Elsevier

Ecological Engineering

Volume 85, December 2015, Pages 26-38
Ecological Engineering

Assessing the link between environmental flow, hydropeaking operation and water quality of reservoirs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.074Get rights and content

Abstract

Eutrophication is a common problem in lakes and reservoirs with high incoming loads of nutrients. The consequent algae bloom affects the water quality and causes incompatibility with tourist and recreational activities. This is the case of the Rapel reservoir, an old, dendritic and monomictic reservoir located in central Chile (34° S, 71.6° W, 105 m.a.s.l.), which has received high loads of nutrients, sediments and metals during its operation and has been known for its numerous algae bloom events. On the other hand, the reservoir outflow is mainly controlled by the electrical demand and the minimization of economic costs, independent of any ecological analysis in the reservoir. Thus, the aim of this study is to analyze the effects of the hydropower plant operation scheme on the reservoir water quality. Several scenarios are performed considering five hydrological conditions for the Rapel tributaries and the incorporation of an environmental flow (EF) constraint to the hydropower plant operation, which are represented by four minimum outflow scenarios. The hydrodynamic and water quality of the reservoir are modeled using ELCOM-CAEDYM, while the hydropower plant operation is obtained using an optimization model, which replicates the practices of Chilean system operator. The results of the simulations are analyzed through the comparison of time series for hydropower generation, water level variations, hydrological alteration and phytoplankton concentration. The results show that under a wet scenario there is no significant difference between any of the parameters during the simulation period. In contrast, for normal and dry hydrology, the inclusion of environmental constraint to the operation of the hydropower plant increased chlorophyll-a concentration in the reservoir. However, this proportional relationship is not valid for higher EF in dry scenario that showed important improvements in the water quality and hydrological alteration index. This study evidences the conflicting goals among environmental considerations, reservoir water quality and tourist interests, and at the same time, it expands the possibilities of using the operating schemes as a prevention and control tool for reservoir water quality problems.

Introduction

The construction of a dam implies the creation of a new and complex human-made ecosystem with non-natural regulation depending on the purpose of the reservoir. Reservoirs enable flood control, electricity generation, and water management for human consumption and agriculture. Other purposes, such as navigation and recreation, have been added over time. Regardless of these uses, the construction and operation of a reservoir lead to environmental problems affecting the riverine vegetation, aquatic species, water quality, and river morphology, as well as social impacts on the surrounding areas (Collier et al., 1996). In this context, the construction and operation of the reservoir require awareness of the effects on both the pre-existing environment and the new human-made reservoir.

Most previous studies have focused on the downstream river, where the operational scheme of the withdrawals alters the natural flow rate and the sediment load. Downstream of the dam, erosion near structures and modifications of the channel morphology are to be expected, among other effects (Carling, 1988, Brandt, 2000, Graf, 2006). Additionally, the presence of a dam affects the aquatic ecosystem downstream of the reservoir due to alterations of the flow rate itself, changes in water depth and velocity, variations in water temperature, destruction of fish nesting sites on banks, obstruction of fish migration due to the dam barrier and increases in the concentration of fine sediment (Baxter, 1977, Collier et al., 1996, García et al., 2011, Gray and Ward, 1982). Water quality problems, as well as the anomalous growth of biological species and changes in biodiversity, are common inside the reservoir itself (George and Edwards, 1976, Baxter, 1977, Chung et al., 2009a). With respect to the nutrients, catchment management and the control of point and non-point source emissions have been useful in the mitigation of these environmental problems (Cooke et al., 2005, Peng et al., 2014). In other cases, it has been necessary to implement in-lake engineering, which includes the use of mixers, barriers, oxygenators and selective withdrawals (Morillo et al., 2006, Chung et al., 2009b, Chung et al., 2014).

