Smectite alteration and its influence on the barrier properties of smectite clay for a repository

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2008.10.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Hydrothermal tests were conducted to investigate smectite alteration and its influence on the barrier properties of a smectite clay for a repository. Examinations of the X-ray diffraction patterns of the starting material and reacted samples and the silica release rate in the solution revealed that the smectite was transformed into randomly interstratified illite–smectite by a smectite-to-illite conversion when it was hydrothermally treated under a potassium concentration of 0.5 M, maintaining a 1 g/20 ml of solid sample-to-solution ratio. Temperature was observed to be a key factor controlling the conversion reaction. The smectite alteration affected the barrier properties of smectite clay for a repository: when the temperature increased, the percentage of the expandable smectite layers in the randomly interstratified illite–smectite decreased, the layer charge was more negative, and the cation exchange capacity and the sorption capacity for the cesium and nickel ions were reduced.

Introduction

The major functions of the buffer in a high-level waste (HLW) repository are to inhibit the penetration of groundwater and to retard the release of radionuclides from the radioactive wastes to the surrounding environment. Smectite clay has been considered favorably as such a buffer material because of its high swelling and sorption capacities. However, when the smectite clay is exposed to an elevated temperature due to heat from radioactive decay and the particular geochemical conditions of a repository for a long time, it may be transformed into other minerals (e.g., illite, chlorite, etc.) which leads to a decrease in the swelling and sorption properties of the smectite clay and consequently increases its water penetration and radionuclide transport properties (Pusch and Carlsson, 1985, Bucher and Müller-Vonmoos, 1989). Therefore, an understanding of smectite alteration and its influence on the barrier properties of a smectite clay is essential to evaluate the long-term barrier performance of a buffer for a HLW repository.

Smectite alteration, especially smectite-to-illite conversion which may occur under commonly-prevailing pH conditions, has drawn considerable interest in the last few decades due to the implication of its reaction for clay diagenesis and migration of petroleum as well as the long-term barrier performance of a smectitic buffer for a repository. Very many investigators (Eberl, 1978, Roberson and Lahann, 1981, Inoue, 1983, Howard and Roy, 1985, Huang and Otten, 1987, Proust et al., 1990, Güven and Huang, 1991, Velde and Vasseur, 1992, Huang et al., 1993, Cuadros and Linares, 1996, Huertas et al., 2001, Bauer et al., 2005, Sato et al., 2005, Bauer et al., 2006) have studied the reaction mechanism and kinetics of smectite-to-illite conversion. On the basis of those studies, smectite-to-illite conversion has been suggested by a general consensus to proceed by two different mechanisms. One is a solid-state one-to-one transformation where T–O–T layers are conserved, and the reaction proceeds with a replacement of the tetrahedral Si4+by Al3+until the layer charge deficiency is sufficiently developed to dehydrate the interlayer cations, and a collapse occurs (Hower et al., 1976):Smectite + Al3+ + K+  > Illite + Si4+

The other is a mechanism in which a destruction of the T–O–T layers provides the source of aluminium for the transformation, which thus consumes more smectite than it produces illite (Boles and Franks, 1979):Smectite + K+  > Illite +Si4+where the ratio of smectite consumed to illite produced is approximately 1.6:1, and no external source of aluminium is required. However, no consensus has been reached on which mechanism prevails because the reaction depends on different test conditions. The kinetics of a smectite-to-illite conversion has been studied to obtain a rate law for the overall conversion process (Pytte and Reynolds, 1989, Velde and Vasseur, 1992, Huang et al., 1993, Wei et al., 1993 Cuadros and Linares, 1996, Huertas et al., 2001). Most of these studies are based on field observation of clay diagenesis, while there are not many studies based on systematic laboratory work. From these studies, it is implied that, although the most important parameters for controlling smectite-to-illite conversion are the temperature, potassium concentration, and reaction time, the proposed rate laws have limitations in their application to evaluate the extent of smectite-to-illite conversion under different repository conditions, due to an uncertainty in the parameter values. On the other hand, insufficient data has been reported regarding the influence of smectite alteration on the barrier properties such as the percentage of expandable smectite (MacEwan and Wilson, 1980, Huang et al., 1993), layer charge (Howard and Roy, 1985, Güven and Huang, 1991), cation exchange capacity (CEC) (Oscarson, and Hume, 1993), and sorption capacity (Comans et al., 1991, Ohnuki et al., 1994) of a smectite clay for a buffer of a HLW repository.

