Elsevier

Composites Part B: Engineering

Volume 57, February 2014, Pages 155-165
Composites Part B: Engineering

High strength metahalloysite based geopolymer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.034Get rights and content

Abstract

The unique properties of aluminosilicates had made them valuable in the wide range of industrial applications. One branch of application represents building materials. A significant factor of the level of the quality of engineering properties of building materials anyhow is the water/binder ratio. It is well known that its decreasing value effectively increases strength and quality of other engineering properties of the material. Due to the accompanying effect impairing workability of the mixture for processing the pressure compaction is needed.

The subject of the paper are the results of the study of the properties of metahalloysite based geopolymer prepared under the use of the combination of very low water/metahalloysite ratio (0.08), pressure compaction of the fresh mixture by applying an uniaxial compressive stress of 300 MPa and alkali activation. The effect of preparation conditions was systematically studied by thermal analysis (DTA, GTA), mercury intrusion porosimetry, scanning microscopy and compressive strength estimation of the geopolymer. The used metahalloysite was a product of calcination of the source material at 650 °C 4 h. It was an amorphous material showing an increased thermodynamic unstability and herewith an increased reactivity in comparison with the unheated solid.

The metahalloysite based geopolymer pressure compacted paste reached after 24 h of the hardening compressive strength of 76.2 MPa whereas the reference paste only 0.03 MPa. It represents 2540 times increase in behalf of the pressure compacted paste. High compressive strength was evidently the consequence of the found high homogeneous and dense pore structure of the pressure compacted paste.

The regression analysis shown for the geopolymer binder systems a polynomial empirical equations as an appropriate configuration. For the alkali activated slag and Portland cement systems the exponential configuration was suitable. The cause of the difference may be apparent phase composition. It was pronouncedly amorphous structure of the geopolymer binder systems opposite to the combined amorphous and crystalline structures distinctive for alkali-activated slag and Portland cement binder systems. Then the resulted different destruction mechanism under the loading, at the strength test of the material.

For the elucidation of the causality more detailed research is needed.

Introduction

Geopolymers are a class of aluminosilicates formed by reaction of alkali solution with dehydroxylated clay or analogous solid waste materials under high alkaline conditions. The hardening mechanism involves the chemical reaction of geopolymeric precursors, such as alumino-silicate oxides, with alkali polysilicates yielding polymeric Si–O–Al bonds. The result of the hardening mechanism is a three dimensional zeolitic framework unlike traditional hydraulic binders [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].

This circumstance is a cause of significant differences in the quality and variety of the engineering properties of the composites based on geopolymer and current cements. Geopolymers can gain strength more rapidly then Ordinary Portland cement. The dependence of the engineering properties of concretes and other cement composites on the value of water/cement ratio (w/c) is very well known. Also the fact that their strengths, durability and the quality of other engineering properties are increased when the w/c values are decreased [1], [2], [3]. A significant factor limiting the use of this positive effects is the decrease of the workability of the fresh composite mixture and the decrease of the quality of the engineering properties of the hardened composite. A limited solution enables the use of the plasticizers or the superplasticizers. An illustration of the influence and significance of the w/c ratio used shows Fig. 1.

A very attractive solution represents the combination of super low w/c ratios, under w/c 0.1 resulting in a submicroscopic pore structure and an adequate high quality of the engineering properties of the composite [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. It appears that the low porosity cement composites have a great potential of reconsideration and modification of composition and structure [11]. All mentioned dependences and effects are common also to geopolymer systems distinguishing from the related cement materials only by the specific properties of geopolymer as a binder. The significance of the water: cement ratio for the geopolymer systems is reported by Barbosa et al. [12]. According to the authors the effects of the changes of water:cement ratio on the properties of the geopolymers are the same like at cement materials. Similar is the effect of ambient temperature increase showing the setting time decrease as a consequence of increase of rapidity of polymerization and the hardening more rapidly than OPC cement. But only the temperature increase to 90 °C seems to be optimal [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. The aim of the presented work was to study on the possibilities of the use of effects of the combination of very low w/c ratio and pressure compaction in the geopolymer cement systems. As a model the alkali activated metahalloysite system was used. Metahalloysite used was a product of its heating. Halloysite is an end member of kaolin group of clay minerals and it is composed of kaolin like kaolinite. The properties of the heated halloysite may vary due to the influence of mineral composition which is complicated by presence of minor elements and impurities in the clay lattice and by nonclay minerals [18], [19].

