Elsevier

Energy and Buildings

Volume 72, April 2014, Pages 271-279
Energy and Buildings

Trial results from a model predictive control and optimisation system for commercial building HVAC

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.037Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A novel predictive control system for commercial building heating ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC).

  • Multi-objective optimisation framework simultaneously considers energy, operating cost and occupant comfort.

  • Online occupant comfort feedback helps to fine-tune occupant comfort satisfaction.

  • Results presented from real-world trials have demonstrated energy improvement between 19 and 32% over existing control strategies.

Abstract

This paper presents the results from two real-world trials of an optimised supervisory model predictive control (MPC) system for heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) in commercial buildings. The system learns a model from historical data and uses weather forecasts and a given temperature set-point profile to predict building zone conditions and thermal comfort with the aim of optimising building controls for a number of HVAC zones throughout a day. The multi-objective optimisation minimises running cost and CO2 emissions, subject to operator preferences, while constraining occupant thermal discomfort to an acceptable range to find the best zone temperature set-point schedule for the building. This schedule is then applied to the building by a feedback control loop, which balances the power supplied to each zone for heating, cooling and ventilation.

A complementary online occupant comfort feedback tool was deployed to all occupant computers in the trial office buildings. This tool allows occupants to submit feedback on their thermal comfort and satisfaction at any point in time via electronic surveys, as well as allowing these surveys to be issued to occupants at scheduled times. This feedback fine-tuned the thermal comfort model used to constrain the optimisation, allowing for errors in the comfort model to be compensated. Thermal comfort feedback was also used to measure and compare relative occupant comfort levels with a baseline.

This control system was trialled on two office buildings in Australia, over two winter months and results compared with the performance of the incumbent building management and control system (BMCS). An average energy reduction of 19% and 32% was achieved in the two buildings over 51 and 10 days of operation respectively without substantially affecting measured or modelled occupant thermal satisfaction levels.

Introduction

This paper presents a supervisory control and optimisation system for commercial HVAC systems, aimed at minimising energy consumption and occupant thermal discomfort, and an accompanying online occupant comfort feedback tool which can be installed on occupant computers.

Occupant feedback from the comfort feedback tool is used to assess the impact of the optimised HVAC control strategy, to fine-tune the standard comfort model used in the optimisation process and to inform users of the state of the HVAC system, such as when natural ventilation or economy modes are active.

The supervisory HVAC control and optimisation system (referred to hereafter by the authors’ internal designation ‘OptiCOOL’ interfaces with a commercial building management & control system (BMCS) to read required data from HVAC zones and air handling units (AHUs) and to perform required control actions. It learns a model that can be used to predict zone conditions and comfort levels using information about HVAC power consumption and weather, which is used to discover the optimal power consumption schedule throughout the day-balancing cost, energy and emissions while maintaining comfort. The control module then overrides zone or supply air set-points to balance the heating/cooling power supplied to each zone and to track the best power profile from the optimisation.

Both systems were installed in two office buildings on the east coast of Australia and trialled over two months during winter to evaluate their energy savings potential. Thermal comfort levels were monitored throughout the trials to ensure consistency with pre-trial levels.

Section snippets

Background

Model predictive control (MPC) has been widely used for some form of building HVAC optimisation. The majority of work to date concentrates on examining control strategies for specific subs-systems [1], applying offline optimisation of particular buildings or building configurations using simulation models [2], or considers only specific approaches such as set-point resetting, peak demand limiting or load shifting [3], [4], [5], or examines techniques using small-scale test beds [6], [7]. Whole

Thermal comfort

Human perception of thermal comfort is highly subjective, and modelling it accurately for the purposes of predicting occupant comfort from measured environmental conditions is an active area of research, with de facto standard models having been shown to bias predictions such that excess cooling energy is often consumed unnecessarily [22]. Given that the primary aim of building HVAC systems is to maintain a level of occupant thermal comfort, it is critical to have an accurate comfort metric by

Trial details

The system was deployed and experiments run at two sites during winter 2011 (July–August) in two buildings on the east coast Australia.

The first building was a 3-floor 3322 m2 office building in Newcastle, New South Wales (NSW) with an under-floor air distribution system driven by 15 AHUs. The water loops to each AHU were supplied by two centralised chillers and a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) system with two gas micro-turbines and two gas boilers. The second building was a 3-floor 1808 m2 office

Conclusions

We have presented a novel method of optimising the operation of commercial HVAC systems using model predictive control, to minimise a weighted combination of operating cost, greenhouse gas emissions and occupant thermal comfort. The system was trialled in two buildings in Newcastle, and Melbourne Australia during winter 2011 to compare performance to standard building management and control systems.

Performance results obtained from the Newcastle Office Wing over winter 2011 show an average

Acknowledgement

This research was funded in full by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Energy Transformed Flagship, Australia.

References (35)

  • V. Zavala et al.

    Proactive energy management for next-generation building systems

  • J. House et al.

    A system approach to optimal control for HVAC and building systems

    ASHRAE Transactions

    (1995)
  • M. Cascia

    Implementation of a near-optimal global set point control method in a DDC controller

    ASHRAE Transactions

    (2000)
  • G. Henze et al.

    Experimental analysis of model-based predictive optimal control for active and passive building thermal storage inventory

    HVAC&R Research

    (Apr. 2005)
  • S. Wang

    Supervisory and optimal control of building HVAC systems: a review

    HVAC&R Research

    (Jan. 2008)
  • N. Nassif et al.

    Optimization of HVAC control system strategy using two-objective genetic algorithm

    HVAC&R Research

    (Jul. 2005)
  • Y. Sawaragi et al.

    Theory of multiobjective optimization

    (1985)
  • Cited by (129)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text