Elsevier

Energy and Buildings

Volume 139, 15 March 2017, Pages 732-746
Energy and Buildings

Indoor air quality and thermal comfort optimization in classrooms developing an automatic system for windows opening and closing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.017Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Environmental parameters triggering users’ actions on windows were assessed.

  • An automatic system for windows opening was developed to achieve IEQ in a classroom.

  • The system was driven by an adjusted version of Humphreys’ adaptive algorithm.

  • The algorithm was adapted including CO2 concentration and reducing the dead band.

  • The system guarantees low CO2 levels, thermal comfort and users satisfaction.

Abstract

Thermal comfort and indoor air quality in school classrooms are essential requirements to promote students’ productivity and reduce health symptoms. This paper presents the development of an automatic system for window openings, based on thermal comfort and indoor air quality correlations. The research was carried out in two adjacent classrooms. The initial phase aimed at assessing environmental conditions in classrooms, testing objective and subjective comfort models and establishing trigger parameters for window opening events; the second phase regarded the implementation of an adaptive control algorithm in an automatic system piloting windows with the aim of maintaining a satisfactory environment both in terms of IAQ and thermal comfort. The main results show that: (1) the IAQ is a relevant issue in school classrooms, because students usually suffer high CO2 levels; (2) the stronger driving force for undertaking adaptive actions is thermal comfort, while the need to improve the air quality is a secondary constraint; (3) the mechanized system ensures a good quality in terms of IAQ, thermal comfort and users’ satisfaction.

Introduction

The main target to be achieved in school classrooms is preserving students’ attention, efficiency and health while attending the lessons. From an environmental perspective it can be translated into reaching and maintaining a satisfactory perception in terms of air temperature and indoor air quality. Indeed, students spend almost all day in indoor environments and mainly inside classrooms with high occupant density [1], [2], [3]. Several studies show that inadequate ventilation rates can lead to a decrease in users’ performances and growing absenteeism [4], [5] and that adaptive actions, to restore comfortable conditions, usually occur when the situation is already critical, especially in relation to CO2 concentration [6], [7].

During the recent years different adaptive control algorithms (named ACA in the paper as in [8]) have been developed with the aim of predicting human behaviours, usually in relation to a specific action (e.g. windows or blind use, light-switching) [9], [10], [11], [12]. The “adaptive” term means that these algorithms are based on the adaptive comfort theory, stating that: “if a change occurs such as to produce discomfort, people react in ways which tend to restore their comfort” [13]. This principle focuses on the human-building interaction, since it asserts that if people perceive the ambient as uncomfortable, they will try to improve their thermal comfort, operating both on building controls (e.g. using doors, windows, blinds and fans) and on their personal condition (e.g. changing their clothes or taking hot or cold drinks). Many authors demonstrated that the adaptive model is the most proper and realistic approach for naturally ventilated buildings. Humphreys and Nicol, assessing the validity of the Fanger steady-state comfort model [14], [15], concluded that a ISO 7730 [16] compliant approach is more likely to bring to erroneous evaluations of thermal discomfort because the model poorly reflects the human thermal adaptation [17], [18]. Similar results were obtained by de Dear and Brager [19] and confirmed by many other researches [20], [21].

This active-user comfort approach is based on the relationship between the indoor temperature and the comfort one. Humphreys and Nicol assessed that the comfort temperature is a function of the outdoor average temperature and proposed two equations to derive it in free-running buildings [22]. The proposed equations were tested, tuned and validated in different climatic areas [8] and were also adopted by various Standards (ASHRAE, ATL CEN, CIBSE).

The majority of ACAs proposed in the last decades concerns the window use, a pattern widely studied because it is one of the most recurring users’ adaptive action [23]. The ACAs were usually developed for residential [24], [25], [26] and commercial buildings [9], [10], [27], [28], while the academic environment was rarely analysed [6].

Among these ACAs, the Humphreys adaptive algorithm [11] (the logical structure is reported in Table 1 part a) was selected for the present research since it is based on the widely-accepted adaptive comfort theory and its use in real applications requires the recording of few environmental variables.

The possible adjustments refer to the scholastic building use. In fact, the algorithm was tailored on the specifics of office buildings and it is only driven by temperature inputs, so it doesn’t consider metabolic and clothing variables as well as CO2 concentration. In school classrooms, like in offices, the met and clo parameters are rather constant [29]. In fact, the activity level is the sedentary one (met: 1.1 according to ISO 7730 Table B.1) and the clothing level among the students is very similar along each season [30]. On the contrary, the CO2 concentration is one of the major issues in rooms with high occupational density [31].

Indoor air quality in school classrooms is a global issue [32]: various studies developed in many countries [33], [34], including Italy [35], [36], remark poor indoor ventilation rates and high CO2 levels [37], [38], [39], [40] and even European projects are focused on this topic [41], [42]. However, the evidence of the problem is not followed by satisfactory solutions [43], especially for natural ventilated buildings that can’t benefit from mechanical ventilation to enhance the IAQ.

