Fully anisotropic finite strain viscoelasticity based on a reverse multiplicative decomposition and logarithmic strains
Introduction
Rubberlike materials and biological tissues are capable of sustaining large strains and are frequently considered quasi-incompressible and hyperelastic in finite element analyses, see for example [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. In the observed behavior of these materials, specially in biological tissues, there is frequently a relevant viscous component [3], [4]. Hence, visco-hyperelastic models are very important in both the engineering and biomechanics fields.
Among the many types of formulations proposed for isochoric viscoelasticity, two approaches stand out in finite element simulations. The first one was advocated by Simo and Hughes [6] and Simo [8] and successfully used by other researchers, see [3], [9], [10], [11], [12], among others. This formulation is based on stress-like internal variables and allows for anisotropic stored energies. However, this formulation is not adequate for large deviations from thermodynamical equilibrium [13], [14] (i.e. finite linear viscoelasticity). Furthermore, the instantaneous and relaxed stored energies are usually proportional [6], [8].
The second approach has been proposed by Reese and Govindjee [13] and used also in Refs. [15], [16] among others. In this approach the Sidoroff multiplicative decomposition [17] is employed and the stored energy is separated into equilibrated and nonequilibrated parts following the framework introduced by Lubliner [18]. The main advantage of this formulation is that it is valid for deformations away from thermodynamical equilibrium and that distinct instantaneous and relaxed stored energies may be considered. As a drawback, the phenomenological formulation is only valid for isotropy, although anisotropic formulations are possible following these ideas and modelling the microstructure [19].
Recently we have developed a formulation following the ideas from Reese and Govindjee which is valid for anisotropic hyperelasticity and for deformations arbitrarily away from thermodynamic equilibrium (i.e. finite nonlinear viscoelasticity) [20]. This formulation uses the Sidoroff multiplicative decomposition of the total (equilibrated) deformation gradient into non-equilibrated elastic and viscous parts. The equilibrated and non-equilibrated stored energies are formulated in terms of logarithmic strains. These strain measures are intuitive [21], [22], [23] and allow for simple formulations in large strain elasto-plasticity [26], [24], [25]. Furthermore, they are employed in spline-based hyperelasticity [27], [28], [29]. Spline-based hyperelasticity introduced by Sussman and Bathe permits the exact (in practice) replication of experimental data and also facilitates the interpretation of the material behavior [20] in visco-hyperelasticity. Furthermore, it may be formulated as to preserve both theoretical and numerical material symmetries consistency [30]. However, the inconvenience of the formulation of Ref. [20] based on Sidoroff’s decomposition is that whereas the stored energies may be anisotropic, the viscous component should arguably be isotropic. This is due to the intermediate configuration imposed by the Sidoroff multiplicative decomposition. Hence, only one relaxation time can be considered as an independent parameter (i.e. obtained from an experiment). The relaxation times for the remaining components are given by the prescribed stored energies [20].
The purpose of this paper is to present a formulation for anisotropic visco-hyperelasticity in which both the stored energies and the viscous contribution are anisotropic. Therefore, in orthotropy up to six independent relaxation times may be prescribed, i.e. obtained from six different experiments as for the case of isochoric spline-based orthotropic equilibrated and nonequilibrated stored energies [29]. The procedure employs a reversed multiplicative decomposition from that used by Sidoroff. The intermediate configuration from this decomposition allows for the formulation of the stored energies using the same structural tensors and, hence, facilitates the use of anisotropic viscosity tensors. The algorithm is introduced using a special co-rotational formulation in order to facilitate a parallelism with the formulation introduced in Ref. [20]. As an inconvenience of the present formulation when compared to the one presented in [20], the resulting non-equilibrated consistent tangent moduli tensor is slightly non-symmetric for off-axis nonproportional loading. However, for the numerical nonproportional examples presented in this paper typically only one additional iteration is employed when using a symmetrized tensor. For the case of nonproportional off-axes loading, the observed behavior is also slightly different due to the also different multiplicative decomposition employed. Therefore, if the viscosity is considered isotropic, the formulation given in [20] may be preferred, but for more general anisotropic viscosities, the present formulation is clearly better.
In this paper we focus mainly on the large strain formulation using the reversed decomposition. For a detailed small strains motivation and for some concepts used in the kinematics of the multiplicative decomposition, the reader can refer to Ref. [20].
Section snippets
Sidoroff’s and reverse multiplicative decompositions
Unidimensional viscoelasticity is motivated by the standard solid rheological model [6], see Fig. 1, where the small elongations of the springs and the viscous dashpot per unit device-length (i.e. infinitesimal strains) are related through
Within the context of three-dimensional large deformations, a generalization of this additive decomposition in terms of some finite deformation measure is needed as point of departure in order to formulate strain-based constitutive viscoelastic models.
