Resilience in children and youth: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Many children are reared in less than ideal family conditions (e.g., poverty, violence, substance abuse, family dissonance, family or personal illnesses). Situations such as these may inhibit the normal intellectual, social, and emotional development of children and youth, thus interfering with them reaching their full potential as adults. Conversely, many children encounter such adversities and fair well in spite of the challenges and may be considered to be resilient. This paper offers a review of the literature dating back to the 1970s to the present. In addition, several monumental longitudinal studies dating back to the 1950s are included. The paper reviews the (a) definition of resilience, (b) origins and recent advances in researching resilience, (c) protective factors, (d) models of resilience, (e) issues when researching resilience, (f) measures of resilience, and (g) resilience-based interventions.

Highlights

► We review the origins of resilience based on research. ► We review recent advances related to resilience. ► We examine several models of resilience as reported in the literature. ► We review recommendations related to measuring resilience. ► Several research-based interventions are reviewed.

Introduction

In this modern, complex society, it has become common to identify certain children as at-risk of failing to succeed because of the hardships in their young lives (Rak & Patterson, 1996). Poverty, violence, substance abuse, family dissonance, and illness represent a few potential vulnerabilities. According to Rak and Patterson, researchers are concerned that at risk children stand only slight chances of attaining their full potential as adults. Furthermore, there are worries that at risk individuals will become dysfunctional to the point of being incapable of supporting themselves or establishing rewarding relationships with others. However, many children who encounter stress and adversity in life fair well despite their exposure to severe challenges (Alvord and Grados, 2005, Brooks, 2006, Masten, 2007, Masten, 2011, Masten et al., 1991, Masten and Coatsworth, 1998, Rak and Patterson, 1996, Werner, 1986). Children who succeed in spite of adversity have been identified as resilient; possessing certain strengths and benefiting from protective factors that help them overcome adverse conditions and thrive.

It is essential to understand what environmental factors place children and youth at-risk as well as what protective factors may be nurtured to improve and support resilience in children (Alvord & Grados, 2005). This paper offers a review of the literature on resilience beginning in the 1970s to the present. Much of the literature from the 1970s is based on monumental longitudinal studies dating back to the 1950s. The paper begins by reviewing risk factors including biological and environmental influences. Resilience is defined and the origins and recent advances of resilience are delineated. Protective factors are then discussed, specifically, individual characteristics, family conditions, environmental supports, and other factors associated with what we deem as resilience. In addition, we highlight models of resilience, issues for consideration when researching resilience, and measures of resilience. Finally, individual, family, and social environment resilience-based interventions are examined.

Section snippets

Risk factors

In the medical field, the concept of risk has long been common; however, the acceptance of the concept began to emerge in the 1970s in the behavioral sciences (Jens & Gordon, 1991). Over the past three decades, signs of trouble (e.g., rates of divorce, teenage pregnancy, poverty) have materialized for child development in the United States (Masten & Coatsworth, 1998) causing much attention to the status of children regarding school success, behavior, and physical and mental health.

Children and

Resilience defined

According to Alvord and Grados (2005), numerous definitions of resilience require conditions of an identified risk or challenge followed by some defined measure of positive outcome. However, debate remains concerning what constitutes resilient behavior and how to best measure successful adaptation to hardship. Resilience is not an one-dimensional, dichotomous attribute that an individual has or does not have. It has been suggested that a resilient individual must show positive outcomes across

Origins of resilience

Historically, the origins of resilience have deep roots in the field of medicine; however, research on resilience in the behavioral sciences began to emerge around 1970 (Cicchetti, 2006, Cicchetti and Curtis, 2006, Masten, 2007, Masten, 2011, Masten and Obradovic, 2006). According to Masten (2011), pioneering scientists contended that critical aspects of human function and development, crucial for understanding and promoting prevention of, resistance to, or recovery from psychopathology, had

Recent advances

According to Curtis and Cicchetti (2003), theoretical treatments of resilience have concentrated almost entirely on psychosocial levels of analysis to develop explanatory models. The developing research in the area of resilience incorporates numerous areas (Alvord & Grados, 2005). Some investigations have included children from various cultures. For example, Hart, Hofmann, Edelstein, and Keller (1997) set out to replicate findings in another culture, and Grotberg (1995) launched an

Protective factors

According to Rutter (1979), … any children do not succumb to deprivation, and it is important that we determine why this is so and what it is that protects them from hazards they face (p. 70). Garmezy et al. (1984) and Rutter (1986) stressed the crucial need to understand the impact of life experiences on children. Furthermore, it is essential to understand why those experiences provoke such a range of responses in different individuals.

