Electoral and structural losers and support for a national referendum in the U.S.
Section snippets
Support for institutional change: short-term electoral and long-term structural losers
We argue that mass support for a national referendum might be a function of a citizen’s short-term electoral fortunes as well as the long-term structural conditions under which ‘losers’ find themselves to be underrepresented. Of course, with high levels of approval for a national referendum, it is not only losers who would like to see the adoption of the plebiscitary mechanism at the national level. Nevertheless, we suspect that losers – in terms of their immediate electoral fortunes as well as
Expectations, data, and methods
We test two general hypotheses with respect to support for a national referendum in the U.S. They are grouped into long-term structural losers versus short-term electoral losers. Long-term structural losers are tested a number of different ways. We expect independents to be more likely to support a national referendum than partisans who regularly are advantaged under a two-party majoritarian electoral system. We expect residents of large population states whose collective voice and
Who supports a national referendum pre-election?
We begin by examining the long-term factors increasing support for a national referendum prior to the 2008 general election (October wave) in Table 1. Column 1 reports covariates for Republicans and non-partisans with Democrats as the reference category, while column 2 includes covariates for Democrats and non-partisans with Republicans as the reference category. This same pattern is repeated in Table 2, Table 3 of the paper. Marginal effects are reported in the column to the right of each
Conclusion
Drawing on the growing literature of winners and losers, and utilizing pre- and post-election panel data from the 2008 general election, we have identified certain segments of the population that are more willing than others to have elected officials grant citizens plebiscitary power. We find opinions on an electoral reform proposal to be fluid and responsive to electoral politics, rather than constant and stable as reported in earlier work. Our results are consistent with Bowler and Denovan
References (58)
- et al.
Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: a cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems
American Political Science Review
(1997) - et al.
Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy
(2005) - et al.
Winning, losing and political trust in America
British Journal of Political Science
(2002) - et al.
Winners, losers, and attitudes about government in contemporary semocracies
International Political Science Review
(2001) - et al.
The Coming of Age of Direct Democracy: California’s Recall and Beyond
(2007) - et al.
Perceptions of fairness and support for proportional representation
Political Behavior
(1999) - et al.
Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy
(1998) - et al.
Reasoning about institutional change: winners, losers and support for electoral change
British Journal of Political Science
(2007) - et al.
Enraged or engaged? Preferences for direct citizen participation in affluent democracies
Political Research Quarterly
(2007) - et al.
Electoral Reform and Minority Representation: Local Experiments and Alternative Elections
(2003)
Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States
Why politicians like electoral institutions: self-interest, values, or ideology
Journal of Politics
Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy
The religion card: gay marriage and the 2004 presidential election
Public Opinion Quarterly
Democracy in the States: Experiments in Election Reform
Party Lines: Competition, Partisanship and Congressional Redistricting
The nature of belief systems in mass publics
Direct Democracy: the Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall
Public opinion and direct democracy
Journal of Democracy
A national initiative
Reforming the Republic: Democratic Institutions for the New America
O OTHER, WHERE ART THOu? Support for multiparty politics in the United States
Social Science Quarterly
Popular support for direct democracy
Party Politics
Priming presidential votes with direct democracy
Journal of Politics
Political engagement, mobilization, and direct democracy
Public Opinion Quarterly
The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation
The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System is Failing and How to Fix It
The referendum in representative democracies
The advisory referendum in America
Public Opinion Quarterly
Cited by (20)
Strategic considerations and support for direct democracy in the United States
2024, Electoral StudiesDeterminants of support and participation in a major sport event referendum
2021, Sport Management ReviewRejecting representation? Party systems and popular support for referendums in Europe
2020, Electoral StudiesCitation Excerpt :Electoral losers in majoritarian systems are therefore “less satisfied with the way democracy works” than their counterparts in more proportional systems (Anderson and Guillory, 1997, 68). Several studies suggest that support for out-of-government parties increases support for referendum use (Karp and Banducci, 2008; Smith et al., 2010). Along these lines, Bernauer and Vatter (2012) find that electoral losers are more satisfied with democracy in more proportional systems and in countries that employ popular vote processes.
‘You Can't Always Get What You Want’: The effects of winning and losing in a referendum on citizens' referendum support
2020, Electoral StudiesCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, Smith et al. (2010) find that referendum support is also shaped by short-term electoral fortunes: being a winner or loser in the electoral arena is an important force that can either increase or decrease support for a national referendum. Based upon multiple-survey data, they show that U.S. citizens “supporting the losing presidential candidate (…) are considerably more likely to favour a national referendum after the election, but not before, as their loser status had not yet been conferred upon them” (Smith et al., 2010, p. 519). In a recent contribution to this body of literature, Werner (2019) argues that individuals take instrumental considerations into account when expressing support for forms of political decision-making, such as referendums.
Support for Deliberative mini-Publics among the Losers of Representative Democracy
2024, British Journal of Political ScienceOpinion incongruence and public support for direct decision-making
2024, European Journal of Political Research
- 1
Tel.: +1 352 392 0262; fax: +1 352 392 8127.