Elsevier

Computers in Human Behavior

Volume 48, July 2015, Pages 340-357
Computers in Human Behavior

Benefitting from virtual customer environments: An empirical study of customer engagement

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.061Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We propose and test a model for studying customer engagement within VCEs.

  • Hedonic, social, and cognitive benefits positively influence customer engagement.

  • Personal integrative benefits do not influence customer engagement.

  • System-specific VCE characteristics influence the perceived benefits of a VCE.

  • The results are robust across three datasets of actual VCE users.

Abstract

Customer engagement has been labeled as a prerequisite for the success of virtual customer environments. A key challenge for organizations serving their customers via these environments is how to stimulate customer engagement. This study is among the first to shed light on this issue by examining customer engagement and its drivers. Using the theory of uses and gratification as theoretical lens, we develop a model that relates characteristics of virtual customer environments, perceived benefits of using these environments and customer engagement intentions. The model is validated using partially least squares structural equation modeling on three samples of real users of different virtual customer environments in the Dutch telecom industry. The results provide clear support for the validity of the hypothesized relationships and show high robustness of the findings across the three datasets. An important finding of this study is that cognitive, social integrative and hedonic benefits appear to be significant in their influence on customer engagement intentions. Overall, the findings add to the underexplored field of customer engagement study and hold implications for research into and the management of virtual customer environments.

Introduction

An increasing amount of companies have started to make use of their own online customer platform to have customers engage with the company and with each other (Mathwick et al., 2008, Van Doorn et al., 2010, Wagner and Majchrzak, 2007). These so-called virtual customer environments (VCEs), defined here as company-hosted electronic platforms that facilitate digital communications between customers and company employees (Nambisan, 2002), have been described as effective, reliable and low-cost digital platforms to maintain relationships with customers as well as to provide customer service (Das, 2003). Previous research has confirmed this potential of VCEs by demonstrating successful practices across industries such as automobiles (Füller, Bartl, Ernst, & Muhlbacher, 2004), e-commerce (Dholakia, Blazevic, Wiertz, & Algesheimer, 2009), sports equipment (Füller, Jawecki, & Mühlbacher, 2007) and software (Jeppesen & Frederiksen, 2006).

Despite the rise and attributed advantages of VCEs only little is known about the drivers of customer engagement (CE) within VCEs. This lack of knowledge is quite remarkable given that establishing an engaged population of VCE users has been labeled as a prerequisite for companies to achieve VCE success (e.g., see Bishop, 2007, Hagel, 1999). Also from a conceptual and contextual perspective, studying the drivers of CE in VCE settings seems of high interest. Reflecting customers behavioral manifestations, beyond transactional behavior, that have a firm or brand focus and that are derived from motivational drivers (Van Doorn et al., 2010, p. 254), CE has been put forward as a relatively renewed concept that integrates a multitude of non-transactional behaviors such as customer retention, referral/word-of-mouth, supporting other customers, and co-creation (Kumar et al., 2010, Verhoef et al., 2010, Vivek et al., 2012). These kinds of behavior are typically observed in VCEs, where customers exhibit loyalty (Rosenbaum & Massiah, 2007), share their thoughts and opinions (Hennig-Thurau, Gwinner, Walsh, & Gremler, 2004), help other customers (Verhagen, Nauta, & Feldberg, 2013), and may assist the company in improving/designing products (Füller et al., 2007). Overall, this underlines the relevance of studying CE in a VCE context.

This study aims to answer the question what drives VCE users to become engaged with the VCE? To answer this question we develop and validate a model grounded in uses and gratifications theory (UGT) (Katz, Blumler, & Gurevitch, 1973). Drawing upon UGT we examine the role of four types of perceived VCE benefits as direct determinants of CE intentions: cognitive benefits, social-integrative benefits, personal-integrative benefits, and hedonic benefits. These four benefits represent basic behavioral needs underlying people’s use of new media and online technology (Nambisan & Baron, 2007), and are included as core constructs in the model to address the elementary reasons why customers make use of VCEs. To gain more understanding of how customers show engagement through VCEs we add eight VCE-specific characteristics to the model. These VCE characteristics are, following recent suggestions for adding contextual richness to grounded research models (see Hong, Chan, Thong, Chasalow, & Dhillon, 2013), incorporated as indirect determinants of engagement intentions, mediated through the four aforementioned benefits.

