Original articleEvaluation of European diatom trophic indices
Introduction
Trophic conditions are one of the most important determining factors influencing the freshwater diatom communities in rivers and lakes (Harper, 1992). The reliability of diatoms as indicators of the trophic conditions in aquatic environments has been demonstrated in multiple studies (Pan and Lowe, 1994, Pan et al., 1996, Potapova and Charles, 2007, Stevenson and Pan, 1999; see also Whitton and Rott, 1996). With the increasing eutrophication of European aquatic environments, the number of indicator indices used for the assessment of trophic conditions has risen. These indicator indices were developed independently for both lotic and lentic ecosystems, more often originated from regional datasets, and served mostly as basis for regional water quality assessment [Coring et al., 1999 (Germany); Hofmann, 1994, Hürlimann and Niederhauser, 2002 (Switzerland); Kelly and Whitton, 1995 (UK); Rott et al., 1999 (Austria); van Dam et al., 1994 (The Netherlands)]. The software package Omnidia (Lecointe et al., 1993) includes some 30 diatom indices and accompanying lists of taxa with ecological scores and is often used to assess water quality in various geographical regions assuming the cosmopolitan nature of diatoms. In some cases, users adjust the indices by incorporating new or corrected autecological information to apply in their specific region (A. Jarlman, pers. comm.).
The large variation in indicator indices also caused confusion and arbitrariness among researchers performing quality assessments. It is unclear whether there are significant differences between the results of the indices, and if so, what these differences are and what causes this variation. On the one hand, the cosmopolitan nature of diatoms should display a constant trophic preference. On the other hand, primarily in studies from the North America, it has been shown that European indicator indices may need to be calibrated to regional conditions (e.g. Fore and Grafe, 2002, Potapova and Charles, 2007). Moreover, a number of European phycologists argued that indices developed in certain regions of Europe were not effective in others (Kelly et al., 1998, Pipp, 2002, Rott et al., 2003).
In this study, we tested the causes of variation between trophic diatom indicator indices by mutually comparing individual species’ trophic scores. We extracted a common trophic preference score list to be used in a wide geographical area based on consistent species scores derived from different indices. We evaluated trophic diatom scores and the consistency of indicator indices results by applying them on a large set of samples from European running waters. As a result, we determined a list of recommendations to be applied in order to get a more objective and consistent diatom-based trophic evaluation.
Section snippets
Rescaling the indices
The Diatom Indicator Database version 3.2 (http://www.freshwaterecology.info) was developed within the EU Eurolimpacs project and represents the state-of-the-art knowledge of the ecological response of diatom taxa to climate change. It contains 17 trophic diatom indices originating from studies in running and standing freshwaters throughout different ecoregions in Europe and outside. The Diatom Indicator Database uses a standardised taxonomic diatom list (CEMAGREF taxa list, updated version May
Rescaling the indices
Trophic scores were more consistent for the indices GM B&O, GM Seen and Rott when based on phosphorus ranges. When based on word descriptions, trophic scores were more consistent for the indices Trophy D, TDI, Hoffmann and van Dam. The scale originally used to construct an index, phosphorus ranges or word descriptions, decides these results, with the exception of TDI since it had broader scale boundaries (Appendix 1).
Consistency of index scores
Two groups of indices, with on average a mutual similarity higher or lower
Discussion
The similarity in taxonomic composition of the trophic indices correlated to the origin of the underlying data. The indices of group 2 (Rott, TDI, van Dam, Hofmann) were obtained from the Omnidia program, whereas those of group 1 (GM B&O, GM Seen, Trophy D) were extracted from the original papers. Taxonomic correctness and consistency is crucial for any comparison or assessment. All taxa were converted to a common taxon list. Group 1 taxa were converted to the most recent specific level
Conclusions and recommendations
Despite the upscaling of the seven trophic indices to a common reference scale, the trophic assessment results varied significantly. A detailed comparison of the autecological information between the indices revealed a difference in both composition of the taxonomic lists and of the trophic scores of diatom taxa. Common valid taxonomy has up to now been a practical barrier for comparison studies. A first step would be to accompany new water quality indicator indices by taxonomic notes and a
Acknowledgements
This paper is a result of the EU-funded project Eurolimpacs (6th Framework Programme; contract number: GOCE-CT-2003-505540). Prof. Luc Ector, Mrs. Amelie Jarlman and Dr. Martyn Kelly are thanked for stimulating discussions. We also thank Mr. Martin van den Hoorn and Mr. Jos Sinkeldam for technical assistance in processing the data. The comments of two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript.
