Analysis of dynamic stress concentration problems employing spline-based wavelet Galerkin method

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2015.04.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) dynamic stress concentration problems are analyzed using the wavelet Galerkin method (WGM). Linear B-spline scaling/wavelet functions are employed. We introduce enrichment functions for the X-FEM to represent a crack geometry. In the WGM, low-resolution scaling functions are periodically located across the entire analysis domain to approximate deformations of a body. High-resolution wavelet functions and enrichment functions including crack tip singular fields are superposed on the scaling functions to represent the severe stress concentration around holes or crack tips. Heaviside functions are also enriched to treat the displacement discontinuity of the crack face. Multiresolution analysis of the wavelet basis functions plays an important role in the WGM. To simulate the transients, the wavelet Galerkin formulation is discretized using a Newmark-β time integration scheme. A path independent J-integral is adopted to evaluate the dynamic stress intensity factor (DSIF). We solve dynamic stress concentration problems and evaluate DSIF of 2D cracked solids. The accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed method are discussed through the numerical examples.

Introduction

In recent years, various new methodologies for solving solid and structural problems have been proposed. A number of these are meshfree methods, such as the element-free Galerkin method [1], reproducing kernel particle method [2], and meshless local Petrov–Galerkin method [3]. Because there are no finite elements (FEs) in the discretization, the nodes need only be relocated to represent severe stress concentration near holes or cracks. Applications for static and dynamic problems using meshfree methods are discussed in [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. In addition, the extended finite element method (X-FEM) [17], [18] has been adopted for analyzing dynamic crack problems. X-FEM is well suited to the treatment of crack problems. Crack tip singular fields and displacement discontinuities are introduced in the displacement functions based on partition of unity method [19], [20]. Because the crack shape can be modeled independent of the FE meshes, crack propagation simulations are carried out without remeshing. Applications of dynamic crack problems using X-FEM have been presented in [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. In addition, the combination of meshfree methods and X-FEM for dynamic crack problems was proposed in [26], [27].

Wavelet-based methods [28], [29], [30], [31] have also been adopted to solve science and engineering problems. Among them, we focus on the wavelet Galerkin methods (WGMs). Some of these methods are discretized based on a fixed-grid (voxel-based approach) [32], [33]. Scaling/wavelet functions are adopted as the basis functions, and are periodically located on the analysis domain, and equally spaced structured cells are adopted for numerical integration of the stiffness matrix. The wavelet basis functions permit a multiresolution analysis (MRA), so the spatial resolution of the wavelet Galerkin (WG) model can be easily controlled. Therefore, the approach is considered as an enhanced voxel FEM. To date, WGMs have been adopted to solve several boundary value problems [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]. Other related wavelet-based numerical methods are summarized in [41].

In the present study, dynamic problems including holes or cracks are analyzed using the WGM. Because the WG discretization is based on fixed-grid, model generation is relatively easy in the elastodynamic problems as well as the meshfree methods [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] and boundary element methods (BEMs) [42], [43], [44]. As it is easy to control the spatial resolution near the holes or crack tips, a stress concentration can effectively be evaluated with fewer degrees of freedom (DOFs). Although the multilevel wavelet functions are fixed in the elastodynamic analyses in this study, spatial mesh adaptation will be enabled with an error estimator, e.g. [45], [46], because relocation of the wavelet functions is easy. When carrying out the fracture mechanics analysis in the WGM, it was difficult to introduce displacement discontinuities such as crack faces, because the displacement functions in most WGMs are assumed to be continuous. In a previous study by some of the present authors [47], [48], [49], X-FEM enrichment functions were introduced to represent the crack geometry and severe stress concentration near the crack tip. To carry out transient simulations, a Newmark-β time integration scheme is adopted. A path-independent J-integral is employed to evaluate the dynamic stress intensity factor (DSIF). We consider certain dynamic WG problems, and examine the discretization and accuracy of the solutions.

This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents the governing equations for dynamic problems for 2D elastic solids. In Section 3, WG formulation and the discretization for the dynamic problems is presented. Section 4 explains how we evaluate the DSIF by employing a path-independent J-integral. Section 5 describes the numerical results from various examples. Section 6 summarizes our conclusions.

Section snippets

Governing equations

The governing equations for dynamic problems for 2D elastic solids are now presented. We consider a 2D cracked body 0Ω with boundary 0Γ, and 0Γc is a crack surface in the reference configuration at time 0t. X represents the position vector of a material point in the reference configuration. Here, the motion of a body is described by its displacement field u(X,t). The Ω, Γ, and Γc represent the domain, boundary, and crack surface in the current configuration at time t. The current position of

MRA in WGM

In this section, we briefly describe the role of MRA in WGM for solving solid mechanics problems. In WGM, scaling/wavelet functions are adopted as the basis functions. The basis functions enable the so-called MRA. A hierarchical structure of function spaces can be formed employing the multilevel wavelet basis functions. Details of the MRA are described in [50], [51], [52].