In the particular case of a reservoir built for hydropower purposes, the operation of the hydropower plant alters the thermal structure of the water column and the mixing processes in the reservoir, due to the number of outlets, the location of the outlets and the withdrawal scheme (Casamitjana et al., 2003, de la Fuente and Niño, 2008, Ibarra et al., 2015). Hydropeaking operation in the hourly scale characterizes the behavior of hydropower plants. This operation policy produces energy for only a few hours each day, when the energy demand is maxima, while the rest of the time the system produces minimal energy and stores the inflow volume. The environmental flow usually defines this minimum energy produced during the day. The impacts of hydropeaking operation on the downstream river are well-understood: changes in benthic communities, habitat degradation and fish mortality, among others (Saltveit et al., 2001, Young et al., 2011). However, the influence of the hydropower operating policy on the reservoir water quality is not clear. Changes in the outflow are external perturbations of the physical environment, which have ultimately consequences on plankton dynamics (Reynolds, 1984, Reynolds, 1993, Hoyer et al., 2009).

The aim of this article was to investigate the link between hydropower plant operation, environmental flow constraints and water quality at a reservoir. The Rapel reservoir (34° S, 71.6° W) was chosen for this purpose: an old, dendritic and monomictic reservoir, located in central Chile (Vila et al., 1987, Vila et al., 2000, de la Fuente and Niño, 2008). The Rapel hydropower plant operates in the context of the Central Interconnected System (SIC), which provides energy to most of the Chilean population (CDEC-SIC, 2013). An Independent System Operator (ISO) minimizes the system's economic costs and defines which power plants will supply the energy demand. Since the construction of the Rapel Dam in 1968, no environmental restrictions have been imposed on its operation, and therefore the ISO has established a hydropeaking operation scheme. During its operation, the reservoir has received discharges of domestic, agro-industrial and mining wastewaters, which contain high rates of sediments and nutrients as well as metal compounds (Vila et al., 2000). The first eutrophication-related problems were observed in the 1970s: unnatural fish deaths and algae bloom events started to occur (Cabrera et al., 1977, Vila et al., 1987, Vila et al., 2000). Previous research has shown that hydropower operation affects the hydrodynamics of the reservoir, forces deeper stratification (de la Fuente and Niño, 2008), enhances vertical mixing and decreases horizontal dispersion (Ibarra, 2013, Ibarra et al., 2015), and alters the effluent temperature (Guzmán, 2013).

For this study, the three-dimensional ELCOM-CAEDYM model (Hipsey et al., 2010) was implemented to simulate the hydrodynamic and water quality of the reservoir, together with the interactions among sediments, nutrients and algae species. Operation of the ISO was simulated using a model called MIPUC that reproduces the economical operation of the entire SIC and consequently defines the required water volume to be released for hydropower generation. This outflow information is used as input data in ELCOM-CAEDYM simulations, which output the water quality of the reservoir, specifically, the variations in phytoplankton concentrations. The next section describes the models implemented in this study, the indicators used for analysis and comparison of the results, and the simulation scenarios proposed. The results section presents the validation of the models. Finally, the results of a total of 20 simulation scenarios are compared in terms of the indicators, as well as in terms of the factors that enhance or limit phytoplankton growth.

Section snippets

Study site

The Rapel reservoir is a dendritic and monomictic reservoir with a storage capacity of 400 Hm3, composed of 3 sub-basins with different retention times (Fig. 1a). The southern part of the system contains the Cachapoal basin, which receives inflows from the Cachapoal and Tinguiririca Rivers. In the eastern zone, the Alhué basin receives waters from Alhué Creek. Finally, the Muro basin receives contributions from the other two basins, and it is located in the northwestern zone of the reservoir.

Validation of water quality simulation

The base simulation for the Qhyd scenario was built only on field measurements, as detailed in the previous section. Two different approaches were followed to validate the performance of the ELCOM-CAEDYM simulation. First, simulated water temperatures at the same location as the thermistor chain were compared with observations. The measured and simulated temperature time series of vertical profiles are shown in Fig. 4a and b, respectively. Both figures show similar temperatures in the entire

Discussion

The present study aims to contribute to the understanding of possibilities and limits for hydropower plant operation regarding the water quality inside the Rapel reservoir; an old, dendritic and monomictic reservoir of central Chile. Previous studies showed that the thermal structure is characterized by a sharp thermocline, whose location is defined by the elevation of the outlets for the hydropower generation (de la Fuente and Niño, 2008, Ibarra, 2013, Ibarra et al., 2015). Regarded to the

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Andrea Castelletti for his cooperation on this research; Jannik Haas, Cristián Godoy, Carolina Meruane and Marcelo Olivares for their helpful comments on an early version of this manuscript. We thank the Centre for Water Research, University of West-ern Australia, for providing the 2010 version of ELCOM-CAEDYM model under for non-commercial purposes, and to Centro de Energía of Universidad de Chile, for providing MIPUC model. The second author acknowledges financial

References (49)

  • A. Rigosi et al.

