Smectite alteration and its influence on the barrier properties of smectite clay for a repository
Introduction
The major functions of the buffer in a high-level waste (HLW) repository are to inhibit the penetration of groundwater and to retard the release of radionuclides from the radioactive wastes to the surrounding environment. Smectite clay has been considered favorably as such a buffer material because of its high swelling and sorption capacities. However, when the smectite clay is exposed to an elevated temperature due to heat from radioactive decay and the particular geochemical conditions of a repository for a long time, it may be transformed into other minerals (e.g., illite, chlorite, etc.) which leads to a decrease in the swelling and sorption properties of the smectite clay and consequently increases its water penetration and radionuclide transport properties (Pusch and Carlsson, 1985, Bucher and Müller-Vonmoos, 1989). Therefore, an understanding of smectite alteration and its influence on the barrier properties of a smectite clay is essential to evaluate the long-term barrier performance of a buffer for a HLW repository.
Smectite alteration, especially smectite-to-illite conversion which may occur under commonly-prevailing pH conditions, has drawn considerable interest in the last few decades due to the implication of its reaction for clay diagenesis and migration of petroleum as well as the long-term barrier performance of a smectitic buffer for a repository. Very many investigators (Eberl, 1978, Roberson and Lahann, 1981, Inoue, 1983, Howard and Roy, 1985, Huang and Otten, 1987, Proust et al., 1990, Güven and Huang, 1991, Velde and Vasseur, 1992, Huang et al., 1993, Cuadros and Linares, 1996, Huertas et al., 2001, Bauer et al., 2005, Sato et al., 2005, Bauer et al., 2006) have studied the reaction mechanism and kinetics of smectite-to-illite conversion. On the basis of those studies, smectite-to-illite conversion has been suggested by a general consensus to proceed by two different mechanisms. One is a solid-state one-to-one transformation where T–O–T layers are conserved, and the reaction proceeds with a replacement of the tetrahedral Si4+by Al3+until the layer charge deficiency is sufficiently developed to dehydrate the interlayer cations, and a collapse occurs (Hower et al., 1976):Smectite + Al3+ + K+ – > Illite + Si4+
The other is a mechanism in which a destruction of the T–O–T layers provides the source of aluminium for the transformation, which thus consumes more smectite than it produces illite (Boles and Franks, 1979):Smectite + K+ – > Illite +Si4+where the ratio of smectite consumed to illite produced is approximately 1.6:1, and no external source of aluminium is required. However, no consensus has been reached on which mechanism prevails because the reaction depends on different test conditions. The kinetics of a smectite-to-illite conversion has been studied to obtain a rate law for the overall conversion process (Pytte and Reynolds, 1989, Velde and Vasseur, 1992, Huang et al., 1993, Wei et al., 1993 Cuadros and Linares, 1996, Huertas et al., 2001). Most of these studies are based on field observation of clay diagenesis, while there are not many studies based on systematic laboratory work. From these studies, it is implied that, although the most important parameters for controlling smectite-to-illite conversion are the temperature, potassium concentration, and reaction time, the proposed rate laws have limitations in their application to evaluate the extent of smectite-to-illite conversion under different repository conditions, due to an uncertainty in the parameter values. On the other hand, insufficient data has been reported regarding the influence of smectite alteration on the barrier properties such as the percentage of expandable smectite (MacEwan and Wilson, 1980, Huang et al., 1993), layer charge (Howard and Roy, 1985, Güven and Huang, 1991), cation exchange capacity (CEC) (Oscarson, and Hume, 1993), and sorption capacity (Comans et al., 1991, Ohnuki et al., 1994) of a smectite clay for a buffer of a HLW repository.
The present study, in this connection, focuses on investigating to what extent the smectite may be altered when it is hydrothermally treated under a certain potassium concentration and as a result how the smectite alteration may affect the barrier properties of a smectite clay for a Korean HLW repository.
Section snippets
Materials
The solid material used for the tests was a natural smectite fractioned into a < 2 µm size from a bentonite (Chun et al., 1998) which was taken from Kyeongju, Korea. The original bentonite contains smectite (78%), feldspars (20.1%), quartz (1.7%), and some impurities. The < 2 µm fraction of the bentonite was separated by a centrifugation method, and the physicochemical and mineralogical properties of the separated natural smectite are as summarized in Table 1.
