Composite wastewater treatment by aerated electrocoagulation and modified peroxi-coagulation processes
Introduction
Small and medium-sized industries play a vital role in the economic growth and development of every country. It is reported that more than 300000 of small-scale industries are spread all over India and most of these industries are situated in 867 industrial estates (CPCB, 2005). It is estimated that small and medium scale industries are responsible for generating about 50% of industrial wastewater in India (Singh et al., 2008). Wastewater generated from these industries contains a variety of pollutants and should be treated before its discharge into natural waterbodies. Lack of operational space, technical manpower, scale of operation, budget etc. are the main challenges to operate individual wastewater treatment plant for each industrial units. To solve these problems and to protect our environment, Ministry of Environment and Forest, India introduced the concept of common effluent treatment plant (CETP) in 1984 (Pathe et al., 2004). The concept of CETP is to collect effluent generated from different industries and treat them at a common treatment system (Kapley et al., 2007). Effluent generated from each industry transported via tankers or pipeline to the equalization tank of CETPs. This system is similar to a municipal sewage treatment plant system where sewage generating from individual houses is treating in a common treatment plant. CETPs can be planned in such a way that there will be no issue of space in future expansion. Implementation of CETPs reduces the effluent treatment cost for individual industries significantly (Pophali and Dhodapkar, 2011, Singh et al., 2008). CETP eliminates several effluent discharge points and provide a better platform for the effective management of treated effluent and generated sludge.
CETPs can be divided into homogeneous and heterogeneous CETPs, based on the types of industries from which CETPs receiving the effluents. Homogenous CETPs receives effluents from a similar type of industries, while heterogeneous CETPs receive effluents from various types of industries such as textile, tanneries, pharmaceutical, chemical etc. Wastewater treatment in heterogeneous CETPs is quite difficult as compared to that in homogenous CETPs. The quantity and quality of wastewater receiving at heterogeneous CETPs are highly fluctuating than homogenous CETPs. Thus treatment of composite wastewater (mixed industrial wastewater) is a great challenge.
Central Pollution Control Board, India (CPCB, 2005) examined the performance of 78 CETPs operating in India and found that only 20 CETPs are meeting effluent discharge standards for the parameters pH, BOD, COD, and TSS. Only 5 CETPs out of 78 CETPs were meeting parameters including TDS (CPCB, 2005). This poor performance of CETPs is mainly due to the heterogeneous nature of wastewater. Most of the CETPs were designed by extrapolating sewage treatment plant design assumptions. Wastewater receives in STPs are homogeneous in nature, while the inlet wastewater characteristics of CETPs varies with the type of industries and industrial process. More often the industrial effluents contain toxic compounds which retard the performance of secondary treatment system (Roshini et al., 2017). Apart from all, most of the organic compounds present in industrial wastewater are non-biodegradable.
Electrochemical water and wastewater treatment methods have received great attention due to its simplicity, efficiency, lower operating cost compared to other treatment processes etc. (Brillas et al., 2009, Brillas and Martínez-Huitle, 2015, Martínez-Huitle et al., 2015, Nidheesh and Gandhimathi, 2012, Vasudevan and Oturan, 2014). Electrochemical treatment methods such as electrocoagulation (Shankar et al., 2014), electrochemical oxidation (Bhatnagar et al., 2014), anodic oxidation (Panizza and Cerisola, 2006), electro-Fenton process (Nidheesh and Gandhimathi, 2015, Roshini et al., 2017), peroxi-coagulation process (Nidheesh and Gandhimathi, 2014a), etc. are found very effective for the treatment of various industrial wastewater. Higher dissolved solid concentration present in the industrial wastewater is also helpful for the performance of electrochemical methods. The present study examines the performance of two electrochemical processes, namely aerated electrocoagulation process and modified peroxi-coagulation process for the treatment of composite wastewater. Efficiency of the processes was monitored in terms of color and COD removal.
Section snippets
Chemicals
Sulphuric acid (98% pure), sodium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide (30% pure) were purchased from Merck and used for the experiments without further purification or treatment. Deionized water was used for reagent preparation.