Resilience is inhibited by risk factors and promoted by

Models of resilience

Models of resilience have been identified to explain how individual and environmental factors function to reduce or offset the adverse effects of risk factors (Fergus and Zimmerman, 2005, Garmezy et al., 1984, Rutter, 1985, Zimmerman and Arunkumar, 1994). Garmezy et al. (1984) proposed three models to describe the impact of stress and personal attributes on the quality of adaptation: (a) compensatory model, (b) challenge model, and (c) protective factor model. Researchers have defined other

Issues when researching resilience

According to Fergus and Zimmerman (2005), there are several issues related to research in resilience causing confusion within the field and igniting criticism of resilience theory. There are varying definitions of resilience and central terminology, which slow the development of the field (Luthar et al., 2000). The authors recommend developing a common language to bring the field to the next level. Although some researchers believe resilience is a trait, resilience is not a quality of an

Measuring resilience

There are numerous ways of assessing resilience. Checklists, scales, and interviews have been developed to assess resilience, risk and protective factors (e.g., Baruth and Carroll, 2002, Vance et al., 1998), or competence in one or more domains (e.g., Ewart, Jorgensen, Suchday, Chen, & Matthews, 2002). However, Naglieri and LeBuffle (2005) recommend only using standardized approaches for measuring resilience.

Resilience-based interventions

Without intervention, youth facing significant adversities have a greater likelihood of encountering problems as they navigate their developmental paths (Luthar & Cicchetti, 2000). A key idea is that interventions need to focus on developing assets and resources for those exposed to risk rather than concentrating on risk amelioration (Fergus & Zimmerman, 2005; Luthar & Cicchetti; Yates et al., 2003). In the past, practitioners focused on documenting predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing

Conclusion

Assets and resources that assist children and youth overcome adverse effects of risks differ according to the population studied, context, and outcome (Fergus & Zimmerman, 2005). However, several common themes appear. Parental factors such as support, monitoring, and communication skills are crucial resources for youth. Although individuals with self-confidence and social skills are slightly prone to being resilient irrespective of the risk or outcome, it is essential that resilience-based

Staci M. Zolkoski is a doctoral candidate in the leadership program, specializing in the area of emotional/behavioral disorders, at the University of North Texas. Prior to beginning full-time doctoral studies, she taught inclusion-based general education in Title I elementary schools.

References (92)

  • C.A. Olsson et al.

    Adolescent resilience: A concept analysis

    Journal of Adolescence

    (2003)
  • E.E. Werner

    The children of Kauai: Resiliency and recovery in adolescence and adulthood

    Journal of Adolescent Health

    (1992)
  • N.R. Ahern et al.

    A review of instruments measuring resilience

    Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing

    (2006)
  • M.K. Alvord et al.

    Enhancing resilience in children: A proactive approach

    Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

    (2005)
  • K.E. Baruth et al.

    A formal assessment of resilience: The Baruth protective factors inventory

    Journal of Individual Psychology

    (2002)
  • D. Baumrind

    Rearing competent children

  • D. Baumrind

    Effective parenting during the early adolescent transition

  • M.D. Beardslee et al.

    Resilient adolescents whose parents have serious affective and other psychiatric disorders: Importance of self-understanding and relationships

    The American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1988)
  • K. Benzies et al.

    Fostering family resiliency: A review of the key protective factors

    Child & Family Social Work

    (2009)
  • B. Bernard

    Fostering resiliency in kids

    Educational Leadership

    (1993)
  • B. Bernard

    Fostering resilience in children

    (1995)
  • M. Bleuler

    Different forms of childhood stress and patterns of adult psychiatric outcome

  • R. Bolig et al.

    Resiliency and hospitalization of children

    Children's Health Care

    (1998)
  • G.J. Botvin et al.

    Life skills training as a primary prevention approach for adolescent drug abuse and other problem behaviors

    International Journal of Emergency Mental Health

    (2002)
  • J.S. Brook et al.

    Dynamics of childhood and adolescent personality traits and adolescent drug use

    Developmental Psychology

    (1986)
  • J.S. Brook et al.

