Elsevier

Electrochimica Acta

Volume 54, Issue 26, 1 November 2009, Pages 6417-6425
Electrochimica Acta

Electro-oxidation of chlorophenols at glassy carbon electrodes modified with polyNi(II)complexes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.017Get rights and content

Abstract

The effect of the ligand macrocycle (phenylporphyrin (PP) or phthalocyanine (Pc)) and of the ligand substituent (single bondNH2 or single bondSO3) on the catalytic activity for the electro-oxidation in a pH 11 buffer electrolyte of 2- and 4-chlorophenol (2-CP and 4-CP), 2,4- and 2,6-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP and 2,6-DCP), 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (2,4,6-TCP), and pentachlorophenol (PCP) at glassy carbon electrodes modified with electropolymerized Ni(II) macrocycles was studied. The polyphenolic residue deposited at the electrode surface was characterized by cyclic voltammetry, impedance measurements, ex situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). A band of aliphatic Cdouble bondO stretching in the IR spectrum of the fouling film produced by potential cycling in 2,4,6-TCP indicated that the aromatic ring had been broken, yielding ketones, aldehydes and/or carboxylic acids. The sulphonated Ni(II) polymers, which showed the Ni(III)/Ni(II) process in the CV, had XP spectra typical of paramagnetic Ni(II), indicating that they contained Ni(OH)2 clusters. On the contrary, the CVs of the amino Ni(II) did not show the Ni(III)/Ni(II) process at all, this process appearing only after previous activation by potential cycling, and only to a small extent. As was to be expected, the XP spectra of activated amino films corresponded to diamagnetic Ni(II), showing that the concentration of Ni(OH)2 clusters was very small. The amino films were less active than the sulpho films for the oxidation of chlorophenols, in agreement with the lower concentration of Ni(OH)2 clusters in the former films. For all electrodes the highest activity was observed for 2,4,6-TCP, since its oxidation yields a phenolic residue which is much more porous than those produced by the other CPs.

Introduction

Chlorophenols (CPs), common pollutants in many industrial wastewaters, are used as pesticides, paint preservatives and cellulose bleaching agents. They are highly toxic and persistent, and thus their recovery or mineralization is a must. The phenolic OH group confers the CPs solubility in water, the ionized form being more hydrophilic, while the neutral form is more lipophilic and has higher membrane permeability [1], [2]. The pKa value depends on the number of chlorine atoms and on their position with respect to the OH group [3], [4], [5], increasing from 4.7 for pentachlorophenol up to 9.4 for 2-chlorophenol. We reported a linear correlation between the anodic peak potential of several CPs on glassy carbon (GC) at pH 11 and the pKa, the oxidation being the more facile the less acidic was the CP [4]. The formation of the polyphenolic film began at a lower potential for 2-CP and 2,4-DCP than for 2,4,6-TCP, and the film on the latter was so porous that it allowed the oxidation of 2,4,6-TCP to continue [4]. The first charge-transfer step is rate-determining and yields the corresponding phenoxy radical.

Abgoola et al. [6] studied the electro-oxidation of CPs at gold electrodes modified with electropolymerized Ni(II)tetrakisbenzylmercapto- and Ni(II)dodecylmercapto-phthalocyanines, and found that activation of the “Osingle bondNisingle bondO” bridge yielded polyNi(OH)NiPcs, which showed a better catalytic activity than the unactivated polyNiPcs, although eventually all the electrodes became fouled by deposition of oligomers [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Coteiro et al. [12] propose that the electro-oxidation of 4-CP in acidic media on Ti/Ru0.3M0.7O2 with Mdouble bondTi or Sn could yield the easily mineralized oxalic acid via 4-chlorocatechol or via hydroquinone–benzoquinone–malic acid–maleic acid.

Nickel tetraazamacrocyclic complexes are exceptionally efficient and selective electrocatalysts [6], [13], [14], probably because nickel easily changes from a square planar to an octahedral conformation [15], [16]. When planar Ni(II)-phthalocyanine and -porphyrin tetrasulphonated complexes are electrodeposited in aqueous media they form a stacked structure on the electrode surface [6], film growth being proposed to occur via Nisingle bondOsingle bondNi bridges, with the formation of some nickel hydroxide nanostructures [17], [18]. In these modified electrodes the oxidation of Ni(II) occurs with water expulsion, probably due to the hydrophobic character of the macrocyclic ligands [19]. Revenga-Parra et al. [20] found that GC electrodes modified with films of Ni(II)-(N,N′-bis(2,5-dihydroxybenzylidene)-1,2-diaminobenzene) (Ni(II)-DHS]/GC) show electrocatalytic activity for methanol oxidation.