Finite strain viscoelasticity based on the reversed decomposition
In Ref. [20] we derived a computational model for finite fully non-linear anisotropic visco-hyperelasticity based on the Sidoroff’s multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient given in Eq. (2). Departing from this kinematic hypothesis, we show that the material formulation of the finite theory can be derived following analogous steps to those followed in the infinitesimal case. This is possible due to the fact that the second-order tensor on which depends in Eq. (4), i.e. the
Finite strain viscoelasticity based on logarithmic strain measures
In the preceding section we have obtained all the required tensors needed to properly formulate a finite fully nonlinear visco-hyperelastic model based on the reversed decomposition defined in terms of Green–Lagrange measures. This continuum formulation is valid for anisotropic compressible materials. However, we are mostly interested in formulating a model for nearly-incompressible materials using logarithmic strains because of both their special properties [21] and the possibility of using
Constitutive equation for the viscous flow
In order to enforce the physical restriction given in Eq. (24)2 in the logarithmic strain space, we rewrite it attending to the purely kinematic power-conjugacy equivalence between the stress power given by the elastic deformation rate tensor and the stress power given by the material rate of the elastic logarithmic strains —recall Eq. (33)where we define the non-equilibrated purely deviatoric generalized Kirchhoff stresses as
Equilibrated contribution
If the total gradient is known at time step , then the equilibrated contributions and are just obtained from as usual uncoupled deviatoric–volumetric hyperelastic calculations, i.e.For detailed formulae to compute these contributions for an incompressible orthotropic material, we refer to Ref. [29], Section 2.5.
Determination of the viscosity parameters of the orthotropic model
Consider a small strains uniaxial relaxation test performed about the preferred material direction of an incompressible material. Eq. (59) represented in preferred material axes and specialized at (just after the total deformation in direction is applied and retained) reads—note that shear terms are not needed and that are isochoric (traceless)
Examples
The following examples are designed to compare the obtained behavior against models based on the Sidoroff decomposition [13], [20] and to highlight the enhanced capabilities of the present anisotropic visco-hyperelasticity formulation based on the reverse multiplicative decomposition.
Conclusions
In this paper we present a phenomenological formulation and numerical algorithm for anisotropic visco-hyperelasticity. The formulation is based on a reverse multiplicative decomposition and on a split of the stored energy into distinct anisotropic equilibrated and nonequilibrated addends. The formulation is valid for large deviations from thermodynamic equilibrium. The procedure may employ anisotropic stored energies and anisotropic viscosities. For the orthotropic case, six relaxation
Acknowledgement
Partial financial support for this work has been given by grant DPI2011-26635 from the Dirección General de Proyectos de Investigación of the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain.
References (33)
On a fully three-dimensional finite-strain viscoelastic damage model: formulation and computational aspects
Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng
(1987)- et al.
A structural model for the viscoelastic behavior of arterial walls: continuum formulation and finite element analysis
Eur J Mech-A/Sol
(2002) - et al.
On modelling nonlinear viscoelastic effects in ligaments
J Biomech
(2008) - et al.
A theory of finite viscoelasticity and numerical aspects
Int J Sol Struct
(1998) A model of rubber viscoelasticity
Mech Res Commun
(1985)- et al.
Modeling the anisotropic finite-deformation viscoelastic behavior of soft fiber-reinforced composites
Int J Sol Struct
(2007) - et al.
On the interpretation of the logarithmic strain tensor in an arbitrary system of representation
Int J Sol Struct
(2014) Discussion of “On the interpretation of the logarithmic strain tensor in an arbitrary system of representation” by M. Latorre and F.J. Montáns
Int J Sol Struct
(2015)- et al.
Response to Fiala’s comments on “On the interpretation of the logarithmic strain tensor in an arbitrary system of representation”
Int J Sol Struct
(2015) - et al.
Modeling large strain anisotropic elasto-plasticity with logarithmic strain and stress measures
Comput Struct
(2011)
A large strain anisotropic elastoplastic continuum theory for nonlinear kinematic hardening and texture evolution
Mech Res Commun
Extension of the Sussman–Bathe spline-based hyperelastic model to incompressible transversely isotropic materials
Comput Struct
Material-symmetries congruency in transversely isotropic and orthotropic hyperelastic materials
Eur J Mech-A/Sol
Constitutive modeling of the large strain time-dependent behavior of elastomers
J Mech Phys Sol
Finite element procedures
Nonlinear elastic deformations
Cited by (45)
Anisotropic evolution of viscous strain in soft biological materials
2024, Mechanics of MaterialsNonlinear anisotropic viscoelasticity
2024, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of SolidsA constitutive model for amorphous thermoplastics from low to high strain rates: Formulation and computational aspects
2023, International Journal of PlasticityModelling the influence of magnetic fields to the viscoelastic behaviour of soft magnetorheological elastomers under finite strains
2023, International Journal of PlasticityMacro-micro mechanical properties and reinforcement mechanism of alkali-resistant glass fiber-reinforced concrete under alkaline environments
2023, Construction and Building Materials