The symmetry of the boron buckyball and a related boron nanotube

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2010.05.086Get rights and content

Abstract

We investigate the symmetry of the boron buckyball and a related boron nanotube. Using large-scale ab initio calculations up to second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory, we have determined unambiguously the equilibrium geometry/symmetry of two structurally related boron clusters: the B80 fullerene and the finite-length (5 0) boron nanotube. The B80 cluster was found to have the same symmetry, Ih, as the C60 molecule since its 20 additional boron atoms are located exactly at the centers of the 20 hexagons. Additionally, we also show that the (5 0) boron nanotube does not suffer from atomic buckling and its symmetry is D5d instead of C5v as has been described by previous calculations. Therefore, we predict that all the boron nanotubes rolled from the α-sheet will be free from structural distortions, which has a significant impact on their electronic properties.

Research highlights

► As reported from density functional calculations the minimum energy structure of the boron fullerene is Th ► Extensive calculation using MP2 show that the boron fullerene ground state structure is Ih, the soccer ball symmetry ► Additional calculations using MP2 on a (5 0) boron nanotube also show that the central atom buckling does not exist ► This will have significant impact on the gap of the boron nano-tubes which will have an effect on the electronic properties (metal or semiconductor).

Introduction

Only recently the most energetically stable boron sheet, the so called α-sheet [1], has been theoretically described. This sheet is closely related to the very stable boron fullerene, B80, which is predicted to be the boron analog of the famous C60 fullerene [2], [3]. The α-sheet is also a precursor of boron nanotubes [4] whose theoretical study is very important in the light of the recent experimental verification [5]. The boron nanotubes had been investigated theoretically (see Refs. [6], [7], [8] and references therein) previous to the first boron tubular forms being synthesized. Additionally, small planar and quasi-planar boron clusters have also been extensively studied both experimentally and theoretically [9]. Together, these efforts have made possible the deeper understanding of the most likely stable structure of all-boron nanotubes, fullerenes and sheets, but more work still needs to be done.

The structural analogy between the B80 and the boron nanotubes has been demonstrated in Refs. [10], [11]. Furthermore, Zope et al. have shown the link between B80 and the α-sheet [12]. Despite all the success of the theoretical description of the B80 cluster, whose structure ‘inspired’ many other investigations, the description of its symmetry is still controversial. The B80 cluster was originally predicted to have the full icosahedral symmetry [2]. These calculations were done using the DFT-GGA approach. In a later publication, Gopakumar et al. have shown that the symmetry of the boron structure is not Ih, but instead, the cluster slightly distorts into the Th symmetry [13] where two such structural distortions, called A and B, have been identified at both Hartree–Fock (HF) and hybrid B3LYP levels of theory. In comparison to our results, Gopakumar et al. have shown that the energy difference between the Th and Ih isomers at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory is 0.50 kcal/mol. Our result is 0.15 kcal/mol at a very similar level of theory (please see Table 1 for B3LYP/cc-pVDZ). Additionally, Gopakumar et al. have calculated the energy difference of 17.08 kcal/mol at the HF/6-31G(d) level of theory whereas we have calculated the energy difference of 14.87 kcal/mol at the HF/cc-pVDZ levels of theory. The symmetry of B80 was also addressed in several other later papers [14], [15], [16]. For instance, Sadrzadeh et al. demonstrated that in fact there is not one but three isomers, of C1, Th, and Ih symmetries, which are close in energy and have almost identical structures [15].

The ambiguity in the description of the symmetry of the B80 fullerene using pure DFT or hybrid approaches motivated us to investigate the structure of this cluster using the abinitio second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation method (MP2). This method, although computationally expensive, is characterized by a much more accurate description of electron correlation effects than the DFT or hybrid HF/DFT methods can achieve. Additionally, we have extended our investigation to the finite-length boron (5 0) nanotube using the MP2 approach.

