Elsevier

Electrochimica Acta

Volume 90, 15 February 2013, Pages 375-381
Electrochimica Acta

Electrodeposition of zinc oxide on transparent conducting metal oxide nanofibers and its performance in dye sensitized solar cells

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.048Get rights and content

Abstract

Transparent conducting nanofibers of indium tin oxide (ITO) and antimony tin oxide were prepared on fluorine doped tin oxide glass substrates by electrospinning. Onto the obtained nanofiber mats first a dense zinc oxide layer followed by a nanoporous ZnO layer were electrochemically deposited. Transmission electron microscopy shows that only ITO nanofibers were covered with dense ZnO layers. For application in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) the dense layer is needed in order to suppress the back reaction of photogenerated electrons from the ZnO to the electrolyte. Therefore only films with ITO nanofibers were tested as porous electron collection layers in DSSC in view of electron transport and electron collection efficiency, and compared to ZnO layers electrodeposited under identical conditions but without nanofibers. Contrary to the expectation the conductive nanofibers do not improve the electron transport in the photoelectrodes and the solar to electrical conversion efficiency is limited to about 2.4%. It is discussed why the presence of nanofibers mats, which was found to be advantageous for TiO2-based DSSCs before, is not favorable for ZnO-based DSSCs.

Highlights

Nanofibers of transparent conducting oxides (TCO) were prepared by electrospinning. ► They were modified by electrodeposited ZnO and tested in dye-sensitized solar cells. ► Compact ZnO electrodeposited on the nanofibres suppressed recombination in the DSSC. ► Electron transport in electrodeposited ZnO cannot be further improved by TCO nanofibers.

Introduction

Since the first publication on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) with a high solar to electrical energy conversion efficiency of 7.1% by O’Regan and Grätzel [1] in 1991, this kind of solar cell has attracted much interest. One of the reasons is the quite high efficiency in relation to their low production cost. Typically a nanocrystalline dye-sensitized semiconductor film of TiO2 with non-ordered nanopores is used as light absorbing layer, but it is also possible to use nanoporous ZnO [2], due to its almost similar band gap energy and band positions [3]. In case of sintered nanocrystallineTiO2 on glass electrodes Yella et al. just recently published a new record efficiency of 12.3% employing a complex Zn-based porphyrin dye as sensitizer and a cobalt (II/III)-based redox electrolyte instead of the typical iodide/triiodide redox couple [4]. Electrochemically deposited, nanoporous ZnO films have the advantage that they can be prepared without applying high temperatures of about 400 °C, as necessary for the preparation of nanocrystalline TiO2. ZnO crystallizes already at about 70 °C allowing the use of conducting flexible polymer substrates as electrodes [5]. ZnO-based DSSCs typically employ easy accessible metal-free dyes, for example the indoline dye D149, as sensitizer. The current champion efficiencies for ZnO-based DSSCs fabricated at temperatures below 100 °C are 5.6% on glass electrodes [3] and 3.8% on flexible polyethylenterephthalate/indium tin oxide (PET/ITO) conducting polymer electrodes [5].

The electron transport in the photoanodes strongly affects the efficiency of the solar cells, since electron diffusion through a nanoporous semiconductor layer with a thickness of typically 10–20 μm is in general a slow process, during which the electrons can recombine with the redox electrolyte or an oxidized dye molecule. Haller et al. expanded the surface of the ZnO by electrochemically depositing a porous ZnO layer on as well electrochemically grown ZnO nanorods [6]. In the dense ZnO nanorods the tendency for recombination is lowered, but the electron diffusion is still much slower than in transparent conducting oxide (TCO) materials.

Therefore, another approach to decrease the electron transport time and, thus, to improve the collection efficiency is to use TCO films with a high surface area or even porosity. The TCO surface is then coated with a thin layer of a dye-sensitized semiconductor film drastically limiting the transport length through the semiconductor. This so-called core-shell concept was first realized by Zaban et al., using films of TCO nanoparticles [7]. Later Fattakhova-Rohling et al. electrodeposited ZnO into TCO, i.e. ITO films with a continuous ordered 3-dimensional mesopores network prepared by a sol–gel method [8].

A probably easier approach is the coating of networks of interconnected TCO nanofibers prepared by electrospinning with a porous semiconductor material. Ostermann et al. deposited anodically a 500 nm thick porous TiO2 layer onto antimony tin oxide (ATO) nanofibers, which led, in comparison to the plain substrate without nanofibers, to an increase of the short-circuit photocurrent density from 0.9 mA cm−2 to 3.9 mA cm−2 and reached a solar to electrical power conversion efficiency of 1% [9]. The porosity was achieved by addition of surfactants. Iskandar et al. coated an ITO nanofiber film with nanocrystalline TiO2 by the doctor blade technique, which led to an increase of the photocurrent density from 8.8 mA cm−2 without nanofibers to 10.2 mA cm−2, resulting in an efficiency of about 4% [10]. In both studies no blocking layer was used between the nanofibers and the nanoporous layer, which is typically recommended to suppress the back reaction between the highly conductive nanofibers and the redox electrolyte [11].

