Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
The adsorption at solution–air interface and volumetric properties of mixtures of cationic and nonionic surfactants
Introduction
The tendency of surfactants to adsorb at interfaces in an oriented fashion and micelle formation are their two fundamental properties [1], [2], [3].
The adsorption of surfactants at air–water interface controls the dynamic behavior of many important systems [4], [5]. The surfactants adsorption influence the stability of foams, the droplet size in jets and sprays, the spreading of drops on solid surfaces, and the smooth coating of multiple layers [6].
The micelle formation affects such interfacial phenomena as surface or interfacial tension reduction that do not directly involve micelles. Some of the micelles have the structure similar to that of the biological membranes and globular protein and catalytical properties [7], [8], [9].
Because of the specific surface and volumetric properties of the surfactants they are employed by organic chemists and biochemists in different industrial processes such as: ore flotation [10], coal transport [11], firefighting [12], emulsion polymerization [13], corrosion inhibition [14], oil recovery [15], cement hardening [16] and commercial laundering [17].
However, the systems employed in these applications almost always consist of mixtures of surfactants, because technical-grade surfactants are themselves mixtures, and the purification process may be difficult or excessively expensive, and the mixed systems often behave better than a single surfactant [18], [19], [20]. The widespread use of surfactant mixtures for industrial purposes has stimulated the interest of researchers, and in the last decade many papers have been published on the solution properties of mixed surfactant systems [21], [22], [23], [24], [25].
In these papers it is possible to find that the micelle and monolayer at water–air interface and the composition of two surfactant mixtures can be substantially different than the equilibrium composition in the bulk phase [2], [26]. Because of these differences a deviation from linear relationships between such parameters as surface or interfacial tension, wettability, CMC, standard free energy of adsorption and micellization and composition of surfactants is observed. Sometimes, the above mentioned parameters show a maximum or minimum at a given composition of the parameters. Our earlier studies showed that even for mixtures of two anionic surfactants, having different hydrophilic heads and a different length of hydrophobic alkyl tails, there is no linear relationship between the concentration excess at water–air and hydrophobic solid–water interfaces, the surface tension, critical micelle concentration and wettability of hydrophobic low energetic solids and the composition of the mixtures [3].
From the fundamental point of view mixtures of ionic–nonionic surfactants are more interesting because they often exhibit a highly nonideal behavior. Addition of a nonionic surfactant to an ionic surfactant micelle can reduce the electrostatic repulsions between the charged surfactant heads and greatly facilitate mixed micelle formation. Nonideal behavior of an ionic/nonionic surfactant mixture can also be influenced by other structural characteristics of the two surfactants, such as differences in the sizes of the surfactants heads or the lengths of the surfactants tails [27].
In the literature it is possible to find data concerning rather the anionic/nonionic mixtures of two surfactants than those of cationic/nonionic ones which are also used in many processes, for example as detergents for some materials.
Thus, the purpose of our studies was to determine the adsorption behavior of mixed layers basing on the equations of Gibbs, Joos, Miller and co-workers [2], [28], [29], [30], [31] as well as interactions between cationic and nonionic surfactants in the surface layers and micelles.
For this purpose the surface tension, density and conductivity of aqueous solutions of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenoxypoly(ethylene glycol), Triton X 100 (TX100) mixtures were measured.
Section snippets
Materials
Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) (Sigma) and Triton X-100 (TX100), p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenoxypoly(ethylene glycol) (Sigma) were used for preparation of aqueous solutions. Aqueous solutions of individual surfactants and CTAB and TX100 mixtures at different ratios of CTAB to TX100 were prepared using doubly distilled and deionized water (Destamat Bi18E). The surface tension of water was always controlled before the solution preparation.
Surface tension measurements
Surface tension measurements were made at 293 K with Krüss K9 tensiometer under atmospheric pressure by the ring method. The platinum ring was thoroughly cleaned, and the flame dried before each measurement. The measurements were done in such a way that the vertically hung ring was dipped into the liquid to measure its surface tension.
It was then subsequently pulled out. The maximum force needed to pull the ring through the interface was then expressed as the surface tension, γ (mN/m).