Composite wastewater
Composite wastewater was collected from the inlet point of a heterogeneous common effluent treatment plant situated in Gujarat, India. This composite wastewater contains effluents from various chemical industries, textile industries etc. Sufficient amount of wastewater was
Composite wastewater treatment by aerated electrocoagulation
Electrocoagulation process is widely accepted electrochemical process in which pollutants are removed from the water medium by in-situ generated hydrolyzable metal cations (Anantha Singh and Ramesh, 2013, Nidheesh and Singh, 2017, Vasudevan and Oturan, 2014). This process is found highly effective for removing various contaminants from synthetic water medium and to treat real wastewater (Aswathy et al., 2016, Eiband et al., 2014, Garcia-Segura et al., 2017, Mithra et al., 2017). Efficiency of
Conclusions
Electrochemical processes were found effective for COD and color removal from composite wastewater. Efficiency of electrocoagulation process using iron electrodes was improved significantly with external aeration. Aerated electrocoagulation process was found effective at pH 3 and 7.7, and more than 60% color and 50% COD were removed at pH 3. Performance of modified peroxi-coagulation process was found quite high compared to aerated electrocoagulation process. Color and COD removal efficiencies
Acknowledgments
Authors are thankful to the Director, CSIR-NEERI, Nagpur, India for providing encouragement, and kind permission for publishing the article.
References (47)
- et al.
New trends in electrocoagulation for the removal of dyes from wastewater: a review
Environ. Eng. Sci.
(2013) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Stand. Methods
(2012)- et al.
Removal of organics from bilge water by batch electrocoagulation process
Separ. Purif. Technol.
(2016) Treatment of landfill leachate by using electro-Fenton method
J. Hazard Mater.
(2009)- et al.
Process Chemistry for Water and Wastewater Treatment
(1982) - et al.
Electrocoagulation and effect of cathode materials on the removal of pollutants from tannery wastewater of Rouïba
Desalination
(2011) - et al.
Electrochemical oxidation of textile industry wastewater by graphite electrodes
J. Environ. Sci. Health. A. Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng
(2014) - et al.
Electrochemical removal of gallic acid from aqueous solutions
Electrochim. Acta
(2006) - et al.
Decontamination of wastewaters containing synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical methods. An updated review
Appl. Catal. B Environ.
(2015) - et al.
Electro-Fenton process and related electrochem- ical technologies based on Fenton’s reaction chemistry
Chem. Rev.
(2009)
Performance Status of Common Effluent Treatment Plants in India
Decolorization of orange II by electrocoagulation method
Separ. Purif. Technol.
Electrochemical removal of pollutants from agro-industry wastewaters
Separ. Purif. Technol.
Elimination of Pb2+through electrocoagulation: applicability of adsorptive stripping voltammetry for monitoring the lead concentration during its elimination
J. Electroanal. Chem.
Electrocoagulation and advanced electrocoagulation processes: a general review about the fundamentals, emerging applications and its association with other technologies
J. Electroanal. Chem.
Treatment of recalcitrant caprolactam wastewater using electrooxidation and ozonation
Clean. - Soil, Air, Water
Eubacterial diversity of activated biomass from a common effluent treatment plant
Res. Microbiol.
Treatment of dye solution containing colored index acid yellow 36 by electrocoagulation using iron electrodes
int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech
Mechanisms of radical generation in the removal of phenol derivatives and pigments using different Fe-based catalytic systems
J. Mol. Catal. Chem.
Single and coupled electrochemical processes and reactors for the abatement of organic water pollutants: a critical review
Chem. Rev.
Studies on the removal of phosphate from water by electrocoagulation with aluminium plate electrodes
Environ. Eng. Manag. J
An unprecedented route of [rad]OH radical reactivity evidenced by an electrocatalytical process: ipso-substitution with perhalogenocarbon compounds
Appl. Catal. B Environ.
Textile wastewater treatment by electro-fenton process in batch and continuous modes
J. Hazardous, Toxic, Radioact. Waste
Cited by (102)
Application of biochar in electro-Fenton process: Advantages and recent advancements
2024, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringInfluence of toilet flushing water when using an on-site faecal sludge treatment combining electrocoagulation-flotation and anaerobic digestion
2024, Journal of Water Process EngineeringA comparative study of advanced oxidation-based hybrid technologies for industrial wastewater treatment: An engineering perspective
2024, Chemical Engineering ScienceEnhancing pharmaceutical wastewater treatment: Ozone-assisted electrooxidation and precision optimization via response surface methodology
2024, Journal of Water Process Engineering