ReviewA critical review of geopolymer properties for structural fire-resistance applications
Introduction
Fire damage can be critical in structures and in all cases, the protection of people and property is essential. Despite all the technological advancements and measures for fire prevention, there always remains a threat of fire breakout. The fire arising from 9/11 attack on World Trade Centre, the Windsor tower fire, the fire in Mont Blanc and Channel tunnels, have caused heavy losses of life and human assets. Protection of structures from fire is vital since it would surely contribute to a reduction of losses in all respects. Therefore, research in a matter of fire safety is of utmost importance.
Concrete and steel are the most widely used construction materials [1]. The reasons are that concrete has inherent fire resistance, is non-combustible, and has a relatively low thermal conductivity. Cracking, spalling, and loss in mechanical strength of concrete after exposure to fire, however, are key concerns, especially with high strength concrete [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. All concrete structures, especially structures such as concrete liner of tunnels, must offer sufficient fire resistance. There has been an experience of severe dramatic tunnel fires in the past few decades. Table 1 [11] summarizes the life and property losses due to these fires. In case of a tunnel fire, there is a rapid increase in air temperature within the first few minutes of fire. This results in considerable spalling of concrete and consequently, the tunnel lining suffers damage. It leads to safety issues both for the tunnel users and the fire rescuers. As can be seen from the table, there are direct economic losses from repair activities and indirect losses related to tunnel closure. Fire resistance tests on concrete elements are required, in most tunneling projects, to address the tunnel fire issues. Temperature-versus-time curves such as the ISO standard fire curve, RWS curve, hydrocarbon fire curve have been adopted in various tunnel fire testing regulations. All these highlight that fire safety of any concrete structure, not just tunnels, is a serious concern.
The use of polypropylene (PP) fibers in concrete is generally undertaken to reduce the danger of spalling of concrete in the event of a fire [12], [13], [14], [15]. Two chief causes for spalling are – a rise in pore pressure and development of thermal stresses. Although PP fibers have been shown to reduce the spalling caused by pore pressure rise, they have not been very effective in reducing the thermal stresses. This is one of the drawbacks with using PP fibers as a measure to prevent concrete from fire damage. Use of thermal barriers is another solution for concrete fire protection. However, this solution is available at a cost. Moreover, when OPC concrete is subject to high temperature, ordinary Portland cement (OPC) hydration products, namely, calcium silicate hydrate, calcium hydroxide and calcium carbonate degrade (Fig. 1). It is challenging to avoid this deterioration of concrete micro-structure [16], [17].
Moreover, steel, both as reinforcement in concrete and for structural applications, is much more vulnerable to high temperature as compared to concrete. Thus, steel structures need fire protection. For steel members, in many applications, it is imperative to provide insulation to prevent softening of steel at high temperatures. Four common types of passive fire protection materials are listed below:
- a)
Traditional materials (concrete, plaster, bricks): These are readily available, and their implementation does not require special skills. These materials are weather resistant but are slow to apply on site. The thick casing takes up the floor space, and they are heavy.
- b)
Board materials: These are pre-fabricated non-combustible boards made by gypsum and reinforced with inert fibers. The pre-fabricated insulation boards can be applied to existing structures as a method for fire refurbishment. However, this is an expensive method and requires a long installation time.
- c)
Spray-applied fire-resistive material (SFRM): This is the most commonly used passive fire protection material for steel structures. It is also used in reinforced concrete structures to prevent explosive spalling. SFRM usually consists of cement matrix or gypsum plaster containing vermiculite, shredded polystyrene or mineral fibers. They can be sprayed either in the form of dry-mix (sprayed mineral fiber SFRM) or wet-mix (sprayed cementitious SFRM). They have relatively low cost and can be applied to existing structures as well. However, the application of SFRM makes the appearance of the structural element less aesthetically appealing. The adhesion or bonding to the surface of structural element is important. Missing fireproofing due to poor adhesion to steel and brittleness of SFRM has been observed. One primary reason of the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers in 2001, for example, was the dislodging of SFRM from structural members due to aircraft impact, which resulted in rapid heating of unprotected structural steel. In reinforced concrete structures, heat-induced spalling can result in severe loss of integrity and collapse of structures.