Adsorption isotherms
The measured values of the surface tension (γ) of aqueous solutions of TX100 and CTAB and their mixtures are presented in Fig. 1. This figure shows the dependence between γ and log C (C represents the concentration of TX100, CTAB, and their mixtures at a given α) for aqueous solution of TX100 (curve 1) and CTAB (curve 6) and their mixtures (curves 2–4). From this figure it appears that the shape of curve 6 is somewhat different from the others; however, for all surfactants a linear dependence
Conclusion
The results of the measurements of the surface tension and the calculations of the standard free energy of adsorption and micellization of aqueous solution of CTAB and TX100 suggest that:
- (a)
the surface tension depends on the concentration and composition of aqueous solution of CTAB and TX100 mixture and at the concentration close to 5 × 10−6 and higher there is a negative deviation from the linear relationship between γ and α;
- (b)
for all α values the parameter of intermolecular interaction in mixed
Acknowledgment
The financial support from Ministry of Education and Science (MEiN), Grant No. 3 T09A 036 29 is gratefully acknowledged.
References (47)
- et al.
Micelles from lipid derivatives of water-soluble polymers as delivery systems for poorly soluble drugs
Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
(2004) - et al.
Conformation of a synthetic antigenic peptide from HIV-1 p24 protein induced by ionic micelles
Biophys. Chem.
(2005) - et al.
Synergism in mixtures of zwitterionic and ionic surfactants
Coll. Surf. A
(2005) - et al.
Interaction and viscous properties of aqueous solutions of mixed cationic and nonionic surfactants
J. Coll. Interf. Sci.
(1996) - et al.
Phase transitions in cationic and anionic surfactant mixtures
Coll. Surf.
(1996) - et al.
Synergism in mixed zwitterionic–anionic surfactant solutions and the aggregation numbers of mixed micelles
Coll. Surf. A
(1998) - et al.
A comparison of predicted and experimental critical micelle concentration values of cationic and anionic ternary surfactant mixtures using molecular-thermodynamic theory and Pseudophase Separation Theory
Coll. Surf. A
(2002) - et al.
The properties of mixtures of two anionic surfactants in water at the water–air interface
Coll. Surf. A
(2003) - et al.
Simple model for prediction of surface tension of mixed surfactant solutions
Adv. Coll. Interf. Sci.
(2002) - et al.
Calculation of the coefficient in the Gibbs equation for the adsorption of ionic surfactants from aqueous binary mixtures with nonionic surfactants
J. Coll. Interf. Sci.
(1982)
The absorbance deviation method: a spectrophotometric estimation of the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of ethoxylated alkylphenol surfactants
Coll. Surf. A
Comparing decyl-β-maltoside and octaethyleneglycol mono n-decyl ether in mixed micelles with dodecyl benzenesulfonate
J. Coll. Interf. Sci.
A simple thermodynamic analysis of the stability of ionic/nonionic mixed micelles
J. Coll. Interf. Sci.
Ultrasonic relaxation and volumetric studies of micelle/monomer exchange process in aqueous solutions of sodium and cesium perfluorooctanates
J. Coll. Interf. Sci.
Effect of the nature of the counterion on the volume change upon micellization of ionic detergents in aqueous solutions
J. Coll. Interf. Sci.
Encyclopedia of Surface and Colloid Science
Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena
Study of the adsorption from aqueous solution of mixtures of nonionic and cationic surfactants on crytalline quartz using the technique of neutron reflection
Langmuir
Adsorption dynamics of surfactants at the air/water interface: a critical review of mathematical models, data, and mechanisms
Coll. Surf. A
Surfactants, A Practical Handbook
External reflection FTIR spectroscopy of the cationic surfactant hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) on an overflowing cylinder
Langmuir
Cholesterol binding to simple micelles in aqueous bile-salt-cholesterol solutions
J. Coll. Interf. Sci.
Surface Chemistry of Froth Flotation
Cited by (107)
Adsorption and volumetric properties of some nonionic surfactants and their mixtures with quercetin and rutin
2023, Advances in Colloid and Interface ScienceEffect of fluorocarbon surfactants on the adsorption of hydrocarbon surfactants mixture at the water-air interface
2022, Journal of Molecular LiquidsSynergetic effect of cottonseed fatty acid salt and nonionic surfactant NP-4 in the froth flotation of siliceous-calcareous phosphate rock
2021, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering AspectsProperties of some nonionic fluorocarbon surfactants and their mixtures with hydrocarbon ones
2021, Advances in Colloid and Interface ScienceCitation Excerpt :The values of the surface tension of the surfactant mixtures containing CTAB and Tritons calculated from the Joos equation using for CTAB 2RT are more reliable compared to those in which 1RT was applied [52]. It should be remembered that so far the Joos equation has been successfully used for determination of the surface tension of aqueous solutions of binary surfactant mixtures [95–97,100,101] in the range of the mixture concentration from 0 to the value corresponding to the minimal surface tension determined experimentally. Szymczyk et al. [52] modified the Joos equation to the form which can be applied for the ternary surfactant mixtures.