    Changes in drug involvement: A longitudinal study of childhood and adolescent determinants

    Psychological Reports

    (1989)
  • J.E. Brooks

    Strengthening resilience in children and youths: Maximizing opportunities in the schools

    Children and Schools

    (2006)
  • J.C. Buckner et al.

    Characteristics of resilient youths living in poverty: The role of self-regulatory processes

    Development and Psychopathology

    (2003)
  • C.H. Caldwell et al.

    Enhancing adolescent health behaviors through strengthening non-resident father–son relationships: A model for intervention with African-American families

    Health Education Research

    (2004)
  • D. Cicchetti
  • D. Cicchetti et al.
  • D. Cicchetti et al.

    The role of self-organization in the promotion of resilience in maltreated children

    Development and Psychopathology

    (1997)
  • D. Cicchetti et al.

    A developmental psychopathology perspective on adolescence

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2002)
  • J.D. Coatsworth et al.

    Familias unidas: A family-centered ecodevelopmental intervention to reduce risk for problem behavior among Hispanic adolescents

    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

    (2002)
  • R. Crosnoe et al.

    Protective functions of family relationships and school factors on the deviant behavior of adolescent boys and girls: Reducing the impact of risky friendships

    Youth & Society

    (2002)
  • W.J. Curtis et al.

    Moving research on resilience into the 21st century: Theoretical and methodological considerations in examining the biological contributors to resilience

    Development and Psychopathology

    (2003)
  • N. Eisenberg et al.

    Longitudinal relations among parental emotional expressivity, children's regulation, and quality of socioemotional functioning

    Developmental Psychology

    (2003)
  • C.K. Ewart et al.

    Measuring stress resilience and coping in vulnerable youth: The social competence interview

    Psychological Assessment

    (2002)
  • S. Fergus et al.

    Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk

    Annual Review of Public Health

    (2005)
  • N. Fredman et al.

    Handbook of measurements for marriage & family therapy

    (1987)
  • N. Garmezy et al.

    The study of stress and competence in children: A building block for developmental psychopathology

    Child Development

    (1984)
  • P.J. Gerber et al.

    Identifying alterable patterns in employment success for highly successful adults with learning disabilities

    Journal of Learning Disabilities

    (1992)
  • I.I. Gottesman

    Developmental genetics and ontogenetic psychology: Overdue détente and propositions from a matchmaker

  • I.I. Gottesman et al.

    Schizophrenia and genetics: A twin study vantage point

    (1972)
  • E.H. Grotberg

    A guide to promoting resilience in children: Strengthening the human spirit

  • L.M. Gutman et al.

    The academic achievement of African American students during early adolescence: An examination of multiple risk, promotive, and protective factors

    American Journal of Community Psychology

    (2002)
  • D. Hart et al.

    The relation of childhood personality types to adolescent behavior and development: A longitudinal study of Icelandic children

    Developmental Psychology

    (1997)
  • L. Hechtman

    Developmental neurobiological and psychosocial aspects of hyperactivity, impulsivity, and attention

  • A. Hogue et al.

    Family-based prevention counseling for high-risk young adolescents: Immediate outcomes

    Journal of Community Psychology

    (2002)
  • K.G. Jens et al.

    Understanding risk: Implications for tracking high-risk infants and making early service delivery decision

    International Journal of Disability, Development and Education

    (1991)
  • H.C. Kraemer et al.

    Coming to terms with the terms of risk

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • F. Luthans et al.

    Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction

    Personnel Psychology

    (2007)
  • S.S. Luthar

    Vulnerability and resilience: A study of high-risk adolescents

    Child Development

    (1991)
  • S.S. Luthar et al.

    The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies

    Development and Psychopathology

    (2000)
  • S.S. Luthar et al.

    The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work

    Child Development

    (2000)
  • C. Martinez-Torteya et al.

    Resilience among children exposed to domestic violence: The role of risk and protective factors

    Child Development

    (2009)
  • Cited by (448)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Staci M. Zolkoski is a doctoral candidate in the leadership program, specializing in the area of emotional/behavioral disorders, at the University of North Texas. Prior to beginning full-time doctoral studies, she taught inclusion-based general education in Title I elementary schools.

    Lyndal M. Bullock is a Regents Professor in Special Education at the University of North Texas where he coordinates the graduate leadership program in emotional/behavioral disorder. Over the years, he has contributed significantly to the literature and leadership in professional education associations.

    View full text