Distance and intrastate college student migration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.06.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Most studies of student migration focus on interstate migration of college students, largely because the aggregate data typically used are limited in geographic specificity to states. However, interstate migration is only a small part of the total student migration. Public institutions generally get most of their students from within their state; for example, 88 percent of first-time freshmen who enrolled in University System of Georgia institutions in 2002 graduated from Georgia schools. Such intrastate migration is seldom considered. This paper examines intrastate college student migration, using data for Georgia. Aside from such traditional measures of benefits and costs like tuition, financial aid, and school quality, a crucial explanatory variable in our analysis is the distance from a student's home to the different Georgia state institutions. Our empirical results indicate that student intrastate migration is strongly discouraged by greater distance, but with effects that differ across types of higher education institutions.

Introduction

Pursuing higher education involves a significant migration decision by students, and most studies of student migration focus on interstate migration of college students (e.g., out-migration, in-migration, net migration), largely because the aggregate data that are typically used in these studies are limited in geographic specificity to states. However, interstate migration is only a small part of the total student migration that actually occurs. Public institutions generally get most of their students from within their state; for example, 88 percent of first-time freshmen who enrolled in University System of Georgia (USG) institutions in 2002 graduated from Georgia schools (Information Digest, 2002–2003), and many other states exhibit a similar pattern. Such intrastate migration is seldom considered. This paper examines intrastate student migration using data for the USG, a statewide system of universities and colleges that includes all public institutions of higher education in Georgia except for technical colleges. Aside from such traditional measures of benefits and costs like tuition, financial aid, and school quality, a crucial explanatory variable in our analysis is the distance from a student's home to the different Georgia state institutions. Our empirical results indicate that student intrastate migration is strongly discouraged by greater distance, but with effects that differ across types of higher education institutions.

Indeed, evidence on USG enrollment rates by school district indicates that distance may in fact affect enrollments in USG institutions. Fig. 1 provides a map of Georgia public school districts and the 33 institutions of the USG. School districts are shaded according to their USG enrollment rate, defined as the number of first-time freshmen enrolling in any institution of the USG divided by the number of high school graduates; location of a USG institution is indicated by an open circle. The shading in Fig. 1 suggests that school districts that contain or are near a USG institution generally have a higher USG enrollment rate. However, this evidence is only suggestive, and more systematic analysis is necessary.

In-state students face two, sequential migration decisions, both of which seem likely to be affected by distance. First, a student must decide whether to pursue any type of higher education. Second, conditional upon deciding to pursue postsecondary education, the student must decide which institution to attend. If there is no postsecondary institution near a student's home, then pursuing higher education necessarily involves moving to a new place or commuting long distances; even when there are higher education options near the student's home, the student still has to decide if the best choice is a nearby institution or one further away. If the student chooses an institution in his or her home state, the institution may still be as far away as two or three hundred miles in an average size state.

In this paper we examine these intrastate migration decisions for first-time freshmen who graduate from Georgia public high schools and attend a USG institution. Georgia public high school graduates account for 81 percent of first-time freshmen enrolled in the USG in 2002 (Information Digest, 2002–2003).1 We are interested in two related questions. First, what factors affect a student's probability of enrolling in a USG institution? Second, conditional upon enrollment in a USG institution, what factors affect a student's choice among USG institutions? In both cases, an important variable is the distance to the nearest USG institution, and, along the lines of gravity models of international trade (e.g., Bergstrand, 1985), we hypothesize that the likelihood of attendance decreases as the distance to the nearest USG institution increases. It seems likely that individuals are more likely to enroll at all when they live closer to an institution, and also that they are more likely to enroll in institutions that are located closer to their home.2

We estimate the elasticity of higher education attendance with respect to distance from home to college, using a basic gravity model approach. We find that the overall probability of attending any USG institution is decreasing with the distance to the nearest USG college, with an enrollment-distance elasticity of −0.12. We also estimate the distance elasticity for enrollment in individual institutions separately for each institution, and we find that demand for more prestigious institutions is less elastic with respect to distance than less prestigious institutions.

In the next section we discuss previous research on student migration. We then present in Section 3 our approach and our data. In Section 4 we present our estimation results, and we conclude in Section 5.

Section snippets

Previous work on student migration3

Much of the literature on student migration focuses on the role of tuition and financial aid policies in the student migration process, and most of this work focuses upon interstate student migration. For example, using data on U.S. states Tuckman (1970) finds that higher average tuition and fees in a state increase out-migration from the state, while levels of financial aid do not affect out-migration; Mixon, 1992a, Mixon, 1992b also estimates that higher in-state tuition repels students from

A gravity model of student migration

We use a gravity model of student migration to estimate the distance elasticity of enrollment demand for the University System of Georgia. Migration flows Mij from school district i to institution j can be written as:Mij=AijPiα1Pjα2dijβ,where Pi is the student population of school district i (the origin area), Pj is the student population of institution j (the destination area), dij is the distance from i to j, Aij=Πk(zkijγk) is a multiplicative shift term that allows for inclusion of K

Attending any USG institution?

Table 2 presents estimation results on how the likelihood of attending any USG institution varies with the distance to the closest college or university, the number of high school graduates in a district, and the various push factors. This is not a standard gravity model because there is only one destination, the USG, so we do not include institutional pull factors.15

Summary and conclusions

This paper examines how accessibility affects enrollment in and within the University System of Georgia. We find several important results. First, greater distance to the nearest college decreases the likelihood of enrollment in any USG institution with an elasticity of −0.12, while greater distance to the nearest university has little or no effect on the likelihood of enrollment in the USG. However, once students decide to enroll in the USG, they must choose between colleges and universities.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the editor and to two anonymous referees for many helpful comments.

References (30)

  • S.L. Desjardins et al.

    Modeling the college application process in a land-grant university

    Economics of Education Review

    (1999)
  • R. McHugh et al.

    The determinants of interstate student migration: A place-to-place analysis

    Economics of Education Review

    (1984)
  • F.G. Mixon et al.

    The determinants of out-of-state enrollment in higher education: A tobit analysis

    Economics of Education Review

    (1994)
  • M. Alfonso

    The impact of community college attendance on baccalaureate attainment

    Research in Higher Education

    (2006)
  • M.K. Ali

    Analysis of enrollment: A spatial-interaction model

    The Journal of Economics

    (2003)
  • T. Amemiya

    Regression analysis when the dependent variable is truncated normal

    Econometrica

    (1973)
  • E.A. Baryla et al.

    Student migration: Do significant factors vary by region?

    Education Economics

    (2001)
  • J.H. Bergstrand

    The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence

    The Review of Economics and Statistics

    (1985)
  • D. Card

    Using geographic variation in college proximity to estimate the return to schooling

  • A.S. Fotheringham et al.

    Hierarchical destination choice and spatial interaction modeling: A simulation experiment

    Environment and Planning A

    (2001)
  • S. Ghatak et al.

    Migration theories and evidence: An assessment

    Journal of Economic Surveys

    (1996)
  • C.S. Gossman et al.

    Migration of college and university students in the United States

    (1968)
  • M.J. Greenwood

    Research on internal migration in the United States: A survey

    Journal of Economic Literature

    (1975)
  • E.A. Hanushek

    The failure of input-based schooling policies

    Economic Journal

    (2003)
  • D.E. Heller

    Student price response in higher education: An update to Leslie and Brinkman

    Journal of Higher Education

    (1997)
  • Cited by (95)

    • Regional favouritism in Chinese university admissions

      2024, Economics of Transition and Institutional Change
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text