Elsevier

Crop Protection

Volume 24, Issue 8, August 2005, Pages 756-759
Crop Protection

Short communication
The effect of fruit orientation of postharvest commodities following low dose ultraviolet light-C treatment on host induced resistance to decay

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2004.12.008Get rights and content

Abstract

The possibility of inducing resistance to bitter rot (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides), brown rot (Monilinia fructicola), and green mold (Penicillium digitatum) in apples, peaches, and tangerines, respectively, by treating them with ultraviolet light-C (UV-C light) at the stem end in a stationary position without rotation was investigated. This approach was compared with the conventional procedure where fruits were rotated four times, thereby exposing the entire surface area to the full effects of the UV-C light. Results revealed that when the stem ends of apples, peaches, and tangerines were exposed in a stationary position to dosages of 7.5, 7.5 and 1.3 kJ m−2 of UV-C light, respectively, induced host resistance to postharvest decay which was equal to, or slightly better than when fruits were rotated four different times. When fruits were rotated, exposing only one or two different sides to UV-C light, the percent infection appeared to increase, compared to treating only the stem ends or when fruits were rotated four times.

Introduction

A relatively new crop protection technology that involved exposing fruits and vegetables to low dose hormetic (adj. of hormetin, the agent of hormesis) ultraviolet light (UV-C, 254 nm) has been reported in two reviews, to produce biopositive effects such as induce resistance to postharvest decay (Stevens et al., 1996b; Wilson et al., 1994). This phenomenon is termed radiation hormesis (Luckey, 1980). This contrasts to the germicidal effect of similar UV-C dosage, which showed an inverse relationship between UV-C doses and the amount of propagule of the fungus and number of infected wound lesions found on the surface of a fruits (Stevens et al., 1998).

The development of a hormetic low-dose UV-C on-line apparatus to treat harvested fruits, is being considered as a commercial alternative to chemical fungicide applications to treat fruits to control postharvest decay (Wilson et al., 1997). However, further studies of UV-C application to harvested commodities need to be conducted before a commercial on-line operation can become a reality. At this time the effectiveness and reliability of UV-C treatment needs improvement (Wilson et al., 1997). All postharvested commodities studies in the past have used low hormetic doses of UV-C to induce host postharvest decay resistance, by manually exposing the entire fruit surface to UV-C light by rotating the treated commodities four times (Stevens et al., 1996a, Stevens et al., 1998). This manual rotation system to ensure proper low-dose UV-C coverage to harvested fruits is not practical for an on-line apparatus.

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of only exposing the stem end, and one side (used as a UV-C control) of the fruit in a stationary position without rotation to low-dose UV-C light, to evaluate the effects on induced resistance to bitter rot of apples (caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides [Penz.] Sacc.), brown rot of peaches (caused by Monilinia fructicola [Wint.]) and green mold of tangerines (caused by Penicillium digitatum [Sacc.]). These different fruit orientation positions were compared with the conventional four time rotation procedure normally used to treat postharvest commodities (Stevens et al., 1996a, Stevens et al., 1998).

Section snippets

Fruits used

“Elberta” peaches [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch var. Persica] were harvested from E.V. Smith Research Center, Alabama Agriculture Experiment Station Auburn University, Shorter, Alabama. “Golden Delicious” apples (Malus domestica Bork.) were shipped from the Appalachian USDA/ARS Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, West Virginia. “Dancy” tangerines were (Citrus reticulata Blanco) obtained from Whitmore Citrus Foundation Farm, USDA/ARS, Clearmont, Florida.

UV-C irradiation method

The UV-C application procedure of using a

Results and discussion

Results revealed that when just the stem ends of apples, peaches, and tangerines were treated with UV-C light in a stationary position, they resisted postharvest decay. The results obtained were equal to or slightly better than when the fruits were rotated four times (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3) as required in the conventional orientation method (Stevens et al., 1996a, Stevens et al., 1996b, Stevens et al., 1998). However, when the fruits were not rotated and only one side was exposed or when

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (47)

  • UV-B radiation on lemons enhances antifungal activity of flavedo extracts against Penicillium digitatum

    2017, LWT
    Citation Excerpt :

    Some natural products isolated from plants exert antifungal activity and could be good candidates for that purpose (Grayer & Kokubun, 2001). Natural resistance in fruit and vegetables can be elicited by physical treatments, such as heat (Ballester, Lafuente, de Vos, Bovy, & González-Candelas, 2013; Infla and Boonyakiat, 2010; Kim, Ben-Yehoshua, Shapiro, Henis, & Carmeli, 1991), low temperature (Leyva, Jarillo, Salinas, & Martínez-Zapater, 1995; Rab et al., 2012), UV-C radiation (D'Hallewin et et al., 2000; Stevens et al., 2005), and mechanical injury (Ballester et al., 2013; Godoy, Zanetti, San Segundo, & Casalongué, 2001). In spite UV-C has been broadly studied to counteract rots on fruit and vegetables during postharvest and storage (Arcas, Botía, Ortuño, & Del Río, 2000; Ben-Yehoshua, Rodov, Kim, & Carmeli, 1992; Del Río, Gómez, Báidez, & Ortuño, 2004; Droby et al., 1993; Haro-Maza and Guerrero-Beltrán, 2013), this radiation can cause significant damage in the citrus skin, such as browning (D'Hallewin et al., 1999).

  • A comparison of low intensity UV-C and high intensity pulsed polychromatic sources as elicitors of hormesis in tomato fruit

    2017, Postharvest Biology and Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    It has, however, been shown by Stevens et al. (2005) that alterations in treatment orientation may facilitate systemic signal translocation utilising the fruit’s vasculature. Stevens et al. (2005) showed that treatment focused at the calyx resulted in systemic disease resistance on apples (Malus domestica), peaches (Prunus persica) and tangerines (Citrus reticulate). Alternative treatment orientations were, therefore, performed to establish whether directing treatments at either the blossom end or calyx would allow the translocation of a systemic signal to delay ripening.

  • Short-term UV-B exposure induces metabolic and anatomical changes in peel of harvested lemons contributing in fruit protection against green mold

    2016, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Several attempts with promising results were performed using both organic and inorganic chemicals [8,9,38]. On the other hand, natural resistance in citrus fruit can be elicited by physical treatments, such as heat [20], low temperature [33], UV-C radiation [39], and mechanical injury [6]. The hypothesis of this work was that UVBR induces changes on postharvest lemon peel, representing an acclimation response that enhances fruit resistance against P. digitatum.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text