Elsevier

Construction and Building Materials

Volume 120, 1 September 2016, Pages 251-264
Construction and Building Materials

Review
Structural performance of reinforced geopolymer concrete members: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.088Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Structural performance of geopolymer concrete members is summarized.

  • No detrimental effects of using geopolymer concrete in structural members.

  • General behaviour is similar with conventional reinforced concrete structural members.

  • Design codes for structural member are applicable, but conservative.

Abstract

Due to the significant benefit of carbon footprint reduction with the use of cement-less geopolymer concrete, researches had shifted their focus towards the study of the behaviour of geopolymer concrete on micro- and macro-scales. The most important application of concrete in building construction is nonetheless reinforced concrete structural members. Therefore, this review aims to summarize and discuss the reported findings on the structural behaviour of geopolymer concrete members in order to give a clearer understanding of effects of such concrete in structural elements. Among the geopolymer concrete members highlighted in this review include reinforced concrete beams, columns, slabs and panels. It is found that generally there is no detrimental effect of using geopolymer concrete as structural member in terms of its load-carrying capacity, and standard codes of practice could be used to safely design the geopolymer concrete members. Nevertheless, it is suggested that further researches may be carried out to provide a more realistic and cost-effective design guidelines for utilizing geopolymer concrete in structural elements so as to expedite the use of such concrete for large-scale field applications in the future.

Introduction

With the growing environmental and economic concerns associated with conventional concrete-based building materials such as reinforced concrete structures, researchers have been actively involved in exploring possibilities in using alternative materials to address these concerns. For instance, alternative concrete-making materials have been trialled in reinforced concrete structures such as recycled concrete aggregate [1], [2] and agriculture waste materials [3], among others, in an attempt to reduce the dependency on conventional concrete constituent materials, which are fast depleting. One of the primary environmental concerns from concrete-based building materials is the high amount of carbon dioxide emission, which arises during the manufacturing of cement. Approximately 5% of the global carbon dioxide emission is contributed by the cement industry. In recent times, a cement-less binder for producing concrete, termed as geopolymer concrete, is fast gaining popularity in concrete research work as the technology eliminates the need for cement. In order to produce geopolymer, a process termed as ‘geopolymerization’ is required which involves the reaction between aluminosilicate material and alkaline liquids. Common aluminosilicate material used for producing geopolymer is fly ash and slag, which are both industrial by-products and both of these materials have much lower carbon dioxide emission factor compared to cement. It was reported that the use of geopolymer could bring down the overall carbon dioxide emission by up to 64% in comparison with the use of cement [4]. Furthermore, in terms of economic consideration, due to the lower price of fly ash compared to cement, the price of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete could be as low as 10–30% cheaper compared to conventional cement-based concrete after taking into account the price of alkaline liquids [5].

While most of the research works on geopolymer concrete focus on micro-scale investigation, recent researchers on the use of geopolymer concrete extends to the investigation of the structural behaviour of geopolymer concrete in load-bearing members such as reinforced concrete beams, columns, slabs and more. The structural properties of the concrete members is one of the most vital component in effectively introducing such concrete for actual buildings and applications. The conformity of the performance of reinforced geopolymer concrete members with existing design provisions should be ascertained in order to evaluate the feasibility of using these design codes for geopolymer concrete members for the convenience of structural design engineers. In addition, practising engineers would also be able to produce a more realistic, safer and effective design of geopolymer structures in the long run based on knowledge and findings from research works, such as numerical models, empirical equations, appropriate assumptions and safety factors, among others. In view of the importance of the structural aspect of utilizing geopolymer concrete in reinforced concrete structures, this review summarizes and discusses the published findings of research works involving geopolymer concrete structures such as beams, columns, slabs and panels.

Section snippets

Reinforcing bar-concrete bond

The structural performance of reinforced concrete members depends on the bond between concrete and reinforcement, in which the mechanism of bond influences the embedded length of reinforcing bar and consequently the load-bearing capacity of structural elements, crack opening and spacing [6]. ACI 408R [7] considers the bond strength as one of the structural properties and the understanding of the behaviour is critical to the eventual development of analysis and design basis of the structural

Discussion and suggestions

Based on the literatures studies, it is clear that till date, most research on using geopolymer concrete in structural members were mainly focused in reinforced concrete beams and columns, as well as the steel-concrete bond interaction. Generally, most of the performance of these reinforced geopolymer concrete members were found to exhibit similar, if not enhanced load-bearing capacities compared to the corresponding conventional reinforced cement-based concrete members. Because of this, most