This paper intends to make several contributions. First, the adoption of CE as key concept implies that we add to the underexplored field of CE research. Despite its assumed relevance, theoretical and empirical studies into CE are scarce (e.g., see Van Doorn et al., 2010, Verhoef et al., 2010) and more research, especially in interactive environments, is openly called for (Brodie, Ilic, Juric, & Hollebeek, 2013). Second, we shed light on the drivers of CE intentions by modeling and testing the four benefit types as identified in UGT as determinants. As such, we conceptually integrate the research streams on CE and UGT and empirically assess the value of this integration in terms of explanatory power. Third, by including VCE-specific characteristics as determinants of VCE benefits, and thereof CE intentions, we aim to assist VCE managers and designers in prioritizing their development efforts. The significance and the magnitude of the effects found may serve as actionable guidelines to improve the perceived benefits of VCEs and lead to more engaged customers, as such positively influencing the success of VCEs.

The remaining of this paper is organized as follows. First, we elaborate on the theoretical background of our study and report on a systematic review of the VCE literature. Then, we introduce our research model, discuss its nomological considerations, and postulate the hypotheses. Next, using survey data collected via three different VCEs in The Netherlands, we estimate and cross-validate our model, report on the findings, and discuss the theoretical and practical implications. Finally, interesting avenues for further research are suggested.

Section snippets

Customer engagement

Characteristic for the CE concept is that it extends the value a customer has for a company (Kumar et al., 2010; Marketing Science Institute, 2010). Instead of viewing customer value as equivalent of transactional value (e.g. the monetary value of the purchase), CE substantiates that the value customers deliver to an organization goes ‘beyond the purchase’ and stems from a multitude of other behavioral manifestations, which have a firm or a brand focus (Kumar et al., 2010, Vivek et al., 2012).

Research model and hypotheses

Fig. 1 displays our research model. Following our research objectives and in line with UGT, the four benefits are modeled as determinants of CE intention, that is, customers’ willingness to perform a multitude of non-transactional behaviors, with both other customers and representatives of the organization, that deliver value to the organization (Kumar et al., 2010, Wagner and Majchrzak, 2007). The eight selected VCE characteristics are linked to this theoretical backbone as determinants of the

Procedure

An online survey was conducted to collect the data. Three independent samples were collected from three VCEs facilitated by well-known mobile telecommunication providers in The Netherlands. Each of these VCEs services registered customers by the provision of customer service, by giving a platform of feedback, and by having customers interact with each other. Our decision to collect data within the telecom industry was supported by the fact that companies within this highly competitive industry

Results

To analyze the three datasets we initially estimated the research model by making use of covariance-based structural equation modeling (Amos 20, IBM SPSS). The resulting fit indices, however, indicated unacceptable fit with the data, also after removing a few conflicting items. In such instances, especially when models contain a relatively large number of constructs and items (Chin, 2010), it is common practice to make use of partially least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (Hair,

Key findings

The empirical results of this study lead to three key findings. First, taking the entire model structure into consideration, the analyses provide strong and robust support for the overall assumption that VCE-specific characteristics lead to perceived VCE benefits, and thereof CE intention. Except for the variance explained of cognitive benefits for VCE 2 (28%), all explained variances are 35% or, mostly, higher. Furthermore, 27 of the 36 beta coefficients across the three datasets are higher

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to state their gratitude to inSided for their support in the data collection in this study. In particular we thank Martine van Deursen and Joris Dieben.

References (95)

  • D. Harhoff et al.

    Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit from freely revealing their innovations

    Research Policy

    (2003)
  • T. Hennig-Thurau et al.

    Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?

    Journal of Interactive Marketing

    (2004)
  • A. Hicks et al.

    Why people use Yelp.com: An exploration of uses and gratifications

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2012)
  • E.T. Higgins et al.

    Engaging the consumer: The science and art of the value creation process

    Journal of Consumer Psychology

    (2009)
  • L.D. Hollebeek et al.

    Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation

    Journal of Interactive Marketing

    (2014)
  • I. Kang et al.

    Investigation of online community voluntary behavior using cognitive map

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2007)
  • A. Keropyan et al.

    Customer loyalty programs to sustain consumer fidelity in mobile telecommunication market

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2012)
  • J.W. Kim

    Scan and click: The uses and gratifications of social recommendation systems

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2014)
  • H. Lee et al.

    Gift or threat? An examination of voice of the customer: The case of MyStarbucksIdea.com

    Electronic Commerce Research and Applications

    (2014)
  • T. Mutter et al.

    Don’t take away my status! – Evidence from the restructuring of a virtual reward system

    Computer Networks

    (2014)
  • S.C. Nettelhorst et al.