- d)
Intumescent coating: Specially formulated paint-like coating can be applied onto steel surface. The coating swells upon heating. This approach is aesthetically pleasing and most used in architecturally exposed structural steel. However, the material is much more expensive than SFRM. Intumescent coating commonly provides a fire rating of 1–2 h. Generally, the intumescent coating is applied on site. Application of intumescent coating is fast, and it does not take up space or adds to the weight. The concern with it is the high cost.
Overall, it has been reported that for many applications including fire protection of tunnels, underground structures, high rise buildings, strategic objects, metallic structures such as I-beams, thermal insulation of furnace, chimneys, boilers or as a composite material for ships, automotives and aircrafts, it is necessity to develop new materials which have superior fire and mechanical performance to conventional concrete and other construction materials [19].
Geopolymer is a novel construction material which can be an alternative binder to OPC. It has also been referred to in the literature as ‘inorganic polymer glass’, ‘alkali-activated cement’, ‘mineral polymer’, and ‘alkali-bonded ceramic’ [20]. The term ‘Geopolymer’ was coined by Joseph Davidovits in 1978 [21]. It refers to a solid material formed by the reaction of aluminosilicate source with an alkaline solution [22]. Aluminosilicate sources that are commonly used are metakaolin, fly ash and blast furnace slag. Geopolymer is greener than OPC and can provide a route to reduce carbon footprint caused by excessive usage of OPC [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. Producing geopolymer concrete based on coal combustion by-product, fly ash, is an useful technology to utilize fly ash, instead of amassing or simply dumping this material to cause ecological concern [27], [29], [30]. The mechanism by which geopolymer hardens and gains strength is markedly different from OPC. Geopolymer possesses excellent mechanical properties, and its compressive strength can be greater than 100 MPa [31]. It has excellent potential for fire, alkali-silica reaction (ASR), and acid resistance. It has an inorganic framework and does not combust like organic polymers. It is non-smoking and non-toxic and has low processing temperature as compared to ceramic composites [32]. Geopolymer can serve as a green construction material with immense potential for sustainable development and fire resistance.
Based on the above-presented descriptions, it is realized that there is need of a green construction material for structural applications with admirable fire and mechanical performance. It is also anticipated that geopolymer can fit the bill. As a consequence, there is a need to conduct an in-depth literature review on the current state of the art related to the performance of geopolymer subjected to elevated temperature. The discussion to follow will be focused on assessing the potential of geopolymers towards enhancing the structural fire resistance by reviewing the phase stability, microstructural changes, thermal deformations, strength endurance, and fire-induced spalling resistance of this material on exposure to high temperature. It is an effort to critically review the latest developments on this matter and present it concisely. The review of industrial applications and existing literature in an article such as this is by necessity less than exhaustive. However, the understandings provided by the current article will be valuable for researchers and engineers aspiring to develop high temperature-resistant or fire-resistant materials for structural applications. Fire-resistant geopolymer concrete/composites may be a potential solution for the construction of critical structures such as tunnels, underground caverns and high-rise buildings which necessitate fire safety.
Section snippets
Geopolymer: general introduction to the novel material
Concrete is the most used human-made material in the world. OPC is conventionally used as the precursor to produce concrete. Portland cement production is one of the principal causes of greenhouse gas emission [33], [34]. Thus there has been an ongoing search for alternate building and construction materials with reduced carbon footprint [35], [36].
