Crack growth model for pipelines exposed to concentrated carbonate–bicarbonate solution with high pH
Research highlights
► Corrected the mistake in applying Shoji’s equation in crack tip strain rate estimation and proposed a new one to estimate the crack tip strain rate produced by crack tip advance. ► Proposed the equation for estimation of crack tip strain rate produced by the cyclic loads due to the internal pipe pressure fluctuations. ► Built a physical model for crack growth of pipeline steel in concentrated carbonate–bicarbonate solution with high pH in accordance with the crack tip strain rate equation, anodic dissolution/repassivation kinetic parameters determined by experiments. The comparison with the existing experimental data indicated that the new model can provide a reasonably good prediction on the various factors on the high pH SCC of pipelines.
Section snippets
SCC mechanism of pipeline steel in concentrated carbonate–bicarbonate solution
The intergranular stress corrosion cracking (SCC) occurs on the external pipe surface exposed to concentrated carbonate–bicarbonate solutions with high pH. It is widely accepted that the crack growth is dominated by the repeated rupture of passive film at crack tip [1], [2]. The film rupture or slip-dissolution model has been proposed more than half century [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Theoretically, the average crack velocity produced by the film rupture mechanism can be formulated by Faraday’s
Local strain rate at crack tip
In the present study, pipelines are assumed to be under small scale yield condition, i.e., the local stress/strain is K-dominated. When tensile load is applied, a plastic zone will form at crack tip. If the time-dependent plastic strain is not considered, the local strain within the plastic zone is given bywhere r is the distance from the crack tip. The local strain rate at the crack tip will be [10] by definition and is the
Crack growth model
Inserting Eq. (21) into Eq. (3), we have,Eq. (22) is expression of crack velocity dominated by the film rupture mechanism. To check the applicability of Eq. (22), the numeric simulation program originally developed by Song [7] was employed. In the present simulation, the following modifications were made.
- (1)
The surface except at the crack tip was assumed to be under the passive condition and the passive current density was
Various factors affecting on SCC
In light of the mathematic model of SCC described in the previous section, three groups of parameters are involved in the crack velocity prediction:
- (1)
the mechanical properties and microstructural characteristics of steels that affect the CTSR, including Young’s modulus E, the yield strength σy, the strain-hardening exponent N (or N∗), the specific length r0 and the coefficient β and ε0;
- (2)
the parameters to characterize the external loads, such as the maximum stress σmax, the stress intensity factor K
Summary
A predictive model is proposed for the crack growth of pipelines exposed to the concentrated carbonate–bicarbonate solution based on the following assumptions.
- (1)
The crack growth is dominated by the repeated film rupture at the crack tip.
- (2)
The crack tip strain rate due to crack advance can be estimated by Eq. (15), (16).
- (3)
The crack tip strain rate induced by the cyclic load is dominated by the alternative crack tip opening displacement.
- (4)
The anodic dissolution rate over the bare metal surface produced
Acknowledgements
The project was conducted under DOT Contract DTPH 56-08-T-000001. James Merritt of PHMSA/DOT provided management oversight for the project. This work is co-sponsored by CANMET Materials Laboratory of the Natural Resources of Canada (Winston Revie), Williams Pipeline Company (Sergio Limon), and TransCanada Pipeline Company (Richard Kania and Robert Worthingham) for their support. The project also benefited from the input of Dr. Raymond R. Fessler of BIZTEK Consulting Inc. earlier in this program.
References (58)
Corros. Sci.
(1975)Corros. Sci.
(2009)Corros. Sci.
(2007)Corros. Sci.
(2008)- et al.
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
(1990) - et al.
J. Nucl. Mater.
(2004) - et al.
Corros. Sci.
(2010) Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech.
(1996)J. Mech. Phys. Solids
(1968)- et al.
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
(1968)
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
Corros. Sci.
Corros. Sci.
Corros. Sci.
Eng. Fract. Mech.
Corrosion
Corrosion
J. Electrochem. Soc.
Prediction and experimental verification of the slip-dissolution model for stress corrosion cracking of low strength alloys
Corrosion
Corrosion
Int. J. Fract.
Int. J. Fract.
Cited by (57)
Effect of cathodic polarization on stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of 35CrMo steel for Class 12.9 fasteners in seawater
2023, Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyPre-cyclic-loading-enhanced Stage-1b stress corrosion crack growth of pipeline steels
2022, Corrosion ScienceInfluence of microstructure on stress corrosion cracking of X100 pipeline steel in carbonate/bicarbonate solution
2022, Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyCharacteristics of hydrogen embrittlement in high-pH stress corrosion cracking of X100 pipeline steel in carbonate/ bicarbonate solution
2020, Construction and Building Materials