Field application

In Australia, reinforced geopolymer concrete application had been utilized for actual field application, by using both precast geopolymer concrete elements and casting in-situ of the geopolymer concrete. Examples of these include precast retaining wall, precast bridge decks and boat ramp (Fig. 10) using geopolymer concrete of grade 40 [70]. In 2013, being the first application of geopolymer concrete in multi-storey building, precast geopolymer concrete floor beams were utilized as structural

Conclusion

Based on the review of the performance of the structural properties of geopolymer concrete members, it is concluded that the geopolymer concrete members such as beams and columns could be designed using design codes for conventional reinforced concrete members as most of the codes gave conservative estimation of the ultimate load-capacity of the geopolymer concrete members. Moreover, the general behaviour and failure mode of reinforced geopolymer concrete members were similar with those of

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the University of Malaya under the grant GC003D-15SUS: “Application of environmental-friendly building materials consisting of local waste materials for affordable housing”.

References (76)

  • G.B. Maranan et al.

    Evaluation of the flexural strength and serviceability of geopolymer concrete beams reinforced with glass-fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars

    Eng. Struct.

    (2015)
  • X. Fan et al.

    Experimental study on flexural behaviour of inorganic polymer concrete beams reinforced with basalt rebar

    Compos. B: Eng.

    (2016)
  • K. Tan et al.

    Experimental behaviour of restrained reinforced concrete columns subjected to equal biaxial bending at elevated temperatures

    Eng. Struct.

    (2013)
  • G.B. Maranan et al.

    Behavior of concentrically loaded geopolymer-concrete circular columns reinforced longitudinally and transversely with GFRP bars

    Eng. Struct.

    (2016)
  • D. Faxing et al.

    Mechanical performance of concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns with round ends under axial loading

    Thin Wall. Struct.

    (2015)
  • X. Shi et al.

    Structural behaviour of geopolymeric recycled concrete filled steel tubular columns under axial loading

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2015)
  • N. Ganesan et al.

    Prediction of ultimate strength of reinforced geopolymer concrete wall panels in one-way action

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2013)
  • P.K. Sarker et al.

    Fire endurance of steel reinforced fly ash geopolymer concrete elements

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2015)
  • K.H. Mo et al.

    A review on the use of agriculture waste material as lightweight aggregate for reinforced concrete structural members

    Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng.

    (2014)
  • N. Lloyd et al.

    Geopolymer concrete with fly ash

  • ACI Committee 408

    Bond and Development of Straight Reinforcing Bars in Tension. ACI 408R-03

    (2003)
  • M. Sofi et al.

    Bond performance of reinforcing bars in inorganic polymer concrete (IPC)

    J. Mater. Sci.

    (2007)
  • Australian Standard AS 3600

    Concrete Structures

    (2004)
  • ACI Committee 318

    Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-02)

    (2002)
  • EC2

    Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings

    (2004)
  • E.H. Chang et al.

    Bond behaviour of reinforced fly ash-based geopolymer concrete beams

  • E. Canbay et al.

    Bond strength of lap-spliced bars

    ACI Struct. J.

    (2005)
  • J.S. Kim et al.

    An experimental evaluation of development length of reinforcements embedded in geopolymer concrete

    Appl. Mech. Mater.

    (2014)
  • P. Topark-Ngarm et al.

    Setting time, strength and bond of high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete

    J. Mater. Civ. Eng.

    (2014)
  • P.K. Sarker

    Bond strength of reinforcing steel embedded in fly ash-based geopolymer concrete

    Mater. Struct.

    (2011)
  • N. Ganesan et al.

    Bond behaviour of reinforcing bars embedded in steel fibre reinforced geopolymer concrete

    Mag. Concr. Res.

    (2015)
  • G. Maranan et al.

    Bond stress-slip behavior: case of GFRP bars in geopolymer concrete

    J. Mater. Civ. Eng.

    (2015)
  • B.H. Tekle et al.

    Bond properties of sand-coated GFRP bars with fly ash-based geopolymer concrete

    J. Compos. Constr.

    (2016)
  • P. Sarker

    Bond strengths of geopolymer and cement concretes

    Adv. Sci. Technol.

    (2010)
  • A.M. Fernandez-Jimenez et al.

    Engineering properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete

    ACI Mater. J.

    (2006)
  • C.O. Orangun et al.

    A reevaluation of test data on development length and splices

    ACI J. Proc.

    (1977)
  • D.M.J. Sumajouw et al.

    Behaviour and strength of reinforced fly ash-based geopolymer concrete beams

  • D.M.J. Sumajouw et al.

    Low-Calcium Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete: Reinforced Beams and ColumnsResearch Report GC 3

    (2006)
  • Cited by (136)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text