Manufacturing technique and mechanical properties of plastic nanocomposite

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.023Get rights and content

Abstract

This research first produced the 20A140 nano-composite by melt-blending polyamide 6 (PA6) and one type of montmorillonite—(Cloisite 20A) one to six times, after which the nano-composites were evaluated by mechanical properties. The results showed that the exfoliated nano-composite displayed the best tensile modulus of 4.1 GPa; however, both its elongation at break and its notch Izod impact strength were inferior to those of the intercalated nano-composite. When melt-blended for six times, the exfoliated nano-composite displayed a tensile modulus of 3.9 GPa and a yield stress of 80 MPa. The intercalated nano-composite’s tensile modulus and yield stress were both on the increase when silicate layers were more dispersed. Finally, for the conventional nano-composites, the tensile modulus and yield stress rose slightly with an increase in melt-blending cycles; however, the elongation at break and notch Izod impact strength were not influenced by the number of melt-blending cycles.

Introduction

The most widely used polymer nano-composite is an inorganic layered material, which could be divided into artificially-synthesized clay and natural clay. The former contains fewer impurities but is more costly. The latter contains more impurities but is more abundant in nature. With proper purification, the natural clay features greater application possibility [1].

Montmorillonite (MMT) possesses a unique layered structure and a good intercalation ability. It can also be chemically-modified to increase its compatibility with a polymer, making it a good candidate for polymer nano-composites. MMT does not exist in nature in the form of nano-particles, but it can be exfoliated by a suitable method, thereby dispersing its internal silicate layers on a nano-scale. The exfoliated silicate layers have a thickness of 1 mm, an aspect ratio (L/D) of 100–200 [2], and a surface area of 700–800 m2/g [3]. The MMT used in this study has an aspect ratio of 75–150 and a surface area of 750 m2/g. Compared to an ordinary polymer, the silicate layers of MMT possess extremely high strength (178 GPa) and rigidity [4], [5] so a very small amount of MMT could reinforce the polymer matrices as much as the traditional reinforcing materials like glass fiber, talc, and calcium carbonate. As the silicon-oxygen bonds in silicate layers have polarity, rendering MMT hydrophilic, MMT is not compatible with ordinary hydrophobic polymers. Therefore, surface modification is crucial for making polymer/MMT nano-composite to turn hydrophilic MMT into hydrophobic organoclay. Some previous studies used ordinary polymer processing facilities for multiple melt-blending cycles to simulate and explore the influence of recycle process on the materials’ structure and properties. Lozano-González et al. found that after virgin polyamide 6 was processed with an injection molding machine ten times, its mechanical properties decreased by 10–15% and its elongation at break by 70% [6]. The result of gel permeation chromatograph (GPC) also indicated that the average molecular weight of polyamide 6 increased with the increase in processing cycles (Mw = 17%, Mn = 14%). This implies that during multiple melt-blending cycles, the molecular chains that broke because of the degeneration recombined, and their gel content also increased with the increase in melt-blending cycles [6].

This research prepared nano-composites with polyamide 6 (PA6) and three MMTs separately, during which the screw speed was changed in order to explore the intercalation behavior of the MMTs in the PA6 matrices; in addition, multiple melt-blending cycles were employed to simulate the recycling of nano-composites and to acquire the mechanical properties of the recycled nano-composites [7].

Section snippets

Materials and facilities

PA6 (Sunylon 6N) was provided by Formosa Chemicals and Fiber Corporation, Taiwan. MMT with an average particle diameter of 8 μm was purchased from Southern Clay Products, Inc. Table 1 summarizes the three MMTs—Cloisite Na+, Cloisite 20A, and Cloisite 30B.

The twin screw extruder (KTX-30) had a 30 mm screw diameter (L) and a 43.5 aspect ratio (L/D). The injection molding machine (SM-50) had a screw diameter (L) of 30 mm, an aspect ratio (L/D) of 19, and a mold clamping force of 50 tons.

Preparation of samples

Two sets of

Effects of screw speeds and the number of melt-blending cycles on the mechanical properties of the PA6/MMT nano-composites

Fig. 1 shows the influence of screw speeds and the number of melt-blending cycles on the tensile modulus of the pure PA6 matrices and the organic PA6/Cloisite 20A nano-composites (20A100, 20A140, and 20A180). Regardless of the screw speeds or the number of melt-blending cycles, the organic PA6/Cloisite 20A nano-composites showed a greater tensile modulus than the pure PA6 matrices did. Even though the PA6/Cloisite 20A nano-composite was processed either at a lower screw speed or with a lower

Conclusions

20A140, which was made by melt-blending PA6 and Cloisite 20A at a screw speed of 140 rpm, exhibited improved mechanical properties with the improvement of the MMT’s dispersion status. After being melt-blended three times, 20A140 displayed the optimum tensile modulus and yield stress. However, the elongation at break and the Izod impact strength of both the pure PA6 matrices and the 20A140 decreased with an escalated degree of degeneration.

As for mechanical properties of nano-composites,

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (7)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text