Progressive heating of clays leads to the removal of free, adsorbed and structural water, which is followed by the formation of new minerals. In open atmospheric conditions include reversible dehydration of loosely bound water when dry-heated between 100 °C and 300 °C, irreversible removal of interlayer water and loss of swell potential at temperature above 400 °C, dehydroxylation or release of hydroxide groups from the crystal structure between 500 °C and 1000 °C, silicate recrystallization and the formation of new minerals above 800 °C [20], [21], [22].

Some physico-chemical properties of clays such as swelling, plasticity, cohesion, compressibility, strength, cation exchange capacity, particle size, adsorptive properties, pore structure, surface acidity, and catalytic activity as well mineralogy are greatly affected by thermal treatment. The investigation of these effects and their influence on the properties of the clays has a great importance [23], [24], [25].

The thermal transformation of clays is dependent on the heating parameters such as temperature, heating rate and time, as well as, cooling parameters significantly influence the dehydroxilation process. The major quantitative criterion for evaluating the performance by thermal analysis is a degree of dehydroxilation. In dehydroxilation region the activity of heated material increases along with the temperature but decreases abruptly in the “spinel” region. The activities can be measured by the compressive strength of prepared geopolymer.

The behavior of geopolymers at high temperatures exposure is significantly dependent on the chemical composition of the binder itself, especially on the type of alkali ion, and on the type of high-temperature phases built up [26]. The type of charge-compensating cation, Si/Al ratio and crystal structure themselves are the significant factors also [27], [28].

The metakaolin geopolymer suffered strength loss exposed to temperatures up to 800 °C. It is interesting that fly ash geopolymer gained strength after the same high temperature exposure. Results show a strength drop of 34% in metakaolin geopolymer while fly ash-synthesized counterparts had strength increase of 6% after elevated temperature exposures. According to the authors the cause is the different pore structure character of the materials. The metakaolin geopolymer pores are predominantly composed of mesopores whereas fly ash geopolymer pores contain higher proportion of micropores than metakaolin geopolymer [29].

While numerous studies on the calcination of kaolinite have been conducted much less attention has been paid to the thermal transformation of halloysite, nevertheless the heating has undoubtedly a significant influence on the properties of halloysite [30], [31]. The situation is evidently a consequence of the fact that the reaction mechanism under heating of halloysite has been postulated to be analogous to that of kaolinite because halloysite is structurally and chemically similar to kaolinite. But halloysite possesses a tabular morphology in contrast to the plate-like nature of kaolinite. The textural and morphological characteristics of heated halloysite, accordingly, should be different from those of kaolinite [18], [30], [31]. It is evident that heating causes extensive changes in a broad spectrum of the properties also of halloysite, offering potential uses from the production of versatile ceramic and novel clay mineral nanocomposites including construction materials [12], [32], [33].

The significant fact is that the burning of clays produces material, that harden when mixed with lime and water. It is due to the fact that clay gains a pozzolanic activity when burned at temperature between 600 °C and 900 °C. This artificial pozzolana is mostly composed of silica and alumina [34].

Thermally treated or calcined clays display a higher reactivity during geopolymerization than non-calcined material. Calcification activates material by changing their crystalline structure into amorphous structure to store extra energy and increase its activity and increasing compressive strength [35]. The calcining temperature of the clay affects the pozzolanic reactive state. Calcination also affects the amount of Al and Si released from source material. Higher the temperature used during calcination process, shorter the time is needed to obtain the material that gives the maximum compressive strength [36], [37].