    Hydraulic control of short-term successional changes in the phytoplankton assemblage in stratified reservoirs

    Ecol. Eng.

    (2012)
  • H. Yajima et al.

    Changes in phytoplankton biomass due to diversion of an inflow into the Urayama Reservoir

    Ecol. Eng.

    (2013)
  • D.B. Baker et al.

    A new flashiness index: characteristics and applications to Midwestern rivers and streams

    JAWRA: J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc.

    (2004)
  • R.M. Baxter

    Environmental effects of dams and impoundments

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.

    (1977)
  • C. Benavides

    Herramienta Computacional para modelo de pre-despacho económico de carga

    (2008)
  • S. Cabrera et al.

    Limnological characteristics of the Rapel reservoir, central Chile

    (1977)
  • P.A. Carling

    Channel change and sediment transport in regulated UK rivers

    Regul. Rivers Res. Manage.

    (1988)
  • X. Casamitjana et al.

    Effects of the water withdrawal in the stratification patterns of a reservoir

    Hydrobiologia

    (2003)
  • A. Castelletti et al.

    A multiobjective response surface approach for improved water quality planning in lakes and reservoirs

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2010)
  • CDEC-SIC

    Estadísticas de operación 2003–2012

    (2013)
  • M. Collier et al.
    (1996)
  • G.D. Cooke et al.

    Restoration and Management of Lakes and Reservoirs

    (2005)
  • A. de la Fuente et al.

    Strong vertical mixing of deep water of a stratified reservoir during the Maule earthquake, central Chile (Mw 8.8)

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2010)
  • EULA-Chile

    Diagnosis and management plan for Rapel reservoir water quality

    (2011)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Impacts of hydropeaking: A systematic review

      2024, Science of the Total Environment
    • Transboundary river basins: Scenarios of hydropower development and operation under extreme climate conditions

      2022, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      While not at the same levels of contribution, S2 (tributary only scenario) was also predicted to help increase flow during dry seasons with levels at FNP, PPS, and PST increasing from 1.7 to 6.4%, 2.2 to 7.8%, 5.3 to 11.5%, respectively. The increased dry season flow could be considered an added benefit and consistent with known benefits associated with hydropower operation which include increased water availability for irrigation of dry season crops and drought management (Rossel and de la Fuente, 2015; Branche, 2017; Hecht et al., 2019; Intralawan et al., 2019). Table 3.2 provides a summary of changes in the Mekong River flow as predicted by LMB-Source at FNP, FPS, and FST stations.

    • Hazardous chemical accident prediction for drinking water sources in Three Gorges Reservoir

      2021, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hu et al. (2014) applied a self-adaptive GA-aided multi-objective ecological reservoir operation model to water quality management and the results showed that the ecological operation have a better benefit. Rossel and Alberto (2015) analyzed the effects of operation schemes on the water quality of reservoir and proved the feasibility of using operating schemes to control and prevent water quality problems. Overall, reservoir optimal operation can mitigate the adverse effects of pollution rapidly when a pollution incident occurs.

    • Floating photovoltaic plants: Ecological impacts versus hydropower operation flexibility

      2020, Energy Conversion and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      In general, any software that is able to couple the hydrodynamics of the reservoir with the water quality would be suitable for the here intended simulations. The selection of ELCOM-CAEDYM for the purposes of this study is based on previous knowledge of the Rapel Reservoir with this particular model [22–24]. Fig. 1 illustrates the conceptual scheme of the ELCOM-CAEDYM model and the full technical detail can be found in reference [19].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text