    Examining the impact of consumer feedback on internet product evaluation: Comparing base-rate and case history information

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2013)
  • H. Park et al.

    The role of social network websites in the consumer-brand relationship

    Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

    (2014)
  • C.K. Prahalad et al.

    Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation

    Journal of Interactive Marketing

    (2004)
  • F.T. Rothaermel et al.

    Virtual internet communities and commercial success

    Journal of Management

    (2001)
  • M. Sawhney et al.

    Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation

    Journal of Interactive Marketing

    (2005)
  • L. Tonteri et al.

    Antecedents of an experienced sense of virtual community

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2011)
  • T. Verhagen et al.

    Negative online word-of-mouth: Behavioral indicator or emotional release?

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2013)
  • E.S.-T. Wang et al.

    Forming relationship commitments to online communities: The role of social motivations

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2012)
  • R. Algesheimer et al.

    The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs

    Journal of Marketing

    (2005)
  • Bagozzi et al.

    Intentional social action in virtual communities

    Journal of Interactive Marketing

    (2006)
  • Baldus, B. J., Voorhees, C., & Calantone, R. (2014). Online brand community engagement: Scale development and...
  • C.D. Batson

    The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer

    (2014)
  • R. Belk

    Extended self in a digital world

    Journal of Consumer Research

    (2013)
  • R.J. Brodie et al.

    Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research

    Journal of Service Research

    (2011)
  • Z.-C. Chen et al.

    The formation of social identity and self-identity bases on knowledge contribution in virtual communities: An inductive route model

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2015)
  • G.-L. Chen et al.

    Sense of virtual community and knowledge contribution in a P3 virtual community: Motivation and experience

    Internet Research

    (2013)
  • W.W. Chin et al.

    A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a monte carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study

    Information Systems Research

    (2003)
  • W.W. Chin

    How to write up and report PLS analyses

  • R. Chitturi et al.

    Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits

    Journal of Marketing

    (2008)
  • D. Constant et al.

    The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice

    Organization Science

    (1996)
  • J.M. Cortina

    What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and application

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1993)
  • A. Das

    Knowledge and productivity in technical support work

    Management Science

    (2003)
  • C. Dellarocas

    The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms

    Management Science

    (2003)
  • R.F. DeVellis
    (2012)
  • U.M. Dholakia et al.

    Communal service delivery: How consumers benefit from participation in firm-hosted virtual P3 communities

    Journal of Service Research

    (2009)
  • R. Ferguson et al.

    Telecom’s search for the ultimate customer loyalty platform

    Journal of Consumer Marketing

    (2008)
  • M.L. Foster et al.

    Why users participate in online social networks

    International Journal of E-Business Management

    (2010)
  • Cited by (103)

    • Consumer engagement in social media brand communities: A literature review

      2022, International Journal of Information Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most studies conceptualising consumer engagement in a brand community as an outcome (Table 6) aim to understand how the community dynamics influence community engagement. Measuring community dynamics as environmental characteristics (Carlson et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2011; Triantafillidou & Siomkos, 2018), or consumers' benefits (De Oliveira, Huertas, & Lin, 2016; Simon & Tossan, 2018; Verhagen, Swen, Feldberg, & Merikivi, 2015b), authors explore its influence on consumers' engagement behaviour. Studies were also found analysing the impact of community characteristics on consumer engagement as motives to participate (Hartmann et al., 2015; Khan et al., 2016; Phua et al., 2017), and consumers benefits and cultural values on community engagement measured as attitude (Claffey & Brady, 2017; Fernandes & Remelhe, 2016; Le & Duong, 2020; Wang et al., 2019).

    • Usage of augmented reality (AR) and development of e-learning outcomes: An empirical evaluation of students’ e-learning experience

      2022, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      AR.LRP also helps students to have consistent valuable feedback which improves the learning process in general and the learning outcomes (i.e. Ha et al., 2015; Martin-Gutierrez et al., 2017; Verhagen et al., 2015). Such results are not far from other studies that have supported the role of CGB (Dunleavy et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2020; Verhagen et al., 2015). Path coefficient analyses also supported the causal path between PIB and EXP which explains how students are more likely to have a positive learning experience as long as using AR.LRP helps them to gratify their personal needs such as confidence, self-efficacy, and self-esteem (Godey et al., 2016; Nambisan et al., 2016; Verhagen et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +31 20 598 6059.

    2

    Tel.: +86 358 9 43131.

    View full text