Davidovits [32] proposed in 1978 that novel binders could be synthesized by a polymeric reaction of silicon and aluminum-rich source materials of
Geopolymer properties subject to elevated temperatures
Elevated temperature performance of any material is significant, especially when it is to be utilized as a fire-proof material for structures, as a thermal insulator, a material for the refractory application and so on. Geopolymeric materials have intrinsic fire resistance. They have an inorganic framework, and do not burn like organic polymers. They are non-smoking, non-toxic, and have a low processing temperature as compared to traditional ceramic composites [32]. Indeed, it should be noted
Fire performance of Portland cement concrete vs. geopolymer concrete
It is very important and interesting to understand the differences between the performances of Portland cement concrete as compared to geopolymer concrete. Table 4 describes some of the differences. It can be observed in the table that both Portland cement concrete and geopolymer concrete are incombustible. However, thermal conductivity for geopolymer concrete could be lower than OPC concrete. Geopolymer concrete has shown better spalling resistance compared to OPC concrete. This has been
Application of geopolymers for heat and fire resistance
There have been several applications of geopolymers as cements and concretes [58], [71], [80], [93], [94], heat and fire resistant material [32], [44], [79], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100], [101], [102], [103], [104], [105], [106], thermal insulator [11], [49], [107], [51], [108], [109], [110], [111], [112], [113], thermal energy storage concretes [114], refractory material [52], [115], [116], [117], intumescent coating for steel fire protection [118], [119] and precursors to ceramic
Discussion
There is a need of a green construction material for structural applications with admirable fire resistance and mechanical performance. It is anticipated that geopolymer has the capacity to fit the bill. However, to ensure the good structural performance of geopolymers subject to high-temperature heating, geopolymer must perform well at micro-scale (i.e., the stability of chemical structure), at meso-scale (i.e., resistance to deformation) and macro-scale (i.e., strength endurance and spalling
Conclusions
This article reviewed the potential of geopolymers to enhance the fire resistance of structures by critically reviewing its properties subjected to elevated temperature exposure. The properties of geopolymers were classified into three scales, namely, micro-scale, meso-scale, and macro-scale and comprehensively discussed. It was noted that geopolymers are chemically stable and do not undergo breakdown of chemical structure in contrary to OPC hydration products when exposed to high temperature.
Declaration of Competing Interest
None.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the funding support for this project from Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India (Research Initiation Grant), and from Ministry of National Development, Singapore (Land and Livability National Innovation Challenge, L2NICCFP1-2013-4).
References (127)
- et al.
Compressive strength and pore structure of high-performance concrete after exposure to high temperature up to 800 °C
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2000) - et al.
Effect of temperature on porosity of concrete for nuclear-safety structures
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2001) - et al.
Young’s modulus of cement paste at elevated temperatures
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2007) - et al.
Effects of polypropylene fibre type and dose on the propensity for heat-induced concrete spalling
Eng. Struct.
(2017) - et al.
Influence of steel and/or polypropylene fibres on the behaviour of concrete at high temperature: Spalling, transfer and mechanical properties
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2017) - et al.
Introduction to geopolymers
- et al.
The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals
Int. J. Miner. Process.
(2000) - et al.
Eco-efficient alkali-activated cement based on red clay brick wastes suitable for the manufacturing of building materials
J. Cleaner Prod.
(2017) - et al.
Low temperature alkaline activation of weathered fly ash: Influence of mineral admixtures on early age performance
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2015) - et al.
Coal fly ash as raw material for the manufacture of geopolymer-based products
Waste Manage.
(2008)
Very high strength (120 MPa) class F fly ash geopolymer mortar activated at different NaOH amount, heat curing temperature and heat curing duration
Constr. Build. Mater.
Synthesis of nano cementitious additives from agricultural wastes for the production of sustainable concrete
J. Cleaner Prod.
Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions – management options and abatement cost
J. Cleaner Prod.
Characterisation of fly ashes. Potential reactivity as alkaline cements
Fuel
Effects of calcium on setting mechanism of metakaolin-based geopolymer
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
Activating solution chemistry for geopolymers
Effects of Si/Al molar ratio on strength endurance and volume stability of metakaolin geopolymers subject to elevated temperature
Ceram. Int.
