Vehicle-to-barrier communication during real-world vehicle crash tests
Introduction
Connected vehicles of tomorrow and autonomous vehicles of the near future are slated to operate on roadside infrastructure designed decades ago. Today, more than 50% of all traffic fatalities are a result of run-off-road (RoR) crashes [1], [2], [3]. These RoR crashes include vehicular crashes caused by hitting the fixed objects, rollovers, cross-median crashes, return-to-travelway crashes etc. Specifically, 40% of the defined RoR crashes represents single-vehicle crashes [2]. Roughly 20% of all traffic fatalities are related to RoR fixed-object crashes [4]. Recent vehicles are equipped with sensory technologies, such as blind-spot detection or lane-departure warning. Yet, recent statistics released by the White House and U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration show that 8.3% (2483) more people died in traffic-related accidents in 2015 than in 2014, and this increasing trend continued in 2016 with 5.8% (1900) more fatalities compared to 2015 [5]. This unfortunate data point breaks a recent historical trend of fewer deaths occurring per year [6].
For nearly two decades, intelligent transportation systems (ITS) have been in development to provide transportation systems with information and communication facilities. New technologies are developed for connected vehicles dubbed V2X communication paradigms (Fig. 1): such as vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) [8], vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) [9], vehicle-to-pedestrian (V2P) [10], and vehicle-to-cloud (V2C) [11]. The recent ITS strategic plan aims to enable safer vehicles and safer roadways by developing better crash avoidance for all road vehicles [12]. The available intelligent collision avoidance mechanisms mostly focus on inter-vehicle collisions [13], [14], [15].
Section snippets
Motivation and V2B use cases
The core motivation of V2B communications is to prevent and mitigate run-off-road crashes. A car-to-barrier crash lasts nearly 1 to 2 seconds; depending on the encroachment velocity of the vehicle [16]. Introduction of a V2B communication infrastructure that shares information between errant vehicles and roadside barriers will lead to a rapid-response safety system, detect an on-coming crash, take precautions within vehicle to avoid the crash, and if a crash is inevitable, take control of
Experimental setup
The wireless communication experiments are piggybacked on four crash tests at MwRSF:
Bogie to post crash (bogie) test: In this test, a bogie vehicle, as shown in Fig. 3(a), is crashed into a post buried in the ground. The experimental setup is illustrated in Fig. 2(a). The bogie started its journey 60 m away from the crash point, and crashed to the post with a velocity of 27 mph (12.1 m/s). Snapshots from the experiment at the beginning, encroachment, crash, and post-crash are shown in Fig. 6
Experiment results
In this section, we first present the communication experiment results of the three crash tests: 1) Bogie Test, 2) Sedan Test, and 3) Pickup test. Metrics discussed in Section 3.3, RSS, SINR, EVM, PE, coherence time, symbol missing rate (SMR), frame bit error rate, and BER are presented. Then, based on these results, an in-depth analysis of the impact of antenna height and directivity, vehicle type and mobility on the channel characteristics is provided in Section 4.4.
To compare the
Conclusions
Vehicle to barrier (V2B) communication system is a new addition to the family of V2X communication approaches, aiming to enhance transportation safety. To guide the development of V2B communication solutions, in this paper, real-world crash test results are presented, which reveal the effects of the vehicle crash on OFDM signal transmission on the 5.8 GHz band.
Besides environmental complexity and vehicle mobility, antenna height and directivity are also found to have a significant influence on
Acknowledgments
This work is partly supported by NSF CNS-0953900, CNS-1247941, DBI-1331895, and CNS-1423379 awards. The crash tests described in this paper are conducted under the National Strategic Research Institute Contract FA4600-12-D-9000 - Task Order 0055 (TOPR 0002) with funding provided by the US Department of Defense Surface Deployment and Distribution Command Transportation Engineering Agency (SDDCTEA). The data discussed in this paper are ancillary to the data collected for SDDCTEA, and SDDCTEA’s
References (45)
- et al.
Vehicle-to-vehicle (v2v) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (v2i) communication in a heterogeneous wireless network–performance evaluation
Transp. Res. Part C
(2016) - et al.
Let’S talk in groups: a distributed bursting scheme for cluster-based vehicular applications
Veh. Commun.
(2017) A compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the fatality analysis reporting system and the general estimates system
Traffic Safety Facts 2013
(2013)- Vehicle-to-vehicle communications: Readiness of v2v technology for application, 2014,...
- U.S. Department of Transportation, (http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/), Accessed:...
- Roadway and environment,...
- Nhtsa statistics 2016, (https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812451), Accessed:...
- 2015 traffic fatalities,...
- et al.
A primer on vehicle-to-barrier communications: effects of roadside barriers, encroachment, and vehicle braking
Proc. 2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2016-Fall)
(2016) - et al.
A survey on vehicle-to-vehicle propagation channels
IEEE Wireless Commun.
(2009)
Wireless traffic service platform for combined vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
IEEE Wirel. Commun.
When transportation meets communication: V2p over vanets
Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), 2010 IEEE 30th International Conference on
Rethinking vehicular communications: merging vanet with cloud computing
IEEE 4th Intl. Conf. on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom)
ITS 2015–2019 Strategic plan
A vehicular networking perspective on estimating vehicle collision probability at intersections
IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.
Improving communication-based intersection safety by cooperative relaying with joint decoding
2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
Early car collision prediction in vanet
2015 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE)
Midwest guard-rail system for standard and special applications
Transp. Res. Rec.
Interworking of dsrc and cellular network technologies for v2x communications: a survey
IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.
Vehicular channel characterization and its implications for wireless system design and performance
Proc. IEEE
Vehicular communications: survey and challenges of channel and propagation models
IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag.
Cited by (19)
A city-wide experimental testbed for the next generation wireless networks
2021, Ad Hoc NetworksA New Handover Management Model for Two-Tier 5G Mobile Networks
2022, Computers, Materials and ContinuaA Dynamically-Concise Roadmap Framework for Guiding Connected and Automated Vehicles
2021, Proceedings of the IM 2021 - 2021 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network ManagementSpectrum sensing challenges & their solutions in cognitive radio based vehicular networks
2021, International Journal of Communication SystemsCrashing Waves: An Empirical Vehicle-to-Barrier Communication Channel Model via Crash Tests
2021, Proceedings - 2021 IEEE 18th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Smart Systems, MASS 2021A survey on subsurface signal propagation
2020, Smart Cities