Mixed-mode cohesive fracture of adhesive joints: Experimental and numerical studies
Introduction
Adhesive joints offer significant advantages over traditional joining methods such as welding or mechanical fastening in structural applications. Adhesively bonded joints and bonded repairs for cracked metallic structures have been continuously receiving attention in the aerospace industry for the purpose of enhancing fatigue resistance and restoring the stiffness and strength of damaged/cracked structures. Although stress-based approaches, which focus on indicating both shear and normal (peel) stresses through standard lap shear tests, have been the subject of a vast amount of research, additional design considerations are required since adhesively bonded joints usually fail by initiation and propagation of flaws. Fracture mechanics deals with the effects of flaws and fatigue in the presence of cracks and has been proven to be a viable tool for adhesive joints analysis. The fracture aspects of adhesively bonded joints have been discussed by several researchers [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].
A number of test methods have been proposed by many researchers to determine fracture toughness of adhesively bonded joints. The double cantilever beam (DCB) test is the most widely used method for measuring mode-I (opening) fracture toughness. The end-notched flexure (ENF) has emerged as one of the most convenient mode-II (shear) type fracture tests. Various attempts have been made to characterize fracture toughness under mixed-mode loading conditions in adhesively bonded joints, where mostly beam type specimens were used. The crack lap shear (CLS) and the mixed-mode bending (MMB) test specimens have been proposed by combining the schemes used for DCB and ENF tests to study the mixed-mode fracture of bonded joints [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. However, for these test methods there are problems to create a wide range of mixed-mode ratios which limits their usefulness. Also, different beam type specimens would be required in order to obtain reliable results for fracture toughness in pure mode-I, pure mode-II, and mixed-mode loading conditions.
Previous work in this area has centered on the double cantilever beam (DCB) and end-notched flexure (ENF) [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. However, deeper understanding of the fracture behaviour of adhesively bonded joints, particularly under mixed-mode loading conditions, is needed in order to fully achieve the benefits of adhesive bonding. Several studies have been conducted on adhesively bonded joints under mode-I, mode-II and mixed mode loading conditions. Pang and Seetoch [3] using compact mixed mode (CMM) fracture specimen reported from his study with a two-part epoxy structural adhesive (Ciba Geigy AW106/HV953U) adhesive that the adhesive fracture toughness measured under different loading modes were ordered as mode-I < mixed-mode < mode-II. However, the similar study Pang [4] revealed that mode-II fracture toughness is lower than the mode-I. It is not clear whether the fracture surfaces were analysed to gain insight into the fracture mechanisms. Pirondi and Nicoletto [7] in their study using compact tension-shear (CTS) specimen with a commercial elastomer methacrylate adhesive (Loctite Multibond 330), reported that the KIIc/KIc ratio is very close to unity and a fracture toughness in mode-II higher than in mode-I is not a unique possibility with considering the interaction of factors such as the roughness of the crack surfaces, the presence of residual stresses and the mismatch of elastic properties at the interface. In a study of mixed-mode fracture behavior of aluminum alloy specimens bonded with a tough one-part epoxy adhesive (Dow Automotive Betamate 46011®), Liu et al. [12] adapted and modified MMB test used for mixed-mode, mode-I and mode-II delamination testing of composite laminates for fracture testing of adhesively bonded joints and reported that the mode-II strain energy release rate is higher than mode-I strain energy release rate. A study on mode-I, mode-II and mixed-mode (I and II) using double cantilever beam (DCB), end notch flexure (ENF), and mixed mode flexure (MMF) tests by Parvatareddy and Dillard [13] on a chromic acid anodized titanium (Ti-6A-4V)/polyimide (FM-5) adhesive system reported that the adhesive fracture toughness measured under different loading modes were ordered as mode-I > mixed-mode > mode-II and interfacial type failures were observed in the ENF and MMF specimens as a result of the mode-II loading inherent in these tests. They also reported that loading mode; changes in material properties along the length and thickness of the bond line, and environmental aging all play an important role in experimentally determining the fracture toughness of this bond system. Ducept et al. [11] studied the mode-I (DCB), mode-II (ENF) and mixed-mode I/II (MMB) fracture of adhesively bonded composite/composite joint by bonding together two 8 ply glass epoxy laminates (Cotech 250 g/m2 glass reinforcement, DGEBA based epoxy reference SR1500 with amine hardener SD2505 from Sicomin) with a two-part epoxy adhesive (Redux 420, from Ciba Geigy), reported from their study that the crack seems to propagate mainly in the first composite resin layer, very close to the composite/adhesive interface, but in some specimens cracks do appear in the adhesive layer and fracture toughness measured under different loading modes were ordered as mode-I < mixed-mode < mode-II. Except for the adhesive and adherends, the only obvious difference between the studies was different test methods used to obtain mixed mode loading conditions.
In this work, a modified version of the Arcan specimen is made for the mixed-mode fracture test of adhesively bonded joints, which allows mode-I, mode-II, and almost any combination of mode-I and mode-II loading to be tested with the same test specimen configuration. The Arcan test specimen was originally designed for use with fibre-composite materials [20], [21], [22], [23], but has been adapted by many researchers for use with adhesives [3], [4] and isotropic materials [24], [25], [26]. Therefore, the limitations presented in the previous mixed-mode toughness test methods can be avoided. Mixed-mode fracture experiments were conducted to determine the fracture toughness of adhesively bonded joints for various adherends. The stress intensity calibration was obtained by finite element analysis using the finite correction factors method. The mixed-mode fracture criteria were determined and fracture surfaces obtained at different loading angles for various substrates were discussed.