Section snippets

Test specimens preparation and their testing

For the study the metahalloysite pastes prepared with activator solution/metahalloysite ratio (l/s) 0.08 and compacted in the fresh state by applying of the uniaxial pressure of 300 MPa were used. The test specimens were 20 mm-edge cubes. The reference test specimens were prepared with l/s 0.70 compacted by hand. The alkali activator sodium hydroxide solution was added to the mixture. The portion of the activator corresponded to 7 wt.% of the weight of the metahalloysite. Depending on the l/s

Chemical composition

The data on the materials used are given in Table 1, Table 2. As it can be seen in Table 1 the consequences of the heating of halloysite was the increase in the content of SiO2 and Al2O3, and increase in the specific weight. It was evidently a consequence of minimizing the ignition loss content due to the heating. The increase of SiO2 and Al2O3 content seems to be interesting effect because their ratio used to be appreciated as a factor significant for the development of mechanical properties

Mechanical properties and pore structure parameters

The results of the estimation of bulk weight, compressive strength and pore structure parameters are summarized in Table 4. The significant increase in compressive strength and bulk weight of the pressure compacted paste opposite to the reference is evident. Also the decrease in total porosity and water permeability. For comparison the metahalloysite based geopolymer pressure compacted paste reached compressive strength of 76.2 MPa whereas the reference paste only 0.03 MPa. It corresponds to the

Conclusion

The influence of activator solution/solid (s/l) ratio 0.08 and applied uniaxial compressive strength 300 MPa on the alkali activated metahalloysite binding fresh system was studied. The results of thermal analysis (DTA, GTA), mercury intrusion porosimetry, scan microscopy, compressive strength estimation provided an expressive compressive strength increase after 24 h of the hardening of pressure compacted metahalloysite based geopolymer, representing the value ca 2500 times increase – opposite to

Acknowledgements

This article has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under the Operational Programme Research and Development/Measure 4.2 Transfer of knowledge and technology from research and development into practice in the Bratislava region /Project Centre for applied research of composite materials for deep geothermy.

References (82)

  • G. Cruciani

    Zeolites upon heating: factors govering their thermal stability and structural changes

    J Phys Chem Solids

    (2006)
  • A. Buchwald et al.

    Geopolymeric binders with different fine fillers-phase transformations at higher temperatures

    Appl Clay Sci

    (2009)
  • D.L.Y. Kong et al.

    Comparative performance of geopolymers made with metakaolin and fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures

    Cem Concr Res

    (2007)
  • K.L. Lin et al.

    Effects of Al2O3 on the hydration activity of municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash slag

    Cem Concr Res

    (2004)
  • J.G.S. van Jaarsveld et al.

    The characterisation of source materials in fly ash-based geopolymers

    Mater Lett

    (2003)
  • S. Alonso et al.

    Alkaline activation of metakaolin and calcium hydroxide mixtures: influence of temperature, activator concentration and solid ratio

    Mater Lett

    (2001)
  • L. Bágeľ et al.

    Relationship between pore structure and permeability of hardened cement mortars: on the choice of effective pore structure parameter

    Cem Concr Res

    (1997)
  • W.K.W. Lee et al.

    The effect of ionic contaminants on the early-age properties of alkali-activated fly-ash based cement

    Cem Concr Res

    (2002)
  • P. Duxson et al.

    The effect of alkali and Si/Al ratio on the development of mechanical properties of metakaolin – based geopolymers

    Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects

    (2007)
  • T.W. Cheng et al.

    Fire-resistant geopolymer produced by granulated blast furnace slag

    Miner Eng

    (2003)
  • V. Zivica et al.

    Properties of metakaolin geopolymer hardened paste prepared by high-pressure compaction

    Constr Build Mater

    (2011)
  • H. Wang et al.

