Flatness-based hypersonic reentry guidance of a lifting-body vehicle
Introduction
In late 1998, the successful flight of the Atmospheric Reentry Demonstrator (ARD) was a milestone for Europe in the design and operation of civil space transportation vehicles that can return to Earth, whether carrying payloads or people (Pignié, Clar, Ferreira, Bouaziz, & Caillaud, 1996). For the first time, Europe flew a complete space mission, launching a vehicle into space and recovering it safely. The hypersonic reentry guidance scheme initially developed for the ARD (Vernis & Ferreira, 1999), and retained for the ARES-H winged-body demonstrator (Atmospheric Re-entry Experimental Spaceplane-Hypersonic) (Vernis & Ferreira, 2003), derives from the U.S. Space Shuttle entry guidance, as described by Harpold and Graves (1978). This scheme proceeds by a decoupling of the in-plane motion, for the downrange control, and the out-of-plane motion, for the crossrange control, the management of the aerodynamic forces leading to the typical Mach 2 gate being achieved by the vertical modulation. A neighboring linear guidance law that is scheduled on the current velocity is used onboard and can be computed using look-up tables. When the vehicle has a weak banking authority, a mixed modulation of both the bank angle and the angle-of-attack may be used. In such cases, the angle-of-attack modulation is introduced in a simple way in order to improve the tracking of the Drag–Velocity (D–V) profile, essentially during the roll reversals. At the same time, the out-of-plane guidance is essentially ensured by the classical roll reversal technique. The guidance law has to cope with design constraints such as the maximum g-load, for the integrity of the onboard equipment and the maximum heat flux and heat load for the structural integrity of the vehicle during the hypersonic phase. For most hypersonic entry guidance schemes, the mission scenario is designed with sufficient margins left on these parameters so that these requirements correspond only to passive path constraints.
Following the works of Harpold and Graves (1978), several hypersonic guidance schemes for reentry vehicles based on nonlinear control theory have been proposed. In Mease and Kremer (1994) and Lu (1997), guidance laws based on feedback linearization were introduced in order to manage the drag modulation, the bank angle being considered as the only control for the translational dynamics. While these techniques provide an expanded region of stability as compared with that used on the Space Shuttle, the main difficulty is to accurately estimate onboard the drag and also the associated acceleration. In Bharadwaj, Rao, and Mease (1998), a linear control design method is applied to the approximately linearized dynamics to achieve bounded-input/bounded-output tracking globally in the absence of control saturation. This scheme makes use of an approximate feedback linearization technique in order to compute the bank angle and the angle-of-attack in a coupled way. Even if the previous nonlinear guidance laws (Bharadwaj et al., 1998, Lu, 1997, Mease and Kremer, 1994) do not rely on a precomputed set of neighboring trajectories onboard, they are still slightly more computationally intensive than the linear guidance law proposed in Harpold and Graves (1978). Therefore, an alternative guidance law is proposed in Bikdash, Sartor, and Hofaimar (1999) that can track a family of reference trajectories. Sugeno approximators are used to perform multi-dimensional interpolation of a set of predefined neighboring hypersonic trajectories. However, a significant off-line design effort is needed to train the approximators from the set of reference trajectories.
For the purposes of improving the performance of the Shuttle-like hypersonic guidance schemes, one objective of the nonlinear control community was to make use of exact linearization techniques (the so-called flatness approach) so as to efficiently manage the nonlinear coupling terms existing between the in-plane and out-of-plane motions. Initial attempts in this direction were made in Neckel, Talbot, and Petit (2003) and Carson, Epstein, MacMynowski, and Murray (2006), but the authors concluded that the full nonlinear model of the vehicle is not input-to-state linearizable. In this paper, the vehicle longitudinal dynamics are inverted in a geocentric frame using altitude and curvilinear abscissa as linearizing outputs. Thus, the proposed longitudinal guidance law does not rely explicitly on a predefined D–V profile. While the proposed approach shows some similarities with the approximate feedback linearization technique introduced in Bharadwaj et al. (1998), it has the advantage of being based on an exact input-to-state linearization, thus avoiding the potential instability of the dynamics that are made unobservable. This approach appears to be an appealing alternative to other Shuttle-like guidance schemes since the longitudinal guidance law is in-flight self-adaptive to any feasible hypersonic trajectory and can be written formally with a small set of design parameters. Therefore, onboard computational resources are limited, and a reduced off-line design effort is needed for the change of vehicle parameters. In this way, the absolute bank angle and the angle-of-attack are computed onboard in a coupled way, offering an efficient management of the degree of freedom associated with the angle-of-attack modulation, as long as this modulation is compliant with the thermal flux constraint. Then, PID controllers are designed based on the longitudinal flat model in order to circumvent model uncertainties and atmospheric dispersions and also take account of several navigation scenarios. As the same time, the lateral guidance is ensured using the well-known roll reversal technique. The robustness and performance of the guidance law are assessed by performing Monte Carlo runs with a dedicated nonlinear simulation tool, considering various sets of dispersions.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Flatness theory and its application to trajectory tracking are briefly reviewed in the next section. An application of these concepts is presented in Section 3 for the hypersonic reentry of a lifting-body. A flat model corresponding to the simplified longitudinal dynamics of the vehicle is computed and a linear feedback is designed. Finally, numerical results are provided to demonstrate the performance and robustness of the flatness-based guidance scheme.
