Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.017Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, we explore how privacy settings and privacy policy consumption (reading the privacy policy) affect the relationship between privacy attitudes and disclosure behaviors. We present results from a survey completed by 122 users of Facebook regarding their information disclosure practices and their attitudes about privacy. Based on our data, we develop and evaluate a model for understanding factors that affect how privacy attitudes influence disclosure and discuss implications for social network sites. Our analysis shows that the relationship between privacy attitudes and certain types of disclosures (those furthering contact) are controlled by privacy policy consumption and privacy behaviors. This provides evidence that social network sites could help mitigate concerns about disclosure by providing transparent privacy policies and privacy controls.

Introduction

Activity in a networked community can be stimulated by the creation and exposure of user-generated content (Erickson and Kellogg, 2000, Mynatt et al., 1998). In a social network site like Facebook, shared pictures, status updates, and links keep users interested and drive page views. However, user attitudes toward privacy may affect the volume and type of content shared in a social network site (Acquisti & Gross, 2006), which may in turn have implications for social network site vibrancy. For example, a user who is particularly concerned about ownership or privacy of shared data may limit information disclosed in a social network. Users are in good stead to be concerned about information shared in social network sites; harms originating from inadvertent or improper disclosures include legal sanctions (Grimmelmann, 2009), unintentional exposure of personal data (Jernigan & Mistree, 2009), and physical threats including cyberbullying (Palfrey, 2008). Social network site administrators are challenged to implement technologies and policies that address user privacy concerns while enabling the free flow of content. In the design community, researchers are working to create systems that support the sharing of content in a way that reduces potential harms to users (Hawkey and Inkpen, 2006, Nov and Wattal, 2009).

Research by Cranor, Reagle, and Ackerman (2000) explored attitudes towards information disclosure on the Internet. The researchers found that prior attitudes, such as conceptions about the value of identifiers, were important factors in online disclosure. Notably, the researchers also found that transparency (e.g. the posting of a privacy policy) and personal information control were important positive factors in online disclosure. General attitudes about privacy also play a strong role in individual online disclosure practices. If a company sufficiently addresses user privacy concerns, the role privacy concerns play in online disclosure may be mitigated.

In the following study we explore factors that potentially mediate the relationship between privacy attitudes and disclosure behaviors in a social network site, Facebook. As prior research suggests, the relationship between privacy attitudes and disclosure behaviors may be mediated by education about company privacy practices, and by increasing individual control over disclosures (e.g. Ahern et al., 2007, Cranor et al., 2000, Fogel and Nehmad, 2009, Lewis et al., 2008). By controlling the effects of privacy attitudes on disclosure, social network site users may feel free to share content and engage in other community-enhancing behavior (Iriberri & Leroy, 2009). Therefore, it is useful for both designers and policy-makers to understand the relationship between privacy attitudes and disclosure behaviors in social network sites. In this work, we draw on Altman’s (1975) theories of boundary regulation, employing the privacy optimization process to explore if increased knowledge and privacy control potentially mediate the relationship between privacy attitudes and disclosure behaviors.

Section snippets

Literature review

The link between disclosure and privacy attitudes has been explored extensively in communication theory. Altman’s (1975) original theorization of privacy posits a general optimization function, through which individuals attempt to balance the necessary disclosures of communication with individual privacy control mechanisms. The social individual must disclose, Altman argues, but disclosure is inherently tied to practical mechanisms that adjust our disclosures in relation to our privacy

Participants and data collection

Participants were recruited widely from the University of North Carolina (UNC) community through an email solicitation sent to a campus-wide opt-in mass-email listserv. This listserv reaches all students that received informational messages from the university, and allows targeting based on student status. We restricted the sample to undergraduate students that used Facebook, inviting them to follow a link to complete a survey about privacy awareness on Facebook. The survey was hosted on the

Overview

Our analysis follows the model outlined in Fig. 1. We first explore the baseline association between privacy attitudes and disclosure practices (H1). Next, we test the validity of the controls by testing the relationships between the independent variable and the controls (H2 and H3) and between the controls and the dependent variable (H4 and H5). Then, we examine the final model with the controls included (H6).

Fig. 1 indicates the specific hypotheses (H1–H6) we test as part of the analysis.

Benefit analysis

Administrators of social network sites are challenged to address user privacy concerns; in this study, we have explored how privacy behaviors and privacy policy consumption may mitigate privacy concerns. To explore the impact these controls have on disclosure behavior, we present a benefit analysis, using predicted probabilities. Predicted probabilities allow us to demonstrate the impact of a manipulation of a single variable, holding all other values constant. Using the disclosures furthering

Discussion

Social network sites, such as Facebook, thrive on user-contributed content. However, many users report apprehension about the risks that may result from sharing content in social network sites (Acquisti & Gross, 2006). By increasing transparency: educating users about their personal data with a privacy policy, and by providing privacy controls, social network sites may be able to alleviate some of the privacy concerns that affect the contribution of user data to the site. In this paper, we

Limitations and conclusions

There are a number of important limitations of this study. First, the data examined are self-reported, which is a source of potential error. Second, while we utilized a solicitation method that allowed access to a diverse population, a low response rate and evidence of potential gender bias due to nonresponse limits the generalizability of the results. Furthermore, unique aspects of the population studied (college students in the US Southeast) may limit generalization to other colleges. Third,

References (43)

  • J. Fogel et al.

    Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2009)
  • S. Hinduja et al.

    Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace

    Journal of Adolescence

    (2008)
  • A. Acquisti et al.

    Privacy attitudes and privacy behavior: Losses, gains, and hyperbolic discounting

  • A. Acquisti et al.

    Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In PET, Heidelberg, 2006

    (2006)
  • A. Acquisti et al.

    Predicting social security numbers from public data

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    (2009)
  • L. Adamic et al.

    A social network caught in the web

    First Monday

    (2003)
  • S. Ahern et al.

    Over-exposed? Privacy patterns and considerations in online and mobile photo sharing

  • I. Altman

    The environment and social behavior

    (1975)
  • N.K. Baym et al.

    Tunes that bind?

    Information Communication & Society

    (2009)
  • Bonneau, J., & Preibusch, S. (2009). The privacy jungle: On the market for data protection in social networks. In The...
  • D. Boyd

    Facebook’s privacy trainwreck

    Convergence

    (2008)
  • L.F. Cranor et al.

    Beyond concern: Understanding net users’ attitudes about online privacy

  • V. Derlega et al.

    Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships

    Journal of Social Issues

    (1977)
  • P. Dourish et al.

    Collective information practice. Exploring privacy and security as social and cultural phenomena

    Human–Computer Interaction

    (2006)
  • T. Erickson et al.

    Social translucence. an approach to designing systems that support social processes

    ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction

    (2000)
  • A.T. Fiore et al.

    Homophyly in online dating: When do you like someone like yourself?

  • V. Grigoriadis

    Do you own facebook? Or does facebook own you?

    New York Magazine

    (2009)
  • J.T. Grimmelmann

    Facebook and the social dynamics of privacy

    Iowa Law Review

    (2009)
  • K. Hawkey et al.

    Keeping up appearances: Understanding the dimensions of incidental information privacy

  • S. Herring

    Gender and power in on-line communications

  • D. Heerwegh et al.

    Face-to-face versus web surveying in a high-internet-coverage population: Differences in response quality

    Public Opinion Quarterly

    (2008)
  • Cited by (195)

    • Twitter has a Binary Privacy Setting, are Users Aware of How It Works?

      2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text