The present study, in this connection, focuses on investigating to what extent the smectite may be altered when it is hydrothermally treated under a certain potassium concentration and as a result how the smectite alteration may affect the barrier properties of a smectite clay for a Korean HLW repository.

Section snippets

Materials

The solid material used for the tests was a natural smectite fractioned into a < 2 µm size from a bentonite (Chun et al., 1998) which was taken from Kyeongju, Korea. The original bentonite contains smectite (78%), feldspars (20.1%), quartz (1.7%), and some impurities. The < 2 µm fraction of the bentonite was separated by a centrifugation method, and the physicochemical and mineralogical properties of the separated natural smectite are as summarized in Table 1.

All the solutions were prepared by

Smectite alteration

The smectite alteration caused by the hydrothermal reaction under the potassium concentration of 0.5 M was identified by examining the data sets of XRD and dissolved silica concentration. Fig. 1 demonstrates the XRD patterns of EG samples, each of which is subjected to a different reaction time and temperature. With increasing reaction time and temperature, the first-and third-order reflections of EG samples progressively weakened and broadened, the second-order reflections moved toward the

Conclusions

This study identified that when the smectite was hydrothermally treated under the potassium concentration of 0.5 M it was transformed into randomly interstratified I–S by a smectite-to-illite conversion. The temperature was a key factor controlling the conversion reaction. Also, it was observed that such a smectite conversion might affect the barrier properties of smectite clay: the percentage of the expandable smectite layers in the randomly interstratified I–S decreased, the layer charge was

References (33)

  • ComansR.N.J. et al.

    Sorption of cesium on illite: non-equilibrium behavior and reversibility

    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

    (1991)
  • GüvenN. et al.

    Effect of octahedral Mg2+and Fe3+substitutions on hydrothermal illitization reactions

    Clays and Clay Minerals

    (1991)
  • HowardJ.J. et al.

    Development of layer charge and kinetics of experimental smectite alteration

    Clays and Clay Minerals

    (1985)
  • HowerJ. et al.

    Mechanism of burial metamorphism of argillaceous sediment, I. mineralogical and chemical evidence

    Geological Society of America Bulletin

    (1976)
  • HuangW.L. et al.

    Smectite illitization: effect of smectite composition

  • HuangW.L. et al.

    An experimentally derived kinetic models for smectite-to-illite conversion and its use as a geothermometer

    Clays and Clay Minerals

    (1993)
  • Cited by (53)

    • A systematic review of bentonite/concrete interaction system in HLW disposal repositories: Theoretical, experimental and geochemical modelling analysis

      2022, Construction and Building Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Then, the interactions come to the second stage that the montmorillonite dissolves while the secondary minerals are not in well crystalline state or in amorphous phase [20,30,70,71]. The last stage of the reaction is the mineralogy altering and generating the secondary minerals such as mixed layers, illite, kaolinite, chlorite, zeolite, feldspars, mica, etc. [3,19,23,27,30,32,46,48,72,73]. Fernández et al. [3] has summarized the bentonite degradation stages caused by concrete degradation:

    • Adsorption of Eu(III) onto Gaomiaozi bentonite corroded by cement waters: Effect of cement solutions on the long-term sorption performance of bentonite in the repository conditions

      2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is concluded from the literature that high-pH plume interacts with clay and tends to dissolve primary minerals such as smectite, illite, mixed layers, kaolinite and accessory minerals such as quartz, feldspars, mica, and dolomite (e.g. Ramirez et al., 2005; Yamaguchi et al., 2007; Nakayama et al., 2004; Gaucher and Blanc, 2006; Fernández et al., 2009b, 2010; Savage et al., 2002). When the montmorillonite in bentonite reacts with alkaline cement solutions, the formation of some new minerals (illite, chlorite, zeolite, etc.) would occur (Nakayama et al., 2004; Bauer et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2010; Fernández et al., 2010, 2013), subsequently decreasing its swelling pressure (Sun et al., 2018a,b) and increasing its permeability (Lee et al., 2010). The long-term prediction is usually made by using numerical simulation coupling geochemistry analysis to assess the alkaline plume perturbation with geochemical codes such as PRECIP (Savage et al., 2002), PHREEQC (Gaucher and Blanc, 2006; Fernández et al., 2009a), Hytec (Trotignon et al., 2007; Windt et al., 2008), QPAC (Savage et al., 2007), etc.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text