Elsevier

Cities

Volume 24, Issue 4, August 2007, Pages 285-297
Cities

Shaping neighborhoods and nature: Urban political ecologies of urban waterfront transformations in Portland, Oregon

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.12.003Get rights and content

This research critically examines the planning and redevelopment of historic industrial waterfronts adjacent to downtown Portland, Oregon. While the city’s economy once centered on its waterfronts, economic restructuring and industrial decline rendered obsolete many of these spaces and their ancillary warehouses and railyards. The city and the region have pinned their hopes for the future on real estate development, biotech and the creative economy. The waterfront has become the site of considerable residential and commercial redevelopment that transforms underutilized areas into an expanded downtown following a familiar model of condos, restaurants, offices and galleries. These remade waterfront districts must be considered within the way in which articulations of nature and urbanity are mobilized in order to shape expectations and consumption of the new neighbourhoods. This is particularly relevant given the city’s prominence in academic and mainstream media regarding its liveability and environmentalism. Waterfront ecological restoration, urban liveability, and sustainable technologies all appeal to the urban imaginaries of planners, developers and residents while potentially displacing other concerns or questions. Public–private partnerships and strategic rescaling suggest new governance regimes are articulated in the visioning, planning and development of these districts, simultaneously reconstructing neighbourhoods and ecologies. Portland is often considered (and considers itself) at the leading edge of progressive urban development and politics. Careful criticism of the city’s production of new urban spaces should be pursued to avoid foreclosing opportunities for articulating alternate urban futures.

Section snippets

Introduction: Portland planning and waterfront redevelopment

Nearly everyone loves Portland, Oregon. It is beautiful, has a mild climate, progressive politics and strong environmental ethics. Common stories of Portland circle around outdoor activities, unique civic spaces and institutions, and a variety of transit options including: light rail, streetcars, a soon to be completed aerial tram, walkable neighbourhoods, an award winning bus system, and bicycle friendly streets. In a word, it’s liveable. Organizations such as Partners for Liveable Communities

Staging of urban nature: The River District and North Macadam District in Portland

Established at the few areas of flat land along the lower Willamette River, the historic waterfront was the heart of Portland’s early economic activity. It became separated from this function as transportation technology shifted scales and the harbour moved downstream to wider, deeper portions of the river. Until recently, railroad yards, barge works and salvage operations dominated the historic riverfront, but over time, new configurations for this ‘grey zone’ of older buildings and lots

Conclusion

Planning for liveability in Portland has sought to capitalize on and reinforce particular forms of nature, linked to specific types of marketable urban revitalization and reflecting desires for post-industrial knowledge-based economic development amid the uncertainties of deindustrialization and globalization. Considering waterfront redevelopment through the discourse of liveability planning in Portland presents an opportunity to move beyond blanket assessments of gentrification, while

References (78)

  • Abbott, C (1997) The Portland Region: Where City and Suburbs Talk to Each Other-And Often Agree. Housing Policy Debate...
  • C. Abbott

    Greater Portland: Urban Life and Landscape in the Pacific Northwest

    (2001)
  • R.A. Beauregard

    Voices of Decline: the postwar fate of US cities

    (1993)
  • U. Beck

    Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity

    (1992)
  • E. Beck-Gernsheim

    Risk and the Self: Life as a planning project

  • M. Berman

    All that is solid melts into air: the experience of modernity

    (1982)
  • Bjelland, M (2000) Recycling the Industrial City: Brownfield Site Remediation and Redevelopment in the Twin Cities and...
  • Bogason, P (2004) Networks in Policy analysis – Towards a New Pragmatism, Centre for Democratic Network Governance,...
  • J.R. Borchert

    Futures of American Cities

  • G. Bridge

    Gentrification, class and residence: a reappraisal

    Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

    (1994)
  • G. Bridge

    The space for class? On class analysis in the study of gentrification

    Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS

    (1995)
  • N. Castree

    False antithesis? Marxism, nature and actor-networks

    Antipode

    (2002)
  • N. Castree et al.

    The construction of nature and the nature of construction: analytical and political tools for building survivable futures

  • J. Caulfield

    ‘Gentrification’ and desire

    Canadian Rev. Socio. Anthro

    (1989)
  • Citizen Advisory Committee and Portland Planning Commission

    Planning Guidelines: Portland Downtown Plan

    (1972)
  • Citizen Advisory Committee and Bureau of Planning

    Central City Plan

    (1988)
  • City of Portland (1996) New City Neighbourhood Now On the Map! Press Release – November 13, 1996. City of Portland,...
  • City of Portland (1998) Portland city council approves designation of River District as city’s newest urban renewal...
  • M. Dear

    Privatization and the rhetoric of planning practice

    Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

    (1989)
  • D. Demeritt

    Science Social Constructivism and Nature

  • A. Duany

    Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream

    (2000)
  • B. Edmonston et al.

    Population outlook for the Portland Vancouver Metropolitan Area

  • R. Florida

    The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it’s Transforming Work, Leisure, and Everyday Life

    (2002)
  • B. Flyvbjerg

    Rationality and Power

    (1998)
  • L. Ford

    Cities and Buildings: Skyscrapers, Skid rows, and Suburbs

    (1994)
  • Francesconi, J (2003) City Council Meeting. Portland, OR, July 31,...
  • Frank, R (2006) Potter asks full council to oversee tram project. The Oregonian Portland, Oregon: B2. February 1,...
  • Frisk, B (2006) Urban Treasures. Bicycling March...
  • M. Gandy

    Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City

    (2002)
  • Gragg, R (2005) Tanner Springs, Portland’s newest, comes with instructions. The Oregonian Portland, Oregon: E1, July...
  • Grudowski, M (2005) The New American Dream Towns. Outside August...
  • T. Hall et al.

    The entrepreneurial city: new urban politics, new urban geographies?

    Progress in Human Geography

    (1996)
  • D. Harvey

    The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change

    (1989)
  • B. Hoyle

    Urban Waterfront revitalization in developing countries: the example of Zanzibar’s Stone Town

    The Geographical Journal

    (2002)
  • Inc. (2005) The Top U.S. Cities for Doing Business: Most Balanced Economy and Growth. Inc. May...
  • R. Keil

    Progress report: urban political ecology

    Urban Geography

    (2003)
  • R. Keil

    Progress report – urban political ecology

    Urban Geography

    (2005)
  • J. Kenny

    Portland’s comprehensive plan as text: the Fred Meyer case and the politics of reading

  • Cited by (127)

    • What influenced the vitality of the waterfront open space? A case study of Huangpu River in Shanghai, China

      2021, Cities
      Citation Excerpt :

      Aimed at empirically testing Jacobs' ideas, X. Delclòs-Alió and Miralles-Guasch (2018) analyzed urban vitality throughout a systemized approach, whose factors include accessibility, concentration, diversity, contact opportunity, need for aged buildings and border vacuums. The existing literature on waterfront factors includes discussion of nature (Hagerman, 2007; Sairinen & Kumpulainen, 2006), function (Breen & Rigby, 1996; Evans, 2005), culture (Hurley, 2006; Moe & Wilkie, 1997), accessibility (Che et al., 2012; Sairinen & Kumpulainen, 2006), economic (Desfor & Jørgensen, 2004; U. Lehrer & Laidley, 2008), and others (Bassett, Griffiths, & Smith, 2002; Desfor & Jørgensen, 2004; Saito, 2003) (Table 1). These studies provided the basis for the subsequent selection of factors of waterfront vitality.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text