According to the contextual lacks, the main goal of the present work was the development of an automatic window-operating system driven by an adaptive control algorithm that, combining both temperature and CO2 concentration inputs, could guarantee a healthy and thermally comfortable environment in naturally ventilated schools. Moreover, the present study is included in a wider research carried out in the same school along several years. The experimental data collected from previous monitoring campaigns provided solid working bases and were used as lines guide for the survey development.

Section snippets

Methodology

The work was structured according to the following phases:

  • 1.

    Data collection in one free-running classroom: recording indoor and outdoor environmental parameters, occupancy patterns and users’ actions on windows;

  • 2.

    Data analysis: testing comfort models, evaluating trigger parameters for windows use and identifying an ACA in order to reflect both users’ thermal preference and IAQ requirements;

  • 3.

    Automatic system development: installing a mechanized system to pilot windows, driven by the adapted ACA

Results

The result section has been divided in three main sub-sections. The first one concerns the evaluation of thermal comfort and IAQ during the monitoring campaign: objective and subjective comfort models and IAQ Standard limits were applied and compared. The second one reports linear regression analyses on environmental variables to assess which are the main triggers for windows openings and the tuning of the ACA used in the case study. The last section describes the results from the automatic

Discussion

The work presented in the paper focuses on the topics of indoor air quality and thermal comfort in school classrooms. Since students spend a considerable part of their life inside schools [54], achieving and maintaining an adequate indoor environment is an issue of primary importance. Many researchers pointed out the inappropriate conditions of these environments (e.g. poor ventilation rates, high CO2 levels and indoor temperature) and the bad influence they have on students’ comfort levels,

Conclusions

This paper presents the results of an experimental survey conducted in a school building in Italy and focused on thermal comfort and IAQ issues. Two similar and adjacent classrooms were selected to point out the effects of two management systems operating windows opening: users’ direct control and a mechanized automatic control.

The monitoring took place both during the heating season (monitoring only one classroom) and non-heating season (with a parallel investigation in both the classrooms).

Acknowledgements

This research would not be possible without the collaboration of Ancona Province granting the permissions to set up the monitoring stations and the automatic operation system inside the school. A special thanks is directed to Eng. Enrica Bontempi for her collaboration during the initial research phases.

References (62)

  • J.F. Nicol et al.

    Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings

    Energy Build.

    (2002)
  • M.A. Humphreys et al.

    The validity of ISO-PMV for predicting comfort votes in every-day thermal environments

    Energy Build.

    (2002)
  • R.J. de Dear et al.

    Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55

    Energy Build.

    (2002)
  • S. Heidari et al.

    A comparative analysis of short-term and long-term thermal comfort surveys in Iran

    Energy Build.

    (2002)
  • S. Barlow et al.

    Occupant comfort in UK offices-How adaptive comfort theories might influence future low energy office refurbishment strategies

    Energy Build.

    (2007)
  • R. Andersen et al.

    Window opening behaviour modelled from measurements in Danish dwellings

    Build. Environ.

    (2013)
  • F. Haldi et al.

    Interactions with window openings by office occupants

    Build. Environ.

    (2009)
  • M.a. Humphreys et al.

    Updating the adaptive relation between climate and comfort indoors; new insights and an extended database

    Build. Environ.

    (2013)
  • D. Daum et al.

    A personalized measure of thermal comfort for building controls

    Build. Environ.

    (2011)
  • D.J. Clements-Croome et al.

    Ventilation rates in schools

    Build. Environ.

    (2008)
  • T. Salthammer et al.

    Children’s well-being at schools: impact of climatic conditions and air pollution

    Environ. Int.

    (2016)
  • M. Griffiths et al.

    Control of CO2 in a naturally ventilated classroom

    Energy Build.

    (2008)
  • L. Dias Pereira et al.

    Assessment of indoor air quality and thermal comfort in Portuguese secondary classrooms: methodology and results

    Build. Environ.

    (2014)
  • P.V. Dorizas et al.

    An integrated evaluation study of the ventilation rate, the exposure and the indoor air quality in naturally ventilated classrooms in the Mediterranean region during spring

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2015)
  • V. Turanjanin et al.

    Indoor CO2 measurements in Serbian schools and ventilation rate calculation

    Energy

    (2014)
  • F. Stazi et al.

    Experimental assessment of a zinc-titanium ventilated façade in a Mediterranean climate

    Energy Build.

    (2014)
  • S. Carlucci et al.

    A review of indices for the long-term evaluation of the general thermal comfort conditions in buildings

    Energy Build.

    (2012)
  • M.a. Humphreys et al.

    Do people like to feel neutral?

    Energy Build.

    (2007)
  • D. Teli et al.

    Naturally ventilated classrooms: an assessment of existing comfort models for predicting the thermal sensation and preference of primary school children

    Energy Build.

    (2012)
  • S. D’Oca et al.

    A data-mining approach to discover patterns of window opening and closing behavior in offices

    Build. Environ.

    (2014)
  • M. Turunen et al.

    Indoor environmental quality in school buildings, and the health and wellbeing of students

    Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health

    (2014)
  • Cited by (102)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text