Elsevier

Chemosphere

Volume 82, Issue 3, January 2011, Pages 308-317
Chemosphere

Review
Interaction of engineered nanoparticles with various components of the environment and possible strategies for their risk assessment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Nanoparticles are the materials with at least two dimensions between 1 and 100 nm. Mostly these nanoparticles are natural products but their tremendous commercial use has boosted the artificial synthesis of these particles (engineered nanoparticles). Accelerated production and use of these engineered nanoparticles may cause their release in the environment and facilitate the frequent interactions with biotic and abiotic components of the ecosystems. Despite remarkable commercial benefits, their presence in the nature may cause hazardous biological effects. Therefore, detail understanding of their sources, release interaction with environment, and possible risk assessment would provide a basis for safer use of engineered nanoparticles with minimal or no hazardous impact on environment. Keeping all these points in mind the present review provides updated information on various aspects, e.g. sources, different types, synthesis, interaction with environment, possible strategies for risk management of engineered nanoparticles.

Introduction

A remarkable progress has been noted in the area of nanotechnology in recent years as evident from its widespread use in textile, electronics, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, foods and environmental remediation (Dunphy Guzman et al., 2006, Royal Society, 2004). Despite tremendous benefits, the inevitable release of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in the environment with the development of nanotechnology is a serious case of concern of environmental biologists worldwide. However, a few studies have already demonstrated the toxic effects of nanoparticles on various organisms, including mammals (Handy et al., 2008a). But scanty and fragmentary information are available on probable inputs, fate and interactions of these nanoparticles with various components of the environment. Thus the present review is aimed to address the current understanding of the structure, fate, behaviour, ecotoxicity test methods and environmental risks assessment of ENPs.

Section snippets

Natural vs engineered nanoparticles

The existence of naturally occurring nanoparticles in water, air and soil is known from the beginning of earth’s history as they have been recorded from 10 000 years old glacial ice cores. These nanoparticles are assumed to be derived from natural combustion processes and deposited into the ice core via atmospheric deposition (Murr et al., 2004). Likewise, the presence of natural nanoparticles has also been recorded from the sediments of Cretaceous–Tertiary (K–T) boundary at Gubbio, Italy (Verma

Production of engineered nanoparticles

Theoretically ENPs can be produced from any chemical but usually most of the ENPs are synthesized from transition metals, silicon, carbon/single-walled carbon annotates, fullerenes and metal oxides (Drobne, 2007). Top-down and bottom-up fabrication are two distinct methods for the production of ENPs. In top-down method, lithographic techniques are used to cut larger pieces of a material into NPs. Particles with sizes lesser than 100 nm and 30 nm can be produced using extreme UV photolithography

Classes of engineered nanoparticles

ENPs can be divided into several classes, such as, carbonaceous nanomaterials; metal oxides; semi-conductor materials; zero-valent metals and nanopolymers (Fig. 1). Carbonaceous nanomaterials include fullerene compounds, nanotubes, nanowires, etc. The discovery of first fullerene (C60-atom hollow sphere, also known as the buckyball) in 1985 marked the origin of this class (Kroto et al., 1985). C60 fullerenes possess a regular truncated icosahedron, the vertices of which bear the carbon atoms (

Physico-chemical properties of engineered nanoparticles

Physico-chemical properties of ENPs are one of the most important factors that regulate the behaviour of ENPs in the environment. Engineered nanoparticles are synthesized for a particular application therefore, the physico-chemical properties of each nanoparticles vary considerably. However, universally agreed and essentially required properties for ENPs are chemical composition, mass, particle number and concentration, surface area concentration, size distribution, specific surface area,

Release of engineered nanoparticles in the environment

Increased production and widespread use ENPs in various industries cause their frequent release into the environment. ENPs enter the environment through intentional as well as unintentional releases such as atmospheric emissions and solid or liquid waste streams from production sites. Intentional release of ENPs in the environment includes the uses of nanoparticles for remediation of contaminated soil and water (Klaine et al., 2008). A proportion of nanoparticles used as one of the components

Biological uptake of engineered nanoparticles

The probable mechanisms of uptake of ENPs by living organisms are not well known so far. But, it has been believed that animals incorporate NPs in their bodies mainly via gut (Baun et al., 2008). NPs can enter in the gut cells by diffusing through cell membranes (Lin et al., 2007), through endocytosis (Kim et al., 2006) and adhesion (Geiser et al., 2005) as shown in Fig. 2. The uptake of NPs via ion transporters seems unlikely considering the larger size of NPs than ions (Handy et al., 2008a).

Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles

Though a detailed mechanism of toxicity caused by ENPs is not yet elucidated, a few mechanisms like damage to membrane integrity, protein destabilization and oxidation, damage to nucleic acids, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), interruption of energy transduction, release of harmful and toxic components are likely involved in the damage caused by ENPs (Klaine et al., 2008).

Cell membrane is a potential target of damage from ENPs. Carboxyfullerene and gold NPs have been reported to

Ecotoxicity test strategies and biological hazard assessment

Frequent release and interaction of ENPs with various components of environment as well as probable risks necessitate the development of certain strategies to test the potential hazards of ENPs. The toxicity of ENPs vary with their size and shape and other basic properties, therefore, it is essential to study these basic properties while assessing its biological hazards. But studying the basic properties of ENPs becomes difficult because of two reasons. First, their relevant concentration (in ng

Legislations on the management of risk related to engineered nanoparticles

Due to serious environmental risk posed by the release of ENPs in the environment, it becomes essential to set specific standards for the manufacture, use, and disposal of ENPs (Handy and Shaw, 2007). The Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR, 2005) reports that the existing legislations do not mention or define ENPs. However, a number of organizations have evolved development-, description- and usage-associated standards for ENPs (Bard et al., 2009). The

Future research

Considering the wide application of ENPs and their entry into the environment, the study of their impact on the ecosystem, at biotic as well as abiotic level, has become mandatory. Only a limited number of areas have been covered as far as ecotoxicity tests and assessment of the hazardous effects of ENPs are concerned. Therefore, it is required to study their release, uptake, and mode of toxicity in the organisms. Furthermore, to understand the long-term effect of ENPs on the ecosystem,

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Professor Aditya Shastri, Vice Chancellor of Banasthali University for kindly extending the facilities of “Banasthali Centre for Education and Research in Basic Sciences” sanctioned under CURIE programme of the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi.