    Synthesis and mechanical properties of metakaolinite-based geopolymer

    Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects

    (2005)
  • A. Elimbi et al.

    Effects of calcination temperature of kaolinite clays on the properties of geopolymer cements

    Constr Build Mater

    (2011)
  • P. Duxson et al.

    Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties

    Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects

    (2005)
  • K.K. Schiller

    Strength of porous materials

    Cem Concr Res

    (1971)
  • A. Nazari et al.

    Prediction of early age compressive strength of OPC-based geopolymers with different alkali activator and sea-shell powder by gene expression programming

    Ceram Int

    (2013)
  • M. Saridemir

    Genetic programming approach for prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing rice husk ash

    Constr Build Mater

    (2010)
  • Z. Xu et al.

    Influence of various hydraulic binders on performance of very low porosity cementitious systems

    Cem Concr Res

    (1993)
  • T.S. Naragaj et al.

    Generalization of Abraḿs

    Cem Concr Res

    (1996)
  • G. Appa Rao

    Role of water–binder ratio on the strength development in mortars incorporated with silica fume

    Cem Concr Res

    (2001)
  • Xu Zhongzi et al.

    Influence of various hydraulic binders on performance of very low porosity cementitious systems

    Cem Concr Res

    (1993)
  • Xu Zhongzi et al.

    Relationship between composition, structure and mechanical properties of very low porosity cementitious systems

    Cem Concr Res

    (1993)
  • D.M. Roy et al.

    Very high strength cement pastes prepared by hot pressing and other high pressure techniques

    Cem Concr Res

    (1972)
  • D.M. Roy et al.

    High strength generation of cement pastes

    Cem Concr Res

    (1973)
  • A. Durekovic

    Cement pastes of low water ratio: an investigation of the porosity characteristics under the influence of a superplasticizer and silica fume

    Cem Concr Res

    (1995)
  • M. Roessler et al.

    Investigation on the relationship between porosity, structure and strength of hydrated Portland cement pastes. I. Effect of porosity

    Cem Concr Res

    (1985)
  • Xu Zhongzi et al.

    An ideal structural model for very low porosity cementitious systems

    Cem Concr Res

    (1993)
  • V.F.F. Barbosa et al.

    Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: sodium polysialate polymers

    Int J Inorg Mater

    (2000)
  • Chang NV, Trung BD, Tuan DV. Recent research of geopolymer concrete. In: The 3rd ACF international conference. ACF/VCA;...
  • D.L.Y. Kong et al.

    Effect of elevated temperatures geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete

    Cem Concr Res

    (2010)
  • P.M. Constanzo et al.

    Dehydration of synthetic hydrated kaolinites. A model for dehydration of Halloysite (10 Ǻ)

    Clays Clay Miner

    (1985)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Nanomaterials in geopolymer composites: A review

      2023, Developments in the Built Environment
    • The role of nanomaterials in geopolymer concrete composites: A state-of-the-art review

      2022, Journal of Building Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      This result could be due to the action of NC filling vacancies and resulting in denser matrices. Moreover, due to the evaporation of absorbed water, the thermograms of the pure geopolymer and nanocomposite samples show a weight loss from 25 to 225 °C [280]. On the other hand, all samples lost weight slowly between 225 and 525 °C due to the evaporation of physical free water.

    • Advanced utilization of molybdenum tailings in producing Ultra High-Performance Composites based on a green activation strategy

      2022, Construction and Building Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      At present, there are two main ways to stimulate active substances: mechanical excitation [25,26] and chemical excitation [27,28]. Mechanical excitation generally adopts low temperature calcination or grinding [29,30], and its main working principle is to reduce particle size [31], increase specific surface area [32], enhance surface properties and improve hydration activity [10,33,34]. Correspondingly, based on the excitation of view, chemical activation is treated as an efficient way to stimulate the activity [28].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text