Comparison of evolutionary-based optimization algorithms for structural design optimization
Introduction
Structural design optimization has been a very important and challenging topic in the field of engineering design for obtaining more efficient and lighter structures. The aim of the design optimization is to determine the optimal shape of a structure to maximize or minimize a given criterion, such as minimize the weight, maximize the stiffness, subjected to the stress or displacement constraint conditions.
The evolutionary algorithms have emerged as a powerful tool for finding optimum solutions of complex optimization problems. In the past few decades, a number of evolutionary algorithms such as genetic algorithm, cuckoo search algorithm, particle swarm optimization algorithm, artificial bee colony algorithm, harmony search algorithm and artificial immune algorithm have been used extensively to obtain optimal designs and overcome the computational drawbacks of traditional mathematical optimization methods (Yildiz and Durgun, 2012a, Yildiz (2012b), Yildiz and Saitou, 2011, Perez and Behdinan, 2007, Ferhat et al., 2011, Omkar et al., 2008, Karaboga and Basturk, (2003), Woon et al., 2001).
Recently, Yildiz and Saitou (2011) developed a novel topology optimization approach for continuum structures using the genetic algorithms. The developed approach is applied to multi-component topology optimization of a vehicle floor frame.
The differential evolution (DE) algorithm introduced by Storn and Price (1995) is an efficient population-based optimization method. The DE has received considerable attention and has been successfully used in various areas. The use of the DE in the optimum solution of problems resulted in better solutions compared to classical methods (Wu and Tseng, 2010, Hull et al., 2006, J´armai et al., 2003, Thangaraj et al., 2010, Dragoi et al., 2011, Khoei et al., 2002).
Although the DE algorithm is very effective at finding relatively good neighborhoods of solutions in a complex search space, they may have a premature convergence to a local minimum (Wang et al., 2011, Isaacs et al., 2007).
Some researchers have used the robustness issues to solve optimization problems (Chen et al., 2002, Lee et al., 2003). Robinson et al. (2004) presents a review paper which focuses largely on the work done since 1992 and a historical perspective of parameter design is also given. Kunjur and Krishnamurty (1997) presented a robust optimization approach that integrates optimization concepts with statistical robust design techniques.
Hybrid optimization algorithms have received significant interest for fast convergence speed and robustness in finding the global minimum at the same time (Yildiz, 2009a, Yildiz, 2009b, Yildiz, 2009c, Yildiz and Solanki, 2011). Tsai et al. (2004) proposed a hybrid algorithm in which the Taguchi's method is inserted between crossover and mutation operations of a genetic algorithm. The Taguchi method is incorporated in the crossover operations to select the better genes to achieve crossover, and consequently, enhance the performance of genetic algorithm. Yildiz (2012b) developed a novel hybrid robust optimization method (HRABC) based on the Taguchi's method and the artificial bee colony algorithm. The HRABC was applied to structural design optimization problem of an automobile component from industry and a milling optimization problem. Yildiz (2009b) hybridized immune algorithm with hill climbing local search algorithm and applied to multi-objective disc brake and manufacturing optimization problems from literature. Yildiz (2009c) developed a new hybrid particle swarm optimization approach to solve optimization problems in design and manufacturing area.
In this paper, a comparative study of six evolutionary-based optimization algorithms for the structural design optimization is presented. Furthermore, a hybrid technique (HTDEA) based on differential evolution algorithm is introduced. The HTDEA is applied to a welded beam design problem and the optimal design of a vehicle component to illustrate how the present approach can be applied for solving structural design optimization problems. The results show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Section snippets
Hybrid differential evolution optimization algorithm for structural optimization
In this paper, the differential evolution algorithm and the Taguchi's method are integrated to solve structural design optimization problems. First, some brief explanations about the differential evolution optimization algorithm and the Taguchi's method are given and, finally, the proposed hybrid approach is explained.
Evaluation of the proposed approach using test problem
A welded beam design optimization problem is used to illustrate the implementation procedure of the HTDEA. Fig. 1 shows design variables and structure of the welded beam.
The objective is to find the minimum fabricating cost of the welded beam subject to constraints on shear stress (t), bending stress (s), buckling load (Pc), end deflection (d). The beam has a length of 14 in. and P=6000 lb force is applied at the end of the beam (Siddall, 1972, Ragsdell and Phillips, 1976, Coello and Montes, 2002
Structural design optimization using improved hybrid differential evolution algorithm
The hybrid approach is applied to optimal structural design of an automobile component taken from the automotive industry. The objective function is minimization of the volume. The boundary conditions are shown in Fig. 2. There is only one force acting along x-direction. The all degree of freedom on upper and lower connection regions are resticted.
In this research, then structural design optimization is performed using the present approach. In the first stage, the experiments are designed to
Conclusions
This research presents a new design optimization approach based on differential evolution algorithm and Taguchi method. The HTDEA is validated for a welded beam design problem and then applied to the optimization of a vehicle component taken from automotive industry. The volume reduction of the vehicle component is 28.4% using the HTDEA. A comparative study of six population-based optimization algorithms which are genetic algorithm, particle swarm, immune algorithm, artificial bee colony
References (33)
- et al.
Modeling of oxygen mass transfer in the presence of oxygen-vectors using neural networks developed by differential evolution algorithm
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.
(2011) - et al.
An effective co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.
(2007) - et al.
An effective co-evolutionary differential evolution for constrained optimization
Appl. Math. Comput.
(2007) - et al.
Design optimization of aluminium recycling processes using Taguchi technique
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
(2002) - et al.
A robust multi-criteria optimization approach
Mech. Mach. Theory
(1997) - et al.
Artificial immune system for multi-objective design optimization of composite structures
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.
(2008) - et al.
Particle swarm approach for structural design optimization
Comput. Struct.
(2007) - et al.
Optimal coordination of over-current relay using modified differential evolution algorithms
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.
(2010) - et al.
Parameter Identification of Chaotic systems by Hybrid Nelder–Mead simplex search and differential evolution algorithm
Expert Syst. Appl.
(2011) An effective hybrid immune-hill climbing optimization approach for solving design and manufacturing optimization problems in industry
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
(2009)
Artificial bee colony algorithm for large-scale problems and engineering design optimization
J. Intell. Manuf.
Design optimization of a nonlinear magnetic media system using finite element analysis and Taguchi method
Int. J. Comput. Math. Electric. Electron. Eng.
Constraint-handling in genetic algorithms through the use of dominance-based tournament selection
Adv. Eng. Inf.
Optimum design of cellular beams using harmony search and particle swarm optimizers
J. Construct. Steel Res.
Evolutionary optimization of a geometrically refined truss
Struct. Multidisc. Optim.
Cited by (279)
Improved stochastic subset optimization method for structural design optimization
2024, Advances in Engineering SoftwareDynamic scheduling for flexible job shop with insufficient transportation resources via graph neural network and deep reinforcement learning
2023, Computers and Industrial EngineeringGeometric design and optimization of scissor-type deployable structures
2023, Journal of Building EngineeringReview of artificial intelligence applications in engineering design perspective
2023, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence