Comparison of gradient elasticity models for the bending of micromaterials
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Materials with an intrinsic microstructure may show size-dependent material behavior when the outer dimensions of a body are reduced. This is referred to as the size effect in mechanics. Micromaterials are important in micro- and nanosystem technology and denote basic materials whose properties are dependent on the microscopic design of its internal structure. Size effects in elasticity manifest themselves in a stiffer or softer elastic response to external forces applied to small structures made of these micromaterials. This has first been observed in several experiments on metals and polymer materials [14], [28], [39], [6], [7], [37], [4], [30]. Simulation of structural behavior grows in importance from the design phase up to the valuation of reliability and is driven by miniaturization, saving of materials, and targets of higher performances. Because conventional (Cauchy-) continuum theory is unable to predict size effects, several continua of higher order are applicable either in a manner that can be interpreted in terms of physics or as an alternative technique of homogenization with regard to real internal structure. Theories of higher order are for example non-local theories [36], [13], strain gradient theories [32], [40], micropolar theories [16], [10], [38], [35], [9], theories of material surfaces [17] or fractional continuum mechanics [3], [18]. In this work, a comparison of two models of higher elastic gradient theories (in terms of higher gradients of displacements) is performed. In Section 2 the higher gradient theory of elasticity is established and the modified strain gradient model, as well as the couple stress model is presented. Analytical and finite element solutions are used in order to analyze the problem of simple beam bending. Current experimental investigations of the size effect in SU-8 and epoxy are presented in Section 3. An Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) is used to apply a quasi point-force at the free end of a cantilever and to record force as well as deflection data of the microbeam bending. In Section 4 the elastic modulus is evaluated according to the Euler–Bernoulli beam assumptions and fitted to the afore-mentioned higher gradient models. The additional material parameters that stem from the incorporation of the higher gradient terms were determined following an inverse analysis using both the analytical and the finite element solution.
Section snippets
Selected higher gradient elasticity models
In order to predict physical phenomena on the micro-, nano-, or even atomic scale the use of generalized continua was proposed, for example, by Eringen [10], [11], [12], [13] and Maugin and Metrikine [29]. A history of origin of generalized continuum theories that are attributed to the initial works of Cosserat and Cosserat [5] is presented in [1]. With the development of a linearized Cosserat theory a model with couple stresses has been developed [40], [31], [19], [33] that incorporates
Identification of higher gradient coefficients
According to [21] the analytical investigation of a bending mode of deformation for different sizes of a beam structure results in a relation of the bending rigidity to the outer dimension and to the internal material parameter. In order to derive an analytical formula for simple beam bending within the MSG and the CS model, the displacement field according to the Euler–Bernoulli beam assumptions is used:
After applying the principle of virtual displacements to the
Results and comparison
The conventional and the higher order elastic parameters are fitted by using the method of minimization of least squares of the error between the measured and predicted data, cf., Table 1. The best material parameters from the FE approaches are filtered out from a loop of FE calculations using an underlying grid of pairs of coefficients (E, ) with a resolution of GPa and nm. The results for the scale dependent elastic moduli are in good agreement to the predictions of the analytical
Conclusions
In the present work continuum theories of higher order were presented. Their potential to quantify the size effect in elastostatic bending deformations was illustrated. A numerical solution strategy using an open source finite element environment was used in order to solve the derived differential equations for the MSG and for the CS theory. The MSG theory was derived from the point of view of Mindlin’s formulations of displacement gradients of higher order, whereas the CS theory was derived
Acknowledgements
The present work is supported by (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) DFG under Grant MU 1752/33-1. The authors would like to thank the Fraunhofer Institute for Reliability and Microintegration Berlin for sample preparation and the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig for the help in AFM calibration.
References (42)
Mech. Mater.
(1994)Int. J. Eng. Sci.
(1966)- et al.
Acta Metall. Mater.
(1994) - et al.
Strain gradient plasticity
- et al.
Int. J. Eng. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
J. Mech. Phys. Sol.
(2003) - et al.
Comput. Mater. Sci.
(2003) - et al.
Int. J. Solids Struct.
(1968) - et al.
Int. J. Solids Struct.
(2007) - et al.
Int. J. Eng. Sci.
(2003)
Couple stress based strain gradient theory for elasticity
Int. J. Solids Struct.
Arch. Appl. Mech.
Finite gradient elasticity and plasticity: a constitutive mechanical framework
Theorie des corps deformables
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Phys. Rev. B
Proc. R. Soc. A
Foundations of Micropolar Mechanics
Continuum physics
Microcontinuum Field Theories. I. Foundations and Solids
Cited by (101)
Design and application of a micro-force measuring system based on the principle of torsion balance
2024, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement ConfederationA New High-order Deformation Theory and Solution Procedure Based on Homogenized Strain Energy Density
2024, International Journal of Engineering ScienceThermally and mechanically induced strain gradient fields in architected 2D materials and beam structures
2024, International Journal of Solids and StructuresCapturing size effects in effective field methods through the prism of strain gradient elasticity
2023, Mechanics of Materials