Experimental study on z-pin bridging law by pullout test
Introduction
Through-thickness reinforcements are now widely considered as successful methods to enhance interlaminar toughness of laminated composites against delamination fracture. Since Jain and Mai [1], [2] developed the first micro-mechanics models for interlaminar mode I and mode II fractures in 1994, many research papers have been published to study the efficiency of through-thickness reinforcement and its bridging mechanisms [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Fig. 1 shows a double-cantilever-beam (DCB) specimen with z-pin reinforcement [8] showing mode I delamination. During delamination growth, a reinforcing z-pin provides a closure force against the opening crack. Simultaneously, the z-pin experiences elastic deformation, interface debonding from the laminates and, finally, frictional pullout. In the whole process, the functional relationship between the delamination crack-opening displacement and the closure force from a single pin is called the bridging law. The results obtained in all previous work show that the efficiency of through-thickness reinforcement is strongly dependent on the corresponding bridging law. However, a z-pin pullout is a complicated process, which is affected by many variables, for example, material properties, geometry, and interfacial parameters between the pin and the laminates. To simulate the bridging effect due to the z-pins on composite delamination, certain assumptions for the bridging law are used in all the previous numerical and theoretical studies. In Jain and Mai’s models [1], [2], the interface between stitches (or z-pins) and laminates was assumed fully frictional. The bridging force due to stitching was calculated by assuming a constant frictional shear stress between the stitch and the laminates. Later, Cox [3] presented a model of mode II delamination with a through-thickness fibre tow. Here, the bridging tow was assumed to deform in shear as a rigid-perfectly plastic material. The axial sliding of the tow relative to the laminates was frictional in nature and represented by uniform shear traction. In his numerical example, both the shear and closure tractions of the tow were given by assumed values based on observations from experiments. More recently, Liu and Mai [4] presented a theoretical model of mode I delamination of DCB with z-pinning. The bridging stress of the z-pin was calculated by a single-fibre pullout model [5], which included the whole process of z-pin pullout: elastic deformation before z-pin debonding, elastic deformation and frictional sliding during debond growth and, finally, frictional sliding. Computer simulations were given for mode I delamination fracture with z-pin reinforcement. Effects of areal density, diameter, Young’s modulus of z-pin and, especially, interfacial friction between the z-pin and laminates were studied in depth. Another study conducted by Liu et al. [6] was focused on the effect of the bridging law on z-pinned mode I delamination. Here, the bridging law was simplified to either a bi-linear or tri-linear function. These functions were determined by three parameters: maximum debonding force, maximum frictional force and displacement corresponding to debonding force. Parametric studies have been presented in order to identify the dominant factors in z-pin reinforcement. Yan et al. [7] further studied the effect of z-pinning on delamination toughness of composite laminates by using the finite element method (FEM). Different to the analytic studies, which were based on elementary beam theory, shear deformation, material orthotropy and geometric non-linearity were considered in the FEM model. The z-pin bridging law was described by a bi-linear function, which included elastic deformation and frictional sliding during z-pin pullout. The z-pin pulling-out process was simulated by the deformation of a set of non-linear springs.
From the above discussions, it is clear that there has been much effort by researchers to try to model and quantify the effects of z-pinning on delamination growth. However, the accuracies of their results and conclusions are very much dependent on the bridging law assumed based on the pullout mechanics of a single fibre, stitch or pin with varying degree of sophistication or complexity. Certainly, the most reliable bridging law is that determined by accurate pullout experiments. So far, there are no reported experimental details of the measured bridging law to justify the analytic models used in previous studies. This is seen as a major deficiency of current research on z-pinning and this paper aims to address this issue.
An experimental study on z-pin bridging was performed to determine directly the relationship between the bridging force and pullout displacement by the z-pin pullout test, which is shown in Fig. 2. Results were obtained for pullout of 3 × 3 small-pins, 3 × 3 big-pins and a single small-pin. We expect to obtain an in-depth physical understanding of the z-pin bridging mechanics and mechanisms. The experimental bridging law obtained can be used for future theoretical and numerical studies on through-thickness reinforcement due to z-pinning.
Section snippets
Experimental work and results
The test set-up for pullout of a 3 × 3 z-pins sample is shown in Fig. 2. The z-pins were made of carbon fibre (T300) reinforced BMI resin and were vertically inserted into the central areas of two carbon fibre reinforced epoxy prepregs (IMS/924) by an ultrasonic insertion machine before curing [8]. The prepreg was 40 mm long and 20 mm wide. A thermal insulated film with a thickness of 10 μm was inserted between the upper and lower laminates to avoid any adhesive bonding between them. Two T-shaped
Conclusions
Z-pin pullout tests were carried out to study the z-pin bridging mechanism and mechanics in mode I delamination. Load–displacement curves showing initial elastic bonding, unstable debonding and frictional sliding were obtained for 3 × 3 multi-pin and single-pin samples. These results confirmed our assumptions of the z-pin bridging law and computer simulation studies in our previous work [4], [6], [7]. From the present pullout tests, we can draw the following conclusions:
- 1.
With the same areal
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Australian Research Council (ARC) for the continuing support of this project. Y.-W. Mai and H.-Y. Liu are supported by an Australian Federation Fellowship and an Australian Research Fellowship, respectively, funded by the ARC and tenable at the University of Sydney. Professor Ivana Partridge and Dr. Denis Cartié of Cranfield University kindly provided all the z-pinned composite samples for the pullout tests. Their helpful discussions and constructive input during the
References (11)
- et al.
On the effect of stitching on mode I delamination toughness of laminated composites
Compos. Sci. Technol.
(1994) - et al.
On steady-state fibre pull-out part II: computer simulation
Compos. Sci. Technol.
(1999) - et al.
Numerical study on the mode I delamination toughness of z-pinned laminates
Compos. Sci. Technol.
(2003) - et al.
Analysis of stitched laminated enf specimens for interlaminar mode-II fracture toughness
Int. J. Fract.
(1994) A constitutive model for through-thickness reinforcement bridging a delamination crack
Adv. Compos. Lett.
(1999)
Cited by (146)
Investigation on fracture behavior of unidirectional bamboo laminate with self-tapping screws reinforcement
2023, Case Studies in Construction MaterialsExperimental and numerical study on the influence of cure process on the bridging traction mechanism of z-pins
2023, International Journal of Mechanical SciencesMultiscale modelling of curing-induced z-pin/composite interfacial cracks
2023, International Journal of Mechanical SciencesImproving joint performance through graded materials and geometries
2023, Advances in Structural Adhesive Bonding, Second EditionA review on the multi-scale simulation of Z-pinned composite laminates
2022, Composite StructuresCNT toughened aluminium and CFRP interface for strong adhesive bonding
2022, Nano Materials Science