Linear B-spline scaling/wavelet functions are used as the wavelet bases [53]. A schematic illustrations of one-dimensional

Path independent J-integral

To evaluate the fracture mechanics parameters, Rice [55] proposed the path independent integral (J-integral). Researchers have extended the path independent integral to include inertial effects in [56], [57], [58], [59], [60]. A schematic illustration of the J-integral is shown in Fig. 5(a). Two contours Γ0 and Γ1 are defined by including a crack tip. The vector n is normal to the contours. Γc+ and Γc- are the upper and lower surfaces of a crack. A traction-free condition is assumed on the

Stress concentration problem

To examine the accuracy and effectiveness of the WGM for dynamic analysis, we consider the stress concentration problem. The analysis model is shown in Fig. 6(a). A perforated strip of size W=20 cm and L=36 cm is chosen. The diameter of the hole is 2r=10 cm. A plane stress condition is assumed. Young׳s modulus is E=2.1e7 N/cm2, Poisson׳s ratio is ν=0.3, and the mass density is ρ=0.00785 kg/cm3. The dynamic load P(t)=7.5e4 N/cm2 is suddenly applied at time t=0 on the edges. The y-direction

Conclusion

In this paper, dynamic stress concentration problems were solved for 2D solids by employing the WGM. A mathematical formulation of the proposed approach was presented, and the formulation was discretized by WGM. The EDI form of the J-integral was used to evaluate the DSIF in the crack problems. Some numerical examples allowed us to analyze the dynamic WG model and evaluate the DSIF. Our results showed good agreement with those of reference solutions.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the Grant for Young Researchers from the JGC-S Scholarship Foundation. This work was performed under the Cooperative Research Program of Institute for Joining and Welding Research Institute, Osaka University.

References (68)

  • P. Venini et al.

    An adaptive wavelet-Galerkin method for an elastic-plastic-damage constitutive model1D problem

    Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng

    (2001)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    A Daubechies wavelet-based method for elastic problems

    Eng Anal Bound Elem

    (2010)
  • L. Zhang et al.

    Wavelet solution for large deflection bending problems of thin rectangular plates

    Arch Appl Mech

    (2015)
  • B. Li et al.

    Wavelet-based numerical analysisa review and classification

    Finite Elem Anal Des

    (2014)
  • D.P.N. Kontoni et al.

    Transient dynamic elastoplastic analysis by the dual reciprocity BEM

    Eng Anal Bound Elem

    (1993)
  • M.F. Samaan et al.

    BEM for transient 2D elastodynamics using multiquadric functions

    Int J Solid Struct

    (2007)
  • S. Tanaka et al.

    Study on crack propagation simulation of surface crack in welded joint structure

    Mar Struct

    (2014)
  • K. Kishimoto et al.

    On the path independent integral-Ĵ

    Eng Fract Mech

    (1980)
  • S.N. Atluri

    Path-independent integrals in finite elasticity and inelasticity, with body forces, inertia, and arbitrary crack-face conditions

    Eng Fract Mech

    (1982)
  • T. Nishioka et al.

    Path-independent integrals, energy release rates, and general solutions of near-tip fields in mixed-mode dynamic fracture mechanics

    Eng Fract Mech

    (1983)
  • F.Z. Li et al.

    A comparison of methods for calculating energy release rates

    Eng Fract Mech

    (1985)
  • B. Moran et al.

    Crack tip and associated domain integrals from momentum and energy balance

    Eng Fract Mech

    (1987)
  • T. Nakamura et al.

    Analysis of a dynamically loaded three-point-bend ductile fracture specimen

    Eng Fract Mech

    (1986)
  • Y.M. Chen

    Numerical computation of dynamic stress intensity factors by a Lagrangian finite-difference method (the HEMP code)

    Eng Fract Mech

    (1975)
  • X. Lin et al.

    Re-consideration of Chen׳s problem by finite difference method

    Eng Fract Mech

    (1993)
  • S.H. Song et al.

    Dynamic stress intensity factors for homogeneous and smoothly heterogeneous materials using the interaction integral method

    Int J Solid Struct

    (2006)
  • T. Belytschko et al.

    Element-free Galerkin methods

    Int J Numer Methods Eng

    (1994)
  • W.K. Liu et al.

    Reproducing kernel particle methods

    Int J Numer Methods Fluid

    (1995)
  • S.N. Atluri et al.

    A new meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) approach in computational mechanics

    Comput Mech

    (1998)
  • T. Belytschko et al.

    Dynamic fracture using element-free Galerkin methods

    Int J Numer Methods Eng

    (1996)
  • P. Krysl et al.

    The element free Galerkin method for dynamic propagation of arbitrary 3-D cracks

    Int J Numer Methods Eng

    (1999)
  • R.C. Batra et al.

    Analysis of elastodynamic deformations near a crack/notch tip by the meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) method

    Comput Model Eng Sci

    (2002)
  • Y. Cheng et al.

    Boundary element-free method for elastodynamics

    Sci China G

    (2005)
  • S. Hagihara et al.

    Application of meshfree method to elastic–plastic fracture mechanics parameter analysis

    Comput Model Eng Sci

    (2007)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Advanced reproducing kernel meshfree modeling of cracked curved shells for mixed-mode stress resultant intensity factors

      2020, Engineering Fracture Mechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although studies have analyzed cracked shell problems using the FEM [12–15], fracture mechanics simulations are still limited owing to difficulties in the crack modeling and re-meshing procedure. Recently alternative numerical methods, such as the dual boundary element method (BEM) [16], meshfree method [17–21], extended FEM (XFEM) [22], isogeometric analysis (IGA) [23,24], wavelet Galerkin method [25–29], and peridynamics [30–35] have been proposed to analyze various fracture problems. These methods have been extensively adopted to solve fracture problems for curved shells and cylinders.

    • Stress resultant intensity factors evaluation of cracked folded structures by 6DOFs flat shell meshfree modeling

      2019, Thin-Walled Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dirgantara and Aliabadi analyzed cracked shells by the dual boundary element method [18,19,57]. In the last two decades, meshfree methods [20–22], isogeometric analysis [23], wavelet Galerkin methods [24–28] and etc. have been developed and applied to the plate and shell problems [29–33]. Because continuous functions are adopted in the approximation of the plate and shell deformations, the methods can address the shear locking problem without special treatments in the formulation and discretization.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text