In this study we investigated electrospun TCO nanofiber substrates covered with ZnO instead of TiO2 toward their use in dye-sensitized solar cells. Since fully crystalline ZnO can be easily electrodeposited at 70 °C from O2-saturated ZnCl2 aqueous solutions alternatively as compact or porous layer, this method allows the consecutive deposition of a blocking layer and a porous electron collecting layer in the same setup. The electrodeposition of the porous ZnO is simply achieved by addition of the pore-creating additive eosin Y (EY) to the electrodeposition bath after completion of the blocking layer. The eosin Y can be desorbed easily by soaking the film in aqueous KOH (pH = 10.5) [12], resulting in fully crystalline and highly porous ZnO films on top of the compact ZnO layer without further calcination [13], [14]. We compare the solar to electrical power conversion efficiencies and electron transport properties of thus prepared ZnO/ITO nanofiber DSSCs to DSSCs based on porous ZnO electrodeposited under identical conditions on flat FTO substrates without nanofibers.

Section snippets

Experimental

A detailed description for the preparation of the nanofibers is given elsewhere [9]. In short; the nanofibers of ITO and ATO were electrospun for 120 s from a methanolic solution containing 10 wt% of the precursors (corresponding salts, i.e. SnCl4 (Sigma–Aldrich, 99%) and In(acac)3 (Sigma–Aldrich, 99.99%) for ITO or SbCl3 (Sigma–Aldrich, 99%) for ATO) and 5 wt% of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, Sigma Aldrich). Afterwards the nanofibers were calcined at 550 °C for 5–10 min to remove the PVP and to form

Results and discussion

Fig. 1 shows SEM micrographs of uncoated ITO (a) and ATO (b) nanofibers. The diameters of the ITO and ATO nanofibers are 200–300 nm and 100–200 nm, respectively. The insets in Fig. 1 show STEM cross sections of the respective nanofibers, indicating that they consist of nanoparticles with diameters between 5 and 10 nm. The resistance of an 1.2–1.5 μm thick nanofiber mat was found to be about 2  cm−1. The specific conductivity of a single nanofiber is about 1 S cm−1 for the ATO fibers and 5 S cm−1 for

Conclusions

Compact ZnO blocking layers can be electrodeposited on electrospun ITO nanofibers, but not on ATO nanofibers, both on conducting FTO/glass substrates, because of the higher conductivity of the ITO nanofibers. Subsequent electrodeposition of a porous ZnO layer allows dye-sensitization and the construction of dye-sensitized solar cells. However, lower efficiencies were obtained compared to solar cells from compact and porous ZnO films electrodeposited on flat FTO substrates. Investigation by IMPS

Acknowledgements

The authors thank PD Dr. Armin Feldhoff and Frank Steinbach (Hannover) for TEM images. We acknowledge gratefully financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under the grants OE 420/5-1 and WA 1116/18.

References (22)

  • K. Hara et al.

    Highly efficient photon-to-electron conversion with mercurochrome-sensitized nanoporous oxide semiconductor solar cells

    Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells

    (2000)
  • E. Bellingeri et al.

    High mobility ZnO thin film deposition on SrTiO3 and transparent field effect transistor fabrication

    Superlattices and Microstructures

    (2005)
  • B. O’Regan et al.

    A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films

    Nature

    (1991)
  • H. Rensmo et al.

    High light-to-energy conversion efficiencies for solar cells based on nanostructured ZnO electrodes

    Journal of Physical Chemistry B

    (1997)
  • T. Yoshida et al.

    Electrodeposition of Inorganic/Organic hybrid thin films

    Advanced Functional Materials

    (2009)
  • A. Yella et al.

    Porphyrin-Sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)-Based redox electrolyte exceed 12 percent efficiency

    Science

    (2011)
  • X. Liu et al.

    Room temperature fabrication of porous ZnO photoelectrodes for flexible dye-sensitized solar cells

    Chemical Communications

    (2007)
  • S. Haller et al.

    Design of a hierarchical structure of ZnO by electrochemistry for ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells

    Physica Status Solidi A

    (2010)
  • S. Chappel et al.

    Extending the current collector into the nanoporous matrix of dye sensitized electrodes

    Journal of Physical Chemistry B

    (2005)
  • D. Fattakhova-Rohlfing et al.

    Transparent conductive films of indium tin oxide with 3D mesopore architecture

    Advanced Materials

    (2006)
  • R. Ostermann et al.

    Electrospun antimony doped tin oxide (ATO) nanofibers as a versatile conducting matrix

    Chemical Communications

    (2011)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Electrochemistry and Spectroelectrochemistry with Electrospun Indium Tin Oxide Nanofibers

      2016, Electrochimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      One common way to obtain macroporous ITO layers is through templating using various procedures like electrochemically assisted deposition [36], self-assembly deposition [37] or electrophoretic deposition [38]. Another way to deposit macroporous ITO layers is electrospinning [39–47]. Compared to methods achieving macroporosity through templating, nanofiber films generated using electrospinning do not have the problem of narrow connections that the former often possess [48].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Now at: Friemann & Wolf Batterietechnik GmbH, 63654 Büdingen, Germany.

    View full text