Synthesis and thermal behaviour of potassium sialate geopolymers
Mater. Lett.
Thermal behaviour of inorganic geopolymers and composites derived from sodium polysialate
Mater. Res. Bull.
Producing fire- and heat-resistant geopolymers
Preparation and thermal properties of fire resistant metakaolin-based geopolymer-type coatings
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
Thermal analysis of geopolymer pastes synthesised from five fly ashes of variable composition
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
Performance of fibre reinforced, low density metakaolin geopolymers under simulated fire conditions
Appl. Clay Sci.
Comparative performance of geopolymers made with metakaolin and fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures
Cem. Concr. Res.
Thermal behaviour of geopolymers prepared using class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing
Cem. Concr. Res.
Thermal evolution of metakaolin geopolymers: Part 1 – Physical evolution
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
Effect of alkali cation type on strength endurance of fly ash geopolymers subject to high temperature exposure
Mater. Des.
The thermal evolution of metakaolin geopolymers: Part 2 – Phase stability and structural development
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
Aspects of the deformational behaviour of alkali activated fly ash concrete at elevated temperatures
Cem. Concr. Res.
Performance of refractory aluminosilicate particle/fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites
Composites Part B: Eng.
Assessing the suitability of three Australian fly ashes as an aluminosilicate source for geopolymers in high temperature applications
Mater. Sci. Eng. A: Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process.
Effect of elevated temperatures on geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete
Cem. Concr. Res.
Effect of transient creep on compressive strength of geopolymer concrete for elevated temperature exposure
Cem. Concr. Res.
In-situ thermo-mechanical testing of fly ash geopolymer concretes made with quartz and expanded clay aggregates
Cem. Concr. Res.
Effects of elevated temperatures on the thermal behavior and mechanical performance of fly ash geopolymer paste, mortar and lightweight concrete
Constr. Build. Mater.
Strategies to control the high temperature shrinkage of fly ash based geopolymers
Thermochim Acta
The effect of organic and inorganic fibres on the mechanical and thermal properties of aluminate activated geopolymers
Composites Part B: Eng.
Performance of geopolymer high strength concrete wall panels and cylinders when exposed to a hydrocarbon fire
Constr. Build. Mater.
Thermal shock reactions of ordinary Portland cement and geopolymer concrete: Microstructural and mechanical investigation
Constr. Build. Mater.
Effect of fire exposure on cracking, spalling and residual strength of fly ash geopolymer concrete
Mater. Des.
Mechanical and thermal properties of fly ash based geopolymers
Constr. Build. Mater.
Design and performance evaluation of ultra-lightweight geopolymer concrete
Mater. Des.
Fire-resistant geopolymer produced by granulated blast furnace slag
Miner. Eng.
Concrete
Compressive strength of concrete at high temperatures – a reassessment
Mag. Concr. Res.
The “Chunnel” fire. I: Chemoplastic softening in rapidly heated concrete
J. Eng. Mech.-ASCE
Effect of fire on concrete and concrete structures
Prog. Struct. Mater. Eng.
Effects of high temperature on the pore structure and strength of plain and polypropylene fiber reinforced cement pastes
Fire Technol.
Passive fire protection of concrete structures
Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. – Struct. Build.
Spalling and cracking modelling of high-performance concrete exposed to elevated temperatures
Mag. Concr. Res.
Cited by (263)
Development of geopolymer-based lightweight high-strength concrete and properties at different temperatures
2024, Journal of Building EngineeringMicrostructure and mechanical properties of geopolymers utilizing excavated soils, metakaolin and slags
2024, Journal of Building EngineeringThermal stability and strength degradation of lithium slag geopolymer containing fly ash and silica fume
2024, Construction and Building MaterialsAddition of ceramic waste for the preparation of VA-based alkali-activated material with high temperature resistance
2024, Journal of Building EngineeringExperimental investigation of transient strains of GGBS-FA-SF blended geopolymer concrete at elevated temperatures
2024, Construction and Building Materials