References (113)

  • E.F. Kukovitsky et al.

    VLS-growth of carbon nanotubes from the vapour

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2000)
  • Y. Li et al.

    The characterization and photocatalytic properties of mesoporous rutile TiO2 powder synthesized self-assembly of nano crystals

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2004)
  • N.B. Lihitkar et al.

    Titania nanoparticles synthesis in mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2007)
  • D. Lin et al.

    Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: inhibition of seed germination and root growth

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2007)
  • T. Mashino et al.

    Antibacterial and antiproliferative activity of cationic fullerene derivatives

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2003)
  • M.N. Moore

    Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment?

    Environ. Int.

    (2006)
  • J. Muller et al.

    Respiratory toxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (2005)
  • L.E. Murr et al.

    Chemistry and nanoparticulate compositions of a 10 000 year-old ice core melt water

    Water Res.

    (2004)
  • B. Nowack et al.

    Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2007)
  • E. Oberdorster et al.

    Ecotoxicology of carbon-based engineered nanoparticles: effects of fullerene (C-60) on aquatic organisms

    Carbon

    (2006)
  • L. Reijnders

    Hazard reduction for the application to titania nanoparticles in environmental technology

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2008)
  • S.K. Smart et al.

    The biocompatibility of carbon nanotubes

    Carbon

    (2006)
  • C.J. Smith et al.

    Toxicity of single walled carbon nanotubes on rainbow trout (Oncorhyncos mykiss): respiratory toxicity, organ pathologies, and other physiological effects

    Aquat. Toxicol.

    (2007)
  • A.P. Alivisatos et al.

    Quantum dots as cellular probes

    Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.

    (2005)
  • S. Arepalli et al.

    Production and measurements of individual single-wall nanotubes and small ropes of carbon

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2001)
  • A.R. Badireddy et al.

    Inactivation of bacteriophages via photosensitization of fullerol nanoparticles

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2007)
  • D. Bard et al.

    Current standardisation for nanotechnology. Nanosafe 2008: international conference on safe production and use of nanomaterials

    J. Phys. Conf. Ser.

    (2009)
  • P. Biswas et al.

    Nanoparticles and the environment

    J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.

    (2005)
  • P. Borm et al.

    The potential risks of nanoparticles: a review carried out for ECETOC

    Particle Fibre Toxicol.

    (2006)
  • J.A. Brant et al.

    Surface charge acquisition and characteristics of fullerene aggregates (n-C60) in aqueous suspensions

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2005)
  • S. Brunauer et al.

    Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1938)
  • J. Buffle et al.

    A generalized description of aquatic colloidal interactions: the three-colloidal component approach

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (1998)
  • E. Cabiscol et al.

    Oxidative stress in bacteria and protein damage by reactive oxygen species

    Int. Microb.

    (2000)
  • G. Caminati et al.

    Photophysical investigation of starburst dendrimers and their interactions with anionic and cationic surfactants

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1990)
  • P. Christian et al.

    Nanoparticles: structure, properties, preparation and behaviour in environmental media

    Ecotoxicology

    (2008)
  • M. Crane et al.

    Ecotoxicity test methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles

    Ecotoxicology

    (2008)
  • R.C. Doty et al.

    Extremely stable water-soluble Ag nanoparticles

    Chem. Mater.

    (2005)
  • D. Drobne

    Nanotoxicology for safe and sustainable nanotechnology

    Arh. Hig. Toksikol.

    (2007)
  • K.A. Dunphy Guzman et al.

    Influence of surface potential on aggregation and transport of titania nanoparticles

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2006)
  • Q.L. Feng et al.

    A mechanistic study of the antibacterial effect of silver ions on Esherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus

    J. Biomed. Mater. Res.

    (2000)
  • M. Filella

    Colloidal properties of submicron particles in natural waters

  • J.M.J. Frechet

    Functional polymers and dendrimers: reactivity, molecular architecture, and interfacial energy

    Science

    (1994)
  • G. Gao

    Nanostructures and Nanomaterials. Synthesis, Properties & Applications

    (2004)
  • G.W. Gee et al.

    Particle size analysis, methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods; agronomy monograph no. 9

    (1986)
  • M. Geiser et al.

    Ultrafine particles cross cellular membranes by nanophagocytic mechanisms in lungs and in cultured cells

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2005)
  • L.J. Gimbert et al.

    Partitioning and stability of engineered ZnO nanoparticles in soil suspensions using field-flow fractionation

    Environ. Chem.

    (2007)
  • C.M. Goodman et al.

    Toxicity of gold nanoparticles functionalized with cationic and anionic sidechains

    Bioconjugate Chem.

    (2004)
  • K.A.D. Guzman et al.

    Influence of surface potential on aggregation and transport of titania nanoparticles

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2006)
  • G.E.M. Hall

    Relative contamination of levels observed in different types of bottles used to collect water samples

    Explorer

    (1998)
  • R.D. Handy et al.

    Toxic effects of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: implications for public health, risk management and the public perception of nanotechnology

    Health Risk Soc.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text