Multiscale modeling of biomass pretreatment for optimization of steam explosion conditions
Highlights
► Multiscale models are established for steam explosion condition optimization. ► Relationship of biomass moisture content and holding temperature is established. ► Relationship of biomass chip size and discharge port area is established. ► Severity factor enriched with chip size, moisture content and discharge port area.
Introduction
Since the early investigations of Mason (1929), steam explosion has been considered an effective method for disrupting different lignocellulosic plant materials into major plant components, such as cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose (Saddler et al., 1993). Lignocellulosic biomass is heated at elevated temperatures with high pressure steam, and after a few minutes, subjected to explosive decompression, thereby physically and chemically modifying the biomass (Cantarella et al., 2004). Hemicellulose is hydrolyzed, lignin is solubilized, and cellulose is made more accessible to cellulose enzymes (Cantarella et al., 2004).
On the basis of decades of research, scholars developed steam explosion technology into a general biorefining technology platform. A series of novel processes based on steam explosion technology have been successfully established; these processes include clean pulping, cleaning and degumming hemp, and preparing humic acid (Chen and Li, 2002). Wheat straw was pretreated by steam explosion to produce cellulose pulp (Montane et al., 1998). Textile and composite materials were synthesized with steam exploded short staple flax fibers (Kessler et al., 1998). Chen (2009) extended steam explosion technology to develop bio-based production of chemicals from biomass, including furfural, levulinic acid, xylitol, xanthan gum, oxalic acid, lactic acid, and ethylene. The authors also prepared bio-based materials, including cellulose acetate, carboxymethyl cellulose, and ecological plate, and produced bio-based energy fuels, such as ethanol, butanol, hydrogen, and biodiesel (Chen (2009)).
As one of the most economical and efficient biomass pretreatment technologies (Alfani et al., 2000, Ballesteros et al., 2006, Talebnia et al., 2010, Zheng et al., 2009, Kumar et al., 2009, Costa Sousa et al., 2009), steam explosion was initially mistaken as a purely chemical process. The severity factor or modified severity factor of hydrothermal pretreatment processes is often used to describe the severity of the steam explosion process, as shown in Eqs. (1)–(6) in Table 1.
Two conclusions emerge from the effects of steam explosion on straw structure: (1) At high-temperature cooking, hemicellulose is degraded, lignin is solubilized, and cellulose binding is reduced. (2) Under instantaneous decompression, superheated water flashes into steam and steam volume abruptly expands. The impact force generated by flashing and volume expansion destroys cell structure. In this stage, materials are torn into small pieces; fiber bundles are separated from one another and their structures loosen, thereby re-distributing lignin; and cellulose is fully exposed.
The severity factor currently used represents the relationship among time, temperature, and acid concentration. Although it enables the easy comparison of experimental results to facilitate process design and operation, it does not represent all the factors that affect pretreatment efficiency (Hosseini and Shah, 2009). Unlike other hydrothermal pretreatment technologies, steam explosion is an effective fractionation technology that is characterized by physical tearing effects, which enhance lignocellulose defibration and increase specific surface area. Because the severity factor originates from hydrothermal pretreatment processes, it cannot represent the effects in the instantaneous decompression stage, but depicts those in the high-temperature cooking stage.
Hosseini and Shah (2009) developed a model based on the diffusion of steam into biomass, taking particle size and process time into account (see Eq. (6)). Although the mass transfer perspective dictates that chip size be considered first, Eq. (6) still represents the effects of high-temperature cooking on steam explosion. However, the equation does not depict the physical tearing effects of instantaneous decompression.
Physical tearing is affected by numerous factors such as chip size, material bulk density, material loading coefficient, and moisture content (Chen et al., 1999, Chen and Liu, 2007). The performance determinants of a pressure tank also considerably influences steam explosion results; these determinants include the height-to-diameter ratio of the tank, discharge port area (Chen et al., 1999), and buffer tank volume. Holding pressure (temperature) is another important factor.
In this paper, we analyze physical tearing in instantaneous decompression on the basis of the theories of mass transfer, heat transfer, and momentum transfer, as well as on brittle fracture mechanics. We consider particle size, moisture content, and discharge port area in the analysis. An enriched and comprehensive severity factor represents the effects of high-temperature cooking on steam explosion and the physical tearing effects of instantaneous decompression. Such representations enable the comprehensive interpretation of the mechanism of steam explosion technology, and serve as engineering reference in designing the equipment and selecting the conditions for steam explosion technology.
Section snippets
Model assumption
We assume that the height-to-diameter ratio of a tank is unchanged, and that loading density does not affect steam transfer. The volume of a buffer tank (also called a receiver) is sufficiently large, suggesting that the environmental pressure of exported materials stabilize at normal pressure. Hence, the variable factors are holding pressure, holding time, chip size, moisture content, and discharge port area.
Ensuring effective fractionation necessitates physical tearing at the cellular level,
Optimizing holding temperature and moisture content of materials
Eq. (19) shows that moisture content and holding pressure (or temperature) are key factors that affect physical tearing.
The Antoine equation is widely used in calculating the saturated vapor pressure of water, but it is difficult to use in converting pressure to temperature. Thus, we fit a simple unary quadratic equation to represent the relationship between pressure and temperature:
Therefore, Eq. (19) can be converted into
Conclusion
- (1)
On the basis of maximum dissipated energy E of materials in the instantaneous decompression stage of steam explosion, we optimize moisture content wopt with corresponding holding temperature T (T↔wopt) and material chip size d by discharge port area A (A∝d2), which guides the selection of suitable operating temperatures and the matching of chip sizes and discharge port areas for materials with a certain moisture content. Efficient selection and matching generate the best physical tearing
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program (2011CB707401) and National Key Project of Scientific and Technical Supporting Programs (2011BAD22B02).
References (24)
- et al.
Phenomenological kinetics of complex systems: the development of a generalized severity parameter and its application to lignocellulosics fractionation
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1992) - et al.
Comparison of different detoxification methods for steam-exploded poplar wood as a substrate for the bioproduction of ethanol in SHF and SSF
Process. Biochem.
(2004) - et al.
Multiscale modelling of hydrothermal biomass pretreatment for chip size optimization
Bioresource Technol.
(2009) - et al.
Steam explosion of flax—A superior technique for upgrading fibre value
Biomass Bioenergy
(1998) - et al.
Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: An overview on pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation
Bioresource Technol.
(2010) - et al.
Comparison of SHF and SSF process of steam-exploded wheat straw
J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
(2000) - et al.
Ethanol production from steam-explosion pretreated wheat straw
Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
(2006) - et al.
Phenomenological kinetics of complex systems: mechanistic considerations in the solubilization of hemicelluloses following aqueous/steam treatments
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
(1991) - et al.
Mechanics of solids and structures
(1973) Process Engineering in Plant-Based Procucts
(2009)