All the solutions were prepared by
Smectite alteration
The smectite alteration caused by the hydrothermal reaction under the potassium concentration of 0.5 M was identified by examining the data sets of XRD and dissolved silica concentration. Fig. 1 demonstrates the XRD patterns of EG samples, each of which is subjected to a different reaction time and temperature. With increasing reaction time and temperature, the first-and third-order reflections of EG samples progressively weakened and broadened, the second-order reflections moved toward the
Conclusions
This study identified that when the smectite was hydrothermally treated under the potassium concentration of 0.5 M it was transformed into randomly interstratified I–S by a smectite-to-illite conversion. The temperature was a key factor controlling the conversion reaction. Also, it was observed that such a smectite conversion might affect the barrier properties of smectite clay: the percentage of the expandable smectite layers in the randomly interstratified I–S decreased, the layer charge was
References (33)
- et al.
Experimental kinetics study of the smectite-to-illite transformation
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
(1996) The reaction of montmorillonite to mixed-layer clay: the effect of interlayer alkali and alkaline-earth cations
Geochimica et Ccosmochimica Acta
(1978)- et al.
Kinetics of montmorillonite dissolution in granitic solution
Applied Geochemistry
(2001) - et al.
The physical state of Na-smectite used as barrier component
Engineering Geology
(1985) - et al.
Ion exchange capacities and surface areas of some major components and common fracture filling materials of igneous rocks
KBS Technical Report 83-64, SKB, Sweden
(1983) - et al.
The fate of smectite before becoming illite in bentonite experiments
- et al.
The fate of smectite in KOH solution
American Mineralogist
(2006) - et al.
Clay diagenesis in Wilcox sandstones of southwest Texas: implications of smectite diagenesis on sandstone cementation
Journal of Sedimentary Petrology
(1979) - et al.
Bentonite as a containment barrier for the disposal of highly radioactive wastes
Applied Clay Science
(1989) - et al.
High-level waste disposal technology development: Engineered barrier development
(1998)
Sorption of cesium on illite: non-equilibrium behavior and reversibility
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Effect of octahedral Mg2+and Fe3+substitutions on hydrothermal illitization reactions
Clays and Clay Minerals
Development of layer charge and kinetics of experimental smectite alteration
Clays and Clay Minerals
Mechanism of burial metamorphism of argillaceous sediment, I. mineralogical and chemical evidence
Geological Society of America Bulletin
Smectite illitization: effect of smectite composition
An experimentally derived kinetic models for smectite-to-illite conversion and its use as a geothermometer
Clays and Clay Minerals
Cited by (53)
A systematic review of bentonite/concrete interaction system in HLW disposal repositories: Theoretical, experimental and geochemical modelling analysis
2022, Construction and Building MaterialsCitation Excerpt :Then, the interactions come to the second stage that the montmorillonite dissolves while the secondary minerals are not in well crystalline state or in amorphous phase [20,30,70,71]. The last stage of the reaction is the mineralogy altering and generating the secondary minerals such as mixed layers, illite, kaolinite, chlorite, zeolite, feldspars, mica, etc. [3,19,23,27,30,32,46,48,72,73]. Fernández et al. [3] has summarized the bentonite degradation stages caused by concrete degradation:
Adsorption of Eu(III) onto Gaomiaozi bentonite corroded by cement waters: Effect of cement solutions on the long-term sorption performance of bentonite in the repository conditions
2020, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :It is concluded from the literature that high-pH plume interacts with clay and tends to dissolve primary minerals such as smectite, illite, mixed layers, kaolinite and accessory minerals such as quartz, feldspars, mica, and dolomite (e.g. Ramirez et al., 2005; Yamaguchi et al., 2007; Nakayama et al., 2004; Gaucher and Blanc, 2006; Fernández et al., 2009b, 2010; Savage et al., 2002). When the montmorillonite in bentonite reacts with alkaline cement solutions, the formation of some new minerals (illite, chlorite, zeolite, etc.) would occur (Nakayama et al., 2004; Bauer et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2010; Fernández et al., 2010, 2013), subsequently decreasing its swelling pressure (Sun et al., 2018a,b) and increasing its permeability (Lee et al., 2010). The long-term prediction is usually made by using numerical simulation coupling geochemistry analysis to assess the alkaline plume perturbation with geochemical codes such as PRECIP (Savage et al., 2002), PHREEQC (Gaucher and Blanc, 2006; Fernández et al., 2009a), Hytec (Trotignon et al., 2007; Windt et al., 2008), QPAC (Savage et al., 2007), etc.
Effect of aging on thermal conductivity of compacted bentonites
2019, Engineering GeologyCeramics applications of clay in Lake Chad Basin, Central Africa
2019, Applied Clay Science