References (52)
- et al.
Ribosomal DNA sequence variation among sympatric strains of the Cyclotella meneghiniana complex (Bacillariophyceae) reveals cryptic diversity
Protist
(2005) - et al.
Diatom-based TP and TN inference models and indices for monitoring nutrient enrichment of New Jersey streams
Ecol. Indic.
(2007) - et al.
Diatom metrics for monitoring eutrophication in rivers of the United States
Ecol. Indic.
(2007) - et al.
Taxonomy and ecology of characteristic Eunotia species in headwaters with low electric conductivity
Nov. Hedw.
(1991) - et al.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers, Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish
(1999) - et al.
Güteklassenbezogene Zielvorgaben zur Nährstoffreduzierung im Berliner Gewässersystem
Ber. IGB
(1996) - et al.
A habitat matrix conceptual model for stream periphyton
Archiv. Hydrobiol.
(1998) - et al.
Guilds of benthic algae along nutrient gradients, relationships to algal community diversity
J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc.
(1988) - et al.
Large-scale regional variation in diatom–water chemistry relationship, rivers of the eastern United States
Hydrobiologia
(2006) - et al.
Durchgehendes Trophiesystem auf der Grundlage der Trophieindikation mit Kieselalgen
(1999)
Using quantitative PCR to determine the distribution of a semicryptic benthic diatom, Navicula phyllepta (Bacillariophyceae)
J. Phycol.
Calibration of littoral diatoms to water chemistry in standing fresh waters Flanders, lower Belgium, inference models for historical sediment assemblages
J. Paleolim.
Algal periphyton growth on nutrient-diffusing substrates, an in situ bioassay
Ecology
Using diatoms to assess the biological condition of large rivers in Idaho (USA)
Freshw. Biol.
The ecological status of European rivers: evaluation and intercalibration of assessment methods
Hydrobiologia
The STAR project, context, objectives and approaches
Hydrobiologia
Eutrophication of Freshwaters
Aufwuchs diatoms in Seen und ihre Eignung als Indikatoren der Trophie
Bibl. Diat.
Méthode d’analyse et d’appréciation des cours d’eau en Suisse, Diatomées, niveau R région
Limnofauna Europaea
The trophic Diatom Index, a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers
J. Appl. Phycol.
Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe
J. Appl. Phycol.
Littoral diatoms as indicators for the eutrophication of shallow lakes
Hydrobiologia
Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Bacillariophyceae 2. teil. Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae
New species, combinations and synonyms in the genus Nitzschia
Bacillaria
A first “Red List” of endangered taxa in the diatom flora of Germany and of Central Europe – interpretation and comparison
Cited by (92)
Long-term response of diatoms in high-elevation streams influenced by rock glaciers
2022, Ecological IndicatorsEvaluation of a diatom eDNA-based technique for assessing water quality variations in tropical lakes and reservoirs
2022, Ecological IndicatorsCitation Excerpt :Owing to species-specific ecological tolerances and their high sensitivity to variations in a wide variety of environmental variables, diatoms are among the most well-established biological indicators of water quality globally (Battarbee, 2001; Bennion et al., 2010; Stevenson et al., 2010). For example, the European Water Framework Directive recommends diatoms as one of the ideal bioindicators for the assessment of lakes and rivers and this has encouraged development of several diatom-based indices of water quality in Europe (Besse-Lototskaya et al., 2011). Other diatom-based indices are used in the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand (Wang et al., 2005; Chessman et al., 2007; Lavoie et al., 2009; Schowe & Harding, 2014).
Are recent protection strategies sufficient for maintaining diverse freshwater benthic diatom assemblages?
2021, Ecological Indicators