Dispersion and distribution of carbon nanotubes in ternary rubber blends
Introduction
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have a wide range of potential applications in many industrial areas because of their outstanding electrical and mechanical properties. Recently, they have been used as filler in rubber and rubber blends to create new functionalities and/or to improve various properties of tire tread compounds [1], [2], [3]. Generally, it is well-known that a good dispersion and homogeneous phase selective distribution of filler in polymer blends are necessary for optimization of composite properties [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. While the selective filler localization and its effect on mechanical and electrical properties of CNT filled thermoplastic/thermoplastic blends have been comprehensively characterized [4], [5], [6], [7], it is still incomplete in the field of rubber/rubber blends so far [8], [9], [10], [11]. Furthermore, polymer blends containing more than two rubber components have been prepared with filler in order to obtain synergistic properties of composites [12], [13], [14], [15]. For instance, ternary blends on the basis of natural rubber (NR), butadiene rubber (BR) and ethylene propylene diene rubber (EPDM) were used for tire sidewalls showing excellent ultimate properties, better ozone resistance and fatigue resistance under dynamic load [13]. The dispersion and phase specific distribution of CNTs in ternary blends have not been characterized so far because of the lack of suitable testing methods. In the present work we used the method of the online measured electrical conductance and wetting concept as well as Z-model, which were further developed for ternary blends [16], [17] for characterization of the kinetics of CNT dispersion and distribution in ternary blends based on styrene butadiene (SBR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) and NR.
Section snippets
Materials and mixture preparation
Solution styrene butadiene rubber (S-SBR) used was SPRINTAN SLR-4601 (Styron Deutschland GmbH) with a styrene content of 21% and vinyl content of 63%. Nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) Perbunan 3445F (Lanxess) with a nitrile content of 34% and natural rubber (NR) SMR10 (Standard Malaysian Rubber, Weber & Schaer GmbH) were also used. NR was masticated by means of two-roll mill before use in order to obtain a similar Mooney viscosity value as the other blend partners. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes
Online measured electrical conductance and CNT macrodispersion
The online conductance curves of different rubbers containing 5 phr CNTs without and with ethanol recorded during the mixing are presented in Fig. 1a. Without ethanol, SBR and NR show no electrical signal (curves 1 and 3), that indicates there is no percolated conduction filler network in rubbers because of the bad filler dispersion.
For CNT filled NBR an online conductance curve was recorded (curve 2), which shows a typical conductance-time characteristics with tonset = 17 min and tGmax = 30 min. At t
Conclusions
The phase specific distribution of CNTs in ternary SBR/NBR/NR blends was experimentally determined using the wetting concepts. It was found that the CNT distribution after long mixing time of about 50 min is the same for four blends prepared by different mixing regimes. The unusual high value of CNT loading in the non-polar NR phase was explained by taking into consideration the presence of phospholipids. Phospholipid can act as coupling agent bonding the α-terminal of NR with the CNT surface
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (Project No. LE 3202/1-1) and Ministerium für Wirtschaft und Arbeit des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt (Project No. 1304/00022) for the financial support.
References (26)
- et al.
Kinetics of filler wetting and dispersion in carbon nanotube/rubber composites
Carbon
(2012) - et al.
Modified and unmodified multiwalled carbon nanotubes in high performance solution styrene butadiene and butadiene rubber blends
Polymer
(2008) - et al.
Contribution of physico-chemical properties of interfaces on dispersibility, adhesion and flocculation of filler particles in rubber
Polymer
(2010) - et al.
Investigation on the dispersion of carbon nanotubes in nitrile butadiene rubber: role of polymer-to-filler grafting reaction
Compos Sci Technol
(2010) - et al.
Blends of carbon blacks and multiwall carbon nanotubes as reinforcing fillers for hydrocarbon rubbers
J Appl Polym Sci
(2008) - OhWS, Choi WJ, Choi YH, Park J, Lee YS. Nanotechnology 2009: biofuels, renewable energy, coatings, fluidics and compact...
- et al.
NR/XSBR nanocomposites with carbon black and carbon nanotube prepared by latex compounding
J Met Mater Miner
(2012) - et al.
Selective distribution of nanofillers: effect on morphology and crystallization of PLA/PCL blends
Macromol Chem Phys
(2011) - et al.
Effect of ABS rubber content on the localization of MWCNTs in PC/ABS blends and electrical resistivity of the composites
Macromol Mater Eng
(2010) - et al.
Selective localization and migration of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in blends of polycarbonate and poly(styrene-acrylonitrile)
Macromol Rapid Commun
(2009)
Ternary poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile)/poly(vinyl chloride) blend composites with multi-walled carbon nanotubes and enhanced physical characteristics
Macromol Mater Eng
Dispersion of MWCNT in PDMS/PB
Rheol Act
Use of CNT and nano silica in NR/SBR blends latex
Adv Mater Res
Cited by (52)
Mechanical properties and fractal analysis of cement mortar incorporating styrene-butadiene rubber latex and carboxylated MWCNTs
2021, Construction and Building MaterialsCitation Excerpt :The much lower specific gravity of MWCNTs relative to cement further worsens the situation, as MWCNTs tend to move to the upper layer of samples during vibration [53]. In opposite, MWCNTs was reported to be capable of uniform distribution in SBR latex without surfactant agent due to the higher wetting speed of MWCNTs within SBR matrix, which is corresponding to the higher surface tension of SBR [54,55]. With the above-mentioned characteristics, the combination of MWCNTs and SBR latex as reinforcement in cementitious materials probably can overcome the poor dispersion and clustering problems of MWCNTs as well as the lower compressive strength of SBR reinforced cement-based material.
Quantifying morphological and mechanical properties of thermoplastics elastomers by selective localization of nanofillers with different geometries
2021, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering AspectsCarbon black distribution in natural rubber/butadiene rubber blend composites: Distribution driven by morphology
2020, Composites Science and TechnologyOrganic modifier induced interfacial transformation, morphology and physico-mechanical properties of PP/NR based blend nanocomposites
2020, Composites Part B: EngineeringESR spectroscopy as a new method to analyze the synergy between two different nanofillers dispersed in an elastomer matrix
2019, Polymer TestingCitation Excerpt :Many nanofillers, pure and modified, are used to tailor the rubber properties; layered silicates, layered double hydroxides, different carbon based nanofillers, nanosilica, etc. Among these, the most investigated, owing to their unique properties and with demonstrated abilities to enhance the mechanical properties, to improve the barrier properties, flammability resistance etc., are layered silicates [1–5] and carbon nanotubes (CNT) [6–11]. Moreover, the combination of these two nanofillers, different by chemical composition, form and rigidity, engenders synergism which results in their better dispersion [12,13] and further enhancement of the hybrid nanocomposites properties [14,15].
Applications of carbon-based nanofiller-incorporated rubber composites in the fields of tire engineering, flexible electronics and EMI shielding
2019, Carbon-Based Nanofillers and Their Rubber Nanocomposites: Fundamentals and Applications