Section snippets
Mixed-mode cohesive fracture mechanics
The failures in adhesively bonded joints are mainly of two types; adhesive and cohesive (Fig. 1). Well-bonded joints should fail within the adhesive (cohesive) or within the adherends (interlaminar failure) when broken apart. Failure at the adherend–adhesive interface (interfacial failure) generally indicates that the bond was not performed properly. Since adhesive joints usually fail by the initiation and propagation of cracks, the application of fracture mechanics theories to adhesive joint
Materials and specimens
The modified Arcan test specimen and loading fixture (composed of a pair of grips) are shown in Fig. 4. The specimen is attached to the fixture by three pins at each end. The specimen is loaded by pulling apart grips of the fixture at a pair of grip holes on the opposite sides of a radial line. By varying the loading angle α (α = 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, 90°), all mixed-mode conditions starting from pure mode-I to pure mode-II can be created and tested.
Experimental efforts focused on the
FE Analysis of mixed-mode cohesive fracture
Concepts of linear elastic fracture mechanics combining with finite element analysis provides a practical and convenient means to study the mixed-mode cohesive fracture characteristics of adhesively bonded joints. In the context of quasi-static analysis the J-integral in two dimensions is defined as [32]where Γ is an arbitrary contour, W is the elastic strain energy for elastic material, q is a unit vector in the virtual crack extension direction, n is the outward
Numerical results
In order to assess stress intensity factors at fracture and using Eq. (5), geometrical factors or non-dimensional stress intensity factors and for both pure mode-I and pure mode-II loadings were determined. The ratio was varied between 0.3 and 0.7 at 0.1 intervals and a fourth order polynomial was fitted through finite element analysis. From the finite element results, closed-form solutions using least square fitting for a modified Arcan specimen with aluminum
Conclusions and summary
In this study the mixed-mode fracture behaviour of adhesively bonded joints constructed from several combinations of adhesive, composite and metallic adherends was investigated based on experimental and numerical analyses. A modified version of an Arcan specimen was employed to conduct a mixed-mode test using a special test loading device. The full range of mixed-mode loading conditions including pure mode-I and pure mode-II loading can be created and tested. It is a simple test procedure,
Acknowledgments
The School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering and the Electron Microscope Unit at the University of Sydney has kindly provided access to their facilities. I also would like to thank professor Lin Ye for his valuable time, advice, guidance, and support throughout my study.
References (37)
- et al.
A compact mixed mode (CMM) fracture specimen for adhesive bonded joints
Engng Fract Mech
(1997) Mixed mode fracture analysis and toughness of adhesive joints
Engng Fract Mech
(1995)- et al.
Mode I fracture of epoxy bonded composite joints 2. Fatigue loading
Int J Adhes Adhes
(2002) Bonded composite repair of fatigue-cracked primary aircraft structure
Compos Struct
(1999)- et al.
Mixed mode I/II fracture toughness of bonded joints
Int J Adhes Adhes
(2002) Interlaminar fracture behaviour of laminated composites
Comput Struct
(2000)- et al.
The effect of adhesive bonding between aluminum and composite prepreg on the mechanical properties of carbon-fiber-reinfored metal laminates
Compos Sci Technol
(1997) - et al.
An experimental study to validate tests used to determine mixed mode failure criteria of glass/epoxy composites
Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf
(1997) - et al.
Mixed mode failure criteria for a glass/epoxy composite and an adhesively bonded composite/composite joint
Int J Adhes Adhes
(2000) - et al.
Effects of substrate materials on fracture toughness measurement in adhesive joints
Int J Mech Sci
(2001)
A mixed mode fracture specimen for mode II dominant deformation
Engng Fract Mech
A combined modeling-experimental study of the crack opening displacement fracture criterion for characterization of stable crack growth under mixed mode I/II loading in thin sheet materials
Engng Fract Mech
Development and application of a crack tip opening displacement-based mixed mode fracture criterion
Int J Solids Struct
Interlaminar fracture toughness of CF/PEI composites at elevated temperatures: roles of matrix toughness and fibre/matrix adhesion
Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf
A study of some issues in stable tearing crack growth simulations
Engng Fract Mech
Three-dimensional stress and deformation fields around flat and slant cracks under remote mode I loading conditions
Engng Fract Mech
Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology
Analysis and testing of adhesive bonds
Cited by (64)
Extrinsic/intrinsic cohesive zone modelling and experiments on interface failure of multi-walled carbon nanotube reinforced adhesively bonded joints under mode II loading
2023, Theoretical and Applied Fracture MechanicsHygrothermal aging of steel/FRP pipe repair systems: A literature review
2023, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and PipingIn situ optical observation of damage and failure process in adhesively bonded CFRP joints under mixed-mode loading
2023, Composite StructuresCitation Excerpt :Fracture toughness slightly increased under pure mode I loading compared with that in the case of GII/GT = 0.25. Fracture toughness increased considerably with an increasing mode II component as already reported in previous studies [2–4,8,9]. The highest fracture toughness was obtained under pure mode II loading.
Innovations in fracture testing of structural adhesive bonds
2023, Advances in Structural Adhesive Bonding, Second EditionDurability study of adhesive joints used in high-speed crafts manufactured with composite materials subjected to impact fatigue
2020, Engineering Fracture Mechanics