Fly ash lightweight aggregates in high performance concrete

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.09.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Lightweight aggregates have been manufactured by sintering fly ash and crushing the product into suitable sizes. These aggregates possess unique characteristics that make them suitable for high strength and high performance concrete. Concrete produced using these aggregates is around 22% lighter and at the same time 20% stronger than normal weight aggregate concrete. Drying shrinkage is around 33% less than that of normal weight concrete. Moreover, the aggregates possess high durability characteristics required in high performance structures. The importance of the new aggregates lies mostly in the fact that superior qualities are achieved without having to increase the cement content. Thus it is possible to reduce the amount of cement by as much as 20% without affecting the required strength. Weight reduction may reduce precast concrete transportation costs as well as provide slender and spacious construction. Utilising fly ash to produce quality aggregates should yield significant environmental benefits.

Introduction

One of the more important of the industrial by-products, if not the most important, is fly ash. Fly ash is a by-product of the burning of coal for power generation. Its collection and disposal are necessary processes in power stations. It is estimated that the world production of fly ash in the year 2000 was about 600 Mt (million tonnes). Of this amount, only about 9% got to be utilised [1]. In Australia, in the late 1990s, about 9 million tonnes of fly ash was annually produced [2]. Less than 10% of this quantity was used [2]. In 2003, it was reported that Australia and New Zealand produced 12.5 Mt from which 4.1 Mt were effectively utilised [3]. This, is a significant improvement over the figures of the 90s but still falls very much short of what ought to be the case.

Fly ash, however, is a material that has many proven advantages even when used in its raw form [4], [5]. Such advantages, though very important and relevant, are not within the scope of this article.

The use of lightweight aggregate in concrete has many advantages [6], [7], [8]. These include: (a) Reduction of dead load that may result in reduced footings sizes and lighter and smaller upper structure. This may result in reduction in cement quantity and possible reduction in reinforcement. (b) Lighter and smaller pre-cast elements needing smaller and less expensive handling and transporting equipment. (c) Reductions in the sizes of columns and slab and beam dimensions that result in larger space availability. (d) High thermal insulation. (e) Enhanced fire resistance. Furthermore, certain structures, specifically offshore structures which are mostly used for oil production, require lightweight elements which can be towed easily and have the greatest buoyancy [9]. But perhaps the most significant potential advantage of the use of lightweight aggregates for concrete and building in general is the environmental value. When the raw materials needed for lightweight production are derived from industrial by-products, the environment and economy of the producing locality and country are deemed to benefit. Already, stringent environmental limitations are imposed on mining of natural aggregates in various parts of the world [8], [9], [10]. Such production would result in benefits to the community, the environment, and the building industry. Among these benefits are the following: (1) Efficient recyclable disposal of the fly ash. (2) Helping to conserve the natural and sometimes scarce materials of coarse aggregates and sand. (3) Sparing the country side, river beds and beaches from the scarring and damaging activities of aggregate mining. (4) Producing aggregates much lighter than the natural aggregates. This would result in the production of significantly lighter concrete whose advantages have been mentioned above. (5) Significantly reducing the emission of green house gases by reducing the need of large quantities of cement whose production is a major contributor to CO2 emission. (6) Establishing an industry with export potential especially to countries where natural aggregates are depleted or, are of extremely inferior quality as in the oil rich Middle East states [11].

The fly ash aggregates reported here, have been manufactured using sintering but without pelletizing the aggregates as has so far been the usual procedure. Instead the aggregates were crushed from briquettes that were fired in a kiln [12]. This aggregate type will be referred to here as FAA.

In this paper, the performance of concrete made from this type of lightweight aggregates is examined and compared with conventional natural gravel and sand. The mix design was performed such that there is a constant cement content regardless of the type of aggregate in use.

Section snippets

Ash sources

Two series of experiments were made on the FA aggregates. The first series used Class F fly ash conforming to ASTM standard [13]. This was obtained after the ash was screened and classified. The ash used in the second series was collected directly from the hoppers without any further screening. Table 1 shows the properties of the two ash types used in the two series. The manufactured aggregates are angular and possess rough surfaces. These aggregates are crushed to the suitable sizes using

Concrete production

Concrete mixtures were designed and tested for the fresh and hardened relevant characteristics. The mixtures’ designs are shown in Table 5, Table 6. Table 5 relates to series 1 while Table 6 relates to series 2. The Tables show the proportions based on saturated and surface dry conditions of the aggregates. They also show the mixture design for the four types of concrete made for this study so that a direct comparison may be made between concretes from the four aggregates. The design was

Properties of the fresh and hardened concretes

The three types of concrete tested in series 1 had very similar workability conditions. In series 1, the slump was very low for the three types. The three types, however, were workable, easily compactable and did not exhibit segregation or bleeding. The hardened concretes were tested at the ages of 7 and 28 days. The results are recorded in Table 7. At 7 days, only the compressive strength was determined. It is observed that the value of the compressive strength of FAA concrete is substantially

Drying shrinkage properties

The importance and effects of drying shrinkage in concrete structures can not be over-emphasized [16], [18]. Neville has indicated that lightweight aggregate usually results in higher shrinkage values mainly because of the lower modulus of elasticity of the aggregate [19]. Concrete practitioners pay a premium for the production of low shrinkage concrete whether by using low shrink Granite aggregates or low shrinkage cement. There has been a worry that the use of lightweight aggregate concrete

Performance of FAA in concrete

The high performance of FAA concrete as far as strength and shrinkage are concerned may be understood when a closer look is given to the nature of the individual FAA aggregate. These aggregates are shown in Fig. 1. The FAA lightweight aggregates are angular, while Granite aggregates are irregular but have a smooth texture. The SP aggregates, which are a lightweight sintered and pelletized type are round and smooth as a result of the pelletizing during their manufacturing procedure. The process

Protection to steel reinforcement

One of the most important aspects of durability of concrete structures is its ability to protect steel reinforcement from corrosion. This protection may be achieved if the carbonation of concrete does not progress easily to arrive to the reinforcement depth. Carbonation proceeds into concrete much quicker in polluted and urban environments that contain carbon dioxide and other gases emitted from industrial and transportation activities. In some aggressive environments, concrete structures are

Conclusions

  • 1.

    The higher strength, lower carbonation and lower chloride penetration that were observed in lightweight concrete made from sintered and crushed fly ash aggregates are attributed to the strong bonding characteristics that develop in the interfacial zone between the aggregates and the cement paste. The interface in this concrete is therefore, no longer a site of de-bonding and crack propagation.

  • 2.

    Although the lightweight aggregates are manufactured through a process of sintering, it is concluded

References (22)

  • B.K. Bradhan-Roy

    Lightweight aggregate concrete in the UK

    Concrete (London)

    (1996)
  • Cited by (221)

    • High performance concrete using fly ash

      2024, Green Materials in Civil Engineering
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text