Previous studies in our laboratory indicate that polyNiTSPc-modified GC electrodes are less fouled by the electro-oxidation of 2-CP than bare GC [21]. Other authors have reported similar results for the oxidation of organic molecules at electrodes modified with different Ni(II) complexes [17], [22], [23]. We have reported [16] that the half-sum potential of the Ni(III)/Ni(II) process at GC modified electrodes in a pH 11 buffer electrolyte is almost independent of the ligand (phthalocyanines (Pc) or phenylporphyrins (PP)) and of the substituent (amino or sulphonated group). Francisco et al. [24] attributed to the Ni(III)/Ni(II) redox couple the activity for the oxidation of hydroquinone and 4-aminophenol of a carbon-paste electrode modified with SiO2/Nb2O5-phosphate on which Ni(II)porphyrin had been previously adsorbed. However, Yi et al. [25] and Agboola et al. [6] recently reported the electro-oxidation of dopamine and CPs on electrodes modified with different electropolymerized films of nickel(II) complexes, although the Ni(III)/Ni(II) couple did not appear in the CVs. Probably the activity was due to a π–π interaction similar to that reported for polymeric adsorbents chemically modified with porphyrins, on which the retention of phenol and CPs is increased by this interaction [26].

In this work we have studied the effect of the ligand macrocycle, and of the ligand substituent, on the catalytic activity for oxidation at pH 11 of CPs at polyNi(II)phthalocyanine/GC (polyNiPc/GC) and polyNi(II)phenylporphyrin/GC (polyNiPP/GC) electrodes, both tetrasulpho- (TS) and tetraamino-(TA) substituted.

Section snippets

Electrode preparation

As in previous work [18] two water-soluble Ni(II)complexes, tetrasulphophthalocyanine (NiTSPc) and tetrasulphophenylporphyrin (NiTSPP), and two water-insoluble Ni(II) compounds, Ni(II)tetraaminophthalocyanine (NiTAPc) and Ni(II) tetraaminophenylporphyrin (NiTAPP), were used. The respective structures are given in Fig. 1. The Ni complexes (Aldrich for NiTSPc, and Frontier Scientific, Utah, for the other three complexes) and all other chemicals were used as received.

A GC substrate (Pine

Cyclic voltammetry (CV)

The first (thick line), second (dotted line) and fifth (dashed line) CVs, with electrolyte stirring between successive scans, of a polyNiTSPc/GC electrode in 1 mM solutions of 2- and 4-chlorophenol (2-CP and 4-CP), 2,4- and 2,6-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP and 2,6-DCP), 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (2,4,6-TCP), and pentachlorophenol (PCP) are given in Fig. 2. The thin lines are the CVs of the modified electrodes in the support electrolyte. All the CVs show an irreversible anodic peak (peak Ia in Fig. 2) of

Conclusions

Anodic currents appear at potentials lower than that at which Ni(II) is oxidized (Fig. 2), showing that, due to the high porosity of polyNiTSPc films, oxidation of the CPs already occurs on the GC substrate, and also at the polyNiTSPc films when Ni is still present as Ni(II). The first electron transfer (certainly the rds) step of a completely dissociated CP is[4]:ArO  ArOradical dot + ewhere ArO represents the phenolate anion and (ArOradical dot) the phenoxy radical.

The ex situ XPS results confirm, as already

Acknowledgement

Financial support from FONDECYT-CONICYT-Chile, Grant 1070290, is gratefully acknowledged.

References (32)

  • J. Stradins et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1993)
  • C. Berríos et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2008)
  • M.S. Ureta-Zañartu et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2002)
  • B. Agboola et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2007)
  • G. Rosłonek et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1992)
  • A. Ciszewski et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1999)
  • C. Berríos et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2007)
  • M.S. Ureta-Zañartu et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (2005)
  • M. Revenga-Parra et al.

    Sens. Actuators B

    (2008)
  • M.S. Ureta-Zañartu et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (2003)
  • J. Manriquez et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1999)
  • J. Obirai et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (2005)
  • M.S.P. Francisco et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (2007)
  • S.-Y. Yi et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (2007)
  • Z-g. Pei et al.

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2007)
  • F. Hahn et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text