

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (58)

  • Towards system pressure scaling of gas assisted coaxial burner nozzles – An empirical model

    2021, Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    For large gas momentum flows, the ID32,m FIT-curves exhibit a plateau at all system pressures, indicating that a further increase in the gas momentum flow causes only minor changes in the droplet size. At high GLR values (GLR >> 1), the same effect was observed by several authors at atmospheric system pressure [15–17]. For different system pressures, a constant variable B and two pressure-dependent parameters A and C were applied and correlated using a least-square method.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text