Section snippets
Differential flatness and trajectory tracking
Flatness theory was introduced in early 90s by Fliess, Lévine, Martin, and Rouchon (1995) in a differential algebraic framework. Roughly speaking, a nonlinear system is flat if there exists a set of differentially independent variables (equal in number to the number of inputs) such that all states and inputs can be expressed in terms of those outputs and a finite number of their time derivatives without integrating differential equations. More precisely, consider the nonlinear dynamic system of
Considered vehicle model
According to trade-off criteria described in the FLPP program (Tumino, Kauffmann, & Ackermann, 2005), IXV candidate vehicles fall into three concept classes, defined in terms of aerodynamic shape configurations (capsule class, winged-body class or lifting-body class) and demo-flight objectives. Regarding the lifting-body class, two sub-classes may be identified: the sphinx derived shape and the slender body shape. The latter has also been recommended in the FLPP program as a baseline starting
Conclusion
This paper has proposed general guidelines for the application of flatness theory to the hypersonic reentry guidance of a lifting-body. It has been shown how to invert the longitudinal dynamics of the vehicle in order to compute onboard the coupled guidance inputs corresponding to the nominal flat outputs trajectories. Moreover, classical PID controllers have been designed for the flat model so as to circumvent various sets of dispersions. Performance and robustness assessment has been
Acknowledgments
Authors are pleased to acknowledge Thierry Jean Marius and Eugenio Ferreira for fruitful discussions and their company Astrium ST for having sponsored this work.
References (21)
- Betts, J. T. (2001). Practical methods for optimal control using nonlinear programming. Philadelphia, PA:...
- et al.
Entry trajectory tracking law via feedback linearization
Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics
(1998) - Bikdash, M., Sartor, K., & Hofaimar, A. (1999). Fuzzy guidance of the shuttle orbiter during atmospheric reentry....
- Carson, J. M., Epstein, M. S., MacMynowski, D. G., & Murray, R. M. (2006). Optimal nonlinear guidance with inner-loop...
- et al.
Flatness and defect of non-linear systems: Introduction theory and examples
International Journal of Control
(1995) - et al.
A Lie–Bäcklund approach to equivalence and flatness of nonlinear systems
IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control
(1999) - et al.
Shuttle entry guidance
- Louembet, C., Cazaurang, F., Zolghadri, A., Pittet, C., & Maini, M. (2007). Design of algorithms for satellite slew...
Entry guidance and trajectory control for reusable launch vehicle
Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics
(1997)- et al.
Shuttle entry guidance revisited using nonlinear geometric methods
Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics
(1994)
Cited by (49)
A nonlinear optimal control approach for autonomous reentry space vehicles
2023, IFAC Journal of Systems and ControlGlide guidance for reusable launch vehicles using analytical dynamics
2020, Aerospace Science and TechnologyCitation Excerpt :Then a novel PID controller is designed to acquire more robustness in comparison with traditional trackers. To quickly derive feasible trajectories, Morio et al. [17] proposed a new standard trajectory method in the longitudinal plane. With the help of the flatness method, the trajectory is analytically generated and disturbances are easily conquered with a PID controller.
A new design of a support force measuring system for hypersonic vehicle aerodynamic measurement
2019, Flow Measurement and InstrumentationCitation Excerpt :However, in the thrust drag measurement test of hypersonic vehicle with engines, as that structure and aerodynamic configuration of the hypersonic vehicle are highly integrated, the interior of the airframe is mostly functionally designed for arrange components such as inlet ports, engines, fuel injection block, oil pipelines and the like [4]. The method for separating the engine from the test model is no longer applicable, and the hypersonic vehicle is mostly slender or flat [5,6]. Therefore, it is difficult to provide space for the installation of the internal balance, which greatly increases the difficulty of the aircraft model and the internal balance designer.
Suspension force measuring system for hypersonic wind tunnel test: Design and tests
2019, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement ConfederationMapped Chebyshev pseudospectral methods for optimal trajectory planning of differentially flat hypersonic vehicle systems
2019, Aerospace Science and TechnologyCitation Excerpt :By this way, the dynamic differential equations of the system can be entirely eliminated and the original optimization problem can be reformulated in flat output space with algebraic constraints only. Sampled applications of differential flatness methods include trajectory planning for a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle [19], large-angle attitude maneuver planning for an underactuated spacecraft [20–22] and the real-time implementations for other dynamic optimization [23–25]. Additionally, to convert the optimization problem to a mathematical nonlinear programming problem, the set of flat outputs are discretized by the mapped Chebyshev pseudospectral method [27,28], which is derived based on the conformal mapping principle and barycentric Lagrange interpolation algorithm.
Autonomous entry guidance using Linear Pseudospectral Model Predictive Control
2018, Aerospace Science and Technology