Fuzzy modeling and synchronization of hyperchaotic systems
Introduction
Since the early 1990s researchers have realized that chaotic systems can be synchronized [1], [2]. An increasing interest has been generated in chaotic or hyperchaotic synchronization and its practical applications in different fields, particularly in communications because chaotic systems are deterministic but extremely sensitive to initial conditions and have noise-like behavior [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. In particular, synchronization schemes of hyperchaotic systems were investigated recently [8], [9]. It should be noted that the presence of more than one positive Lyapunov exponent clearly improves the security by generating more complex dynamics.
Various control methods have been developed in order to synchronize chaotic systems which include linear and nonlinear feedback control, time delay feedback control, adaptive control, and impulsive control. Most recently, a new approach to control and synchronize chaos via LMI-based fuzzy control system design is suggested in [10], [11], where the idea is to use the Takagi–Sugeno (T–S) fuzzy model to represent typical chaotic models and then apply some effective fuzzy techniques. LMI-based fuzzy synchronization of Chen’s system is considered in [12]. Synchronization of generalized Henon map by using adaptive fuzzy controller is considered in [13].
Following the idea of representing a chaotic system via a T–S fuzzy model [10], [11], [14], in this paper, we intend to represent a class of typical continuous-time hyperchaotic systems via T–S fuzzy models and develop a fuzzy controller design method for hyperchaotic synchronization.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the T–S fuzzy models will be presented for two well-known hyperchaotic systems: the fourth Rössler system and the Matsumoto–Chua–Kobayashi (MCK) circuit. Synchronization issues will be discussed in Section 3. Simulation results is given in Section 4. Finally, Concludes is drawn in Section 5.
Section snippets
Fuzzy modeling of hyperchaotic systems
The T–S fuzzy dynamic model originates from Takagi and Sugeno [15], which is described by fuzzy IF-THEN rules where the consequent parts represent local linear models. Consider a continuous-time nonlinear dynamic system as follows:where is the state vector, f(x) is nonlinear function with appropriate dimension. In the form of T–S model, the system (1) can be exactly represented in a region of interest as follows:
Ri: IF z1(t) is Mi1 and ⋯ and zp(t) is Mip
THEN
Fuzzy synchronization of hyperchaotic systems
In this section, we will achieve the synchronization of hyperchaotic systems based on the T–S fuzzy model. Given the fuzzy hyperchaotic drive system (11), we consider the following fuzzy controlled system as the response system,
Ri: IF is Mi
THENHere, B is input matrix, u(t) is input signal. The defuzzification process is given asThe fuzzy drive system (11) and the fuzzy controlled system (12)
Simulation results
In this section, we will give some numerical simulations to verify the hyperchaotic synchronization based on T–S fuzzy hyperchaotic model and fuzzy controller design. In the following, all the LMIs are solved by MATLAB LMI toolbox and all the differential equation are solved by using the fourth–fifth order Runge–Kutta method (ODE45 in MATLAB).
Firstly, we consider the synchronization between hyperchaotic Rössler systems. The initial conditions for drive and response systems are X0 = [0, 0, 0, 30]T,
Conclusions
In this paper, we represent the typical hyperchaotic systems via T–S fuzzy models. Based on the fuzzy hyperchaotic models, simpler fuzzy controllers have been designed for synchronizing hyperchaotic systems. The proposed approach does not require the computation of the Lyapunov exponents. Finally, numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 60271019 and the Youth Science and Technology Foundation of UESTC under Grant JX04009.
References (18)
- et al.
The synchronization of chaotic systems
Phys Rep
(2002) - et al.
LMI-based fuzzy stability and synchronization of Chen’s system
Phys Lett A
(2003) - et al.
Synchronization of generalized Henon map by using adaptive fuzzy controller
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
(2003) - et al.
Synchronization in chaotic systems
Phys Rev Lett
(1990) - et al.
Synchronizing chaotic circuits
IEEE Trans CAS I
(1991) Taming chaos. Part I. Synchronization
IEEE Trans CAS I
(1993)- et al.
Fundamentals of synchronization in chaotic systems, concepts, and applications
Chaos
(1997) - et al.
From chaos to order methodologies, perspectives and applications
(1998) - et al.
Chaos in nonlinear oscillators: controlling and synchronization
(1996)
Cited by (90)
Robust global fixed-time synchronization of different dimensions fractional-order chaotic systems
2022, Chaos, Solitons and FractalsCitation Excerpt :Up to now, the chaos synchronization problem has been paid much attention by many researchers. In recent decays, many different control approaches have been utilized for the synchronization problem, including Linear feedback control [1], nonlinear feedback control [2], observer-based state feedback control [3], LMI-based control [4], active control [5], the adaptive control [6], fuzzy control [7], sliding mode control technique [8], and so on. On the other hand, the interesting mathematical branch of fractional calculus has been provided an extended framework for defining dynamical models benefiting from generalizing the regular calculus.
Some theoretical and computation results about COVID-19 by using a fractional-order mathematical model
2021, Fractional-Order Modeling of Dynamic Systems with Applications in Optimization, Signal Processing, and ControlAdaptive single input sliding mode control for hybrid-synchronization of uncertain hyperchaotic Lu systems
2021, Journal of the Franklin InstituteCitation Excerpt :Especially, hyperchaotic systems have received more attention because of the availability of more than one Lyapunov exponent in comparison with the chaotic system. It is generally known that more complex dynamics provide more secure communication [5] among the chaotic and hyperchaotic systems discovered such as Lorenz [6], Lu [7], Chen systems [8]. Synchronization of hyperchaotic systems have been explored extensively using nonlinear control methods [9,10].
Fuzzy modeling, stabilization and synchronization of multi-scroll chaotic systems
2016, OptikCitation Excerpt :We note that the method proposed in [31,32] allows stabilization of the typical multi-scroll Chua and Chen systems on their unstable fixed points and unstable periodic orbits with very satisfying performance. In recent years, fuzzy control and synchronization of chaotic systems is attracting more attention [33–40]. This is due to the fact that the model of chaotic systems is generally uncertain and/or unknown in real-word applications.
Chaos Synchronization for a Class of Hyperchaotic Systems Using Active SMC and PI SMC : A Comparative Analysis
2022, Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical SystemsOn Boundary Value Problems in Normed Fuzzy Spaces
2022, Thai Journal of Mathematics