Section snippets

Computational details

The calculations have been carried out using both symmetry restricted and unrestricted methodologies. The computations with restricted symmetry have been done using the NWChem code suite [17]. We have done pure DFT (BLYP), hybrid DFT (B3LYP), HF, and MP2 calculations. The vibrational analysis and IR spectrum where obtained using tight convergence criteria. The symmetry unrestricted calculations have been done using the FreeON code suite [18]. The PBE, PBE0, and X3LYP functionals [19] have been

Boron buckyball

Several tests for the structure and symmetry of B80 have been performed at the MP2/STO-3G level of theory. First, we did several computations at the B3LYP/STO-3G level of theory. At this level, the total energy difference between clusters confined to Ih and Th (isomer A from Ref. [13]) symmetries is ΔE = 36.41 kcal/mol (see Table 1), with the structure with Th symmetry being energetically more favorable. The 20 atoms that are located above or below the hexagonal rings of the B60 frame are divided

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have done extensive calculations at various levels of theory to determine the equilibrium geometry of the B80 cage and a related boron nanotube. We have determined that the equilibrium geometry of B80 is Ih, the same as for C60, and of the boron nanotube is D5d. From these results, we have asserted that a high level description of the correlation effects is essential for the correct description of the structure of these and other hollow boron nanostructures.

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank the Robert A. Welch Foundation (Grant J-1675) for their support of this project. The authors would also like to acknowledge the High Performance Computing Center (URL: http://hpcc.tsu.edu/) at Texas Southern University for providing resources that have contributed to the research results reported within this paper.

References (22)

  • A. Ceulemans et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2008)
  • A.N. Alexandrova et al.

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2006)
  • F. Neese

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2009)
  • H. Tang et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2007)
  • N. Gonzalez Szwacki et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2007)
  • X. Yang et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2008)
  • D. Ciuparu et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2004)
  • A. Gindulytė et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1998)
  • A. Quandt et al.

    ChemPhysChem

    (2005)
  • C. Lau et al.

    Boron and boron carbide materials: nanostructures and crystalline solids

  • N. Gonzalez Szwacki

    Nanoscale Res. Lett.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Al-doped B<inf>80</inf> fullerene as a suitable candidate for H<inf>2</inf>, CH<inf>4</inf>, and CO<inf>2</inf> adsorption for clean energy applications

      2018, Journal of Saudi Chemical Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fullerene and fullerene-based compounds are promising candidates in separation science. The geometry, physical, and chemical properties of a few boron fullerenes were studied extensively and the potential application was already forecasted [10]. By using C60 as a template and replacing C atoms with B atoms and adding 20 extra B atoms at the center of 20 hexagons, B80 fullerene as a stable structure can be obtained [10].

    • Geometries, stabilities, and electronic properties of tungsten encapsulated nanosize irregular B<inf>n</inf> (n = 20, 24, 28, and 32) fullerenes: A density functional investigation

      2016, Chemical Physics Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Concerning gas phase Bn clusters, they exhibit extremely rich structural features. A plethora of planar and quasi-planar forms with tubular, cage, spherical, and fullerene shapes are identified to have several distinct growth patterns [1–8]. As a consequence of electron deficiency, boron can form diverse nanostructures, such as quasiplanar, tubular, convex, and spherical forms [1].

    • Pseudo-Jahn-Teller origin of icosahedral instability in boron buckyball, B <inf>80</inf>

      2012, Chemical Physics Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      In view of this small difference the actual symmetry of the boron buckyball remains a matter of debate. Alternative quantum chemical methods, such as MP2, predict that the minimum has icosahedral symmetry [12]. In any case B80 appears as a fluxional molecule with caps popping in and out easily.

    • DFT investigation of endohedral boron oxide nanocapsules: Encapsulation of He, Ne, Ar, H, N, and Cl atoms

      2012, Chemical Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the most famous fullerene is the C60 molecule, more attention has been paid to inorganic fullerenes in recent years [39–41]. For example, recently, computational studies have predicted that the boron (B80) [42–58], boron hydride (B32H32) [59–61], boron nitride (B36N36) [62–68] and boron oxide (B20O30) [69,70] capsules have an electronic structure similar to that of C60. Recently, nanocapsules consisting of boron oxide/boric acid encapsulating Fe and Fe–Gd cores have been synthesized by Zhang et al. [75,76].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text